ライフサイエンスコーパス: physical distance

1 onemal complex, reflects genetic rather than physical distance.

2 ximizes the ratio of genetic map distance to physical distance.

3 allowing a direct comparison of cRay6000 to physical distance.

4 the lack of evidence on alcohol's effects on physical distance.

5 .e., noise correlations) were independent of physical distance.

6 zero in the ideal limit irrespective of the physical distance.

7 mbination rate, specifically the genetic and physical distance.

8 l candidate genes, showed a rapid decay with physical distance.

9 e disequilibrium is not a simple function of physical distance.

10 w rates of recombination over a considerable physical distance.

11 any such markers can be studied within short physical distances.

12 t maps, and correlate genetic distances with physical distances.

13 stances from the probability distribution of physical distances.

14 interventions such as travel restrictions or physical distancing.

15 n terms of new investments, legislation, and physical distancing.

16 bers can be well-controlled through moderate physical distancing.

17 tive media (Fox News) was related to reduced physical distancing.

18 ng gradient between neighbourhood income and physical distancing.

19 US adults' voluntary behaviors-particularly physical distancing.

20 engage in frequent handwashing, and maintain physical distancing.

21 an drivers to passengers despite masking and physical distancing.

22 combined with other control measures such as physical distancing.

23 wearing (0.47, 0.29 to 0.75, I(2)=84%), and physical distancing (0.75, 0.59 to 0.95, I(2)=87%).

24 t our notion of travel depth, simply put the physical distance a solvent molecule would have to trave

25 t near-constant female, recombination versus physical distance across 21q, explaining the gender-spec

26 decay was rapidly declining with increasing physical distance across all chromosomes.

27 recombination is not a constant function of physical distance across chromosomes.

28 terologies, recombination is proportional to physical distance across the bz gene.

29 modes of all paired plastid genes and their physical distances across user-defined lineages, which a

30 OVID-19-related legislation, and to increase physical distancing adherence in the population, althoug

31 e, based on locational data, as a measure of physical distancing adherence.

32 strings are copied and reinserted over large physical distances, allowing for a duplication block to

33 tion in the relationship between genetic and physical distance along the chromosome.

34 Structural barriers such as physical distance also featured as a challenge to interp

35 used for comparative mapping and to estimate physical distances among markers in many Poaceae species

36 However, lack of physical distancing among health care workers in work ar

37 tes quality control, linkage disequilibrium, physical distance and gene ontology to identify authenti

38 s, in terms of their close relationship with physical distance and recombination rate, their small va

39 ce in body methylation levels increases with physical distance and synonymous (Ks) substitution rates

40 These interactions reflected the physical distances and orientation tuning properties of

41 This model predicts actual physical distances and to what extent chromosomal contac

42 Intensive physical distancing and biosafety interventions prove co

43 nostic testing, isolation of positive cases, physical distancing and lockdowns.

44 Both physical distancing and mask-wearing, although effective

45 t overall mental health, particularly during physical distancing and other circumstances where opport

46 y and mental health was mediated by observed physical distancing and perceptions of the government's

47 considered two potential mediators: observed physical distancing and perceptions of the government's

48 ng non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as physical distancing and protective equipment; pharmaceut

49 ies for controlling an emerging epidemic are physical distancing and regular testing with self-isolat

50 d return of results, and high adherence with physical distancing and use of masks.

51 contact index to quantify the impact of both physical distancing and vaccination measures in a unifie

52 ferences in effects between using the terms 'physical distancing' and 'social distancing'.

53 oom, halving attendance regularity to enable physical distancing, and better ventilation can almost c

54 ective use of personal protective equipment, physical distancing, and hand/surface hygiene.

55 D-19, and the need for effective use of PPE, physical distancing, and hand/surface hygiene.

56 required, disinfecting objects and surfaces, physical distancing, and not touching one's eyes, nose o

57 tective measures included universal masking, physical distancing, and rapid isolation of trainees wit

58 When paired with masking, physical distancing, and ventilation, COVID-19 vaccines

59 We found that LD declined with physical distance approximately five times faster on the

60 calizing expressed sequences, and reflecting physical distance are essential for disease gene identif

61 with a resolution of better than 100 kb, and physical distances are determined.

62 of these assumptions for the calculation of physical distances are investigated.

63 es, including handwashing, mask wearing, and physical distancing are associated with reductions in th

64 ch as telephone consultations, facemasks and physical distancing) are likely to have contributed.

65 k of artisanal fishers to the pandemic using physical distancing as a proxy.

66 een origin and destination, rather than pure physical distance, as considered in some previous works.

67 ociation of political party affiliation with physical distancing behaviors among young adults during

68 The order of and physical distance between 180 polymorphic markers, many

69 The physical distance between an eQTN and its associated tra

70 of compensatory evolution decreases with the physical distance between base-pairing residues.

71 nels (CaV2.1) and is highly dependent on the physical distance between CaV2.1 and synaptic vesicles (

72 re of segregated topology; and the Euclidean physical distance between connected nodes, a proxy marke

73 ted to cytoarchitectonic differences and the physical distance between cortical areas.

74 of the YACs, BAC, and PAC revealed that the physical distance between D14S250 and D14S78 is less tha

75 rofessionals (HCPs), slightly increasing the physical distance between dialysis stations, and-once th

76 on between the probability of conversion and physical distance between duplicates after controlling f

77 by limits to bacterial dispersal imposed by physical distance between hosts.

78 tween inserts on homologues decreased as the physical distance between insert sites was increased.

79 lations, pairwise LD decayed with increasing physical distance between loci in two of the three chrom

80 ced breakage of chromosomes to determine the physical distance between markers, as well as their orde

81 ypes and either contracting or expanding the physical distance between markers.

82 measuring the overlap between clones or the physical distance between non-overlapping contigs.

83 n vs. students), implementations varying the physical distance between participants (online vs. in th

84 To investigate the physical distance between S4 and the pore domain in func

85 in intra-sample variability as a function of physical distance between sections.

86 of long linkage blocks and low LD decay with physical distance between SNPs (LD half decay in 249 kb,

87 The resulting large physical distance between the carbonyl functional group

88 the stem-loop structure opens increasing the physical distance between the donor and acceptor moietie

89 The physical distance between the healed telomeric end and t

90 he predictive power of the inferred TFs, the physical distance between the inferred TFs, and the agre

91 of meioses observed, the heterozygosity and physical distance between the loci studied, and the stat

92 The physical distance between the transcription start sites

93 y point (3-4 microm) is not dependent on the physical distance between the two centromeres, indicatin

94 The physical distance between the two markers is 1.0 Mb.

95 e data address the overlooked problem of the physical distance between the vitamin's reducing hydroge

96 esent on the ancestral chromosome versus the physical distance between them, was compared with a plot

97 rred to play alone, work alone, and put more physical distance between themselves and a new acquainta

98 10-kb restriction fragment, representing the physical distance between these markers.

99 ine smoothly in significance with increasing physical distance between trees.

100 ot fixed, but are modulated by the real-time physical distances between body parts.

101 d has been providing valuable information on physical distances between loci (via image analysis) for

102 aging allows the construction of maps of the physical distances between occurrences of the sequence m

103 The PESM approach compares the physical distances between paired-end sequencing reads o

104 involve object detection and measurements of physical distances between pedestrians.

105 e resolution by isotropically increasing the physical distances between sample structures while prese

106 t models both transcriptional similarity and physical distances between spots.

107 tribution whose intensity decreases with the physical distances between the loci.

108 This analysis made it possible to estimate physical distances between the majority of chromosome 4

109 (CL) model that has these features when the physical distances between the marker loci are known or

110 markers, but also accurate estimates of the physical distances between them.

111 016 presidential election exhibited 14% less physical distancing between March and May 2020.

112 r in the 242 districts with 3 versus 6 ft of physical distancing between students (IRR, 0.891; 95% co

113 national guidelines differ about the optimal physical distancing between students for prevention of s

114 nherent in single-cell imaging, we show that physical distance - but not genomic distance - between g

115 f cortical areas, in addition to the role of physical distance, but this relation is attenuated in mi

116 sity, vaccination can reduce the duration of physical distancing by 36% to 78%, whereas for cities wi

117 ant across the chromosome, good estimates of physical distance can be derived using simple models of

118 model reveals that vaccination combined with physical distancing can contain resurgences without rely

119 ct path in activity flow prediction when the physical distance constraint and asymmetric routing cont

120 grade 4 and lower) or in the classroom where physical distancing could be maintained (grade 5 and up)

121 rence, high-cost and sensitizing behaviours (physical distancing) declined, but this decline decelera

122 Using county-day measures of physical distancing derived from cell phone location dat

123 Anatomical connectivity, rather than physical distance, determined the coupling strength of t

124 examine the effect of alcohol consumption on physical distance during social interaction.

125 ng but that was otherwise fully open without physical distancing during a time of ongoing transmissio

126 ncies are likely to hinder the observance of physical distancing during the current pandemic.

127 elationship between neighbourhood income and physical distancing during the pandemic.

128 This regulation can operate over physical distances encompassing half the genome.

129 In line with movement restrictions and physical distancing essential for the control of the COV

130 ond operons, there is a relationship between physical distance, expression similarity, and sequence s

131 y affect the correlation between genetic and physical distance for the same interval in maize.

132 neral, EST density increased relative to the physical distance from the centromere.

133 s a diversion risk due to their prescriber's physical distance from the pharmacy.

134 d onto a moveable screen placed at different physical distances from the animal.

135 dy provides evidence of the effectiveness of physical distancing (>1.5 m) and indoor group size reduc

136 d April 16, 2020, before and after statewide physical distancing guidelines and stay-at-home orders.

137 nsumption may lead to decreased adherence to physical distancing guidelines.

138 Infection control measures such as physical distancing, hand washing, and the use of masks

139 Unfortunately, one of the settings in which physical distancing has assumed noteworthy consequences

140 Physical distancing has been the primary strategy to con

141 aining in radiology in a situation requiring physical distancing has led to the massive use of online

142 mes, although at the present time only short physical distances have been examined.

143 actors for airborne SARS-CoV-2 include short physical distance, high patient viral load, and poor roo

144 ARS-CoV-2) since 2019 has made mask-wearing, physical distancing, hygiene, and disinfection complemen

145 ns can be remembered as longer than the true physical distance if the locations are separated by a bo

146 uld be vaccinated or wear masks and practice physical distancing if unvaccinated.

147 bserved performance is not merely reflecting physical distance in the brain.

148 The ratio of genetic to physical distance in the hot spot is 85 cM/Mb, two order

149 he Genethon and CHLC genetic linkage maps to physical distance in the metric map is approximately 1.7

150 nable correlation between disequilibrium and physical distance in the region (r=-.540, P=.001, one-ta

151 dication of a decline of disequilibrium with physical distance in this region.

152 case study to investigate how LD decays over physical distance in two avian species.

153 is a tendency to show less mask wearing and physical distancing in a group of tested individuals.

154 citizens' decisions to voluntarily engage in physical distancing in response to communications by the

155 nterpersonal space (e.g., IPS) refers to the physical distance individuals maintain from others durin

156 eared significantly shorter than the actual (physical) distance intervals.

157 nd synthetic contact matrices when modelling physical distancing interventions for the COVID-19 pande

158 Finally, (e) controlling for physical distance, introns of proximate genes are most d

159 nt measurements, and their relationship with physical distance is highly noisy.

160 sons; in this region the ratio of genetic to physical distance is less than 0.5% of the genome's aver

161 regions where the rate of crossing over per physical distance is restricted.

162 Voluntary physical distancing is essential for preventing the spre

163 y complex (MHC) fall into regions of limited physical distance known as hot spots of meiotic recombin

164 We describe the combination of physical distancing, mandatory mask wearing, movement re

165 re separated by at least the average 3600 kb physical distance mapped across the DXZ1 array.

166 We were able to compare the physical distance maps from all reconstructed image-driv

167 impact of post-lockdown measures, including physical distancing, mask-wearing and shielding individu

168 We identify principles that guide whether physical distancing, masks and other barriers to transmi

169 wever, in the age of whole-genome sequences, physical distances measured in base pairs of DNA provide

170 rventions, particularly since the effects of physical distancing measures and upcoming vaccines on re

171 nsmission when combined with the adoption of physical distancing measures by the rest of the populati

172 ible to increases in HIV incidence, although physical distancing measures could lead to reductions in

173 There is growing concern that the social and physical distancing measures implemented in response to

174 to the severe health system constraints and physical distancing measures in place to mitigate the on

175 the effect of mask wearing, handwashing, and physical distancing measures on incidence of covid-19.

176 he Italian government introduced a system of physical distancing measures organized in progressively

177 nts around the world have enacted widespread physical distancing measures to prevent and control viru

178 Numerous physical distancing measures were implemented to mitigat

179 enacted unprecedented movement restrictions, physical distancing measures, and face mask requirements

180 The COVID-19 pandemic and associated physical distancing measures, however, restricted the nu

181 r a 12-month period from the commencement of physical distancing measures, on March 16, 2020, up to 1

182 e, and household assets) and compliance with physical distancing measures.

183 nd the least by NPI attributes that focus on physical distancing, meeting duration, and meeting size.

184 al spans a genetic distance of 5.41 cM and a physical distance of 15.1 Mb that overlaps the DFN2 locu

185 ion was refined to <3 cM, corresponding to a physical distance of 3.5 megabasepairs.

186 to 3 cM, corresponding to a maximum possible physical distance of 4.0 Mb.

187 en D10S1237 and D10S1723, corresponding to a physical distance of 9.5 megabases.

188 Within a regulatory complex, the physical distance of a regulatory protein to DNA affects

189 ecombination cold spot, and corresponds to a physical distance of about 15 Mb.

190 , BAC, PAC, and cosmid resources and spans a physical distance of approximately 0.3 Mb.

191 le BAC contig which spans the Vf region at a physical distance of approximately 1,100 kb has been con

192 ic distance of 8.9 cM which corresponds to a physical distance of approximately 1.44 Mb, representing

193 In this region, 1 cM represents a physical distance of approximately 160 kb.

194 The BAC contig spans a physical distance of approximately 300 kb corresponding

195 ert within an interval that corresponds to a physical distance of approximately 390 kb.

196 ey genetic distance of 0.6 cM and a rice DNA physical distance of ca. 70 kb.

197 nificant signals of recombination across the physical distance of the genes.

198 of tactile localization as a function of the physical distance of the tactile stimuli from the partic

199 The close physical distance of these genes and the interrelated fu

200 th paralogs decays to background levels over physical distances of less than 1 kb.

201 in meetings, few vs many people present, and physical distancing of 1 or 2 m), we conducted a discret

202 Selection of tagSNP using physical distance or linkage disequilibrium information

203 These data may indicate a much larger physical distance or suppression of recombination in the

204 seline and follow-up), while controlling for physical distancing, other risk mitigation strategies, a

205 income neighbourhoods have faced barriers to physical distancing, particularly needing to work outsid

206 The average physical distance per genetic distance was estimated at

207 n provide rapid assessments of the impact of physical distancing policies and help to identify at-ris

208 can aid in assessing the public response to physical distancing policies and the socio-cultural fact

209 The economic disruption and physical distancing policies brought on by the COVID-19

210 Physical distancing policies can control the spread of S

211 ing to work outside the home, and that state physical distancing policies have not mitigated these di

212 tly comparing the impact of 3 versus 6 ft of physical distancing policies in school settings are lack

213 Of non-pharmaceutical interventions, physical distancing policies-designed to reduce person-t

214 te-level responses of government in terms of physical distancing policies.

215 Where physical distance previously protected populations from

216 tion and significant variation in genetic to physical distance ratios.

217 partisanship in individuals' compliance with physical distancing recommendations of political leaders

218 Physical distancing reduces transmission risks and slows

219 cipalities with lower and higher SVIs, while physical distancing remained relatively higher and death

220 Lower physical distancing requirements can be adopted in schoo

221 ublic schools among districts with different physical distancing requirements.

222 and substance use treatment that comply with physical distancing restrictions (e.g., telemedicine).

223 he health of PLWH, we need to understand how physical distancing restrictions affect secondary health

224 izes the ongoing importance of mask wearing, physical distancing, robust testing programs, and rapid

225 Following travel bans and physical distancing, SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory vi

226 al, size, and shape of the nanoparticle, the physical distance separating the metal nanoparticle from

227 Reductions in adherence to physical distancing showed little difference across soci

228 personal protection (mask, hand hygiene, and physical distancing), social distancing (avoiding crowds

229 rence to protective behaviors (mask wearing, physical distancing, staying at home, others) among US a

230 for other potential drivers of differential physical distancing, such as political partisanship, inc

231 with cohesin complexes with a characteristic physical distance suggestive of a defined molecular inte

232 o 0.32 by 5.5 kbp in the former, the maximum physical distance surveyed), a difference attributed to

233 Shelter restructuring to allow physical distancing, testing, and isolation can decrease

234 rtisanship was more strongly associated with physical distancing than numerous other factors, includi

235 terpersonal Distance (IPD) is defined as the physical distance that individuals maintain between them

236 The physical distance that the probes diffuse determines the

237 ecifically, we determine the contribution of physical distance to the coordination of transcriptional

238 5; P = .01; 95% CI: 1.18-29.5) and a shorter physical distance to the patient (OR, 2.0 for every mete

239 thin SNPs by linkage disequilibrium at large physical distances to obtain unbiased results.

240 promoted frequently but used less often than physical distancing to mitigate COVID-19.

241 ision; their place preference depends on the physical distance traveled [6-11] and on the phase of th

242 at ~20% of V1 neurons were influenced by the physical distance traveled, as were ~40% of CA1 place ce

243 Estimates of physical distance using in situ hybridization to cells i

244 l, the distribution of r(2) as a function of physical distance was in close agreement with neutral co

245 tion in the relationship between genetic and physical distance was measured over the avrCO39 chromoso

246 However, physical distance was not the only factor determining th

247 The decay of linkage disequilibrium with physical distance was slower than expected from previous

248 these, the relationship between genetic and physical distances was examined and the genome-wide reco

249 rley cross-overs in relation to the rice DNA physical distances was extremely uneven.

250 the major prevention tactics of masking and physical distancing were a throwback to the 1918 influen

251 ool staff in districts with 3 versus 6 ft of physical distancing were also similar (IRR, 1.015, 95% c

252 ublic school districts with 3 versus 6 ft of physical distancing were estimated using log-binomial re

253 one apps, given accessibility in the time of physical distancing, were widely used for tracking, trac

254 ulations, disequilibrium decays rapidly with physical distance, which is consistent with this interva

255 In contrast, alcohol had no effect on physical distance with a familiar interaction partner.

256 Finally, we estimated that combining physical distancing with contact tracing could enable ep

257 rimental study indicates that 0.914 m (3 ft) physical distancing with face coverings is equally as ef

258 ding of the joint effects of vaccination and physical distancing with respect to a city's population

259 s primarily due to two large gaps of unknown physical distance within the known yeast and bacterial a

260 has determined that the ratio of genetic to physical distance within wx was one to two orders of mag