コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 and CD8 proliferation index were reduced by pirfenidone.
2 conventional therapy were treated with oral pirfenidone.
3 nses was equal or superior to nintedanib and pirfenidone.
4 the activation of the necroptosis pathway by pirfenidone.
5 senicapoc, compared to the FDA-approved drug pirfenidone.
6 p38gamma-specific pharmacological inhibitor pirfenidone.
7 inically useful TGF-beta signaling inhibitor pirfenidone.
8 MHC-mismatched tracheal allografts received pirfenidone (0.5%) in pulverized food according to diffe
11 in a 2:1:2 ratio to pirfenidone 2403 mg/day, pirfenidone 1197 mg/day, or placebo; in study 006, patie
12 ed the study, the mean eGFR increased in the pirfenidone 1200-mg/d group (+3.3 +/- 8.5 ml/min per 1.7
13 pirfenidone 2400-mg/d group, and none in the pirfenidone 1200-mg/d group during the study (P = 0.25).
15 trial), including all patients randomized to pirfenidone 2,403 mg/d (n = 623) or placebo (n = 624).
16 hemodialysis in the placebo group, 1 in the pirfenidone 2400-mg/d group, and none in the pirfenidone
17 The dropout rate was high (11 of 25) in the pirfenidone 2400-mg/d group, and the change in eGFR was
19 change at week 72 was -8.0% (SD 16.5) in the pirfenidone 2403 mg/day group and -12.4% (18.5) in the p
21 ibrosis (12 [3%] vs 25 [7%]) occurred in the pirfenidone 2403 mg/day groups than in the placebo group
23 dy 004, 174 of 435 patients were assigned to pirfenidone 2403 mg/day, 87 to pirfenidone 1197 mg/day,
25 , patients were assigned in a 2:1:2 ratio to pirfenidone 2403 mg/day, pirfenidone 1197 mg/day, or pla
26 ic pulmonary fibrosis to receive either oral pirfenidone (2403 mg per day) or placebo for 52 weeks.
32 allograft model, we evaluated the effect of pirfenidone, a novel antifibrotic agent, on the developm
33 sults of a phase 2 study that suggested that pirfenidone, a novel antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory
36 specific p38gamma pharmacological inhibitor pirfenidone also suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine ex
37 -cell receptor (TCR) activation, and whether pirfenidone alters regulatory T cells (CD4CD25) suppress
45 research into the safety and efficacy of (a) pirfenidone and (b) the combination of pirfenidone plus
46 ly enhanced the anti-proliferative effect of pirfenidone and favorably modulated TGFbeta-induced cell
49 ogeneic response, whereas the combination of pirfenidone and low dose rapamycin had more remarkable e
50 w insights into the anti-fibrotic actions of pirfenidone and nintedanib and identifies novel targets
53 ffectiveness of the antifibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with idiopathic p
54 g the effect of the antifibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib on clinically important outco
55 hic pulmonary fibrosis have established that pirfenidone and nintedanib prevent about 50% of the decl
56 t findings were annotated as associated with pirfenidone and nintedanib treatment in silico via Corem
58 C), serum LOXL2 (sLOXL2) concentrations, and pirfenidone and nintedanib use, were randomly assigned (
60 tive results of recently completed trials of pirfenidone and nintedanib, and results that will come f
62 Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, only slow disease progressio
63 aking studies that confirmed that two drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, slowed disease progression,
66 on-free survival were identified between the pirfenidone and placebo groups, irrespective of the defi
69 l-cause mortality between patients receiving pirfenidone and those on nintedanib (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0
70 stantially alter the tolerability profile of pirfenidone, and is unlikely to be beneficial in IPF.
71 tudies demonstrated the potential utility of pirfenidone as a therapeutic against septic shock and th
72 se findings support further investigation of pirfenidone as an effective treatment for patients with
73 ing induced animals received a daily dose of pirfenidone (as a standard anti-fibrotic drug) (300 mg/k
76 domly assigned 26 subjects to placebo, 26 to pirfenidone at 1200 mg/d, and 25 to pirfenidone at 2400
78 with IPF aged 40-80 years and established on pirfenidone (at least 1602 mg/day for 8 weeks or longer)
79 r IIP-PH, IPF-PH, and IIP-PH with nintedanib/pirfenidone background therapy), but not in patients wit
80 5) of mice receiving a continuous regimen of pirfenidone beginning on day 5 after transplantation had
81 F from the placebo groups of three trials of pirfenidone (CAPACITY 004, CAPACITY 006, and ASCEND) wer
84 meostasis and emphasize the possibility that pirfenidone could be employed as a novel therapeutic reg
85 were randomly assigned (1:1) to 2403 mg oral pirfenidone daily or placebo using a central validated i
89 y suggest that addition of acetylcysteine to pirfenidone does not substantially alter the tolerabilit
90 t (0.6%, -3.5 to 4.7); however, a consistent pirfenidone effect was apparent until week 48 (p=0.005)
93 F and myocardial fibrosis, administration of pirfenidone for 52 weeks reduced myocardial fibrosis.
94 II randomized, placebo-controlled studies of pirfenidone for IPF (the two CAPACITY [Clinical Studies
95 First-line therapy includes nintedanib or pirfenidone for IPF and mycophenolate mofetil for ILD du
98 Lco from baseline was -0.7% (SD 7.1) for the pirfenidone group and -2.5% (8.8) for the placebo group,
99 6MWD from baseline was -2.0 m (68.1) for the pirfenidone group and -26.7 m (79.3) for the placebo gro
100 in FVC at week 72 was -9.0% (SD 19.6) in the pirfenidone group and -9.6% (19.1) in the placebo group,
101 reported in 120 (94%) of 127 patients in the pirfenidone group and 101 (81%) of 124 patients in the p
102 s occurred in 12 (18%) of 67 patients in the pirfenidone group and 11 (16%) of 67 patients in the con
104 ts were reported in 18 (14%) patients in the pirfenidone group and 20 (16%) patients in the placebo g
107 lated adverse events were more common in the pirfenidone group than in the placebo group but rarely l
108 lity outcomes was significantly lower in the pirfenidone group than in the placebo group in the poole
109 was -87.7 mL (Q1-Q3 -338.1 to 148.6) in the pirfenidone group versus -157.1 mL (-370.9 to 70.1) in t
110 gastrointestinal disorders (60 [47%] in the pirfenidone group vs 32 [26%] in the placebo group), fat
111 d pneumonia (four [6%] of 67 patients in the pirfenidone group vs eight [12%] of 67 patients in the c
113 ared with the placebo group, patients in the pirfenidone group were less likely to have a decline in
116 III IPF clinical trials, patients receiving pirfenidone had a lower risk of nonelective respiratory-
117 tor-beta production by purified T cells, and pirfenidone had no effect on the suppressive properties
119 In this study, we tested the hypothesis that pirfenidone has immune modulating activities and evaluat
120 factor, connective tissue growth factor, and pirfenidone have shown promising results in preclinical
122 In vitro chemotaxis assays demonstrated that pirfenidone impaired macrophage migration to monocyte ch
124 ne versus placebo-Clinical Studies Assessing Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Research o
126 the two CAPACITY [Clinical Studies Assessing Pirfenidone in IPF: Research of Efficacy and Safety Outc
127 We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with grade 2 or grade 3 radiatio
130 e aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with progressive fibrosing uncla
131 cy of saracatinib relative to nintedanib and pirfenidone in three preclinical models: 1) in vitro in
135 s to assess whether two-years treatment with Pirfenidone influences necroinflammation, fibrosis and s
140 In conclusion, these results suggest that pirfenidone is a promising agent for individuals with ov
142 e a delay of onset or abrogation of OAD when pirfenidone is administered in the early posttransplanta
145 l benefit from addition of acetylcysteine to pirfenidone is unlikely, with the possibility of a harmf
150 s by IL-1B blockade (n = 19) or antifibrotic pirfenidone (n = 18) reduced CCR2(+) macrophage accumula
151 o placebo in the CAPACITY studies evaluating pirfenidone (n = 347) or the INSPIRE study evaluating in
152 ts were randomly assigned to receive 2403 mg pirfenidone (n=127) or placebo (n=126) and were included
153 the synthesis of many drug analogues such as pirfenidone, naproxen, ibuprofen, geraniol, umbelliferon
154 daily in addition to local standard of care (pirfenidone, nintedanib, or neither) for at least 52 wee
156 e sought to confirm the beneficial effect of pirfenidone on disease progression in such patients.
158 PF receiving standard of care treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib or in those not receiving stan
159 ebo, with or without background IPF therapy (pirfenidone or nintedanib), in an approximately 3:1 rati
161 nary fibrosis were randomly assigned to oral pirfenidone or placebo for a minimum of 72 weeks in 110
164 valuate the effects of the antifibrotic drug pirfenidone (PFD) on arrhythmogenic atrial remodeling in
165 Recent preclinical studies suggested that pirfenidone (PFD) prevents fibrosis in various diseases,
167 tial of targeting the TGF-beta pathway using Pirfenidone (PFD), a TGF-beta inhibitor, either alone or
169 erated random number table to receive either pirfenidone plus glucocorticoids or glucocorticoids alon
170 f (a) pirfenidone and (b) the combination of pirfenidone plus mycophenolate; and 3) suggests the use
172 mma or treatment with the p38gamma inhibitor pirfenidone protects against the chemically induced form
176 rther, treatment with the anti-fibrotic drug pirfenidone reduced pulmonary fibrosis in this model.
177 n peripheral blood lymphocytes revealed that pirfenidone reduced SEB-induced cytokine levels 50 to 80
180 study of cells treated with esomeprazole or pirfenidone revealed that the drugs target several extra
182 ic inhibition or antifibrotic treatment with pirfenidone significantly diminished RV fibrosis progres
183 ploidentical model of sclerodermatous cGVHD, pirfenidone significantly reduced macrophages in the ski
184 -approved antifibrotic drugs, nintedanib and pirfenidone, slow the rate of decline in lung function,
185 Antifibrotic therapy with nintedanib or pirfenidone slows annual FVC decline by approximately 44
187 site spirometry was lower in patients given pirfenidone than placebo (treatment difference 95.3 mL [
188 he approved treatment options nintedanib and pirfenidone, the medical need for a safe and well-tolera
189 differences in the pooled analysis favouring pirfenidone therapy compared with placebo for treatment-
190 everal analytic approaches demonstrated that pirfenidone therapy is associated with a reduction in th
191 everal analytic approaches demonstrated that pirfenidone therapy is associated with a reduction in th
192 razole enhances the antifibrotic efficacy of pirfenidone through complementary molecular mechanisms.
193 al durations 72-120 weeks) and Assessment of Pirfenidone to Confirm Efficacy and Safety in Idiopathic
194 tcomes] trials and the ASCEND [Assessment of Pirfenidone to Confirm Efficacy and Safety in Idiopathic
195 also known as N-acetylcysteine) is used with pirfenidone to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)
197 rosing unclassifiable ILD could benefit from pirfenidone treatment, which has an acceptable safety an
199 and death after hospitalization with use of pirfenidone versus placebo over 52 weeks using data deri
200 yses and meta-analyses of clinical trials of pirfenidone versus placebo to determine the effect of pi
201 he three global randomised phase 3 trials of pirfenidone versus placebo-Clinical Studies Assessing Pi
202 se data and data from two Japanese trials of pirfenidone versus placebo-Shionogi Phase 2 (SP2) and Sh
203 hospitalized for any reason, treatment with pirfenidone was associated with lower risk of death afte
208 rials, the between-group difference favoring pirfenidone was significant for death from any cause (P=
210 , CDH11, and TNS1) have been associated with pirfenidone, while five genes (CLINT1, CADM1, MTDH, SYDE