戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 pinion recommends in favor of routine annual pelvic examination.
2 rates of models involving ultrasonography or pelvic examination.
3 bility typically includes ultrasonography or pelvic examination.
4 t women's health are often evaluated through pelvic examination.
5 eening consisted of mammography and bimanual pelvic examinations.
6 led to questions about the role of screening pelvic examinations among asymptomatic women.
7             Evaluation usually begins with a pelvic examination and an ultrasound to determine both t
8 vided without preabortion ultrasonography or pelvic examination and dispensed to patients in person o
9 toms suggestive of prolapse should undergo a pelvic examination and medical history check.
10 ion, which should include a careful history, pelvic examination, and Papanicolaou smear, should be re
11                          Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prio
12 tified for overall benefits and harms of the pelvic examination as a 1-time or periodic screening tes
13 nitored and scored for each use, followed by pelvic examination at 30 days.
14 olescents for Chlamydia trachomatis during a pelvic examination at each clinic visit.
15 re interviewed and received counseling and a pelvic examination at enrollment, 1 month, and 6 months,
16 rtion without preabortion ultrasonography or pelvic examination between February 1, 2020, and January
17 ne screening, it is indicated if an adequate pelvic examination cannot be performed or if additional
18     Women testing positive for HPV underwent pelvic examination followed by same-day thermal ablation
19 morbidity or mortality benefits of screening pelvic examination for any condition were identified.
20 on screening for gynecologic conditions with pelvic examination for conditions other than cervical ca
21             The positive predictive value of pelvic examination for detecting ovarian cancer was less
22 nefits, accuracy, and harms of the screening pelvic examination for gynecologic conditions for the US
23 y rates resulting from an abnormal screening pelvic examination for ovarian cancer ranged from 5% to
24  recommendations on the utility of screening pelvic examination for the detection of pathology in asy
25 SPSTF found inadequate evidence on screening pelvic examinations for the early detection and treatmen
26 r women need to be seen annually for routine pelvic examinations has arisen.
27                                              Pelvic examinations have historically been a part of reg
28 on screening for pathologic conditions using pelvic examination in adult, asymptomatic women at avera
29                No data supporting the use of pelvic examination in asymptomatic, average-risk women w
30  ACP recommends against performing screening pelvic examination in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, adult w
31  No trials examined the effectiveness of the pelvic examination in reducing all-cause mortality, redu
32 stic accuracy and harms of routine screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic primary care populat
33 , it is unclear whether performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women has a signific
34 f benefits and harms of performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult w
35  and potential harms of performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult w
36 ablished through careful medical history and pelvic examination, including the cotton-swab test.
37                                 Although the pelvic examination is a common part of the physical exam
38                                              Pelvic examination is often included in well-woman visit
39                Low-quality data suggest that pelvic examinations may cause pain, discomfort, fear, an
40 though more than half (62%) had had a recent pelvic examination, only 42% had recently used a condom
41  studies reported accuracy for the screening pelvic examination: ovarian cancer (4 studies; n = 26432
42 dees at 2 Provincial STI clinics receiving a pelvic examination, regardless of a history of anal inte
43            The percentage of women reporting pelvic examination-related pain or discomfort ranged fro
44 uded testing for HIV presence and pregnancy, pelvic examinations, risk reduction counselling, and tre
45     GCT is usually associated with a mass on pelvic examination that is subsequently confirmed on ult
46  recruited; as a part of their routine entry pelvic examination visit, they completed a self-administ
47                                     Bimanual pelvic examination was reported with similar frequency b
48             Nine brain, two cardiac, and two pelvic examinations were performed by using a 1.5-T clin
49 mplication rate within 1 year of a screening pelvic examination with abnormal findings.