コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 oons in patients undergoing femoro-popliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.
2 rug-eluting stents over bare metal stents or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone, particularl
3 was smaller in the medical group versus the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS
4 roke that is increasingly being treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS
6 and D lesions are not randomized and receive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting or fe
7 to receive either femoropopliteal bypass or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting; pati
10 porary studies (2005-2015) on the effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment
12 lloon angioplasty group and the conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group had similar
16 treatment of peripheral artery disease with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is limited by the
17 ctory angina pectoris when bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is not indicated.
19 oved the likelihood of technical success for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of dialysis access
20 ents, mortality, and clinical progression to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or loss of patency
23 of a paclitaxel DCB (n = 1,837) and uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (n = 143) we
24 f patients with critical limb ischemia using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bail-out
25 l restenosis and reintervention rates versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and improve
27 treatment with a low-dose DCB or an uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon.
28 dy of mature accesses that underwent balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) between Janu
29 ngioplasty (DCBA) compared with conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for below-th
30 el drug-eluting balloons versus conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the redu
31 We compared a paclitaxel-coated balloon with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the trea
32 ed balloon (DCB) angioplasty versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients
35 eserved for lesions that are not amenable to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or for recur
37 runs were higher (all P<.001) than those for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), as were rad
38 study was to compare long-term outcomes with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), stent place
39 To compare mortality after DCB or uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), we aggregat
40 e 1-year outcomes compared with conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), yet durabil
43 d Trial of IN.PACT Admiral Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty [PTA] Balloon Cath
44 gned to DCB (n=200) or standard angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]) (n=100).
46 r interventions include balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [standard], drug-c
47 (2 with subclavian-carotid bypass and 5 with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty stenting of the su
48 , and reinterventions after femoro-popliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty up to 1 year of fo
49 o has successfully undergone angiography and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using CO2 as the s
51 popliteal atherosclerotic disease undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were randomized to
52 c femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with a paclitaxel-