コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ts of greater perfusion defect on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
2 ine SR showed good agreement with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
3 cal atherosclerotic disease using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
4 pulmonary embolism, supplanting ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy.
5 as a new stress modality in combination with perfusion scintigraphy.
6 19 who underwent CT pulmonary angiography or perfusion scintigraphy.
7 n extracted from adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, a commonly performed test, is of
8 or cost-effective applications of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, a large amount of research has r
9 butamine stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and dipyridamole stress testing c
10 er, its accuracy in comparison to myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and to that of high dose DE remai
12 accuracy similar to both CTA and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, at lower cost and with lower rad
15 is diameter 55%+/-11%), underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for documentation of reversible p
16 echocardiography may be more versatile than perfusion scintigraphy for identifying the presence and
18 ch as stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy have limited accuracy, and newer
19 , semiautomated CT densitometry, and (99m)Tc perfusion scintigraphy in 28 patients being evaluated fo
20 We sought to study the accuracy of exercise perfusion scintigraphy in patients with an implanted api
26 sess the clinical value of stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in elderly patients (> or =
27 xtent and severity of ischemia on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is commonly used to risk-st
28 ssive and recurring; thus, stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is widely used to identify
32 rmine appropriateness ratings for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), stress echocardiography (S
34 value for myocardial ischemia on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy of all parameters was compared us
35 o reduction in ischemic burden on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy or in the safety endpoints of maj
36 went lower-extremity ultrasound, ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, or both, followed by pulmonary C
37 ventional pulmonary angiography, ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, or lower-extremity ultrasonograp
40 Myocardial contractile reserve and resting perfusion scintigraphy provide independent information t
43 onal flow reserve (FFR) compared with stress perfusion scintigraphy (SPS) in patients with recent uns
44 99m)Tc-macroaggregated albumin ((99m)Tc-MAA) perfusion scintigraphy to estimate the liver-to-lung shu
45 ical practice catheter cerebral angiography, perfusion scintigraphy, transcranial Doppler sonography,
48 or rule out CTEPH should include ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, which has high sensitivity and a
49 tients underwent angiographic assessment and perfusion scintigraphy with (99m)Tc-MAA before lobar (90
50 g for carbon monoxide (DLCO), Tc99m-MAA lung perfusion scintigraphy with PS and SPECT/CT quantificati