戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ect on immunity to bacteria and SA-dependent plant immune response.
2 ed the role of the N-end rule pathway in the plant immune response.
3 the fungus produces proteins to suppress the plant immune response.
4  understand the underlying mechanisms of the plant immune response.
5 ing papillae is an integral component of the plant immune response.
6 ted molecular patterns represent a conserved plant immune response.
7  novel effector, MjTTL5, that could suppress plant immune response.
8 1-387 )and is responsible for activating the plant immune response.
9 t discoveries over the last decade about the plant immune response.
10 2 is an SA receptor that is required for the plant immune response.
11 ND1 and DND2 that are negative regulators of plant immune response.
12  peptide produced by Xoo, XA21 activates the plant immune response.
13 ic haustorial connections, and suppress host plant immune responses.
14 nding of the regulatory mechanisms governing plant immune responses.
15 partially dispensable for the suppression of plant immune responses.
16 icae facilitate aphid survival by modulating plant immune responses.
17  prominent vesicle type in the regulation of plant immune responses.
18 orrelate with the constitutive activation of plant immune responses.
19 dapted vascular pathogens and the associated plant immune responses.
20  EVs may represent an important component of plant immune responses.
21          Plant hormones play a vital role in plant immune responses.
22 ction between cell-cycle progression and the plant immune responses.
23 LS2 complex, and coordinately act to enhance plant immune responses.
24 n levels and NPR1-dependent transcription in plant immune responses.
25 gulators of differential coexpression during plant immune responses.
26 ferential coexpression tend to be related to plant immune responses.
27 ble dynamic but tight and precise control of plant immune responses.
28 o the induction of rapid tissue necrosis and plant immune responses.
29 r understanding the molecular basis of these plant immune responses.
30 tion of SA production, is a key component of plant immune responses.
31 e responses is an intrinsic component of the plant immune responses.
32 odule employ distinct mechanisms to regulate plant immune responses.
33           Light is an important modulator of plant immune responses.
34 usible bacterial component that may regulate plant immune responses.
35 ranscriptional reprogramming associated with plant immune responses.
36 ific role in transcription regulation during plant immune responses.
37 d production of reactive oxygen species, two plant immune responses.
38 at can be used to trigger defined subsets of plant immune responses.
39 cylic acid and most known genes required for plant immune responses.
40 ive response (HR) associated with successful plant immune responses.
41 nd has long been identified as important for plant immune responses.
42 iated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and trigger plant immune responses.
43 nfluence of pathogen effectors and enhancing plant immune responses.
44 dopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) also activates plant immune responses.
45 signaling molecule that modulates animal and plant immune responses.
46  with plant development to those linked with plant immune responses.
47  of the transcriptome following induction of plant immune responses, a process that we term 'RBP-medi
48        Here, we focus on current research in plant immune responses against bacterial pathogens.
49  these data reveal the importance of PRR2 in plant immune responses against P. syringae and suggest a
50 2Cs) are emerging as important regulators of plant immune responses, although little is known about h
51 pid alkalinization factors (RALFs), regulate plant immune responses and cell expansion, which are two
52 hts into diverse translational regulation of plant immune responses and demonstrate that translationa
53  molecular patterns and positively regulates plant immune responses and disease resistance.
54 al surface polysaccharides in the evasion of plant immune responses and elaborate on their role in pr
55 the proteomic changes in the apoplast during plant immune responses and lays the groundwork for futur
56 hogen employs type III effectors to suppress plant immune responses and promote disease susceptibilit
57   Here we discuss the roles of cell death in plant immune responses and the tactics pathogens utilize
58                                              Plant immune responses are usually accompanied by the pr
59      Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a plant immune response associated with both transcription
60 e coordination of cell-cycle progression and plant immune responses at multiple levels.
61 licitors are drug-like compounds that induce plant immune responses but are structurally distinct fro
62 II-28 were found to significantly affect the plant immune response, but not bacterial motility.
63 reveals a novel mechanism where TLPs promote plant immune responses by modulating the PI4Kbetas prote
64 differences in vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant immune responses, comparison of viral evolution fa
65 ley (Hordeum vulgare) and is involved in the plant immune response dependent on jasmonate hormones.
66 establishing that miR6024 negatively impacts plant immune response during necrotrophic pathogenesis.
67                         The evolution of the plant immune response has culminated in a highly effecti
68 cule signals such as ascarosides to activate plant immune responses has potential utility to improve
69  race with plants, whereas the need to avoid plant immune responses has resulted in purifying selecti
70         In sum, the critical role of BIK1 in plant immune responses hinges upon phosphorylation, its
71 le pathway act as distinct components of the plant immune response in flowering plants.
72  the overexpression of genes involved in the plant immune response in root border-like cells of Arabi
73 ning H3K4 demethylase, in local and systemic plant immune responses in Arabidopsis.
74 at PLDgamma1 acts as a negative regulator of plant immune responses in complex with immunity-related
75 itin, and is able to suppress chitin-induced plant immune responses, including generation of reactive
76      Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a plant immune response induced after a local infection by
77                                 Induction of plant immune responses involves significant transcriptio
78 cquired resistance (SAR) is a broad-spectrum plant immune response involving profound transcriptional
79                                          The plant immune response is a complex process involving tra
80                      Real-time monitoring of plant immune responses is crucial for understanding plan
81                                          The plant immune response known as systemic acquired resista
82 r efficient activation of the broad-spectrum plant immune responses known as localized acquired resis
83 ection massively activates genes involved in plant immune responses, mainly those in the calcium-depe
84 genes have been shown to negatively regulate plant immune responses mediated by intracellular immune
85 ecific function of plant wall composition in plant immune response modulation and in balancing diseas
86                                              Plant immune responses need to be tightly controlled for
87                               Therefore, the plant immune response needs to be tightly regulated.
88 inescence can be used to study the impact of plant immune responses on bacterial multiplication, viab
89  effectors associated with distortion of the plant immune response or manipulating signal transductio
90  manipulate host cell physiology and subvert plant immune responses, pathogens secrete an array of ef
91 nounced shifts of the following two distinct plant immune responses: pattern-triggered immunity (PTI)
92 dence that activation of EDS1/PAD4-dependent plant immune responses rapidly disrupts ABA signal trans
93  Unsurprisingly, given their central role in plant immune responses, RBPs can also be targeted by pat
94                                          The plant immune response regulator NPR1 resides in either t
95 e residues sensitive to oxidation during the plant immune response remain largely unknown.
96 kinases through KIN7 and positively regulate plant immune responses, stomatal defense, and disease re
97 map to the same genetic loci associated with plant immune responses, suggesting that specific genetic
98 th in rice cells was restricted and elicited plant immune responses that included the formation of ce
99 P GTPase activation has been reported during plant immune responses, the mechanisms underlying the dy
100 late important cellular processes, including plant immune responses, through protein-protein interact
101 ed pathogenesis-related proteins involved in plant immune responses, thus verifying the bioprotective
102      Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a plant immune response to pathogen attack.
103  stomatal closure is an integral part of the plant immune response to reduce pathogen invasion.
104 s work, we found that RipI can also suppress plant immune responses to bacterial elicitors, which see
105 Botrytis-induced kinase 1 (BIK1) to initiate plant immune responses to bacterial flagellin.
106 xygen species (ROS) represents a hallmark of plant immune responses to infection.
107 iew, recent advances in our understanding of plant immune responses to necrotrophs and comparison wit
108  Arabidopsis thaliana protein that regulates plant immune responses to pathogen-associated molecular
109 SPECIFIC REDUCED ELICITATION (LORE) mediates plant immune responses to Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas bu
110 suggested that this difficulty was caused by plant immune responses triggered by perception of Agroba
111 oot nodule symbiosis requires the evasion of plant immune responses triggered by rhizobial effectors.
112 llular immune receptors that activate robust plant immune responses upon detecting pathogens.
113 d fungal resources, which may be modified by plant immune response, variability in fungal molecular r
114 in reduced virulence and rapid activation of plant immune responses, while ERC deletion in a nonpatho

 
Page Top