戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 4.7% [CI, 62.5% to 67.0%]; P < 0.001 for all pair-wise comparisons).
2 ectively, analysis of variance, P < 0.05 for pair-wise comparisons).
3 ty and death differed significantly for each pair-wise comparison.
4 alysis, and in timepoint-specific multi- and pair-wise comparisons.
5 se data were further processed with post-hoc pair-wise comparisons.
6 s one-way analysis of variance with post hoc pair-wise comparisons.
7 ge r.m.s.d., for invariant Trp and Cys, four pair-wise comparisons,=1.2 A) but less similar to the fi
8 merous DNA methylation changes were found in pair-wise comparisons among the four groups.
9                                              Pair-wise comparison analyses (between individual k-mers
10 r in a certain subtype of tumors through the pair-wise comparison and by hierarchical clustering anal
11  local qualities of a pool of models using a pair-wise comparison approach.
12 e significant differences in PhiST values in pair wise comparisons between LCI and LSI.
13                                              Pair-wise comparisons between groups were conducted by S
14 , most comparative sequencing has focused on pair-wise comparisons between human and a limited number
15 fts in relative nuclear speckle distances in pair-wise comparisons between human cell lines (H1, HFF,
16 to compute the matrix, first all-against-all pair-wise comparisons between protein sequences are comp
17 icroarray data for ten time points with nine pair-wise comparisons during fruit development and ripen
18 the Roundup repository contains all possible pair-wise comparisons for over 250 genomes, including 32
19                                  Human-mouse pair-wise comparisons have limited utility for identifyi
20                                        Using pair-wise comparisons in breast DCIS, we found higher pr
21                                            A pair-wise comparison indicated that roseltide rT7 is >10
22 r an observed change in gene expression in a pair-wise comparison is significant.
23                                     Further, pair wise comparison of DEGs of double mutant with singl
24                                         In a pair wise comparison of the generated mouse MSDK librari
25  with 1.5 for placebo (P < or = .05 for each pair-wise comparison of a linaclotide dose to placebo).
26                                 We conducted pair-wise comparison of aaCVM between SDI groups with th
27                              Intent-to-treat pair-wise comparison of ABMT with CT, CT with CBMT, and
28                                        Using pair-wise comparison of aligned nucleotide sequences of
29             Rapamycin efficacy was tested by pair-wise comparison of changes in individual voiding da
30 tances showed a median distance of 0.603 for pair-wise comparison of fragments indicating significant
31                                  Through the pair-wise comparison of normal and DCIS SAGE libraries,
32                                     A direct pair-wise comparison of PAM4 and CA19-9 immunoassays for
33                                              Pair-wise comparison of Phi(st) values derived from AMOV
34                                            A pair-wise comparison of the experimental and control ser
35           By using distance matrices for the pair-wise comparison of these 112 temporal gene expressi
36                                              Pair-wise comparison of three experimental conditions wa
37 nofluorescence colocalization, we found that pair-wise comparisons of 15 angiogenic-relevant alpha-gr
38                               It is based on pair-wise comparisons of all cells to each other where e
39                                           In pair-wise comparisons of anti-tumor necrosis factor agen
40                                              Pair-wise comparisons of hospital quality were performed
41 an compare an unlimited number of maps, view pair-wise comparisons of known correspondences, and sear
42                 Age was log transformed, and pair-wise comparisons of means were made.
43                                     However, pair-wise comparisons of telomere dynamics between NF an
44                                        Using pair-wise comparisons of tuber-related tissues, we were
45 ion loss and a proposed similarity loss from pair-wise comparisons of waveform segments over time as
46 ss the 4 arms by 1-way ANCOVA (P = 0.02); by pair-wise comparisons, only rhGH (decreasing SI; P = 0.0
47 ct subgroups with different risks of PCSM in pair-wise comparison (p < 0.0001).
48 d from 30% per Brock to 71% per CTCAEv3 (all pair-wise comparisons, P < .01).
49                                     Post-hoc pair-wise comparison revealed increased frontocentral sl
50                                         Each pair-wise comparison revealed unique global proteomic an
51 ring across the three groups and verified by pair-wise comparisons, the MSI-H group was associated wi
52 ntire current PDB release with T-Server, and pair-wise comparison using the TOPOFIT method through th
53  univariate analysis of variance followed by pair-wise comparison was used to establish statistical s
54                               Besides common pair-wise comparisons, we consider a few reasonable stat
55                          For each parameter, pair-wise comparisons were performed using the mixed mod