戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 eolar collapse with the harmful potential of overdistention.
2 tilator-induced lung injury through alveolar overdistention.
3  gas exchange and furthering lung injury via overdistention.
4 pful in identifying and preventing pulmonary overdistention.
5 -volume curves did not demonstrate pulmonary overdistention.
6 1 ranging from 22% to 56% of predicted), and overdistention.
7 mid-inspiration volumes, indicative of local overdistention.
8  to less than or equal to 15% with the least overdistention.
9 pse), and the crossing point of collapse and overdistention.
10  injury due to repeated alveolar collapse or overdistention.
11  circulatory depression and lung injury from overdistention.
12 r veins to complicated bowel obstruction and overdistention.
13 hours: PEEP set at 3% of overdistention (low overdistention), 3% of collapse (low collapse), and the
14 d PEEP providing the best compromise between overdistention and collapsed zones was arbitrarily defin
15 ure/low PEEP strategy might have caused both overdistention and cyclic closure and reopening.
16     This may prevent injury from inspiratory overdistention and expiratory alveolar collapse.
17 o determine whether the effects of pulmonary overdistention are dependent on delivered tidal volume a
18 PEEP ameliorated these effects, despite lung overdistention, but increased histologic and gravimetric
19 e of 20% indicated the presence of pulmonary overdistention by definition.
20 ssure-control ventilation minimizes alveolar overdistention by limiting peak airway pressure, but a c
21 rategies are designed to prevent injury from overdistention by using lower tidal volumes and lower in
22 EEP levels, and the development of pulmonary overdistention had detrimental effects on the cardiovasc
23 e or using a compromise between collapse and overdistention in a randomized trial and to assess the i
24 d ventilated for 12 hours: PEEP set at 3% of overdistention (low overdistention), 3% of collapse (low
25 r choosing a compromise between collapse and overdistention may result in less lung injury, with pote
26                                         Lung overdistention occurred at high respiratory rates and hi
27 e time-constant inhomogeneities could foster overdistention of some lung units during early inflation
28 ng positive end-expiratory pressure promoted overdistention of ventral lung, maximum at positive end-
29  and the subsequent development of pulmonary overdistention on cardiopulmonary interactions were stud
30  Rationale: It is unknown whether preventing overdistention or collapse is more important when titrat
31 bjectives: To compare PEEP targeting minimal overdistention or minimal collapse or using a compromise
32                Conclusions: PEEP to minimize overdistention resulted in high mortality in an animal m
33 ment outcomes; effect of bladder volumes and overdistention, test position, catheter size, catheter i
34                                    Pulmonary overdistention was defined as a decrease in dynamic comp
35 n a porcine model of ARDS, lung collapse and overdistention were estimated using electrical impedance
36           Each of these effects of pulmonary overdistention were further magnified when the tidal vol