ライフサイエンスコーパス: perforation

1 and one in the regorafenib group (intestinal perforation).

2 reening-related harms (including bleeding or perforation).

3 ly through the gastric mucosa while avoiding perforation.

4 kin preparation based on laser-induced micro-perforation.

5 to treatment, including one grade 4 colonic perforation.

6 cavity, which raised a suspicion of duodenal perforation.

7 ue to theoretical risk and reported cases of perforation.

8 Its most feared complication is intestinal perforation.

9 hy to bilateral corneal melt with subsequent perforation.

10 is, stercoral ulcer formation and subsequent perforation.

11 secondary to corneal melting, scarring, and perforation.

12 tible with small bowel ischemia-necrosis and perforation.

13 abdominal surgery without cecal ligation and perforation.

14 association between specific US findings and perforation.

15 ding, protein loss, stricture formation, and perforation.

16 rane compared with patients without membrane perforation.

17 iated with increased risk of histopathologic perforation.

18 ed with an increased rate of histopathologic perforation.

19 hickness, residual bone height, and membrane perforation.

20 ke-free survival for all types of esophageal perforation.

21 nto the pelvic region that caused intestinal perforation.

22 selected patients at risk of intraoperative perforation.

23 or diagnosis of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation.

24 plenic flexure with pneumatosis and signs of perforation.

25 nd, which was essential to repair the midgut perforation.

26 in our department for duodenal diverticulum perforation.

27 computed tomography confirmed the intestinal perforation.

28 on-threatening complication, such as corneal perforation.

29 olicitation of the area to avoid inadvertent perforation.

30 perative findings consistent with intestinal perforation.

31 r corneal melting, and 1 (0.83%) for corneal perforation.

32 open prongs of a needle holder during needle perforation.

33 ts counterbalanced by small risk of coronary perforation.

34 eated after a second perforation and a third perforation.

35 attachment, oligomer assembly, and membrane perforation.

36 edural abrupt closure, slow or no reflow, or perforations.

37 GDD tubes affects the performance of needle perforations.

38 , of which 101 (18.7%) had intraoperative DM perforations.

39 y center, with and without intraoperative DM perforations.

40 wed spherical and irregular vesicles without perforations.

41 uces a thinning of trabeculae and trabecular perforations.

42 hments and 37.1% (13/35) experienced retinal perforations.

43 he tissue without causing complete thickness perforations.

44 s associated with small increase in coronary perforation (1.18 [1.04-1.35], P<0.01).

45 nal stoma formation in children, while bowel perforation (14, 31.8%) was the main indications in adul

46 Four patients experienced colonic perforation, 2 of whom required surgery.

47 Ileon was the most frequent site of perforation (20 patients).

48 uperficial ulcers; 2b: deep ulcers); type 3: perforation (3a: perforation without communication with

49 colonoscopy in asymptomatic persons included perforations (4/10,000 procedures, 95% CI, 2-5 in 10,000

50 ality (1% versus 0.4%; P=0.016) and coronary perforation (7.1% versus 3.1%; P<0.001) occurred more fr

51 Gastrointestinal perforation, a hole in the human gastrointestinal system

52 tions showed a 2.85-fold increased hazard of perforation after controlling for baseline infiltrate de

53 We describe an ascending colon perforation after implantation of a peritoneal drainage

54 Measurements were repeated after a second perforation and a third perforation.

55 The risk of perforation and bleeding was comparable.

56 ocedural complications such as radial artery perforation and compartment syndrome are rare following

57 MainOutcomeMeasures: Rate of intraoperative perforation and conversion to penetrating keratoplasty (

58 Clinicians should consider the risk of perforation and counsel patients/families accordingly wh

59 Although methods for a periodic perforation and heteroatom doping of graphene sheets hav

60 ery for imperforate anus or focal intestinal perforation and isolated ENS cells.

61 scopy-related complications, including bowel perforation and major bleeding.

62 d fecal disimpaction is indicated to prevent perforation and peritonitis.

63 re lung infection in one patient, intestinal perforation and small intestinal obstruction in one pati

64 y reduce the rate of intraoperative Descemet perforation and the conversion to PK in a multi-surgeon

65 on following DALK, along with intraoperative perforation and the occurrence of a type 2 bubble.

66 ysis was used to analyze the risk of corneal perforation and/or need for TPK.

67 s the odds of the patient developing corneal perforation and/or needing TPK (95% CI, 1.18-4.40; P = .

68 those at highest risk for developing corneal perforation and/or needing TPK.

69 third had a 71.4% risk of developing corneal perforation and/or needing TPK.

70 1.67; P = .002) increased odds of developing perforation and/or needing TPK.

71 at predict a high risk of developing corneal perforation and/or the need to undergo therapeutic penet

72 bone remodelling, and are thought to prevent perforations and maintain microstructure.

73 IG had significantly fewer perforations and serious complications than the AR group

74 of IG and AR resulted in significantly fewer perforations and serious complications than the NG group

75 There were two cardiac perforations and three cases of major bleeding in the ab

76 the experimental group (<1%; large intestine perforation) and two patients in the standard group (1%;

77 ection, one other neoplasms, and two colonic perforations) and one died due to sepsis.

78 mplications (abscess, fistula, stricture, or perforation), and severity of the inflammation.

79 eonatorum can cause corneal scarring, ocular perforation, and blindness as early as 24 hours after bi

80 verse events-febrile neutropenia, intestinal perforation, and cholangitis-were reported by one patien

81 ix, presence of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation, and establishment of an alternative diagnos

82 tivariable analysis, bile duct injury, bowel perforation, and high clinical severity were associated

83 postablation esophageal ulcers progressed to perforation, and no patient without esophageal thermal u

84 No serious AEs, no retinal detachment or perforation, and no significant changes in intraocular p

85 scess or pseudoaneurysm, vegetation, leaflet perforation, and paravalvular leakage), and (c) they use

86 or results for vegetation detection, leaflet perforation, and paravalvular leakage.Supplemental mater

87 SCVA), 3-month infiltrate/scar size, corneal perforation, and re-epithelialization rates stratified b

88 r specimen outcome (suboptimal TME specimen, perforation, and/or R1 resection) on multivariate analys

89 3-month visual acuity and scar size, corneal perforation, and/or the need for therapeutic penetrating

90 acuity outcomes compared to those without DM perforations, and did not have any increased risk of gra

91 Complications due to cardiac perforation (aOR: 2.98; p = 0.007), other cardiac (aOR:

92 otal 15 (11%) enteric fever cases with ileal perforation are similar to the clinically diagnosed case

93 Tube perforations are a common method of achieving early intr

94 mortality associated with typhoid abdominal perforations are high.

95 d pathogen-induced host cell plasma membrane perforation as a novel mechanism used by diverse pathoge

96 Knowledge of spontaneous perforation as a potential complication of previously un

97 olonoscopy complications, specifically bowel perforation, aspiration pneumonia, and splenic injury.

98 However, the risk of perforation associated with anesthesia services was incr

99 CI 1.23-5.1), diagnosis of single intestinal perforation at laparotomy (aOR 3.1 95% CI 1.05-9.3), and

100 e following US findings were correlated with perforation at multivariate analysis: maximum appendicea

101 atening corneal complications (ulceration or perforation) at presentation were evaluated using multiv

102 We found one perforation attributed to methylnaltrexone.

103 generalized linear model to estimate excess perforations attributed to the typhoid epidemic, using t

104 ating between mural haematoma and a duodenal perforation because the latter requires immediate surgic

105 We excluded cases with preexisting corneal perforations before surgery.

106 Tube perforations behave like pressure-sensitive valves, open

107 rescriptions was used to compare the rate of perforation between quinolone and neomycin plus hydrocor

108 ing pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding, and perforation between the two groups (P > 0.05).

109 stones clearance, incidence of pancreatitis, perforation, bleeding, as well as, decrease in size of s

110 phosphonate therapy is effective at reducing perforations but may also cause microcrack accumulation,

111 te-treated fracture patients exhibited fewer perforations but more numerous and larger microcracks th

112 ients with a contained duodenal diverticular perforation can be managed conservatively at the outset.

113 y, one reason for the higher number of ileal perforation cases in Pakistan could be the circulation o

114 h radiological diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation caused by fish bone detected by CT between 2

115 The second and third successive perforations caused lower opening and closing pressures.

116 odenal wall haematoma and traumatic duodenal perforation causing pneumoretroperitoneum in two patient

117 traction who experienced vascular or cardiac perforations clinically presented with hemothoraces rath

118 ult Wistar rats underwent cecal ligation and perforation (CLP), and serum and brain (hippocampus and

119 ely inhibit the sequential steps in membrane perforation, combined with video microscopy, electron to

120 Bending the tube after perforation could close a slit and prevent leakage at hi

121 Coronary perforation (CP) during chronic total occlusion percutan

122 The evidence base for coronary perforation (CP) occurring during percutaneous coronary

123 The primary outcome was bowel perforation, defined using a validated algorithm.

124 splantation complicated by posterior corneal perforation demonstrated a corneal hydrops, evident both

125 t prevent membrane resealing, revealing that perforation-dependent L. monocytogenes endocytosis is di

126 7%, 70%) (151 of 237) (P < .001) and leaflet perforation detection, 81% (95% CI: 71%, 88%) (74 of 91)

127 ly related to the implant procedure: cardiac perforation, device dislocation, and femoral vascular ac

128 o recognize and treat complications, such as perforations, dissections, hemodynamic collapse, no-refl

129 ign body density, compatible with intestinal perforation due to migration of the biliary stent.

130 8 years old without predisposing factors for perforation during a 6-month look-back period entered th

131 One grade 3 fatigue and 1 grade 4 intestinal perforation during catheter implantation were observed.

132 esions are at potential higher risk of bowel perforation during implantation of an indwelling periton

133 typhoid fever accounts for 43% of all bowel perforation during the period of enhanced surveillance.

134 30-day and 90-day mortality from esophageal perforation (EP), paraesophageal hernia causing obstruct

135 S findings are significantly associated with perforation, especially the presence of complex periappe

136 nagement of patients presenting with colonic perforation, especially those with risk factors for CC.

137 ific clinical presentations makes dietary FB perforation extremely difficult to diagnose, being a lap

138 ith colon complications, including ischemia, perforation, fistula, stricture/obstruction, and fulmina

139 ageal wall disruptions were seen in areas of perforation/fistula.

140 Delayed small bowel perforation following BAT is thought to occur secondary

141 the first case report of delayed small bowel perforation following BAT with extensive portomesenteric

142 any other case report of delayed small bowel perforation following BAT without signs of intraabdomina

143 Isolated small bowel perforation following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is an

144 mbrane thickness was 0.84 +/- 0.67 mm in the perforation group and 2.65 +/- 4.02 mm in the non-perfor

145 ridge thickness was 2.78 +/- 1.37 mm in the perforation group and 4.21 +/- 2.09 mm in the non-perfor

146 ients had Schneiderian membrane perforation (perforation group).

147 ration group and 4.21 +/- 2.09 mm in the non-perforation group.

148 ration group and 2.65 +/- 4.02 mm in the non-perforation group.

149 Patients who experienced membrane perforation had a thinner membrane compared with patient

150 sured within 30 days, including colonic (ie, perforation, hemorrhage, abdominal pain), anesthesia-ass

151 EoE patients are in risk of oesophageal perforation, if so, management may be conservative but m

152 Patients with perforation/impending corneal perforation were excluded

153 Moreover, epidermal micro-perforation improved antigen capture by epidermal dendri

154 cohort of patients with confirmed intestinal perforation in 2016 and performed enhanced microbiologic

155 s respectively, P=0.31) showed an ulcerative perforation in a high power group patient (treated by en

156 ce of spontaneously healed posterior scleral perforation in a severe ballistic trauma without previou

157 n, which favors the right colon, spontaneous perforation in CC has in all cases involved the left col

158 "Spontaneous" perforation in CC, in which no instigating factor is ide

159 rate of PED, corneal ulceration, and corneal perforation in chronic oGVHD to be 8.1%, 6.2%, and 4%, r

160 Independent associates of perforation in native vessels included age, chronic occl

161 atients and has been misdiagnosed as colonic perforation in previously reported cases of retroperiton

162 als, dehiscence in five (8.62%), and mucosal perforation in seven (12.07%).

163 ntified in one patient and tympanic membrane perforation in seven patients, as the primary injury.

164 aimed to characterize typhoid-related ileal perforation in the context of the population-based Surve

165 the odds of developing corneal ulceration or perforation in the first year.

166 disease underwent emergent laparotomy for a perforation in the terminal ileum and recovered.

167 s the generation and dynamic distribution of perforations in the basement membrane by regulating the

168 Management of the DM perforations included a combination of intracameral air

169 utcomes were frequent in those patients with perforation including bleeding, transfusion, myocardial

170 Our results showed that epidermal micro-perforation increased trans-epidermal water loss, result

171 Allowing the GDD tube to bend during needle perforation increases the risk of very low opening and c

172 avioral abnormalities following endovascular perforation induction of SAH in mice, a heavily-utilized

173 DALK cases with DM perforations intraoperatively are often able to be manag

174 Cases with DM perforations intraoperatively have equivalent visual acu

175 Esophageal perforation is a dreaded complication of atrial fibrilla

176 Spontaneous perforation is a rare and serious complication of CC.

177 Perforation is a rare but potentially lethal complicatio

178 and mortality rates, and delayed small bowel perforation is even rarer.

179 Schneiderian membrane thickness and membrane perforation is examined in lateral window sinus augmenta

180 y, and radiology, the etiology of intestinal perforation is frequently assumed but rarely confirmed.

181 ) subsequent to LLO-mediated plasma membrane perforation is required for the activation of a conventi

182 honeycomb lattice of periodic sub-wavelength perforations is characterised by local pressure field me

183 nvironment following intestinal hollow-organ perforation leads to peritonitis and fulminant sepsis.

184 ere we report the repair of gastrointestinal perforation made by a needle-puncture wound in the silkw

185 olizumab (unspecified cause, large intestine perforation, malignant neoplasm progression, and Stevens

186 ssification system for duodenal diverticulum perforation may help clinicians in making essential ther

187 Anesthesia-related injuries included globe perforation (n = 17), death (n = 13), retrobulbar hemorr

188 e most common pathology (n = 29) followed by perforation (n = 18), fistula (n = 12), inflammatory str

189 cations included loss of suction (n = 1) and perforation (n = 4).

190 uction during trephination (n = 2, 2.3%) and perforation (n = 4, 4.6%).

191 s included bile duct injury (n = 397), bowel perforation (n = 96), and hemorrhage (n = 78).

192 ism (n=2), sepsis (n=1), and small intestine perforation (n=1).

193 In 5 of 832 patients (0.6%), an esophageal perforation (n=3) or an esophagopericardial or atrioesop

194 y was associated with a high rate of retinal perforations (n = 13) and retinal detachments (n = 6).

195 Rates of laparoscopy, perforation, negative appendectomy, morbidity, length of

196 Bleeding and perforation occur at rates <1%.

197 As major complication one small bowel perforation occurred (1/59; 1.7%).

198 Interventricular septal perforation occurred (as late sequela) after 2 weeks in

199 Cardiac perforation occurred in 1 patient who had undergone prev

200 The most common steps at which DM perforation occurred intraoperatively were during deep l

201 Esophageal perforation occurred only in patients with category 2 le

202 No perforation occurred.

203 of AA did not significantly increase risk of perforation (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence inter

204 with secondary peritonitis as a result of a perforation of a hollow viscus or anastomotic insufficie

205 r pancreatic-cutaneous fistula, bleeding and perforation of a visceral organ) or death during 6 month

206 Intraoperative perforation of Descemet membrane occurred in 15 of 58 (2

207 Intraoperative perforation of Descemet membrane occurred in 45.4% of ey

208 incarcerated/strangulated abdominal hernia, perforation of esophagus, small or large bowel, and pept

209 Perforation of the appendix was the only independent ris

210 ts and the most common cause of foreign body perforation of the GI tract.

211 a severe complication of EoE is spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus.

212 ) transplantation complicated by inadvertent perforation of the posterior corneal stroma and Descemet

213 Perforation of tympanic membranes and middle ear hemorrh

214 acks to propagate without branching from the perforations of the horizontal well casing, which are ty

215 A legacy effect of perforation on 12-month mortality was observed.

216 A legacy effect of perforation on mortality was evident, with an odds ratio

217 Perforations on the posterior side are essential for pri

218 11% of cases develop intraoperative scleral perforation or retinal redetachment.

219 risk of aspiration pneumonia, but not bowel perforation or splenic injury.

220 outcome of the trial was the rate of corneal perforation or the need for therapeutic penetrating kera

221 verall, no difference in the rate of corneal perforation or the need for TPK was determined for oral

222 s secondary analysis was the rate of corneal perforation or the need to undergo TPK.

223 conazole had a 0.43-fold decreased hazard of perforation or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty comp

224 arium species might have a decreased rate of perforation or TPK in the oral voriconazole-treated arm;

225 : healed/improving, or poor: enlarged ulcer, perforation or transplant/glue).

226 OR 6.97, 95% CI 6.60-7.37), and peptic ulcer perforation (OR 3.67, 95% CI 3.40-3.96).

227 71, 95% CI 1.31-2.24), small and large bowel perforation (OR 4.33, 95% CI 4.12-4.56), and peptic ulce

228 OR 4.33, 95% CI 4.12-4.56), and peptic ulcer perforation (OR 4.63, 95% CI 4.27-5.02).

229 06, 95% CI 3.03-5.44), small and large bowel perforation (OR 6.97, 95% CI 6.60-7.37), and peptic ulce

230 OR = 5.09, P = .002), intraoperative central perforation (OR = 6.09, P = .03), and type 2 bubble form

231 ost-procedure stent migration, stent-related perforation, or stent-related deaths.

232 ned as final visual acuity </=20/80, corneal perforation, or the need for keratoplasty.

233 No deaths, cardiac perforations, or atrioesophageal fistulas occurred.

234 of typhoid fever lead to an excess of 0.046 perforations per clinical typhoid fever case (95% CI, .0

235 them, 47 patients had Schneiderian membrane perforation (perforation group).

236 lem by showing that vessel pit vesturing and perforation plate morphologies can modify relationships

237 fferent pit vesturing (presence/absence) and perforation plate morphology (simple/scalariform and qua

238 uberances associated with bordered pits) and perforation plate morphology could alter the relationshi

239 were covered with a surface film, but vessel perforation plate openings and intervessel pits were fil

240 w diameter vessels, compared with the simple perforation plates in older secondary xylem, which may f

241 Perforation plates were dimorphic, with more steeply ang

242 limates for species with vestures and simple perforation plates, compared to nonvestured species and

243 essel pits first, followed by bubbles within perforation plates, which hold the last volumes of air w

244 ardiac failure, myocarditis, large intestine perforation, pneumonia, and pulmonary embolism) and two

245 es that of neutralizing antibodies, membrane perforation presents a brief opportunity for a new strat

246 f neurological sequelae, sequelae of gastric perforation, pulmonary embolus, and disease progression.

247 ndicitis does not statistically increase the perforation rate in adult and pediatric patients receivi

248 al, the association between SMT and membrane perforation rate was studied.

249 tive lipid extraction mechanism for membrane perforation represents another distinct process that con

250 ithout corticosteroids, increase the risk of perforation requiring tympanoplasty following tympanosto

251 r drops is associated with increased risk of perforations requiring tympanoplasty, which appears to b

252 several case reports published on abdominal perforation resulting from stercoral colitis.

253 Endovascular perforation SAH rat model, brain slices and cultured per

254 not a statistically significant predictor of perforation, scar size, or final visual acuity.

255 Finally, we observed that epidermal micro-perforation significantly increased the level of the spe

256 gency laparotomy and sutured closure of both perforation sites was performed.

257 Skin micro-perforation slightly activated keratinocytes without ind

258 No perforations, steam pops, or thrombus were noted.

259 acetate plus prednisone group (gastric ulcer perforation, sudden death, and cerebrovascular accident)

260 dds ratio for 12-month mortality of 1.35 for perforation survivors compared with matched nonperforati

261 dds ratio for 12-month mortality of 1.60 for perforation survivors compared with matched nonperforati

262 group was subjected to a cecal ligation and perforation technique, whereas the control (sham) group

263 naling events activated upon plasma membrane perforation that lead to bacterial internalization.

264 umber of nanopores, the septal peptidoglycan perforations that likely accommodate septal junctions.

265 One patient suffered from a delayed perforation the day after the procedure and needed emerg

266 respect to intraoperative Descemet membrane perforation, the rate of successful big-bubble formation

267 ty; infiltrate or scar size or both; rate of perforation; therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK);

268 Tympanic membrane perforation (TMP) was identified as 2 inpatient or outpa

269 tion, and surgery is necessary to repair the perforation to prevent an abdominal abscess or sepsis.

270 rix metalloproteinases and basement membrane perforations-to the posterior side of the embryo.

271 Age, intraoperative central DM perforation, type 2 bubble formation, and presence of sc

272 One patient suffered a ventricular wire perforation, unrelated to the antegrade LAMPOON techniqu

273 transmittance of the hybrid construct after perforation was approximately 15-fold higher than before

274 Perforation was associated with adverse outcomes, with a

275 Schneiderian membrane perforation was associated with decreased residual bone

276 Perforation was defined by its diagnosis code followed b

277 ntraoperatively a small infected left atrial perforation was oversewn and a fistula to the right main

278 A diagnosis of gallbladder perforation was performed.

279 lity rate from typhoid-associated intestinal perforation was substantial at 18% (2/11).

280 The prevalence rates of corneal ulcer and perforation were 6.2% and 4.0%, respectively, over 8 yea

281 Patients with perforation/impending corneal perforation were excluded from the study.

282 ith recent abdominal procedures or contained perforation were excluded.

283 In graft PCI, predictors of perforation were history of stroke, New York Heart Assoc

284 Overall, larger and deeper perforations were found in the skin models with increasi

285 3, including one diagnosed after intestinal perforation, were diagnosed before the present analyses.

286 nagement of intraoperative Descemet membrane perforation, where possible, may be safer than conversio

287 t cardiac surgery, or clinically significant perforation), whereas de-escalation was more frequent am

288 In contrast to procedure-related perforation, which favors the right colon, spontaneous p

289 ded as a key factor for influencing membrane perforation, which may jeopardize the final clinical out

290 One (<1%) patient had Stapfer II perforation, which resolved spontaneously with conservat

291 Cases of ileal perforation who survived were more likely to have sought

292 tember 2019, all cases of nontraumatic ileal perforation with a clinical diagnosis of typhoid were en

293 dness comparable to diamond, is resistant to perforation with a diamond indenter and shows a reversib

294 of quinolone ear drops increased the risk of perforation with intact tympanic membranes and acute oti

295 ted for histopathology 4 (5%) revealed ileal perforation with necrosis.

296 fever or with a nontraumatic terminal ileal perforation, with a median cost of illness per case of U

297 to quinolone ear drops had a higher risk of perforation, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.61 (95%

298 A continued excess mortality occurred after perforation, with an odds ratio for 12-month mortality o

299 was comparable for detection of appendiceal perforation, with MR imaging (n = 103) sensitivity of 90

300 ; 2b: deep ulcers); type 3: perforation (3a: perforation without communication with the atria; 3b: at