ライフサイエンスコーパス: partial nephrectomy

1 edure: 9 open biopsies, 4 needle biopsies, 1 partial nephrectomy).

2 f uremic cardiomyopathy in mice subjected to partial nephrectomy.

3 emia' technique for laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.

4 n to associate with complication rates after partial nephrectomy.

5 re similar to those of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy.

6 decreased morbidity when compared with open partial nephrectomy.

7 ar to be at least equivalent to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

8 r-specific survival rates comparable to open partial nephrectomy.

9 ave recently been published for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

10 renal cortical tumours undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy.

11 d for hemostatic control during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

12 the reference standard, open or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

13 al nephrectomy became an alternative to open partial nephrectomy.

14 ormal contralateral kidney will benefit from partial nephrectomy.

15 deos of themselves performing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

16 ollaborative who also perform robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

17 ) for recurrence who had received radical or partial nephrectomy.

18 carcinoma (RCC) from benign conditions after partial nephrectomy.

19 -19, as did postoperative length of stay for partial nephrectomy.

20 robability of dialysis after nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy.

21 omized clinical trial on mannitol use during partial nephrectomy.

22 ive approach in selected patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

23 rious effects of prolonged clamp time during partial nephrectomy.

24 drives ultimate postoperative function after partial nephrectomy.

25 a of functional outcomes after ischemia-free partial nephrectomy.

26 equivalent to that reported after radical or partial nephrectomy.

27 significant percentage of patients following partial nephrectomy.

28 nal clamp ischemia in 40 patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

29 orts to minimize renal functional loss after partial nephrectomy.

30 plement to traditional laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy.

31 renal functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

32 rular hypertrophy was induced by progressive partial nephrectomies.

33 Of these, 4896 radical nephrectomy, 3508 partial nephrectomy, 13 327 radical prostatectomy, and 2

34 ostatectomy; 20802, total nephrectomy; 8060, partial nephrectomy; 134985, hysterectomy; and 27445, oo

35 405 (6.8%) total nephrectomies, 2759 (34.2%) partial nephrectomies, 14 047 (10.4%) hysterectomies, an

36 lateral partial nephrectomy (48%), bilateral partial nephrectomy (35%), unilateral total nephrectomy

37 ateral total nephrectomy (10.5%), unilateral partial nephrectomy (4%), and bilateral total nephrectom

38 lateral total nephrectomy with contralateral partial nephrectomy (48%), bilateral partial nephrectomy

39 For partial nephrectomy, a baseline of 168 surgeries per qua

40 Recent evidence has demonstrated that partial nephrectomy also provides equivalent oncological

41 nt (stage 4 and higher) CKD after radical or partial nephrectomy among veterans treated for kidney ca

42 n per 1.73 m(2) was 80% (95% CI 73-85) after partial nephrectomy and 35% (28-43; p<0.0001) after radi

43 dentified 1925 patients (27.0%) treated with partial nephrectomy and 5213 patients (73.0%) treated wi

44 5%), and the use of nephron-sparing surgery (partial nephrectomy and ablation) increased (from 21.5%

45 The greater utilization of partial nephrectomy and ablative procedures has increase

46 tumors encompasses extirpative laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and ablative procedures such as cryo

47 database to identify patients who underwent partial nephrectomy and computed tomographic and/or magn

48 ong-term data are available for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and cryoablation.

49 t aetiologies: glomerulosclerosis induced by partial nephrectomy and interstitial fibrosis induced by

50 In 2008, open partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

51 ent multicenter study comparing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy demonst

52 women) with renal masses underwent total or partial nephrectomy and preoperative renal CT.

53 successfully applied to radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy and pyeloplasty.

54 Standard robotic surgeries, such as partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy may soon i

55 This cohort study suggests that partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy surgical v

56 t evidence and highlight emerging issues for partial nephrectomy and renal function.

57 of death for 37 patients (1.9%) treated with partial nephrectomy, and 222 patients (4.3%) treated wit

58 the factors that affect renal function after partial nephrectomy, and presents current information ab

59 ally invasive radical cystectomy, radical or partial nephrectomy, and radical prostatectomy were sort

60 Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy appears to be a safe and efficacious

61 ugh the preliminary results of zero ischemia partial nephrectomy are promising, further research is n

62 st recent oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are reviewed.

63 yses demonstrate that the majority of T1b/T2 partial nephrectomy are still carried out by open surger

64 8, open partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are the reference standards for trea

65 The most recent developments in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are the subject of this review.

66 enal masses is transforming with adoption of partial nephrectomy as a safe and feasible surgical opti

67 described laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy as a safe management option for path

68 In propensity score-matched cohorts, partial nephrectomy associated with a significantly lowe

69 1997, 38 patients (41 lesions) who underwent partial nephrectomy at a single institution were preoper

70 on for select patients, wherein laparoscopic partial nephrectomy attempts to duplicate traditional, e

71 th small exophytic renal tumors laparoscopic partial nephrectomy became an alternative to open partia

72 ere at high risk of relapse after radical or partial nephrectomy between 4-12 weeks before random ass

73 lasty, ureteral reimplantation, complete and partial nephrectomy, bladder augmentation and creation o

74 The second (male) TSC patient had bilateral partial nephrectomies (both at age 36), with similar fin

75 iltration rate of less than 45 was 95% after partial nephrectomy, but only 64% following radical neph

76 Renal neoplasms amenable to partial nephrectomy can be identified and characterized

77 bility studies confirmed that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can be performed safely.

78 Partial nephrectomy can now be safely performed without

79 es less than 4 cm in size (48% of patients), partial nephrectomy can result in a 5-year cancer-specif

80 After laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, collections are more frequently det

81 Length of stay for partial nephrectomy decreased from baseline by a mean of

82 studies and systematic reviews suggest that partial nephrectomy decreases the risks of adverse renal

83 Comparisons between radical and partial nephrectomy demonstrate equivalent cancer contro

84 ng laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy demonstrated that equivalent cancer-

85 Early experience with robotic partial nephrectomy demonstrates good oncologic outcomes

86 Prevalence of findings 2-3 years after partial nephrectomy depends on the surgical approach.

87 his period, patients who were ineligible for partial nephrectomy either because of numerous comorbidi

88 term cancer control and renal function after partial nephrectomy equals the results of radical nephre

89 and 10 years was longer than for radical or partial nephrectomy, especially for patients at higher r

90 the initial reported experience with robotic partial nephrectomy, evaluating techniques, early outcom

91 al and oncologic outcomes comparable to open partial nephrectomy, even for complex tumors.

92 n the published series of minimally invasive partial nephrectomies for such renal masses.

93 There is a paucity of data for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies for this larger tumor size.

94 Partial nephrectomy for larger kidney tumors (T1b) has g

95 irmed, there is an increased push to perform partial nephrectomy for larger tumors.

96 Complex partial nephrectomy for multiple renal tumors, or multip

97 Elective partial nephrectomy for patients with a small (< or = 4

98 The feasibility of performing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 cm in size has

99 clinical evidence and benefits of performing partial nephrectomy for renal tumors greater than 4 cm.

100 With clinical guidelines recommending partial nephrectomy for small renal masses, it is essent

101 In localised disease, partial nephrectomy for small tumours and radical nephre

102 Thirty-nine patients after partial nephrectomy for solid RCC were enrolled in the s

103 The success of partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal can

104 To review current status of partial nephrectomy for treatment of T1b and T2 renal ma

105 Partial nephrectomy for tumors of 7 cm or less provides

106 unction over ischemia time in impacting post-partial nephrectomy function.

107 Patients treated with partial nephrectomy had a significantly lower risk of de

108 Finally, patients treated with a partial nephrectomy had reduced risk of mortality (hazar

109 Partial nephrectomy has become an effective method of tr

110 Partial nephrectomy has become the standard of treatment

111 , or zero-ischemia, approach to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been a proposed means of preserv

112 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been developed in an attempt to

113 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been performed in 15 patients wi

114 NGS: A large breadth of data have shown that partial nephrectomy has equivalent oncologic outcomes co

115 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has lagged behind while laparoscopic

116 Partial nephrectomy has now emerged as an oncologically

117 g an off-clamp technique during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has variably shown increased intraop

118 e open counterpart, laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomies have equivalent operative time, de

119 Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy have been widely adopted for the man

120 on video-based evaluation of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, higher technical skill was associat

121 nt radical prostatectomy, total nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, hysterectomy, or oophorectomy at 13

122 ith use of robotic-assisted surgery only for partial nephrectomy in facilities with medium-high (1.67

123 The role of partial nephrectomy in nonelective treatment of T2 tumor

124 ulti-institutional series indicate that open partial nephrectomy in patients with a solitary kidney c

125 e evaluated the recurrence after radical and partial nephrectomy in patients with RENAL nephrometry s

126 t is essential to understand the benefits of partial nephrectomy in regards to renal function.

127 ribe the rationale for expanding the role of partial nephrectomy in the treatment of renal cortical t

128 ting the small renal mass, with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy increasingly becoming the preferred

129 Partial nephrectomy induced cardiomyopathy and anemia in

130 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a technically challenging procedu

131 Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is a well tolerated and viable optio

132 Despite the mounting clinical evidence that partial nephrectomy is an effective and preferable appro

133 Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is an emerging technique for the tre

134 Partial nephrectomy is an essential surgical approach to

135 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is becoming a standard of care for s

136 al nephrectomy and renal functional benefit, partial nephrectomy is becoming an alternate standard to

137 Partial nephrectomy is effectively performed using both

138 Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is feasible with short-term results

139 Open partial nephrectomy is now recognized as the standard of

140 s indicate superior functional outcomes when partial nephrectomy is performed without global ischemia

141 Partial nephrectomy is successful for low risk unilatera

142 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is technically demanding; efforts di

143 Although partial nephrectomy is the preferred treatment for many

144 renal tumors less than 4-7 cm (T1 lesions), partial nephrectomy is the treatment of choice.

145 nal disease, including diabetic nephropathy, partial nephrectomy, ischemia, and anti-Thy1.1-induced n

146 Post-partial nephrectomy kidney quantity and quality are surg

147 34-78 years; 21 women, 37 men) underwent 62 partial nephrectomies (laparoscopic, 31; open, 31) to re

148 As familiarity with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has grown, application has exp

149 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) technique has continually evol

150 tcomes for RPN when compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), particularly in regards to de

151 Partial nephrectomy may be as effective as radical nephr

152 phrectomy, but under certain circumstances a partial nephrectomy may be done.

153 stage 4 or higher after radical (n=9759) or partial nephrectomy (n=4370) was 7.9% overall.

154 luding robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy and reconstructi

155 hosen, in part, to select tumors amenable to partial nephrectomy, newer data show that this may no lo

156 nded with a predicted survival increase with partial nephrectomy of 5.6 (95% CI, 1.9-9.3), 11.8 (95%

157 Partial nephrectomy of the left kidney was performed.

158 ted instrument to assess technical skill for partial nephrectomy on a scale of 1 to 5 (higher scores

159 on model to estimate the treatment effect of partial nephrectomy on long-term survival.

160 rtial nephrectomy (RAPN) is superior to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in reducing 30-day post-operat

161 lary renal cancer underwent CT and US before partial nephrectomy or enucleation; 205 renal masses wer

162 Conversely, partial nephrectomy (OR, 0.51; p = 0.003) and minimally

163 (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78-1.28), partial nephrectomy (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77-1.27), radic

164 ere significantly higher with radical versus partial nephrectomy (P =.001).

165 trive towards improved kidney function after partial nephrectomy, particularly for larger tumors.

166 des an overview of outcomes for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies performed with or without hilar cl

167 ry objectives were to compare outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) fr

168 nimally invasive surgery approaches (MIS) in partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN), a

169 Partial nephrectomy (PN) for SRMs is the standard treatm

170 A shift towards partial nephrectomy (PN) in the management of small rena

171 r small (<=4 cm) renal tumors versus routine partial nephrectomy (PN), accounting for various competi

172 atients (radical nephrectomy [RN, n = 236] & partial nephrectomy [PN, n = 238]) in a single tertiary

173 xperimental uremic cardiomyopathy induced by partial nephrectomy (PNx).

174 e with both contemporary and historical open partial nephrectomy pT1 controls.

175 was adjusted surgical volume for radical and partial nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy, and radical

176 r cancer who received a radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy, or radical c

177 Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is emerging as a viable compl

178 aimed to determine whether robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is superior to open partial n

179 on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), focusing on complications, t

180 spite their evolution and promising results, partial nephrectomy remains the cornerstone of surgical

181 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after radical or partial nephrectomy remains unknown, and evidence to sup

182 tomy for multiple renal tumors, or multiplex partial nephrectomy, requires not only exceptional surgi

183 Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) is an option for patients desi

184 ly analyzed in the context of published open partial nephrectomy series.

185 Mice that have undergone partial nephrectomy serve as an experimental model of ur

186 patients with such masses minimally invasive partial nephrectomy should be considered for elective an

187 Partial nephrectomy should remain the standard of care f

188 y lacking, the early experience with robotic partial nephrectomy shows promise.

189 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Partial nephrectomy surgery typically requires clamping

190 d-arterial anatomy to allow even substantial partial nephrectomy surgery without clamping the main re

191 ization opens the door to more sophisticated partial nephrectomy surgery, wherein we can now tailor t

192 el technical refinements, such as anatomical partial nephrectomy surgery.

193 renal artery appears unnecessary during most partial nephrectomy surgery.

194 Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy techniques duplicate the open approa

195 the outcomes of unclamped and zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy techniques.

196 oncological outcomes are comparable to open partial nephrectomy, the gold standard.

197 scular instruments have allowed laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to become a viable option for select

198 However, studies comparing enucleation and partial nephrectomy to date have revealed equivalent onc

199 However, the application of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to larger, centrally located tumors

200 The comparative effectiveness of partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy to preser

201 verall score was also associated with higher partial nephrectomy volume (beta coefficient, 11.4 [95%

202 y function (eGFR>/=60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)), partial nephrectomy was also associated with a significa

203 nclusion, compared with radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy was associated with a marked reducti

204 Partial nephrectomy was historically performed only for

205 s with T1 RCC treated with either radical or partial nephrectomy was noted (P =.219).

206 Partial nephrectomy was originally reserved for absolute

207 gs that could affect the decision to perform partial nephrectomy were retrospectively evaluated: tumo

208 ment of a reliable technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, which includes the ability to achie

209 Repeat and salvage partial nephrectomy, while challenging and potentially a

210 Widespread applicability of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy will only occur when oncologic outco