ライフサイエンスコーパス: oversensing

1 ly present as inappropriate shocks caused by oversensing.

2 ocks for sinus tachycardia or noise/artifact/oversensing.

3 gh impedance and/or nonphysiological "noise" oversensing.

4 triggered either by high impedance or rapid oversensing.

5 f right atrial sensing (1%), and ventricular oversensing (0.2%).

6 ), sinus or atrial tachycardias (9%), and/or oversensing (4%).

7 First inappropriate shocks due to cardiac oversensing and electromagnetic interference were more c

8 ested an algorithm that uses two measures of oversensing and one measure of abnormal impedance to det

9 electrograms (EGMs) alerts the physician to oversensing and undersensing problems, which may manifes

10 ation rules, enhancements to minimize T-wave oversensing, and features that restrict therapy to regul

11 ors to reduce inappropriate shocks for rapid oversensing caused by conductor fractures and reported f

12 Oversensing combined with abnormal impedance trends may

13 entary roles of impedance and more sensitive oversensing diagnostics.

14 rdia (HR: 0.97, p = 0.86) and noise/artifact/oversensing (HR: 0.91, p = 0.76) was comparable to that

15 of first inappropriate shock due to cardiac oversensing (HR: 15.07; 95% CI: 3.60-63.15; P < 0.001) a

16 escribed mode of ICD lead failure: prolonged oversensing immediately after shock therapy.

17 ependent predictor for IAT caused by cardiac oversensing in the S-ICD group (HR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.34-7

18 in the TV-ICD group (n=83/89) versus cardiac oversensing in the S-ICD group (n=40/81).

19 sures were met or abnormal impedance and one oversensing measure occurred.

20 The oversensing measures consisted of a counter for RR inter

21 The two oversensing measures used in the algorithm predicted 72%

22 Lead failures were identified when both oversensing measures were met or abnormal impedance and

23 ling at least two of the three impedance and oversensing measures, the sensitivity of our algorithm w

24 Oversensing most often manifested as inhibition, althoug

25 22 patients, most commonly related to T wave oversensing (n=14).

26 e of lead failure for the 6936 consisting of oversensing of electrical noise following shocks, 3) ear

27 diation at typical clinical doses results in oversensing of ICRMDs in the majority of devices tested,

28 used by supraventricular tachyarrhythmias or oversensing of signals.

29 anted defibrillators tested were affected by oversensing of the electric field as verified by telemet

30 ICDs tested in 41 patients were affected by oversensing of the EMI field of the cellular telephones

31 nt and/or physician when triggered by either oversensing or excessive increases in impedance.

32 g only ICD diagnostics identifies leads with oversensing or high impedance as fractures or connection

33 re 9.8% and 17.5%, respectively, with P-wave oversensing the predominant cause.

34 Oversensing was observed in 20 of 21 devices at maximum

35 Oversensing was transient and ceased as soon as the devi

36 d inappropriate shocks, mainly due to T-wave oversensing, which was mostly solved by a software upgra

37 er extremely high maximum impedance or noise oversensing with a normal impedance trend indicated a fr