ライフサイエンスコーパス: offender

1 0 [81%] men, 2568 [26%] of 9776 were violent offenders).

2 e victim for fairness, not punishment of the offender.

3 ual characteristics of intellectual disabled offenders.

4 nsidered as a viable treatment option for DV offenders.

5 ms have shown such promise with drug-abusing offenders.

6 ning and assessment tools for use with young offenders.

7 prohibit the possession of firearms by these offenders.

8 athways initiated by inflammatory and immune offenders.

9 proving the efficacy of treatment for sexual offenders.

10 atment program for heroin-dependent criminal offenders.

11 ined in DSM-IV, in a group of pedophilic sex offenders.

12 s in a population of adult male incarcerated offenders.

13 mong substance abusing or dependent juvenile offenders.

14 iatal glutamate : GABA ratio compared to non-offenders.

15 follow-up questions about their dynamics and offenders.

16 ossession by intimate partner violence (IPV) offenders.

17 effects on risk-taking behaviour in violent offenders.

18 (16 ASPD-P, 14 ASPD + P) and 21 healthy non-offenders.

19 rvivors of domestic violence and of criminal offenders.

20 but not psychopathy, and 18 were healthy non-offenders.

21 ffenders without psychopathy and healthy non-offenders.

22 he sellers; and (e) the buyers as vulnerable offenders.

23 targets for high-risk groups of patients and offenders.

24 has collated an impressive data set on such offenders.

25 k of violence) among intellectual disability offenders.

26 a jail diversion program for low-level drug offenders.

27 ces in 2Dratio4D ratio and impulsivity among offenders.

28 nd female prisoners and both adult and young offenders.

29 isposition to impulsive behavior in juvenile offenders.

30 iduals with personality disorders, including offenders.

31 Violent offenders (1,369 [11.0%]) were the most prevalent offend

32 cohol use and other psychiatric disorders in offenders 15 years after a first conviction for driving

33 agnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in 30 violent offenders (16 ASPD-P, 14 ASPD + P) and 21 healthy non-of

34 led, randomized crossover design, 34 violent offenders (19 ASPD + P; 15 ASPD - P) and 24 healthy non-

35 h subjects, including 166 alcoholic criminal offenders, 261 relatives, and 213 healthy controls.

36 A total national sample of all offenders (9072 released from prisoners and 6329 individ

37 and subjective level in severe psychopathic offenders after SCP-neurofeedback training and could con

38 995 with a convenience sample of 63 juvenile offenders aged 13 through 18 years, each of whom was inc

39 ell established that the mental state of the offender and the severity of the harm he caused are the

40 Nineteen incarcerated violent offenders and 24 healthy control nonoffenders were inclu

41 Overall, 51.4% of male young adult offenders and 43.6% of female offenders had a child psyc

42 To test this possibility, 44 male offenders and 46 nonoffenders completed the Eysenck Impu

43 Repeated offenders and free riders receive ever less community su

44 isorders persisted over 10 years among first offenders and greatly exceeded those found in a general

45 lth needs screening tools for use with young offenders and implications for this vulnerable group.

46 There is some evidence that female offenders and persistent offenders are particularly at r

47 ealth, educational and social needs of young offenders and the implications for key agencies that com

48 to report individuals they serve as criminal offenders and the spillover benefits of the program (e.g

49 hiatric disorders in a sample of young adult offenders and then tested which childhood disorders best

50 ferent groups, that is, fire setters, sexual offenders and those with problems of anger and aggressio

51 en a biological marker and impulsivity among offenders (and lack thereof among non-offenders), which

52 terize the nature of the problem and alleged offender, and compared with each physician's risk manage

53 ive behaviors, while controlling for victim, offender, and crime-related characteristics.

54 that follow from its experience from victim, offender, and observer perspectives.

55 intervention demonstrate, that psychopathic offenders are able to gain control of their brain excita

56 ecidivism (relapse) rates for repeat violent offenders are as high as relapse rates for drug addicts.

57 d that diversion programs for low-level drug offenders are likely to be cost-effective, generating sa

58 nce-based treatment of intellectual disabled offenders are not widely explored issues.

59 vidence that female offenders and persistent offenders are particularly at risk of psychosocial probl

60 If potential offenders are sufficiently deterrable, increasing the co

61 and digit ratio measurements compared to non-offenders, but higher impulsivity scores.

62 by a small group of antisocial recidivistic offenders, but no genes have been shown to contribute to

63 The extent to which offenders can be persuaded, through knowledge of crimina

64 e findings suggest that violent incarcerated offenders can flexibly engage parasympathetic resources

65 In contrast, research with offenders claiming amnesia for their crimes has emphasiz

66 lity were conducted in 804 Finnish alcoholic offenders, controls, and their relatives, in a sample th

67 identification, evaluation, and treatment of offenders, despite increasing concerns and awareness reg

68 Intriguingly, the two groups of offenders did not differ significantly from the non-offe

69 Subjects were 1,130 male criminal offenders drawn from a birth cohort of all individuals b

70 isely how people assess the mental states of offenders, evaluate the harms they caused, and integrate

71 Offenders exhibited smaller right hand digit ratio measu

72 In this trial involving criminal justice offenders, extended-release naltrexone was associated wi

73 airness of the offender proposing the offer (offender-focused block, OB), the feeling of the victim r

74 lts showed that across the three phases, the offender group presented lower RMSSD at baseline (p(FDR)

75 In the violent offender group, striatal 5-HT1BR binding was positively

76 be members of adolescent-limited and chronic-offender groups.

77 uential theories and policies about criminal offender groups.

78 le young adult offenders and 43.6% of female offenders had a child psychiatric history.

79 Thirty-two percent of female and 38% of male offenders had a drug-use disorder, compared with 16% and

80 ystem and treatment of intellectual disabled offenders have also been explored.

81 Young offenders have high levels of morbidity in a number of a

82 Juvenile offenders have high rates of affective disorder.

83 A substantial number of young offenders have learning disabilities, which has implicat

84 opioid relapse among adult criminal justice offenders (i.e., persons involved in the U.S. criminal j

85 treatment in preventing recidivism of sexual offenders in general, a finding that has a high probabil

86 The literature shows that young offenders in North America and Europe have high levels o

87 rs did not differ significantly from the non-offenders in terms of their alteration of motor response

88 Young offenders in the community and those from ethnic minorit

89 im to reduce crime and keep alcohol-involved offenders in the community.

90 lly reactive" children and adolescent sexual offenders in the United States declined from more than o

91 , and psychiatric care for more than 145,000 offenders, incarcerated under the jurisdiction of the Te

92 d for either MAOA or CDH13 among non-violent offenders, indicating that findings were specific for vi

93 However, the peak age incidence for violent offenders is 18, well within the spectrum of the adolesc

94 The most common offender isolated from the PLA in children is Staphyloco

95 ice intuitions: interpersonal devaluation of offenders, judgements of moral wrongness, mock-legislate

96 onal Institute for Health Research, National Offender Management Service, and Department of Health.

97 tions is based on empirical evidence for how offenders move and mix with potential victims or targets

98 Male juvenile offenders (N=1,215) from three regions of the United Sta

99 Drunk-driving offenders need assessment and treatment services not onl

100 out psychopathy (ASPD-P), and 21 healthy non-offenders on tasks assessing cool (verbal working memory

101 The performance of the two groups of offenders on the measures of cool and hot executive func

102 ded if they wanted to punish the first-party offender or help the second-party victim using their own

103 sly was replicated in a new group of Finnish offenders (P=.001, n=122).

104 Social relationships with offenders, peers, and others sharing residential placeme

105 h estimates ranging between 2 and 10% of the offender population having intellectual disabilities.

106 observation suggests that impulsivity in the offender population is a consequence of a delay in typic

107 but little is known about risk in the wider offender population.

108 nding or sexual behavior problems, and eight offenders presented themselves voluntarily to state atto

109 re asked to focus on the (un)fairness of the offender proposing the offer (offender-focused block, OB

110 Treating drug-involved offenders provides a unique opportunity to decrease subs

111 19 ASPD + P; 15 ASPD - P) and 24 healthy non-offenders received 40 IU intranasal oxytocin or placebo

112 cords at 3 points in time and from state sex offender registries.

113 ive behaviors varied as a function of victim-offender relationship status.

114 ury did not vary as a function of the victim-offender relationship.

115 ount of missing information about the victim-offender relationship.

116 Adjustments to account for unknown victim-offender relationships generally increased the prevalenc

117 ighty-five percent of female and 91% of male offenders reported a lifetime alcohol-use disorder, comp

118 779C (L) allele to suicidality in impulsive offenders reported previously was replicated in a new gr

119 Providing services for young offenders requires investment from all the agencies in p

120 r-regarding attention (e.g., focusing on the offender's crime or the victim's situation especially in

121 Adult male and female offenders serving sentences of 2 or more years for a sex

122 Criminal offenders showed significantly reduced electrodermal fea

123 Both victims and offenders tended to be young (median ages, 16 and 17 yea

124 need to be measured include the fraction of offenders that illegally possess a gun, the degree of pr

125 new approaches for managing alcohol-involved offenders that might have public health implications.

126 ate to improve medical care for incarcerated offenders, the state of Texas implemented a novel correc

127 Primarily designed for male offenders, the US correctional system is struggling to m

128 years, thus increasing the sample of violent offenders threefold and allowing more detailed analyses

129 Excess mucus is induced by multiple airway offenders through nonspecific pathways and would explain

130 The index cases were 182 alcoholic criminal offenders, through which 258 relatives were ascertained

131 s with different propensities for sentencing offenders to prison.

132 al marketing campaign that encouraged sexual offenders to seek treatment.

133 rearm possession and also explicitly require offenders to surrender their firearms.

134 atric patients and other mentally disordered offenders together with the offer of monitored abstinenc

135 ersion programs aim to divert low-level drug offenders toward community care resources, avoiding crim

136 ve been a number of promising studies on sex offender treatment and on the treatment of issues relate

137 rticipating in residential or outpatient sex offender treatment programs were recruited to participat

138 ders (1,369 [11.0%]) were the most prevalent offender types; prevalence was highest in men aged 30 ye

139 , universities, psychiatric units, and youth offender units).

140 As offenders varied in their number of previous convictions

141 In comparison to healthy non-offenders, violent offenders with ASPD+P and those with

142 rements significantly predicted criminality (offenders vs. nonoffenders).

143 children are uniquely at risk to become sex offenders was not supported by prospective empirical evi

144 ictims-and to a lesser extent, punishment of offenders-was uniquely driven by traits reflecting emoti

145 Homicide offenders were more likely than homicide victims to have

146 Recent evidence indicates that many sexual offenders were themselves molested and that lack of fami

147 among offenders (and lack thereof among non-offenders), which emphasise the importance of studying t

148 between normal heartbeats (RMSSD) in 22 male offenders who committed interpersonal violence and 24 ma

149 tinuous transdermal alcohol monitors with ex-offenders who recognise a link between their alcohol con

150 rrested were approximately double that of an offender with high activity in this region, holding cons

151 The odds that an offender with relatively low anterior cingulate activity

152 ement results in good outcome even for those offenders with a diagnosis of antisocial behavior.

153 For offenders with alcohol-use disorders, 50% of women and 3

154 pairments in executive function characterize offenders with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) an

155 Punishment prediction error signalling in offenders with antisocial personality disorder and psych

156 RI) study in 50 men, of whom 12 were violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder and psych

157 Offenders with antisocial personality disorder and psych

158 ty disorder and psychopathy, 20 were violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder but not p

159 This difference between violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder with and

160 he bilateral mid-cingulate cortex in violent offenders with ASPD + P, compared with those with ASPD -

161 The present study examined 17 violent offenders with ASPD and psychopathy (ASPD+P), 28 violent

162 th ASPD and psychopathy (ASPD+P), 28 violent offenders with ASPD without psychopathy (ASPD-P), and 21

163 comparison to healthy non-offenders, violent offenders with ASPD+P and those with ASPD-P showed simil

164 oral poles (Brodmann area 20/38) relative to offenders with ASPD-P and nonoffenders.

165 Offenders with ASPD-P exhibited GM volumes similar to th

166 Offenders with ASPDP displayed significantly reduced GM

167 across three matched groups of juveniles: CD offenders with CU traits (CD/CU+; n = 25), CD offenders

168 th a clear policy and organized services for offenders with intellectual disabilities.

169 ssessment reviews and treatment programs for offenders with intellectual disabilities.

170 he impact of recent research on the field of offenders with intellectual disabilities.

171 f the current research illustrates that even offenders with intellectual disability can be successful

172 o the literature, including predictors among offenders with intellectual disability, concurrent diagn

173 h antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and offenders with psychopathy.

174 les were physically assaulted by a lone male offender within the previous 6 months.

175 ly predicted subsequent rearrest among adult offenders within 4 y of release (N = 96).

176 ffenders with CU traits (CD/CU+; n = 25), CD offenders without CU traits (CD/CU-; n = 25), and health

177 This finding was in contrast to results for offenders without psychopathy and healthy non-offenders.