コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 Neither C3H/HeJ nor C3H/HeOuJ mice exhibited orofacial abscess development or infection dissemination
2 kout mice, which lack T and B cells, develop orofacial abscesses and disseminated infections followin
3 After 21 days, a high incidence (5/10) of orofacial abscesses was observed in SCID mice mono-infec
4 rade viral tracing from muscles that control orofacial actions shows that these premotor nuclei segre
10 DMF network is to exert cognitive control of orofacial and vocal acts and, in the language dominant h
15 ntifiable behavioral assessment in the mouse orofacial area remains a major bottleneck in uncovering
16 rves collecting sensory information from the orofacial area synapse on second-order neurons in the do
17 n) is involved in the cognitive selection of orofacial, as well as, speech and nonspeech vocal respon
18 l muscles during different types of rhythmic orofacial behavior in macaque monkeys, finding that the
19 emporal relationship between GC activity and orofacial behaviors by performing paired single-neuron a
20 mals perform a multitude of well-coordinated orofacial behaviors such as breathing, sniffing, chewing
23 one marrow (BMMSCs), mouse MSCs derived from orofacial bone have not been isolated due to technical d
26 loped techniques to isolate and expand mouse orofacial bone/bone-marrow-derived MSCs (OMSCs) from man
31 we reanalyze data from a previously reported orofacial cleft study, to now investigate both fetal and
33 aternal topical corticosteroid exposure with orofacial cleft, low birth weight, preterm delivery, fet
34 aternal topical corticosteroid exposure with orofacial cleft, preterm delivery, fetal death, low Apga
41 Mutations in human MSX1 have been linked to orofacial clefting and we show here that Msx1 deficiency
44 get gene Msx1 in families with both forms of orofacial clefting has implicated Bmp signaling in both
53 umans, mutations in IRF6 cause two mendelian orofacial clefting syndromes, and genetic variation in I
54 tested the hypothesis that individuals with orofacial clefting with or without tooth agenesis have M
55 oding mutations in MSX1 are not the cause of orofacial clefting with or without tooth agenesis in thi
56 ts of children with a specific birth defect, orofacial clefting, and discuss areas for future researc
57 1 has been considered a strong candidate for orofacial clefting, based on mouse expression studies an
58 al morphogenesis is disrupted, the result is orofacial clefting, including cleft lip and cleft palate
59 To dissect the function of Bmp signaling in orofacial clefting, we conditionally inactivated the typ
70 most serious sub-phenotype of non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NSOFC), which are the most common cran
71 types observed in patients with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (NSOFCs) are nonsyndromic cleft lip onl
73 DNMs have not been fully explored regarding orofacial clefts (OFCs), one of the most common human bi
75 hat can be caused by maternal smoking (e.g., orofacial clefts and asthma) or adult smoking (e.g., cer
77 en identified in patients with rare atypical orofacial clefts and with syndromic cleft lip and/or pal
83 atogenic origins; the non-syndromic forms of orofacial clefts are more common and are likely due to s
89 association studies (GWASs) for nonsyndromic orofacial clefts have identified multiple strongly assoc
90 review describes genes that are involved in orofacial clefts in humans and animal models and explore
92 e occurrence of congenital heart defects and orofacial clefts is reported, we will have additional su
93 he authors investigated whether the risks of orofacial clefts or conotruncal heart defects were influ
95 tive system anomalies, 97.6% (95.9-98.6) for orofacial clefts, and 66.2% (61.5-70.5) for nervous syst
96 are diseases, such as ectodermal dysplasias, orofacial clefts, and other craniofacial and dental anom
97 Dysregulation of palatogenesis results in orofacial clefts, which represent the most common struct
106 f known genetic alternations associated with orofacial clefts; so, it is not surprising that CL/P is
111 totopically organized nociceptive responses, orofacial deep tissue injury also is coupled to somatovi
112 The Vi/Vc-RVM pathway is activated after orofacial deep tissue injury and plays a critical role i
115 mmation of the masseter muscle, an injury of orofacial deep tissue, results in a widespread change in
116 athways by directly comparing the effects of orofacial deep vs. cutaneous tissue inflammation on brai
117 ate that haploinsufficiency of IRF6 disrupts orofacial development and are consistent with dominant-n
120 ical abnormalities were related to brain and orofacial development, consistent with the known roles o
126 upregulation of neurotransmitters within the orofacial division of the trigeminal ganglia and in deve
127 athway distribution may correlate with acute orofacial dysfunction with spared pathways contributing
129 lycol(5)]-enkephalin (DAMGO) also stimulated orofacial dyskinesia when infused into the globus pallid
133 cortex and is involved in the development of orofacial dyskinesias, involuntary chewing-like movement
136 use a severe form of language impairment and orofacial dyspraxia, while single-nucleotide polymorphis
137 multiple system atrophy (red flag features: orofacial dystonia, disproportionate antecollis, camptoc
139 ditioning and affective hedonic and aversive orofacial expressions of taste-elicited "liking" and "di
140 sal, as well as in nuclei that contribute to orofacial function and mastication, including the facial
146 We present a case study of a paradigmatic orofacial "gesture," namely tongue protrusion and retrac
147 According to Keven & Akins (K&A), infant orofacial gestures may not reflect imitative responses.
150 e oligodeoxynucleotides led to a reversal of orofacial hypersensitivity, supporting an important role
151 m underlying trigeminal nerve injury-induced orofacial hypersensitivity, we used a rat model of chron
152 pelling alternative to the case for neonatal orofacial imitation, offered by Meltzoff and Moore.
155 are rapidly upregulated in TG neurons after orofacial inflammation and increase the capacity of TG n
157 g the turpentine-induced model of unilateral orofacial inflammation we also show that both the basal
159 To understand the functional significance of orofacial injury-induced neuronal activation, this study
162 But sucrose taste fails to elicit higher orofacial "liking" reactions from mutant mice in an affe
163 clude that neighboring projection neurons in orofacial MCtx form parallel pathways to distinct pools
164 uced a significant reduction in hind paw and orofacial mechanical withdrawal thresholds as a surrogat
165 , hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate; OMSC, orofacial mesenchymal stem cell; OVX, ovariectomized.
167 or the imaging and reconstruction of dynamic orofacial morphology by use of 3D and four-dimensional (
169 measure intercortical coherence between the orofacial motor (MIo) and somatosensory (SIo) areas of c
170 ucleus accumbens and substantia innominata), orofacial motor control (retrorubral area), thalamocorti
174 white matter injury is often accompanied by orofacial motor dysfunction, but little is known about t
175 self-initiated vocal production and nonvocal orofacial motor movement, we identified a subpopulation
177 t JMSA may coordinate activities of multiple orofacial motor nuclei, including Vmo, VII, XII and Amb
179 that generate and coordinate these and other orofacial motor patterns remain largely uncharacterized.
180 n of the parietal lobe; and (ii) a mosaic of orofacial motor programs located in the anterior and cen
183 s: cerebral nuclei, behavior control column, orofacial motor-related, humorosensory/thirst-related, b
184 roduce novel sounds by configuring different orofacial movement patterns and these sounds are used in
187 iculations of varying complexity, non-speech orofacial movements and speech listening, in a cohort of
188 imed to contrast brachiomanual gestures with orofacial movements and vocalizations in the natural com
191 ns these findings may assist in interpreting orofacial movements evoked during deep brain stimulation
192 n two phases: (1) from the onset of isolated orofacial movements in utero to the postnatal mastery of
193 an spiking hundreds of milliseconds prior to orofacial movements linked to sound presentation and rew
198 imb cortex evoked shoulder stump, trunk, and orofacial movements, whereas stimulation in the deeffere
201 C pathway in the Vc is involved in mediating orofacial muscle hypersensitivity under acute inflammato
204 ance imaging, we found that individuals with orofacial neuropathic pain have increased infra-slow osc
205 this study, we report that individuals with orofacial neuropathic pain show altered functional conne
206 alpha2delta1 up-regulation may contribute to orofacial neuropathic pain states through abnormal excit
210 l connectivity with the region that receives orofacial nociceptor afferents, the spinal trigeminal nu
211 en different types of motor actions: manual, orofacial, nonspeech vocal, and speech vocal actions.
213 showed no systemic clinical signs (skeletal, orofacial, or auditory) usually associated with Stickler
217 r-year follow-up, of whom 229 (54%) reported orofacial pain and 195 (46%) did not report such pain.
218 mmation comprises a highly prevalent type of orofacial pain and is mediated by the generation of endo
219 on of arthritis prevented the development of orofacial pain and joint dysfunction, and reduced the de
220 ase of the joint that can produce persistent orofacial pain as well as functional and structural chan
222 e clinical presentation of cancer-associated orofacial pain at various stages: initial diagnosis, dur
223 tion, and it affects numerous aspects of the orofacial pain experience, including pain intensity, pai
224 We aimed to describe the natural course of orofacial pain in a general population sample over a fou
228 and female patients with chronic neuropathic orofacial pain show increased functional connectivity be
229 he overall analysis indicates that rats with orofacial pain states had increased numbers and decrease
232 regulation, particularly among persons with orofacial pain who also have high levels of PTSD symptom
233 nd pain-related functioning in patients with orofacial pain, a retrospective review was conducted of
234 separately investigated inflammation-driven orofacial pain, acute activity of the trigeminal nerve,
235 ooth agenesis, cancers of the head and neck, orofacial pain, temporomandibular disorders, and craniof
245 eletion of Panx1 in a mouse model of chronic orofacial pain; in this model, trigeminal ganglion Panx1
250 S; OMIM 119500) is a disorder with a similar orofacial phenotype that also includes skin and genital
251 ity and whether these changes differ between orofacial primary motor (MIo) and somatosensory (SIo) co
253 in BMP signaling within developing limbs and orofacial primordia regulate proliferation and different
254 the mutants, which prevents the outgrowth of orofacial primordia, especially in the fusion site.
255 ateral subfield of the striatum (VLS) is the orofacial projection field of the sensorimotor cortex an
256 ary and partially overlapping regions of the orofacial prominences that fate mapping revealed contrib
258 nt in controlling the timing of stereotyped, orofacial reactions to aversive tastants during consumpt
259 s in hedonic "liking" (assessed by affective orofacial reactions to sucrose taste) versus "wanting" (
260 ctions are known to enhance positive hedonic orofacial reactions to the taste of sucrose ('liking' re
261 cted the nociceptive neurons innervating the orofacial region by causing increased expression of infl
263 Aergic projections to the deep layers of the orofacial region of the lateral tectum (superior collicu
264 ory of the corticobulbar projection from the orofacial region of the primary (M1), ventrolateral (LPM
267 ynamic peaks were detected in the homuncular orofacial region: the first peak during the nonpainful p
269 , and delayed somatosensory input related to orofacial responses (more than approximately 1.0 sec).
270 lavored saccharin solution elicited aversive orofacial responses that predicted early-session cocaine
272 Rats produce robust, highly distinctive orofacial rhythms in response to taste stimuli-responses
275 midbrain and brainstem targets implicated in orofacial sensorimotor control, and consist of a mix of
279 uggest, particularly for the case of primate orofacial signals, that they derive by ritualization of
280 l factors may lead to abnormal growth of the orofacial skeleton, affecting the overall structure of t
281 opmental syndromes that are characterized by orofacial, skin and genital abnormalities result when th
282 infections, trauma, or tumor resection, how orofacial stem/progenitor cells contribute to tissue dev
283 s the current status of our understanding of orofacial stem/progenitor cells, identifies gaps in our
288 esponsive to tactile inputs from surrounding orofacial structures, including the contralateral upper
290 nts developed severe toxic keratopathy after orofacial surgery on the left side with general anesthes
294 he primary somatosensory cortex may underlie orofacial tactile sensitivity issues and sensorimotor st
295 ematically examine the effects of persistent orofacial tissue injury on prolonged neuronal activation
296 ulated in response to RARgamma inhibition in orofacial tissue, and uncovered homeobox genes lhx8 and