コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ell as external collaborators and regulatory officials.
2 at can promote the use of research by public officials.
3 patients, their providers, and public health officials.
4 d roles, and work closely with public health officials.
5 ging problem to clinicians and public health officials.
6 s disclose financial interests to university officials.
7 ical examiner and interviews with local fire officials.
8 ng providers, researchers, and public health officials.
9 ongressional health staff and administration officials.
10 nd 46.2% of them reported contacts to health officials.
11 obe, presenting a challenge to public health officials.
12 ure conservation efforts by local government officials.
13 avir exposure were reported to public health officials.
14 emic's impact and to inform policy making by officials.
15 were identified by school and public health officials.
16 come under threat from prominent Republican officials.
17 rgency response from local and international officials.
18 oted by the media, public, and fire-fighting officials.
19 directors, and state and territorial health officials.
20 ly 400,000 by the United Nations and Kurdish officials.
21 at which active cases are reported to health officials.
22 ere identified and notified by public health officials.
23 al care and use committees and institutional officials.
24 ublishers, as well as scientists and funding officials.
25 ps actively engage with the local government officials.
26 nd use autonomy typically exercised by local officials?
27 erests of the officials: 55 (71%) for senior officials, 55 (69%) for midlevel officials, 62 (81%) for
28 applicable to the financial interests of the officials: 55 (71%) for senior officials, 55 (69%) for m
29 for senior officials, 55 (69%) for midlevel officials, 62 (81%) for IRB members, and 51 (66%) for go
30 ociation of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO T412), representing a significant step
32 tbreaks, PFGE would have given public health officials additional support in declaring an outbreak an
33 ortant data for clinicians and public health officials advocating for resources to prevent and treat
34 rganizations, governments, and public health officials alike to consider ways to ensure accessibility
35 n has alarmed scholars, pundits, and elected officials alike, research across the social sciences rep
38 d "controversial" by school boards and state officials and are being removed from state-approved teac
39 d by federal, state, and local public health officials and by staff at clinical facilities that admin
40 olved structured facility visits by Ministry officials and clinical experts to assess quality of care
41 tentially powerful tool to assist healthcare officials and decision making for the current and future
42 die quickly from this disease, public health officials and doctors need to understand whether drug re
44 ce of our research to the public and elected officials and ensure that the value of basic, translatio
46 n addition to the flight crew, public health officials and health care professionals have an importan
47 iminal judicial investigations of government officials and industry leaders accused of delaying imple
48 l as difficulty reporting concerns to public officials and influencing decisions about how the practi
49 th scientific coaches, mentors, NIDA Program Officials and intentionally engaging in network building
50 trategy consultation, correspondence between officials and key industry actors, and information on me
51 he close collaboration between public health officials and modeling researchers, are essential to imp
52 members, to make contact with their elected officials and neighbors and explain to them why Federal
53 xamining the preferences of US local elected officials and offers unique insights into the views of t
55 se quick protocols can be used by government officials and other stakeholders to provide smart foreca
58 onals, scientific researchers, public health officials and policymakers should work together to mitig
61 ty data that could be examined by healthcare officials and program managers on a real-time basis to a
67 n be implemented by public health department officials, and (c) health care system interventions that
71 on, improved coordination with public health officials, and clarification of RPEP guidelines could op
72 cross the United States, police chiefs, city officials, and community leaders alike have highlighted
73 mes, privacy violations, deference to prison officials, and estrangement from family and friends outs
74 tructured interviews with donors, government officials, and expert observers involved in CHW programs
76 The data used in this study are from Chinese officials, and hierarchical modeling conclusions drawn f
77 trition professionals, companies, government officials, and individuals working in the food and nutri
79 isting of scientists, clinicians, regulatory officials, and industry representatives from the United
80 ific community, bringing researchers, health officials, and industry together to address the ongoing
81 esearchers, institutional and funding agency officials, and international research collaborators, con
82 governmental organizations, local government officials, and members of local business communities) em
83 s with clinicians, hospital managers, health officials, and other health-care professionals were done
84 hat policy makers, regulators, public health officials, and other stakeholders can better ameliorate
85 ing valuable insights for growers, extension officials, and plant breeders to develop targeted manage
86 tion necessary for clinicians, public health officials, and policymakers to optimize public health em
87 ents, clinicians, blood services, government officials, and politicians about the transmission of inf
89 interviewed AMC executives and staff, state officials, and representatives of MCOs serving TennCare
90 s include dialogue among interested parties, officials, and scientists; complex, redundant, and layer
91 alth care providers, researchers, government officials, and the general public is developing and impl
92 ts by mental health professionals, community officials, and the media to work together to identify an
94 s can also provide disaster managers, public officials, and transportation planners with insights to
95 ioid crisis, policy makers and public health officials are developing novel policies to increase the
98 ational public health programmes, and prison officials are often unwilling to implement effective pre
100 ulators, health policymakers, and government officials are recommended to incorporate specific elemen
102 9) pandemic, policy makers and public health officials are using Rt to assess the effectiveness of in
103 to engage scientific experts with regulatory officials around the emerging public health problem of v
104 ore likely to view threatening public health officials as justified compared with who trusted science
105 ems, community organizers, and public health officials as they consider resource allocation for traum
106 useful to hospital administrators and health officials as they coordinate COVID-19 admissions across
107 interest to clinicians and US public health officials, as intervention efforts can benefit by target
108 ely and crucial information for drug control officials, as well as health professionals, about drug d
109 etings with Ministry of Health and Education officials at the district and facility level, local comm
110 er 2001 through January 2002, we interviewed officials at U.S. medical schools about provisions in th
113 ieved harassing or threatening public health officials because of business closures was justified ros
114 al agencies, policymakers, and public health officials began recommending widespread use of nonmedica
116 or ahead of, real-time could help healthcare officials better design interventions to mitigate impact
118 eases in negative views toward public health officials between November 2020 and July and August 2021
121 ertain kinds of information, or grant health officials broad discretion to disseminate personal infor
122 nterest to epidemiologists and public health officials, but estimation of the distribution is complic
123 models can provide guidance to public health officials by projecting the course of an epidemic and ev
124 hnologies can be more formalised, and health officials can better establish which point-of-care techn
125 ow-dose exposure to it so that public health officials can develop appropriate mitigation measures wh
126 es whether messages from co-partisan elected officials can directly boost intentions to adopt climate
127 cial feature address how scholars and public officials can increase the prospects for future sustaina
129 ential to support emergency managers, public officials, citizens, first responders, and other decisio
130 but are potentially useful for public health officials, clinicians, and researchers seeking to improv
131 ntists, manufacturers, policy and regulatory officials, community leaders, and advocates who held ext
132 ts, industry representatives, and regulatory officials, conducted a literature review of previously p
133 Ophthalmologist, especially trainees, and officials could make better policies according to the pr
134 hich citizens, physicians, and public health officials denied a diagnosis of plague on economic, poli
135 provides valuable insights for public health officials designing targeted vector control strategies a
136 n the fall of 2009 helped Los Angeles County officials develop a measured and appropriate response to
138 odels is crucial for informing public health officials during a public health emergency, such as the
139 aboration between modelers and public health officials during pandemic H1N1 spread in the fall of 200
141 After 18 cases were confirmed, public health officials enforced isolation of persons with confirmed c
143 alth Powers Act, which granted public health officials even more expansive powers to declare a health
144 s known, however, about the views of elected officials-even though they influence democratic outcomes
146 te legislators (N = 534), we show that these officials exhibit less animosity toward the other party,
148 that threatening or harassing public health officials for business closures to slow COVID-19 transmi
149 s, along with state public health laboratory officials from Colorado, Missouri, Tennessee, and Utah,
150 erts from laboratory and clinical practices, officials from ministries of health, and representatives
151 nity dissuaded military officers and federal officials from taking action against the participation o
152 f a one-day meeting held on May 4, 2016 with officials from the National Cancer Institute, the FDA, m
153 ividuals (13 investigators and 14 compliance officials) from 13 institutions to describe the anticipa
155 ng water at the low levels set by regulatory officials has been a major focus for sensor developing r
157 ctious diseases physicians and public health officials have advocated for preservation of these life-
158 s of Covid-19, governments and public health officials have been asking individuals to substantially
159 Since September 18, 2012, public health officials have been investigating a large outbreak of fu
160 Local, state, and federal health department officials have been investigating the source of the cont
162 ich confirmatory trials were incomplete, FDA officials have encouraged sponsors to design AA applicat
163 ed trauma and human rights abuses by Taliban officials have had a profound effect on Afghan women's h
164 or viral replication.ImportancePublic health officials have raised concerns about the use of nonstero
165 s to protect them, they may find that health officials have their hands tied behind their backs.
166 ers, government policy makers, public health officials, health care administrators, payers, businesse
167 t study is expected to provide public health officials helpful insights for future regional-temporal
168 NG, AND PARTICIPANTS: In August 2017, health officials identified, via survey, patients with C jejuni
170 d students at the University of Iowa, health officials implemented a widespread MMR vaccine campaign.
171 nform health practitioners and public health officials in a rapidly changing landscape of population
172 a convenience sample of state public health officials in all US states (excluding Hawaii) plus Washi
173 h can be helpful to modelers and air quality officials in assessing the importance of individual traf
176 assist emergency planners and public health officials in comprehending how different populations are
177 he changing requirements of policymakers and officials in Connecticut from March 2020 to February 202
178 se finding may assist military public health officials in developing strategies to prevent varicella
179 OPD is crucial to assist local public-health officials in developing the best possible primary and se
180 ders; and district, provincial, and national officials in each district were interviewed to elicit pe
181 syndrome in adults have placed public health officials in high alert and highlight the significant im
182 ecular epidemiology can assist public health officials in identifying clusters of individuals who may
183 Discussions with researchers and government officials in multiple countries where vaccines are scarc
184 e biological weapons incident to responsible officials in order to help address microbiological and s
185 This outbreak was detected by public health officials in Tennessee and New York who observed signifi
189 vance of your work to the public and elected officials, including the crafting of a two-minute pitch
190 he 2020 general election, Republican elected officials, including then-President Donald Trump, promot
192 SRP, the knowledge broker brought regulatory officials into the research process, to help scientific
194 Federal, state, and local public health officials investigated the cause of the outbreak and ins
196 cademics, policy makers, scientists, elected officials, journalists, and others responsible for defin
198 ms of influenza outbreaks help public health officials make informed decisions that may help save liv
199 g of influenza outbreaks helps public health officials make timely and meaningful decisions that coul
200 ulled birds leads to nonreporting, and local officials may be complicit if they suspect that reportin
201 el or sewershed-level cases, suggesting that officials may not need to geospatially align case data w
203 Participants included health department officials, municipal managers, port authorities, and com
205 chair (n = 1), and designated institutional officials (n = 2), and 3 were from resident focus groups
206 atable media analyses, government and health officials need to be more invested in addressing people'
207 ce the number of contacts that public health officials need to investigate while still maintaining ex
210 tic boycott stipulates that while government officials of these countries will not attend the event,
211 rs are encouraged to work with public health officials on appropriate local antimicrobial stewardship
212 rovide valuable information to public health officials on tailoring One Health messaging for more eff
213 ls have the potential to guide public health officials on the nature and scale of the interventions r
216 vestigational and control measures by health officials, physicians should report suspected outbreaks
218 arch response to ZIKV may help public health officials plan for the next emerging infectious disease
219 pact what health care systems, public health officials, policy makers, health care practitioners, and
220 duals, scientists, physicians, public health officials, politicians, unions of asbestos workers, lawy
221 s that the early measures taken by the Greek officials positively affected the flattening of the epid
222 ditionally, we find no evidence that elected officials' practice of election denialism encourages the
223 sors that predict health adversity will help officials prepare for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVI
224 cords, and interviews with police and school officials provided detailed information about each case.
226 ditionally targeted managers or higher-level officials, rather than local health care workers (HCWs).
228 titudes of cancer researchers and compliance officials regarding compliance with the US Privacy Rule
229 satisfied with the responsiveness of public officials regarding sludge, many reported a lack of publ
230 r researchers and clinicians; federal health officials; regulatory agency representatives; pharmaceut
232 In April 2018, New Jersey and Pennsylvania officials reported a cluster of STEC O157 infections ass
237 led that although researchers and compliance officials share the view that patients' cancer diagnoses
238 This suggests that policy-makers and health officials should account for patient sharing with and am
239 Clinicians, laboratorians, and public health officials should be aware of the potential for misidenti
240 d mild illness, clinicians and public health officials should be aware of the risk of further expansi
241 review boards, advocacy groups, and federal officials should collaborate to improve evaluation of ri
242 1N1), with an estimated R of 1.4-1.6, health officials should consider strategies for vaccinating chi
243 ations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer th
244 e health of their children and public health officials strive to maintain high immunization rates to
246 useful in providing insights for government officials targeting specific population groups and busin
249 significant access to the policy process and officials through the consultation and numerous meetings
251 ents an unprecedented opportunity for health officials to ameliorate the current worldwide increase i
252 our method provides a way for public health officials to anticipate and manage changes in epidemic r
253 ne to specific diseases, should allow public officials to apply resources most effectively in develop
254 Health Service, academics, and public health officials to conduct responsible and ethical research.
255 h could inform health experts and government officials to design and develop evidence-based and effec
256 ncludes a dynamic county-level map for local officials to determine optimal policy responses and for
257 nt meetings with Zambia Correctional Service officials to discuss PrEP benefits, and trained Zambia C
258 le insights for scientists and public health officials to enhance their understanding of the pandemic
259 ally work with IT administrators and signing officials to ensure all levels of security are implement
260 al care and use committees and institutional officials to ensure appropriate consideration of allegat
261 tools may enable government and health care officials to implement accessible and affordable at-home
264 post-COVID-19 condition, enabling healthcare officials to monitor and provide timely intervention for
265 gs could inform disaster managers and public officials to perform recovery monitoring and resource al
267 It should enable public health actors and officials to preempt these strategies and develop realis
268 -19 cases with empirical models allow Health Officials to prepare for hospital contingencies in a two
269 health care practitioners and public health officials to prioritize trust-building, engage community
270 ear of bioterrorism agents has caused health officials to re-examine the potential of these agents to
271 uns are increasingly used by law enforcement officials to restrain violent subjects, who are frequent
272 ) virus provided reason for US public health officials to revisit existing national pandemic response
274 rofessionals, health experts, and government officials to stop creating and popularizing discriminati
275 ted more than $350 million to local election officials to support the administration of the 2020 elec
276 rn led clinicians, academics, and government officials to talk, telling stories and sometimes making
277 und variability) in wastewater data to alert officials to the need for heightened public health respo
278 gists, physicians, tribal leaders, and local officials, to develop and implement a multiphase COVID-1
279 hese results may be helpful to public health officials trying to balance infection control with the e
280 tted during close social contact, and health officials warn that alcohol consumption may lead to decr
281 n more detailed interviews with 16 financial officials, we found striking disagreements over the perc
282 , including military officers and government officials, we found that, compared with nonleaders, lead
283 r planners, public health experts, and local officials, we paired these with the CDC's Social Vulnera
284 n beliefs regarding attacks on public health officials were examined by respondent sociodemographic a
286 Local, state, and federal health department officials were involved in investigating the source of t
287 isease should be considered by public health officials when addressing Ebola virus disease outbreaks
291 PA would put Drug Enforcement Administration officials, who have no medical expertise, in the positio
292 om a national panel of current local elected officials, who represent a broad range of urban and rura
294 Restoring public trust in public health officials will require nuanced engagement with diverse g
295 T to enhance public safety by providing city officials with a tool for discovering, predicting, and,
296 the results of which provided public health officials with actionable information to prevent the spr
297 ntific censorship is driven by authoritarian officials with dark motives, such as dogmatism and intol
298 Wastewater monitoring has provided health officials with early warnings for new COVID-19 outbreaks
299 ovide emergency response managers and public officials with novel data-driven insights to more proact