コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ronmental signals (e.g., seasonal changes in photoperiod).
2 diposity is reduced naturally independent of photoperiod.
3 ffect on their subsequent sensitivity to the photoperiod.
4 either a standard photoperiod or a long day photoperiod.
5 ften precisely timed and entrained by annual photoperiod.
6 is late-flowering with a reduced response to photoperiod.
7 idence of reproductive dormancy even in long photoperiod.
8 l inductive signals, including long-day (LD) photoperiod.
9 d by reduced cell elongation during the cold photoperiod.
10 s, suggesting these species are sensitive to photoperiod.
11 similar phenotypes to grxs17 in response to photoperiod.
12 clear domains regulated by light quality and photoperiod.
13 l environmental cues such as temperature and photoperiod.
14 cating a strong interaction between PHYC and photoperiod.
15 t of flowering time repression in a long-day photoperiod.
16 n SCN neurons of mice exposed to a short-day photoperiod.
17 ion in Arabidopsis thaliana are regulated by photoperiod.
18 sses and seasonal changes in temperature and photoperiod.
19 g performance after exposure to the long-day photoperiod.
20 o large-effect QTLs which influence critical photoperiod.
21 eightened corticosterone response when in SA photoperiod.
22 mplicated in measurement and response to the photoperiod.
23 plays a role in metabolic acclimation to the photoperiod.
24 ility and ability to acclimate to an altered photoperiod.
25 Suc-induced hypocotyl elongation under short photoperiods.
26 flowering under both long-day and short-day photoperiods.
27 mis) under floral inductive and noninductive photoperiods.
28 flowering is extremely delayed in inductive photoperiods.
29 ring early under noninductive short-day (SD) photoperiods.
30 on of BBX19 delays flowering under inductive photoperiods.
31 after cold exposure as well as in different photoperiods.
32 response to exposure to short- and long-day photoperiods.
33 ike (LD 8:16), or Long summer-like (LD 16:8) photoperiods.
34 c isolation personnel are exposed to extreme photoperiods.
35 r short (winter-like) and long (summer-like) photoperiods.
36 C(AB) mutant of the central photoperiod gene photoperiod 1 (PPD1) and its downstream target flowering
38 e photoperiod pathway such as GIGANTEA (GI), PHOTOPERIOD 1 (PPD1/PRR37), CONSTANS (CO), and florigen/
40 n both temperature (27 --> 10 degrees C) and photoperiod (16 --> 8 h light) is required to induce a t
43 ed seedlings to growth conditions with short photoperiod (8/16 h) and low temperature/ambient CO2 (LT
44 iza melanocephala) is day active under short photoperiods (8 h light:16 h dark, short day sensitive).
47 tion to changes in light:dark regimes (i.e., photoperiod) allows organisms living at temperate latitu
50 t EYA proteins, which peak at night in short photoperiod and accumulate at higher levels in the cold,
53 pamine and serotonin systems are impacted by photoperiod and are consistently associated with affecti
54 igin indicates likely roles for genes in the photoperiod and autonomous pathways in generating switch
55 dividually mediated the relationship between photoperiod and both anhedonia and low mood, while midbr
56 alters seasonal conditions without altering photoperiod and can thus create a cue-environment mismat
63 de recycling and de novo synthesis, and that photoperiod and photon flux could toggle this switch.
64 e domestication gene thought to be linked to photoperiod and reproduction (thyroid-stimulating hormon
74 es that explained the genetic variation were photoperiod and the onset of spring, the Julian date of
75 hese [Ca(2+) ](cyt) transients depend on the photoperiod and time of day, peaking at anticipated dusk
76 erences in time to heading that remain after photoperiod and vernalisation requirements have been sat
77 ing-time QTLs are detected across a range of photoperiod and vernalization conditions, suggesting tha
80 Wild types also were analyzed in various photoperiods and after transfer to free-running light or
81 in adult female wasps subjected to different photoperiods and identified substantial differential met
83 s temporal uncoupling became larger in short photoperiods and may reflect the differing dependence of
84 is grown around the world at a wide range of photoperiods and temperatures, which may influence both
89 g, including cool ambient temperature, short photoperiod, and vernalization, all increased petal numb
90 ing time among accessions grown in different photoperiods, and FT is more highly expressed in vernali
91 velopment compared to mice raised under Long photoperiods, and significantly decreased serotonin and
94 ed by photoperiodic changes, and that longer photoperiods are associated with higher neuronal density
96 ogy was altered when grown under a short-day photoperiod, at 22 degrees C, and a long-day photoperiod
98 conditions other than climate - for example photoperiod, biotic interactions, or edaphic conditions
99 is, we found decreased melanization at short photoperiods but no change in melanization at long photo
100 nually consistent physiological responses to photoperiod, but conditions at their breeding grounds de
101 ELF3 suppresses flowering under noninductive photoperiods by blocking GA production and FT1 expressio
106 her expression at 15 degrees C and 14 h/10 h photoperiod (conditions representing end of vegetative g
107 ion were assessed in mice reared in seasonal photoperiods consisting of light/dark cycles of 8:16, 16
108 wheat revealed a novel mutation within the "photoperiod critical" region in a subset of T. compactum
109 ility in cumulative forcing requirements and photoperiod cues across species and forest types, and sh
110 mRNA expression is dependent on longer-term photoperiod cues and is unresponsive to acute, short-ter
114 re control seedlings were acclimated to long photoperiod (day/night 14/10 h), warm temperature (22 de
118 o improve yield potential by fine-tuning the photoperiod-dependent control of inflorescence developme
119 howed that GmPRR3b(H6) displays rhythmic and photoperiod-dependent expression and is preferentially i
122 s a circadian clock gene that contributes to photoperiod-dependent flowering in plants, with loss-of-
123 Thus, we propose the recruitment model of photoperiod-dependent flowering where NF-Y complexes, bo
124 ger (CrDOF) gene controls transcription in a photoperiod-dependent manner, and its misexpression infl
127 genomic regions underlying a > 2 h critical photoperiod difference between allopatric populations, a
128 re cue thresholds are experienced at shorter photoperiods, disrupting the optimal seasonal timing of
130 adian clock had to adapt to extreme seasonal photoperiods during their colonisation of temperate regi
132 ve cycles is the change in day length (i.e., photoperiod), encoded by the pattern of melatonin secret
133 ve growth, as well as their insensitivity to photoperiod, establish a dual role for phytochromes to a
135 ts after SA or normal active (NA; 12:12 L:D) photoperiod exposure during gestation and early life.
137 cetylation were observed following short-day photoperiod exposure in both TH+ and SST+ neurons at 1 a
139 will determine the mechanism(s) by which SA photoperiod exposure influences brain development to pre
140 ypersensitive to short active (SA; 19:5 L:D) photoperiod exposure versus their wildtype (WT) litterma
141 and is linked to the pattern of day length (photoperiod) exposure experienced by the mother during p
143 s (Arabidopsis thaliana) was grown in a 12-h photoperiod for 19 d, shifted to three different reduced
144 We also assessed variation in the critical photoperiod for flowering and surveyed neutral genetic m
145 gated the genetics of divergence in critical photoperiod for flowering between yellow monkeyflowers M
146 gated the genetics of divergence in critical photoperiod for flowering between yellow monkeyflowers M
147 photoperiod for VRN2 but was independent of photoperiod for ODDSOC2 We also find this warm temperatu
148 addition, this re-activation is regulated by photoperiod for VRN2 but was independent of photoperiod
149 The research in this study aims to separate photoperiod from vernalization and dormancy through a se
150 lation in the phyC(AB) mutant of the central photoperiod gene photoperiod 1 (PPD1) and its downstream
152 ys responsible for the flowering response to photoperiod have been extensively studied in Arabidopsis
153 ther circadian clock genes, HIGH RESPONSE TO PHOTOPERIOD (HR) and DIE NEUTRALIS (DNE), suggests a com
154 rly flowering and a decreased sensitivity to photoperiod in a manner similar to a cdf loss-of-functio
155 sted that very high temperatures during long photoperiods in early summer might also induce cessation
156 l assay, at the transition between different photoperiods, in order to test this proposal in a minima
157 d that melatonin supplementation and a short photoperiod increase brown adipose tissue (BAT) mass.
158 we analyzed the roles of the SWR1c subunits, PHOTOPERIOD-INDEPENDENT EARLY FLOWERING1 (PIE1), ACTIN-R
159 genes for Arabidopsis SWR1 complex subunits photoperiod-independent Early Flowering1, actin-related
160 directly represses FT expression to prevent photoperiod-independent flowering, whereas at dusk EMF1
161 tiation and reduced axillary bud number in a photoperiod-independent manner but promoted floret devel
162 ly, long-duration melatonin signals on short photoperiods induce circadian repressors including DEC1,
165 as examined using flowering-time mutants and photoperiod-induced flowering to separate flowering from
168 expression of circadian genes changes during photoperiod-induced seasonal life-history states (LHSs).
169 ggest the involvement of circadian system in photoperiod induction of seasonal LHSs in a migratory sp
170 sults show that contrasting temperatures and photoperiods influence the sensory quality of broccoli f
171 V bolus injection of chemerin on a 12 h:12 h photoperiod inhibited food intake and decreased body wei
174 cessive sn mutations are early flowering and photoperiod insensitive, with an increased ability to pr
175 ssion is overridden in plants that contain a photoperiod-insensitive allele of Ppd-1, which hastens t
176 of plants transferred from SDs to LDs and in photoperiod-insensitive and transgenic wheat plants with
177 data highlight the possibility of developing photoperiod-insensitive crops by adjusting the allelic c
179 The accelerated inflorescence development of photoperiod-insensitive lines is promoted by advanced se
180 on to the asynchrony between temperature and photoperiod is key to inform our understanding of how sp
183 ation seems to be induced primarily by short photoperiods later in autumn, so warming will likely lea
185 ld (vernalisation) followed by long day (LD) photoperiods leading to elevated expression of the flora
186 lical parthenogen Daphnia magna to different photoperiod lengths co-occurring with warm temperature t
187 field CA and field light signals (like short photoperiod, light intensity and/or light quality) befor
188 er mechanisms may also have a role, such as 'photoperiod limitation' mechanisms that may become ultim
190 sults establish mechanisms by which seasonal photoperiods may dramatically and persistently alter the
192 mbers could govern tuber development through photoperiod-mediated regulation of miR156 is unknown.
194 ine levels were significantly lower in short photoperiod mice, and dopaminergic agonist treatment res
199 lacking on the temporal dynamics in natural photoperiod of photoperiodically regulated genes and the
200 he temperatures 15/9 or 21/15 degrees C, and photoperiods of 12 or 24h, followed by a cold acclimatis
202 for effects of contrasting temperatures and photoperiods on sensory quality and contents of glucosin
206 y be important for the correct regulation of photoperiod pathway genes that have previously been repo
207 homologs of key flowering time genes in the photoperiod pathway such as GIGANTEA (GI), PHOTOPERIOD 1
208 ANS and FLOWERING LOCUS T, components of the photoperiod pathway that regulate flowering time, also c
209 leaf veins specifically at dusk through the photoperiod pathway to induce Arabidopsis flowering.
210 binding to FT chromatin is disrupted by the photoperiod pathway, leading to proper FT activation.
211 sults highlight important differences in the photoperiod pathways of the temperate grasses with those
214 neurons of birds switched to a long-day (LD) photoperiod plus systemically elevated testosterone (T)
217 rthern latitudes of low temperature and long photoperiods, produced bigger floral buds, and florets w
224 review how perception of low temperature and photoperiod regulate the induction of cold acclimation.
225 dian clock to control expression of the main photoperiod-regulated FT gene, FTb2, implying that it pl
227 xpression and that, in response to inductive photoperiods, repression of SVP contributes to the rise
228 l driven by accumulated cold degree-days and photoperiod reproduces most of the interspecific and int
230 ay reproductive development depending on the photoperiod response gene PHOTOPERIOD1 (Ppd-H1) and its
231 we examined the effects of daylength and the photoperiod response gene PHOTOPERIOD1 (Ppd-H1) on barle
233 in pea (Pisum sativum) was one of the first photoperiod response genes to be described and provided
234 , PHOTOPERIOD (PPD), also contributes to the photoperiod response in a similar manner to SN and DNE,
235 (CO) ortholog (Cr-CO) in the control of the photoperiod response in the green alga Chlamydomonas rei
238 lts reveal an important component of the pea photoperiod response pathway and support the view that r
239 of cultivation, and thus modification of the photoperiod response was critical for their domesticatio
240 probably account for the differences in the photoperiod-response system between the relative refract
242 e natural variation in the vernalization and photoperiod responses in Brachypodium distachyon, a smal
243 ng complex genes regulate clock function and photoperiod-responsive flowering and suggest that the fu
245 Thus, PCH1 is a new factor that regulates photoperiod-responsive growth by integrating the clock w
247 ay's rate-limiting enzyme, ninaB1, abolished photoperiod responsiveness independently of visual funct
249 sensitive to high temperatures and long-day photoperiods, resulting in elongated leaves, compromised
251 s and teosinte grown under floral inhibitory photoperiods reveals that both id1 floral inductive acti
253 orghum genotypes, induced by SD treatment in photoperiod-sensitive genotypes, cooperatively repressed
254 Using species-specific temperature- and photoperiod-sensitive vital rates, we estimated the numb
255 Three pea (Pisum sativum) loci controlling photoperiod sensitivity, HIGH RESPONSE (HR), DIE NEUTRAL
258 rkably, the GABAergic activity in a long-day photoperiod shifts from inhibition toward excitation.
259 in many species in the absence of a changing photoperiod signal, leading to the generation of circann
260 DING, KELCH REPEAT, F BOX1 components of the photoperiod-signaling pathway involved in flowering.
261 The expression of AcMFT was regulated by photoperiod similar to that for FT under both long day a
262 tures in early autumn (under relatively long photoperiods), so warming will likely delay cessation an
263 e transferred from a short-day to a long-day photoperiod, suggesting that TPP also plays a role in me
264 lant performance specifically under long day photoperiods, suggesting that humans selected slower cir
265 e brain of monarchs raised in long and short photoperiods, summer monarchs, and fall migrants reveale
266 ior, particularly when studied under a short photoperiod, supporting a possible role for PER3 in mood
267 ed increased miR172 levels under a short-day photoperiod, supporting miR172 regulation via the miR156
268 as associated with environmental conditions (photoperiod, temperature), whereas it was independent of
269 Chilling (autumn/winter) temperatures and photoperiod tend to be important cues for species with e
270 n Siberian hamsters exposed to long day (LD) photoperiods that increase appetite and adiposity, howev
271 al meristem falls when plants are exposed to photoperiods that induce flowering, and this correlates
272 biomass data from two laboratories, for five photoperiods, three accessions, and a transgenic line, h
277 ies of experiments that artificially control photoperiod to prevent the onset of dormancy and chillin
279 bility and level of TIM at night under short photoperiod together with the production of cold-induced
280 regulation of the metabolic networks during photoperiod transition using previously described Arabid
282 into dormancy regulation suggesting a short-photoperiod treatment provides an additive cross-talk ef
286 antiphase light and temperature cycles (cold photoperiod/warm night [-DIF]), most species exhibit red
288 with low mood and anhedonia in females while photoperiod was found to be positively correlated with b
289 served a significant increase in activity as photoperiod was shifted from 13L:11D (light:dark) to 12L
290 xed duration with a start date determined by photoperiod, we find B is tracked by phenotypic plastici
292 by pinealectomy and maintenance in constant photoperiod, were selected when expressing a subjective
293 eriods but no change in melanization at long photoperiods, which is consistent with the greater incre
294 tially modulates flowering time dependent on photoperiod, whilst its presence in lateral root primord
298 We identify extensive variation in critical photoperiod, with most annual populations requiring subs
299 g either a long (EYA3(+)) or short (CHGA(+)) photoperiod, with the relative proportion in each state
300 l flowering of spring barley under inductive photoperiods, with chemical and genetic attenuation of t