コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 bine in platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
2 imens from 20 human patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
3 ty of people with colorectal, endometrial or ovarian cancer.
4 kly treatment among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
5 me stability underlies hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
6 ncer phenotype, is the most common malignant ovarian cancer.
7 kinase AXL to induce oncogenic signaling in ovarian cancer.
8 -200 (miR-200) family is highly expressed in ovarian cancer.
9 rian cancer, 20.4% were diagnosed with a non-ovarian cancer.
10 alpha to regulate an inflammatory network in ovarian cancer.
11 facilitating tumorigenesis and metastasis of ovarian cancer.
12 oinciding with poor outcome in patients with ovarian cancer.
13 vel EphB4-based therapeutic approach against ovarian cancer.
14 tment option for platinum-eligible recurrent ovarian cancer.
15 h newly diagnosed, advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
16 -emitting radionuclides for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
17 72-positive xenografts in a murine model of ovarian cancer.
18 tly associated with lower odds of epithelial ovarian cancer.
19 therapeutic target for paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer.
20 high concentrations in ascites of women with ovarian cancer.
21 cing in flank and metastatic mouse models of ovarian cancer.
22 cy to gemcitabine alone in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
23 e of powder in the genital area and incident ovarian cancer.
24 ritic cell vaccines and immunosuppression in ovarian cancer.
25 ic cytokines and chemokines overexpressed in ovarian cancer.
26 ith ovarian cancer and 1,321 (2.6%) with non-ovarian cancer.
27 genesis and altered immunogenic responses in ovarian cancer.
28 pe (SCCOHT) is a rare and aggressive form of ovarian cancer.
29 les in BRIP1 confer risk for both breast and ovarian cancer.
30 apeutic intervention of metastatic spread in ovarian cancer.
31 95% CI, 0.91-1.05]; P = .55) with epithelial ovarian cancer.
32 py, with potential application to metastatic ovarian cancer.
33 sk, ranges from 12 for testicular to 2.5 for ovarian cancer.
34 f the AXL signaling axis in PIK3R2-amplified ovarian cancer.
35 xt-specific, pro-metastatic role of SIRT3 in ovarian cancer.
36 compared with breast, prostate, uterine, and ovarian cancer.
37 aged <50 years and 15.2% aged >=50 years had ovarian cancer.
38 the genital area and self-reported incident ovarian cancer.
39 ostic significance in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
40 ood biomarkers for both human and laying hen ovarian cancer.
41 opens the door to targeted immunotherapy for ovarian cancer.
42 egimens in the management of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.
43 novel therapies for this aggressive form of ovarian cancer.
44 biopsies from patients with glioblastoma and ovarian cancer.
45 buting to the poor prognosis associated with ovarian cancer.
46 ating regions, superenhancers, and breast or ovarian cancers.
47 ety in a range of neoplasms, particularly in ovarian cancers.
48 ry care for the detection of ovarian and non-ovarian cancers.
49 ved for the treatment of advanced breast and ovarian cancers.
50 CD49e+ CAF compartment in high-grade serous ovarian cancers.
51 primarily associate with familial breast and ovarian cancers.
52 ncing antitumor efficacy in breast, lung and ovarian cancers.
53 ong whom 3,246 developed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (2,045 serous, 319 endometrioid, 184 muci
54 le breast cancer, 5% (95% CI, 2% to 10%) for ovarian cancer, 2%-3% (95% CI females, 1% to 4%; 95% CI
55 ho were aged >=50 years and who did not have ovarian cancer, 20.4% were diagnosed with a non-ovarian
56 steroid hormone pathway activation, whereas ovarian cancer 3D cultures with miR-200 knockdown showed
58 leads to small increases in the risk of most ovarian cancers, a risk that cumulates through life, sug
60 retrospective cohort analyses of epithelial ovarian cancer among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the Co
61 A125 testing; 456 (0.9%) were diagnosed with ovarian cancer and 1,321 (2.6%) with non-ovarian cancer.
63 cluded 22 406 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and 40 941 control individuals and the CI
64 ts to determine the estimated probability of ovarian cancer and all cancers at any CA125 level and ag
65 ion of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC-IV ovarian cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
66 relative to the internal control miR-103a in ovarian cancer and control blood specimens collected fro
67 isms of genome stability that lead to CIN in ovarian cancer and demonstrate the benefit of integratin
70 one modifications are being characterized in ovarian cancer and have been functionally linked to proc
71 of BRIP1 may confer risk for both breast and ovarian cancer and highlight the importance of functiona
72 t the RNA abundance of EIF3C is increased in ovarian cancer and positively correlates with the protei
73 d from H3K27Ac ChIP-seq data generated in 26 ovarian cancer and precursor-related cell and tissue typ
74 pseudouridine may be a novel risk factor for ovarian cancer and that TAGs may also be important, part
75 represents a potential novel risk factor for ovarian cancer and triglycerides may be important partic
77 residual familial aggregation of breast and ovarian cancer and were adjusted for the family-specific
80 ad is the primary mechanism of metastasis of ovarian cancer, and survival of ovarian cancer cells in
81 , when monoallelic, predispose to breast and ovarian cancer, and when biallelic, result in a severe s
83 of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC; N = 63 347)
84 otypic chemosensitivity assay for epithelial ovarian cancer based on Doppler spectroscopy of infrared
88 n cancer (general population) and epithelial ovarian cancer (BRCA1/2 mutation carriers), measured as
89 how a unique collagen fragment may regulate ovarian cancer, but in addition may help provide a usefu
90 nhibition has yielded encouraging results in ovarian cancer, but predictive biomarkers are lacking.
91 n extremely high lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer, but the exact mechanism by which the BRC
92 d expression transiently increased following ovarian cancer cell detachment and in tumor cells derive
94 TLN1 suppresses lactotransferrin's effect on ovarian cancer cell invasion potential and proliferation
95 studies performed in uMUC1-expressing human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3/Luc and control uMUC1(low
96 er agents, we developed and characterized an ovarian cancer cell line that is resistant to a previous
100 s9-mediated deletion of DAB2IP in epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines upregulated expression of stem
103 monstrate that antiproliferative activity in ovarian cancer cells (OVCAR8) depends on CDK2 degradatio
104 ivo models we show that secondary epithelial ovarian cancer cells (sEOC) do not fully reacquire the m
106 silenced, HR+, CARM1-high, high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells become PARPi sensitive, undergo mit
107 tential of Lyso-Gal for detection of primary ovarian cancer cells by using beta-gal as the biomarker.
108 , these results show that targeting FABP4 in ovarian cancer cells can inhibit their ability to adapt
110 tes binding to its cognate receptor CCR-2 on ovarian cancer cells facilitates migration and omental m
111 ibitor TMI-1 or by shRNA knockdown prevented ovarian cancer cells from releasing TNF-alpha protein in
114 etastasis of ovarian cancer, and survival of ovarian cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity as nonadhe
117 tor) reduced growth and peritoneal spread of ovarian cancer cells more effectively than either single
119 iated knockout of FABP4 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells reduced metastatic tumor burden in
121 s study describes the mechanism exhibited by ovarian cancer cells required for adherent cell transiti
122 chymal transition is required for epithelial ovarian cancer cells to acquire metastatic potential, th
124 d differences in the resistance responses of ovarian cancer cells to TRIP and conventional drugs.
125 Therapeutically, p85beta expression renders ovarian cancer cells vulnerable to inhibitors of AXL, p1
128 f the MYC oncogene in tumor cells, including ovarian cancer cells, correlates with poor responses to
129 we systematically assessed in vivo growth of ovarian cancer cells, including six validated HGSC cell
143 urrent, platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer (determined histologically) and Eastern C
146 lthough ovarian cancer is rare, risk of most ovarian cancers doubles as the number of lifetime ovulat
152 cles that play important roles in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) progression, as they are constantly
153 D2L2 and sensitizes HR-proficient epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) to poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribos
156 r and PARP inhibitor to treat chemoresistant ovarian cancers, especially those with high GLS expressi
157 majority of women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer eventually develop recurrence, which rapi
158 s fluid and tissue slices from patients with ovarian cancer facilitated characterization of patients
161 l and histotype-specific invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (general population) and epithelial ovari
162 and histone modifications as "clothes of the ovarian cancer genome" in relationship to their function
163 women with high CA125 levels, especially if ovarian cancer has been excluded, in order to prevent di
166 cer syndromes, such as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), consider genetic testing, especia
167 onditions-BRCA-related hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS) and familial
168 ops in women with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and is associated with drug resis
170 ant chemotherapy (NACT) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), we performed immunogenomic analy
172 (g)(2)) of EOC overall and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOCs) were estimated to be 5%-6%.
173 gh-grade serous, endometrioid, or clear cell ovarian cancer in clinical complete response after a com
174 widely used as an investigation for possible ovarian cancer in symptomatic women presenting to primar
175 case-control analyses of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consort
176 nts associated with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer in two children, a likely pathogenic vari
179 etabolites (N = 420) with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer, including both borderline and invasive t
180 ults aged 15 to 25 years with non-epithelial ovarian cancers, including malignant ovarian germ cell t
181 ween the evanescent fields of microfiber and ovarian cancer inter-cellular medium at different treatm
182 ls and adipocytes, as a primary regulator of ovarian cancer intraperitoneal metastatic dissemination
191 carcinoma (HGSC), the most common subtype of ovarian cancer, is the major cause of death due to gynec
193 ovel congeners in triple negative breast and ovarian cancers, malignancies that typically succumb to
194 tivity occurs in multiple cancers, including ovarian cancer, medulloblastoma, breast cancer, colorect
195 unreported role for host-expressed Wnt5a in ovarian cancer metastasis and suggest Fgr as a novel tar
196 egulation of gene signatures associated with ovarian cancer metastasis, and reduced clonogenic cancer
202 gest Fgr as a novel target for inhibition of ovarian cancer metastatic progression.Significance: This
203 st cancer; germline BRCA-mutated, metastatic ovarian cancer; metastatic gastric cancer; and relapsed
204 of this approach was further validated in an ovarian cancer model with typical germline mutations (ID
206 s were identified using in vitro and in vivo ovarian cancer models treated repetitively with carbopla
207 Here, we describe a "living biobank" of ovarian cancer models with extensive replicative capacit
211 nment (TME) and ascites-derived spheroids in ovarian cancer (OC) facilitate tumor growth and progress
215 fficacy in triple negative breast (TNBC) and ovarian cancers (OCs) harboring BRCA mutations, generati
216 cer (BRCA1/2 mutation carriers), measured as ovarian cancer odds (general population) and hazard rati
217 was associated with lower odds of epithelial ovarian cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.43-0.83
218 cohorts of patients with advanced, recurrent ovarian cancer or malignant mesothelioma received anetum
219 ed with a 2.5-fold increased risk of overall ovarian cancer (OR = 2.56; 95% CI, 1.48-4.45; P = 0.001/
220 g ever users, compared with never users, for ovarian cancer [OR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI),
228 ing cause of female cancer deaths since most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at an advanced sta
229 eaming' germline BRCA testing pathway in 255 ovarian cancer patients at Imperial College NHS Trust.
231 expressed in high-grade serous carcinoma of ovarian cancer patients, and its expression is even high
233 LPA), a lipid mediator present in ascites of ovarian cancer patients, induced expression of TNF-alpha
234 tes with the protein expression of YTHDF1 in ovarian cancer patients, suggesting modification of EIF3
237 ade serous carcinoma (HGSC), the most common ovarian cancer, posits to its development in fallopian t
238 the curve (AUC) value of 0.904 for American ovarian cancer prediction, whereas a model consisting of
239 lly actionable gene implicated in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition that has become a high pri
241 cin 1 (uMUC1) tumor antigen, a biomarker for ovarian cancer progression and response to therapy, usin
242 ify the novel YTHDF1-EIF3C axis critical for ovarian cancer progression which can serve as a target t
244 ore presents a promising strategy to prevent ovarian cancer recurrence and has potential for clinical
248 emerging paradigm is changing many facets of ovarian cancer research and routine gynecology practice.
249 -onset breast cancer and 1,199 patients with ovarian cancer revealed nearly 2% of patients carry a ve
250 ductase inhibition was associated with lower ovarian cancer risk (hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.51-0.
251 n ever use of powder in the genital area and ovarian cancer risk among women with a patent reproducti
252 relationship between incessant ovulation and ovarian cancer risk in order to identify mechanisms of c
256 8; 95% CI, 5.82 to 8.85; P = 6.5 x 10(-76)), ovarian cancer (RR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.40 to 6.04; P = 4.1
257 eld-out testing dataset of 108 breast and 62 ovarian cancer samples, our method ranked first in both
261 d with clear cell, endometrioid, or mucinous ovarian cancer should be offered somatic tumor testing f
264 s to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer should not be used as individual predicti
266 ysis showed that overexpression of DAB2IP in ovarian cancer significantly altered stemness-associated
271 way inhibitor has the potential to eradicate ovarian cancer stem cells and to prevent ovarian cancer
272 though the MEK Inhibitor in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Study did not meet its primary end point,
275 uce Famdenovo.BRCA for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and apply it to a small set of f
276 almost twice as likely to be diagnosed with ovarian cancer than women in the 10th percentile (<294)
279 g for all women with non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer, there is significant variability in acce
280 l carcinoma (OCCC), a challenging subtype of ovarian cancer, this problem is compounded by near-unive
281 ignancies, such as cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers, through direct and indirect mechanisms,
285 Yet the antioxidant adaptations required for ovarian cancer transcoelomic metastasis, which is the pa
287 sm gene sets were strongly correlated in the ovarian cancer Tumor Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database
291 ioritize potential points of intervention in ovarian cancer, we identified the lysine rich coiled-coi
292 ulatory elements influence predisposition to ovarian cancer, we used motifbreakR to predict the disru
294 st cancer, two with lung cancer and one with ovarian cancer-were enrolled into the pre-specified eval
295 cohort of >117,000 patients with breast and ovarian cancer who underwent panel testing, the combined
296 ond-degree blood relatives of a patient with ovarian cancer with a known germline pathogenic cancer s
298 y exerting synergistic anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancers with PTEN deficiency and KRAS(G12D) muta