戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tion of PPARgamma agonists (rosiglitazone or pioglitazone).
2 s (T2DM) seem to be specifically targeted by pioglitazone.
3 d and T cell proliferation was unaffected by pioglitazone.
4 drome, with the thiazolidinedione class drug pioglitazone.
5 class of anti-diabetic medications including pioglitazone.
6 ned CMR, up to 4.7 years after withdrawal of pioglitazone.
7  of inflammatory cytokines were resistant to pioglitazone.
8 omologs, E75 and E78, are in vivo targets of pioglitazone.
9  to those from an equivalent dose of racemic pioglitazone.
10 treatment with the insulin-sensitizing agent pioglitazone.
11 r changes were observed in mice treated with pioglitazone.
12  a novel target of the type II diabetes drug pioglitazone.
13 nsulin sensitivity was seen after 21 days of pioglitazone.
14  in obese mice by the thiazolidinedione drug pioglitazone.
15 hese effects were at par with or superior to pioglitazone.
16 s reversed by diet or the insulin sensitizer pioglitazone.
17 class of anti-diabetic medications including pioglitazone.
18 ominal adipocytes from subjects treated with pioglitazone.
19 ed PASMC proliferation that was prevented by pioglitazone.
20 tor dapagliflozin and the insulin sensitizer pioglitazone.
21 iated inflammation in mice were resistant to pioglitazone.
22 lcohol seeking was prevented by infusions of pioglitazone (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mug/mul) in the CeA, VTA
23                       Bilateral infusions of pioglitazone (0, 5, and 10 mug/mul) in the rostromedial
24 63 (CI, 0.47 to 0.85) for saxagliptin versus pioglitazone, 0.69 (CI, 0.54 to 0.87) for saxagliptin ve
25 74 (CI, 0.64 to 0.85) for sitagliptin versus pioglitazone, 0.86 (CI, 0.77 to 0.95) for sitagliptin ve
26 rms (vildagliptin: -0.1%+/-0.3%; P=0.046 and pioglitazone: -0.2%+/-0.3%; P=0.029).
27 n, 15.4 [5.5] vs 4.5 [2.4] mug/mL, P < .001; pioglitazone, 12.6 [3.6] vs 4.8 [0.6] mug/mL, P < .001).
28 roups, although weight gain was greater with pioglitazone (2.5 kg vs. placebo).
29 rmin, 1.8 at study entry to 0.1 at month 24; pioglitazone, 2.2 at study entry to 0.3 at month 24).
30 rmin, 2.5 at study entry to 0.5 at month 24; pioglitazone, 2.3 at study entry to 0.6 at month 24), as
31 e (vildagliptin: -20+/-24 mg/dL; P=0.002 and pioglitazone: -23+/-29 mg/dL; P=0.004), and pioglitazone
32 a-2a plus ribavirin for 48 weeks, n = 73) or pioglitazone 30-45 mg/day plus standard care (n = 77) in
33                                              Pioglitazone (30 mg/kg weight) was administered orally 1
34 ZDF) rats 45 min after a single oral dose of pioglitazone (30 mg/kg).
35 in, 5.5 [2.4] vs 10.5 [3.4] ng/mL, P < .001; pioglitazone, 4.1 [0.8] vs 11.0 [2.6] ng/mL, P < .001) a
36 rticipants were randomly assigned to receive pioglitazone (45 mg/d target dose) or placebo within 180
37 aloric intake) and then randomly assigned to pioglitazone, 45 mg/d, or placebo for 18 months, followe
38          Among patients randomly assigned to pioglitazone, 58% achieved the primary outcome (treatmen
39 metformin, 6.7 [1.5] vs 2.1 [1.0], P = .001; pioglitazone, 6.9 [0.8] vs 3.0 [0.8], P = .001).
40  by both high-dose glucocorticoids (79%) and pioglitazone (61%), but not low-dose glucocorticoids (25
41                         We hypothesized that pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated recept
42 dition of lipids, and studied the effects of pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated recept
43 was restored in cells that were treated with pioglitazone, a PPARgamma agonist, before infection with
44              Importantly, our data show that pioglitazone, a PPARgamma agonist, significantly inhibit
45                      Here we have shown that pioglitazone, a selective peroxisome proliferative-activ
46 sults showed that activation of PPARgamma by pioglitazone abolished the expression of somatic and aff
47                                              Pioglitazone-activated PPARgamma binds to Smad3 in human
48                               In conclusion, pioglitazone acutely induces whole-body metabolic slowin
49 to determine if the insulin-sensitizing drug pioglitazone acutely reduces insulin secretion and cause
50 as reduced in both Wistar and ZDF rats after pioglitazone administration.
51 e proliferator-activated receptor-gamma with pioglitazone alone is not sufficient to promote differen
52                                              Pioglitazone also reduced energy expenditure in Wistar r
53                                              Pioglitazone also reduced the risk of type 1 MI (hazard
54  pioglitazone: -23+/-29 mg/dL; P=0.004), and pioglitazone also significantly improved fasting plasma
55 se treatment of diabetic obese patients with pioglitazone, an antidiabetic and antiinflammatory PPARg
56                        The PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone and a novel selective PPARalpha/gamma modul
57 gamma binding assays (affinity comparable to pioglitazone and arachidonic acid), and in vitro murine
58 uced TFH cell responses in female mice while pioglitazone and estradiol (E2) co-treatment ameliorated
59 tablished treatments for insulin resistance (pioglitazone and exenatide) as possible disease modifyin
60 om 2004-2010, we analyzed the association of pioglitazone and incidence of dementia in a prospective
61 a is activated by thiazolidinediones such as pioglitazone and is targeted to treat insulin resistance
62                                   The use of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone is associated with a decr
63                                              Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone possess a common function
64 tration of synthetic agonists of PPAR-gamma (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) up-regulates PPAR-gamma-
65 s of two variants of the glitazone scaffold, pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, in an effort to identify
66 f specific cancer types may be different for pioglitazone and rosiglitazone.
67 -3.5 +/- 1.71 and -3.7 +/- 1.62 IU/mL in the pioglitazone and standard-care groups, respectively, Del
68 atohepatitis [NASH]) trial demonstrated that pioglitazone and vitamin E improved liver histology to v
69             Pharmacologic therapies (such as pioglitazone and vitamin E) should be considered only in
70 ith prescriptions of <8 calendar quarters of pioglitazone, and diabetics with >/=8 quarters.
71 ments with proven benefit include vitamin E, pioglitazone, and obeticholic acid; however, the effect
72 mice were treated with the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone, and phagocyte ROS and killing of S aureus
73 FP to inhibit the pro-adipogenic response to pioglitazone, and that the ability of pioglitazone to de
74                    PPAR-gamma agonists, like pioglitazone, appear antiproteinuric.
75                                              Pioglitazone appeared to have its most prominent effect
76                                The effect of pioglitazone appears to be a direct action on beta cells
77 ed receptor (PPAR) gamma agonists, including pioglitazone, approved for type 2 diabetes therapy alter
78 PPARgamma agonists such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are in clinical use for the treatment of in
79  data demonstrate that both vildagliptin and pioglitazone are of potential benefit in patients with I
80 ackground Thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone, pioglitazone) are oral insulin-sensitizing medications u
81 dinediones (TZDs), such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, are peroxisome proliferator-activated rece
82 , and support the feasibility of translating pioglitazone as a novel pharmacotherapy of PAP.
83                      Meta-analysis supported pioglitazone as an effective treatment option for T2DM p
84 mpounds, we identified the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone as neuroprotective in Drosophila.
85 umulative dose, and time since initiation of pioglitazone as time dependent.
86 )=0.960, P<0.0001) 12weeks of treatment with pioglitazone as well as from control subjects (R(2)=0.89
87 c-euglycemic clamp was minimally affected by pioglitazone at this early time point.
88                               Treatment with pioglitazone before and during treatment with peginterfe
89 ells in the presence of the PPARgamma ligand pioglitazone, but this trans-differentiation is inhibite
90                           Here, we show that pioglitazone can rescue TDP-43-dependent locomotor dysfu
91 roach, we identify a set of metabolites that pioglitazone can restore in the context of TDP-43 expres
92 beta1 signals and that the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone can restore vascular homeostasis and preven
93 or MI derive a greater absolute benefit from pioglitazone compared with patients at lower risk.
94             Islets from animals treated with pioglitazone concurrently with HFD demonstrated a revers
95 e findings together suggest that repurposing pioglitazone could potentially enhance the proteinuria-r
96 F11 genetic deficiency effectively abolished pioglitazone cytoprotection in mouse cerebral vascular e
97 Intervention after Stroke) demonstrated that pioglitazone decreased the composite risk for fatal or n
98 shed between nondiabetics, diabetics without pioglitazone, diabetics with prescriptions of <8 calenda
99 esults show that stimulation of PPARgamma by pioglitazone did not affect basal anxiety, but fully pre
100 ients with a recent ischaemic stroke or TIA, pioglitazone did not affect cognitive function, as measu
101                             Troglitazone and pioglitazone differ in their influence on SSC.
102 ic monophosphate sodium salt (8-Br-cGMP), or pioglitazone dose-dependently downregulated podocyte inj
103 ypothesis, female NOD mice were administered pioglitazone during the pre-diabetic phase and assessed
104  and shRNA knockdown of PPFP eliminated this pioglitazone effect.
105 ion; however, when combined, cholesterol and pioglitazone enhance OPC differentiation into mature OLs
106 lysis revealed that both glucocorticoids and pioglitazone enhanced glomerular synaptopodin and nephri
107 rt-term treatment of gp91(phox-/-) mice with pioglitazone enhanced stimulated ROS production in neutr
108  act as a stereoselective barrier to prevent pioglitazone entry into the brain.
109                                              Pioglitazone exerted its positive effect by inhibition o
110                                              Pioglitazone exhibited improved glucose uptake within 3
111 y devoid of HSPC-retaining activity, whereas pioglitazone failed to downregulate Cxcl12 in BM adipocy
112 hemoattractant factors after only 10 days of pioglitazone, followed by a 69% reduction in ATM content
113 ion, and patients who undergo treatment with pioglitazone for longer durations (>12 months) or are ad
114         Within each stratum, the efficacy of pioglitazone for preventing stroke or MI was calculated.
115  a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone for secondary prevention.
116 nd showed that feeding the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone greatly decreased the size of the primary t
117 5-year risk for stroke or MI was 6.0% in the pioglitazone group among patients at lower baseline risk
118 ared mean 3MS score increased by 0.27 in the pioglitazone group and by 0.29 in the placebo group (mea
119 curred in 175 of 1939 patients (9.0%) in the pioglitazone group and in 228 of 1937 (11.8%) in the pla
120     After 16 weeks, compared to placebo, the pioglitazone group had a significant reduction in Adipo-
121 ts at higher risk, the risk was 14.7% in the pioglitazone group vs 19.6% for placebo (absolute risk d
122 %) in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the pioglitazone group, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI],
123                 Treatment with metformin and pioglitazone has beneficial anti-inflammatory effects in
124                     The results suggest that pioglitazone has direct metabolic deceleration effects o
125 stion with a high-fat diet (HFD) or HFD plus pioglitazone (HFD-P), we demonstrate that the fractions
126 arably to high-dose glucocorticoids, whereas pioglitazone + high-dose glucocorticoids reduced protein
127 g of the salt disproportionation reaction of pioglitazone hydrochloride (PIO-HCl) at a very low drug
128 re benefit from the insulin-sensitizing drug pioglitazone hydrochloride compared with patients at low
129 , 850 to 1500 mg/d, and 10 patients received pioglitazone hydrochloride, 15 to 30 mg/d; 20 untreated
130 or MetS, such as metformin hydrochloride and pioglitazone hydrochloride, have been demonstrated, alth
131 amyloid-lowering capabilities to the racemic pioglitazone in an in vitro AD model.
132 oglitazone was 46.6% higher than that of (-)-pioglitazone in brain tissue and 67.7% lower than that o
133 GIIS) and oxygen consumption were reduced by pioglitazone in isolated islets and INS832/13 cells.
134 re, the binding of the type II diabetes drug pioglitazone in mitoNEET effectively inhibits the thiol-
135 rain tissue and 67.7% lower than that of (-)-pioglitazone in plasma.
136                           Microinjections of pioglitazone in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), centra
137 nt with PPARgamma agonists (rosiglitazone or pioglitazone) in primary cultures of mouse glial cells r
138 ent of NASH include the use of vitamin E and pioglitazone, in addition to dietary counseling and regu
139 ormed a secondary analysis of the effects of pioglitazone, in comparison with placebo, on acute coron
140 he remaining PPARgamma in Pparg(C/-) mice by pioglitazone increased S1P1 levels, reduced the Th17 pop
141              In terms of population regions, pioglitazone increased the risk for bladder cancer could
142                                              Pioglitazone increased weight less among patients at hig
143 al years as to whether the antidiabetic drug pioglitazone increases the risk for bladder cancer.
144                           Our data show that pioglitazone induced cellular lipid accumulation and the
145 ystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance, pioglitazone-induced improvement of insulin action is as
146                                              Pioglitazone inhibited the canonical TGFbeta1-CTGF axis
147 ed to protracted abstinence is attenuated by pioglitazone injected into the amygdala.
148                              Dosing with (+)-pioglitazone instead of the racemic mixture may result i
149                            Microinjection of pioglitazone into the AMY, but not into the HIPP, abolis
150 his finding, site-specific microinjection of pioglitazone into the RMTg but not into the VTA reduced
151 sting additional models of ALS, we find that pioglitazone is also neuroprotective when FUS, but not S
152                                              Pioglitazone is beneficial in improving liver histology
153                                              Pioglitazone is contraindicated in patients with HF>New
154                                              Pioglitazone is currently undergoing clinical trials for
155                                              Pioglitazone is suggested to prescribe following individ
156 nhibitor (imatinib) and a thiazolidinedione (pioglitazone) is proposed for the treatment of chronic m
157 oNEET, a target of the type II diabetes drug pioglitazone, is a key regulator of energy metabolism in
158                    Dosing mice with pure (+)-pioglitazone led to a 76% increase in brain exposure lev
159 nformatic drug repurposing analyses (such as pioglitazone, levonorgestrel, salsolidine, ginkgolide A,
160                                  Remarkably, pioglitazone + low-dose glucocorticoids also reduced pro
161                    If diabetes patients used pioglitazone &lt;8 quarters, the dementia risk was comparab
162 uction of [2Fe-2S] clusters, suggesting that pioglitazone may modulate the function of mitoNEET by bl
163  enhanced glycolysis in the cytosol and that pioglitazone may regulate energy metabolism in mitochond
164 bladder cancer cohort, 34,181 (18%) received pioglitazone (median duration, 2.8 years; range, 0.2-13.
165 after oxygen-glucose deprivation, as well as pioglitazone-mediated cerebrovascular protection in a mo
166 tic cancer risks associated with ever use of pioglitazone merit further investigation to assess wheth
167  with protracted abstinence was prevented by pioglitazone microinjection into the amygdala.
168 ntrast, treatment with the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone mimicked selenium supplementation.
169                                              Pioglitazone monotherapy showed equivalent efficacy as c
170 ystematic review and meta-analysis comparing pioglitazone monotherapy with monotherapies of other ora
171 % CI: -1.70 to 0.28) were also observed with pioglitazone monotherapy.
172  and the long-term effects (>/=3.6 years) of pioglitazone needs be monitored more carefully.
173    Osm deletion recapitulated the effects of pioglitazone on adipogenesis, which was p66Shc independe
174        It can be assumed that the effects of pioglitazone on beta-cells are negligible under in vivo
175  We tested the influence of troglitazone and pioglitazone on different parameters of SSC, including i
176                                The effect of pioglitazone on liver metastasis was assessed.
177 nglion neurons revealed a salutary effect of pioglitazone on pathways related to defense and cytokine
178 for ischemic stroke to examine the effect of pioglitazone on stroke outcomes.
179  events in this population and the impact of pioglitazone on these events have not been described.
180  the temporal relationship of the effects of pioglitazone on these two parameters.
181 ic conditions, to investigate the effects of pioglitazone on TNFalpha, SOCS3, and downstream insulin
182 estigate the effect of the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone on tumor metastasis and liver injury follow
183 nediones (TZDs), including rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, on cardiac tissue.
184 ) WDSW alone, (2) WDSW + vehicle, (3) WDSW + pioglitazone or (4) WDSW + saroglitazar for an additiona
185                                              Pioglitazone or its analog NL-1 appears to inhibit the e
186                                              Pioglitazone or matching placebo.
187 fits of lifestyle modification alone or with pioglitazone or vitamin E in a cohort of patients aged 5
188 le modification alone, treatment with either pioglitazone or vitamin E in addition to lifestyle modif
189 siglitazone (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65-0.81) or pioglitazone (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72-0.95), respectively
190 nhibitor vildagliptin, the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone, or placebo for 3 months in addition to lif
191 sulin glargine, insulin lispro, liraglutide, pioglitazone, or sitagliptin).
192 utic options such as lifestyle modification, pioglitazone, or vitamin E.
193                        The PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone partially rescued the adipogenic defect in
194 of lateral fluid percussion injury, combined pioglitazone (PG) and hMSC (combination) treatment showe
195 ing glitazone drugs, rosiglitazone (ROS) and pioglitazone (PGZ) both have anti-proliferative and anti
196          Subjects were randomized to receive pioglitazone (PGZ; 45 mg/day) or placebo and were observ
197 tiveness of the selective PPAR-gamma agonist pioglitazone (PIO) for preventing hypoxia-induced IUGR.
198                                              Pioglitazone (Pio) is a Food and Drug Administration-app
199 ent showed improved molecular responses with pioglitazone, presumably through PPARgamma activation an
200 onstrate that the primary mechanism by which pioglitazone protects against polymicrobial sepsis is th
201                              In this regard, pioglitazone provides advantages as a therapeutic tool,
202                       Patients randomized to pioglitazone received the drug during a 16-week run-in p
203               Hippocampal microinjections of pioglitazone reduce the insurgence of the physical withd
204                                              Pioglitazone reduced risk for ischemic strokes (HR, 0.72
205 ondiabetics, the cumulative long-term use of pioglitazone reduced the dementia risk by 47% (RR = 0.53
206               Hippocampal microinjections of pioglitazone reduced the expression of the physical sign
207 Intervention after Stroke) demonstrated that pioglitazone reduced the risk for a composite outcome of
208 nsulin resistance without diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone reduced the risk for acute coronary syndrom
209                                              Pioglitazone reduced the risk of acute coronary syndrome
210                                   Similarly, pioglitazone reduced the risk of large MIs with serum tr
211 reclinical and clinical data have shown that pioglitazone reduces alcohol and opioid self-administrat
212 ignaling activation by the selective agonist pioglitazone reduces alcohol drinking and alcohol-seekin
213  demonstrate that activation of PPARgamma by pioglitazone reduces the motivation for heroin and atten
214                                Surprisingly, pioglitazone repressed TTF-1 expression in PPFP-expressi
215                                  In summary, pioglitazone reprogrammed BM macrophages and suppressed
216                           Both metformin and pioglitazone resulted in a significant increase in the n
217 onectin protein concentration contributes to pioglitazone's ability to enhance HMW adiponectin levels
218                            We also evaluated pioglitazone's effects on retinal function using electro
219 e treated with metformin and 10 who received pioglitazone showed a significant decrease in the number
220 beta cells, as islets from mice treated with pioglitazone showed reductions in PPAR-gamma (Ser-273) p
221                        Patients treated with pioglitazone showed significant decreases in the mean (S
222                                              Pioglitazone showed similar efficacy as comparators in r
223 acrophages treated with a PPARgamma agonist (pioglitazone) showed enhanced phagocytosis and bacterial
224            Data demonstrate that 2 months of pioglitazone significantly increased electroretinogram a
225  demonstrated that (PPARgamma) activation by pioglitazone significantly inhibited both oxygen-glucose
226         Treatment with the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone significantly reduced TFH cell responses in
227                                              Pioglitazone significantly rescues excessive intimal hyp
228  found that the synthetic PPARgamma agonist, pioglitazone, stimulated Abeta degradation by both micro
229                      Additional studies with pioglitazone suggest that mitochondrial copper is target
230  menstrual cycle of females was inhibited by pioglitazone, suggesting that an estrogen-sufficient env
231 ed in both REC and Muller cells treated with pioglitazone, suggesting that these two cell types are k
232         In vitro, PPAR-gamma activation with pioglitazone switched macrophages from M1 to M2, reduced
233 nt ischaemic attack (TIA) were randomised to pioglitazone (target 45 mg daily) or placebo.
234 ent ischemic stroke or TIA to receive either pioglitazone (target dose, 45 mg daily) or placebo.
235 rction was lower among patients who received pioglitazone than among those who received placebo.
236 rthermore, treating breast cancer cells with pioglitazone that stabilizes the 3Cys-1His cluster of NA
237            When mice were dosed with racemic pioglitazone, the concentration of (+)-pioglitazone was
238                                              Pioglitazone, the only thiazolidinedione drug in clinica
239 d, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone therapy on GIP-mediated insulin secretion a
240                 In patients with diabetes on pioglitazone therapy, HSPC mobilization after G-CSF was
241 result in higher levels of brain exposure to pioglitazone, thus potentially improving the development
242                   Furthermore, the effect of pioglitazone to control the inflammatory response during
243 nse to pioglitazone, and that the ability of pioglitazone to decrease TTF-1 expression contributes to
244  child with refractory NS by the addition of pioglitazone to the treatment correlated with marked red
245 rays of large myelinated sciatic nerves from pioglitazone-treated animals revealed an unanticipated i
246                                              Pioglitazone-treated mice showed identical weight gain,
247 cytokine production and high IL-10 levels in pioglitazone-treated mice.
248                                              Pioglitazone treatment also was associated with improvem
249 llular induction of Cxcl12 In diabetic mice, pioglitazone treatment downregulated Osm, p66Shc, and Cx
250 ence for age effects, nor for selection into pioglitazone treatment due to obesity.
251  p = 0.317), and diabetes patients without a pioglitazone treatment had a 23% increase in dementia ri
252 n a murine model of sepsis, we now show that pioglitazone treatment improves microbial clearance and
253                 These findings indicate that pioglitazone treatment is associated with a reduced deme
254                                    Long-term pioglitazone treatment is safe and effective in patients
255                           Moreover, although pioglitazone treatment normalized renal function, it had
256 hus potentially improving the development of pioglitazone treatment of AD.
257                                              Pioglitazone treatment of BKS db/db mice produced a sign
258               We sought to determine whether pioglitazone treatment of gp91(phox-/-) mice enhanced ph
259                     It was hypothesized that pioglitazone treatment of gp91(phox-/-) mice, a murine m
260              The effect of 10 and 21 days of pioglitazone treatment on insulin sensitivity in 26 diab
261                                Sildenafil or pioglitazone treatment prevented proteinuria and the inc
262                                              Pioglitazone treatment resulted in the phenotypic polari
263 concentrations of all oligomers increased on pioglitazone treatment, with the largest fold increase b
264 used GIP was unchanged following 12 weeks of pioglitazone treatment.
265 ollowed by an 18-month open-label phase with pioglitazone treatment.
266 nocytes from patients with CGD after ex vivo pioglitazone treatment.
267 n hyperplastic mechanism of weight gain with pioglitazone treatment.
268 titumor effect correlates with the fact that pioglitazone turns PPFP into a strongly PPARgamma-like m
269 We also investigate the stereoselectivity of pioglitazone uptake in the brain.
270 ntial increased risk for bladder cancer with pioglitazone use >/=3 years could not be excluded (OR: 1
271 risk (RR) of dementia incidence dependent on pioglitazone use adjusted for sex, age, use of rosiglita
272                              Studies suggest pioglitazone use may increase risk of cancers.
273                                              Pioglitazone use was not associated with a statistically
274 sults were similar in case-control analyses (pioglitazone use: 19.6% among case patients and 17.5% am
275        Crude incidences of bladder cancer in pioglitazone users and nonusers were 89.8 and 75.9 per 1
276 idences of prostate and pancreatic cancer in pioglitazone users vs nonusers were 453.3 vs 449.3 and 8
277 ical Research Network Pathology Committee of Pioglitazone versus Vitamin E versus Placebo for the Tre
278                                  The PIVENS (Pioglitazone versus Vitamin E versus Placebo for the Tre
279 cemic pioglitazone, the concentration of (+)-pioglitazone was 46.6% higher than that of (-)-pioglitaz
280                                              Pioglitazone was also associated with a lower risk of di
281                                     Pure (+)-pioglitazone was also shown to have comparable amyloid-l
282                                              Pioglitazone was associated with a greater frequency of
283                             Long-term use of pioglitazone was associated with a lower dementia incide
284                                              Pioglitazone was associated with a reduced risk for any
285  8 of the 10 additional cancers; ever use of pioglitazone was associated with increased risk of prost
286                                              Pioglitazone was effective for secondary prevention of i
287                                         When pioglitazone was given temporarily to three CML patients
288                                The effect of pioglitazone was independent of actions on T cells, as p
289                                              Pioglitazone was less effective than troglitazone on all
290                      In a direct comparison, pioglitazone was more cost-effective than vitamin E (ICE
291                                  Ever use of pioglitazone was not associated with bladder cancer risk
292          Sensitivity analyses indicated that pioglitazone was not cost-effective if either the total
293 LXR agonist GW3965 and the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone were individually able to increase the leve
294 fic microinjections of the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone were performed to explore the role of this
295 , and treated with metformin with or without pioglitazone were randomly assigned (2:1:1) to daily inj
296 significantly increases brain penetration of pioglitazone, whereas inhibition of breast cancer resist
297                                      The TZD pioglitazone, which has been approved by the U.S. Food a
298 rdial infarction raised the possibility that pioglitazone, which improves insulin sensitivity, might
299  New medications are being explored, such as pioglitazone, which is under study for its role in enhan
300       There was a significant association of pioglitazone with increased BW (WMD: 2.06 kg, 95% CI: 1.
301                          Coadministration of pioglitazone with peginterferon/ribavirin improves insul

 
Page Top