ライフサイエンスコーパス: pericardial fluid

1 , 28.9% demonstrated cardiac motion and 8.6% pericardial fluid.

2 The diagnosis is often troublesome because pericardial fluid analysis or biopsy does not always pro

3 tuberculous pericarditis in 36 specimens of pericardial fluid and 19 specimens of pericardial tissue

4 The likelihood of survival if pericardial fluid and cardiac motion were both absent wa

5 rameter describing the diffusion between the pericardial fluid and epicardium [L/h].

6 te or inadequate with presence or absence of pericardial fluid and/or cardiac motion.

7 Enrolled patients underwent pleural- or pericardial-fluid and blood sampling for ddPCR EGFR test

8 epicardium, midmyocardium, endocardium, and pericardial fluid, and accounted for cardiac metabolism

9 Gata6(+) macrophages in mouse pericardial fluid contributed to the reparative immune r

10 cy caused by the progressive accumulation of pericardial fluid (effusion), blood, pus or air in the p

11 However, pericardial fluid endostatin levels were nearly 40% lowe

12 algorithm for the microbiological workup of pericardial fluid for possible Nocardia spp. is describe

13 We phenotyped cells obtained from pericardial fluid from patients diagnosed with dilated c

14 Kprest, 0.01 for the blood flow through the pericardial fluid [L/h], and 0.78 for the P-parameter de

15 Pericardial fluid levels of endostatin, but not VEGF, ar

16 = 76), cerebral spinal fluid (CSF; n = 152), pericardial fluid (n = 131), or urine (n = 173) specimen

17 as isolated after prolonged culture from the pericardial fluid of a human immunodeficiency virus-infe

18 sEVs from bone marrow (BM)-CD34(+) cells and pericardial fluid (PF) are proangiogenic.

19 uated the diagnostic accuracy of urinary and pericardial fluid (PF) lipoarabinomannan (LAM) assays in

20 pericardial tamponade, and after removal of pericardial fluid (reperfusion period).

21 Pericardial fluid samples were obtained at the time of s

22 Initial pericardial fluid study results are presented in the Tab

23 Gata6(+) macrophages were present in human pericardial fluid, supporting the notion that this repar

24 The sensitivity of PCR with pericardial fluid was poor, and false-positive results w

25 118.1 U/L (normal range, 0.0-11.3 U/L) from pericardial fluid was reported from the laboratory.

26 A pericardial drain was placed and pericardial fluid was sent to the laboratory for evaluat

27 Pericardial fluid was then removed, and iloprost or norm

28 r, platelet count <20,000/mul, and malignant pericardial fluid were independently associated with poo