コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 arity was also significantly associated with pelvic organ prolapse.
2 ue in women undergoing a first operation for pelvic organ prolapse.
3 nd fibrosis in parous women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.
4 e pelvic organs and loss of support leads to pelvic organ prolapse.
5 c organ prolapse compared with those without pelvic organ prolapse.
6 performed annually in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse.
7 o discuss the epidemiology and prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse.
8 revention in patients at risk for developing pelvic organ prolapse.
9 transvaginal mesh kits for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
10 s has been implicated in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse.
11 al pelvic floor for defecatory disorders and pelvic organ prolapse.
12 have increased the available treatments for pelvic organ prolapse.
13 9% of women (95% CI, 2.1%-3.7%) experiencing pelvic organ prolapse.
14 important components in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse.
15 ions in lysyl oxidase-like 1 (LOXL1) develop pelvic organ prolapse.
16 nt of female stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
17 in repair of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
20 related to abnormal elastic fibers, such as pelvic organ prolapse and cardiovascular and pulmonary a
21 rformed to determine the association between pelvic organ prolapse and exfoliation syndrome in women
22 ant proven benefit for symptomatic relief of pelvic organ prolapse and improvement of quality of life
24 a sample of women who screened positive for pelvic organ prolapse and other urinary incontinence sym
29 incontinence undergoing vaginal surgery for pelvic-organ prolapse are at risk for postoperative urin
30 te outcome of success, defined as absence of pelvic organ prolapse beyond the hymen in any compartmen
32 ther the rate of transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse changed after US Food and Drug Adm
33 of life impact of PFD, total and by domain (pelvic organ prolapse, colorectal-anal, and urogenital).
34 the exfoliation syndrome risk in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared with those without pelvic
36 bdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of pelvic-organ prolapse decreases postoperative stress uri
37 en aged 30 to 65 years at baseline who had a pelvic organ prolapse diagnosis compared with controls d
38 The symptomatic coprimary outcome was the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI) symptom
39 mes at 2 years were prolapse symptom scores (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory; range 0-300, h
40 omain (P = 0.0005, 95% CI: 3.8-13.5) and the pelvic organ prolapse domain (P = 0.015, 95% CI: 0.6-9.5
41 in the uterine tract post partum and develop pelvic organ prolapse, enlarged airspaces of the lung, l
42 cells obtained from women with uterovaginal pelvic organ prolapse following vaginal hysterectomy.
45 o the assessment of defecatory disorders and pelvic organ prolapse has highlighted the limitations of
46 irth control and a surgical mesh implant for pelvic organ prolapse, have led to calls to reexamine th
48 life expectancy increases, the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in general, and rectoceles, in par
51 ion syndrome was more frequent in women with pelvic organ prolapse in the Utah Population Database, a
52 ific quantificative information about female pelvic organ prolapse-information that usually can only
60 thought to be involved in the development of pelvic organ prolapse may also be linked to the developm
61 ditions with altered ECM metabolism, such as pelvic organ prolapse, may share common biological pathw
63 to 65 years at baseline with a diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse (n = 5130) compared with birth yea
64 full understanding of the complex impact of pelvic organ prolapse on lower urinary tract function is
65 creased risk of the woman having surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence (aHR 3.17,
66 lastic fiber assembly in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic organ support was characte
67 nrolled twenty-two postmenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse planning to undergo vaginal hyster
68 rders, a large portion of which will involve pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and lower urinary tract dysf
69 for the fibulin-5 gene (Fbln5(-/-)) develop pelvic organ prolapse (POP) due to compromised elastic f
71 ent of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have produced highly variabl
76 Mesh, a synthetic graft, has been used in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair and stress urinary in
77 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mesh used for slings and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair has resulted in incre
78 y have continually adapted new techniques in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair in order to improve b
80 rictions on postoperative activity following pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery are not evidence bas
81 ublished data concerning the indications for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in women who present
82 OF REVIEW: As more women undergo repairs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), an ever-increasing scrutiny
83 0 codes) for PFD [urinary incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and bowel dysfunction (anal
84 for pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), stress urinary incontinence
88 nimally invasive surgery in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP); however, the robotic indust
90 hile the introduction of novel approaches to pelvic organ prolapse provide further options when consi
91 natomic POP failure requiring retreatment or Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification evaluation demonstr
92 f pelvic organ support loss according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (noninferior
93 anterior prolapse (of stage 2 or higher on a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system examination)
96 search (basic and clinical) are post-MUS and pelvic organ prolapse repair urinary retention and obstr
101 kage of solid, liquid, or mucous stool), and pelvic organ prolapse (seeing/feeling a bulge in or outs
102 success 2 years after primary uterus-sparing pelvic organ prolapse surgery for uterine descent, these
105 h require a review of vaginal approaches for pelvic organ prolapse surgery with and without mesh.
107 icipant-reported prolapse symptoms (i.e. the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score [POP-SS]) and condit
108 ie, a significantly greater reduction in the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score [POP-SS]) at 12 mont
109 outcome was self-reported prolapse symptoms (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score [POP-SS]) at 2 years
111 group vs 0 of 97 in the radiotherapy group), pelvic organ prolapse (three [3%] vs 0), fatigue, hot fl
112 ary self-management vs clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse (TOPSY): a randomised controlled s
114 es in genital hiatus (GH) and development of pelvic organ prolapse using data from the Mothers' Outco
115 association between exfoliation syndrome and pelvic organ prolapse using the Utah Population Database
118 ndrome (exfoliation of the lens capsule) and pelvic organ prolapse was investigated as part of the Ut
119 ersy regarding the use of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse, we did a retrospective review of
120 ho will present to healthcare providers with pelvic organ prolapse, we need a better understanding of
121 elastic fibers after parturition, leading to pelvic organ prolapse, weakening of the vaginal wall, pa
123 05 women with symptomatic stage 2 or greater pelvic organ prolapse were requested to participate betw
126 t exfoliation syndrome risk in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (without exfoliation syndrome hist