戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 eine proteases (PLCPs) being central hubs in plant immunity.
2 sistance (NHR) is the most prevalent form of plant immunity.
3 NASE 1) functions as a negative regulator of plant immunity.
4 tubule-associated protein MAP65-1 to subvert plant immunity.
5 phasizes the importance of Ca(2+) sensing to plant immunity.
6 einvent its effector repertoire to undermine plant immunity.
7 acterial flagellin epitope flg22 to activate plant immunity.
8 RKs) are transmembrane receptors involved in plant immunity.
9 echanisms for suppressing effector-triggered plant immunity.
10 ith extra-large G proteins (XLGs) to mediate plant immunity.
11  the transcriptional network associated with plant immunity.
12 derophores also have the ability to activate plant immunity.
13  trigger responses typically associated with plant immunity.
14 per activation underlines a crucial layer of plant immunity.
15 cylic acid (SA), an established regulator of plant immunity.
16 M1 and the involvement of 14-3-3 proteins in plant immunity.
17 tive regulator of cell death associated with plant immunity.
18 ct in the same signaling pathway to regulate plant immunity.
19 gae type-III effectors is the suppression of plant immunity.
20 actions are coordinated to achieve effective plant immunity.
21 teraction with MOS1, a negative regulator of plant immunity.
22 tin inducible complex with AtCERK1 to induce plant immunity.
23 rs also play important noncanonical roles in plant immunity.
24 C) cotransporter CCC1 has a dual function in plant immunity.
25 phosphorylates BIK1 and positively regulates plant immunity.
26 icating that NTL9 is a positive regulator of plant immunity.
27 y shown to be required in multiple layers of plant immunity.
28 tion are essential signals for activation of plant immunity.
29 nd reversibility to protein-SNO signaling in plant immunity.
30 lso compensates for its absence in enhancing plant immunity.
31 t of alternative splicing in R gene-mediated plant immunity.
32 y mechanisms through which pathogens subvert plant immunity.
33 n expression of genes, including R genes, in plant immunity.
34 signaling is an early and necessary event in plant immunity.
35 t of BON1 (BONZAI1), a negative regulator of plant immunity.
36 AD4), which encodes another key regulator of plant immunity.
37 tic link between Ca(2+) and ROS signaling in plant immunity.
38 by FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2), which promotes plant immunity.
39 roteins and inside plant cells it suppresses plant immunity.
40 layers in the signaling networks involved in plant immunity.
41 s as a critical step in the establishment of plant immunity.
42 of antagonism between cytokinin and auxin in plant immunity.
43 roteins, indicating that KEG plays a role in plant immunity.
44 n as a critical component in fine control of plant immunity.
45 e plant MAPKs are required for activation of plant immunity.
46 nimals, as a critical regulator of inducible plant immunity.
47 gnalling and their potential for engineering plant immunity.
48 olymorphisms that are critical to activating plant immunity.
49 substrate and highlights the role of GRP7 in plant immunity.
50 ctional link between the circadian clock and plant immunity.
51 argely independently of NPR1 in establishing plant immunity.
52 inery and subsequently modulates AS-mediated plant immunity.
53 d stimulating gene transcription to regulate plant immunity.
54 uggest that AtSR1 is a negative regulator of plant immunity.
55 based regulator underpins the development of plant immunity.
56 iggered redox changes and gene regulation in plant immunity.
57  intrinsic E3 Ub ligase activity to suppress plant immunity.
58  programmed cell death (PCD) associated with plant immunity.
59                    MCs play crucial roles in plant immunity.
60 versal co-receptor BAK1, thereby suppressing plant immunity.
61  have highlighted the significance of NPC in plant immunity.
62 ificantly enhances salicylic acid levels and plant immunity.
63 itory effect of abscisic acid on SA-mediated plant immunity.
64 how the catalytic activity of AvrM14 impacts plant immunity.
65 ral oomycete virulence factors that suppress plant immunity.
66 degradation system, plays a critical role in plant immunity.
67 icrobial or endogenous elicitors to activate plant immunity.
68 ell-surface receptors form the front line of plant immunity.
69 d changes in bacterial metabolism imposed by plant immunity.
70 , thus suppressing beta-1,3-glucan-triggered plant immunity.
71 nes and diterpenoid phytoalexins to modulate plant immunity.
72  as a damage-associated molecular pattern in plant immunity.
73 ng a new role of the Fe-S cluster pathway in plant immunity.
74 r RxLR23(KM) can induce plant cell death and plant immunity.
75 s a process critical for stomatal closure in plant immunity.
76  of SKRP in regulating pre-mRNA splicing and plant immunity.
77 eepened the mysteries of Ca(2+) signaling in plant immunity.
78 que insight in the role of glycoalkaloids in plant immunity.
79 lar mechanism through which GmBIR1 regulates plant immunity.
80 repeat (NLR) proteins play critical roles in plant immunity.
81 t complex, which plays a significant role in plant immunity.
82 e regulatory mechanisms, thereby suppressing plant immunity.
83 rbivores can deliver effectors that suppress plant immunity.
84 operties are associated with its function in plant immunity.
85 ption, and signal transduction mechanisms in plant immunity.
86 s genes, each having a small contribution to plant immunity.
87 n about roles for BL and phots in regulating plant immunity.
88 o M. javanica, indicating ISP importance for plant immunity.
89  plant pathogens, is the most common form of plant immunity.
90 y effectors to enhance virulence or suppress plant immunity.
91 e expression of PTI, providing insights into plant immunity.
92  of effectors into the host cell to modulate plant immunity.
93 lize multiple types of effectors to modulate plant immunity.
94 hat it may be a broad-spectrum suppressor of plant immunity.
95 ignaling machineries underlying this form of plant immunity.
96 itive regulators of salicylic acid-dependent plant immunity.
97 rs have been characterized in the context of plant immunity.
98 ulation of AGO2-associated sRNAs, to promote plant immunity.
99 es to the roots and shoots and repression of plant immunity.
100 ting crucial roles of common phosphosites in plant immunity.
101 ting the degradation of a positive player in plant immunity.
102 role of l-fucose and protein fucosylation in plant immunity.
103 t the role of pectin acetylesterification in plant immunity.
104 2 and PLDgamma3, is specifically involved in plant immunity.
105 v. tomato (Pst) DC3000 functions to overcome plant immunity.
106 s and reports a new negative role of BIK1 in plant immunity.
107 tion of STKR1 function, SnRK1 signaling, and plant immunity.
108 is a central target of NO bioactivity during plant immunity.
109 e identified PRR2 as a positive regulator of plant immunity.
110 IZATION FACTOR (RALF) propeptides to inhibit plant immunity.
111 were also accumulated and may participate in plant immunity.
112  as mediators of CW integrity maintenance in plant immunity.
113 hogens, substantiating a role for eNAD(+) in plant immunity.
114 een characterized for their specific role in plant immunity.
115 her with CBM1-containing proteins manipulate plant immunity.
116 almodulin-like (CML) proteins is critical to plant immunity.
117  kinases (MAPKs) are important regulators of plant immunity.
118 tial coexpression was a common phenomenon of plant immunity.
119  plays a previously unknown negative role in plant immunity.
120        Despite the important role of NPR1 in plant immunity(5-7), understanding of its regulatory mec
121 at are delivered into host cells to suppress plant immunity added sRNAs to the list of pathogen effec
122 lly important residues for its activation of plant immunity, advances our understanding of these proc
123  is a redox sensor that negatively regulates plant immunity against a bacterial pathogen.
124 ic acquired resistance (SAR), a long-lasting plant immunity against a broad spectrum of pathogens, re
125  acquired resistance (SAR) is a long-lasting plant immunity against a broad spectrum of pathogens.
126         Our results reveal a new pathway for plant immunity against bacteria and a role for AvrPtoB E
127 role for two WRKYs as positive regulators of plant immunity against bacterial and potentially non-bac
128  GTP-binding protein 1 (NOG1), functions for plant immunity against bacterial pathogens.
129 iosynthetic enzymes as a means to strengthen plant immunity against biotrophic pathogens.
130  OsPUX8B.2 and OsCDC48-6 positively regulate plant immunity against blast fungus, while the high-temp
131                                Their role in plant immunity against hemibiotrophic fungal infection r
132 id derivatives are of central importance for plant immunity against insect herbivores; however, major
133 ance of DNA methylation and demethylation in plant immunity against nonviral pathogens.
134                      AtSKRP confers impaired plant immunity against Phytophthora capsici and associat
135                                              Plant immunity against the majority of the microbial pat
136 d kinases (Waks) are important components of plant immunity against various pathogens, including the
137  the integration of selective autophagy into plant immunity against viruses and reveal potential vira
138 ity is essential for HopAM1's suppression of plant immunity and contribution to virulence.
139 atives and SA-Mal exert a moderate impact on plant immunity and defence-related gene expression.
140 s) initiate signaling pathways important for plant immunity and development.
141 ed hormone that regulates diverse aspects of plant immunity and development.
142  delineate the multifaceted roles of MLOs in plant immunity and development.
143 s, and the effects of BIR1 overexpression on plant immunity and development.
144 controls salicylic acid-related signaling in plant immunity and developmental leaf senescence.
145 l transduction pathways associated with both plant immunity and disease susceptibility share a common
146 fector proteins into plant cells to suppress plant immunity and facilitate fungal infection.
147 onents could have non-redundant functions in plant immunity and gene regulation.
148 tional isoforms, which coordinately regulate plant immunity and growth homeostasis.
149        Given the reported antagonism between plant immunity and growth, we suggest that these altered
150 g RNA (lncRNA) in fine-tuning the balance of plant immunity and growth.
151  reprogramming gene expression and balancing plant immunity and growth.
152 characterized histone deacetylase complex in plant immunity and highlights the importance of epigenet
153 tion of AS of immune receptors in regulating plant immunity and how phytopathogens use effector prote
154 le and targeting of vacuolar substructure in plant immunity and pathogenesis.
155 vely, our results reveal a mechanism linking plant immunity and phosphate homeostasis, with BIK1/PBL1
156 ) to inositol pyrophosphates, which regulate plant immunity and phosphate homeostasis.
157 hogens secrete effector proteins to modulate plant immunity and promote host colonization.
158 verexpression of CsACD2 in citrus suppresses plant immunity and promotes Las multiplication, phenocop
159  protein, SDE15 (CLIBASIA_04025), suppresses plant immunity and promotes Las multiplication.
160  repressing the AS of positive regulators of plant immunity and promoting the AS of susceptibility fa
161 d-forward or feed-back signals important for plant immunity and root development.
162 ogrammed cell death has been associated with plant immunity and senescence.
163 ased in vivo act as a DAMP signal to trigger plant immunity and suggest that controlled release of th
164 he diverse functions of MLOs with a focus on plant immunity and susceptibility.
165 ome system is involved in several aspects of plant immunity and that a range of plant pathogens subve
166               MtLYK9 thus has a dual role in plant immunity and the AM symbiosis, which raises questi
167  indicate Bti9 and/or SlLyk13 play a role in plant immunity and the N-terminal domain of AvrPtoB may
168 he established SA impact on transcription in plant immunity and the nontranscriptional effect of SA o
169 two functional units, one acting to suppress plant immunity and the other potentially affecting the h
170 ve demonstrated that the interaction between plant immunity and the plant microbiome is, in fact, bid
171   If they remain undetected, T3Es may reduce plant immunity and thus promote infection of legumes by
172 ighlight the importance of BRs in modulating plant immunity and uncover pathogen-mediated manipulatio
173 RG family members have additive functions in plant immunity and, surprisingly, are under reciprocal r
174 1 (NPR1), a key transcription coactivator of plant immunity, and regulates the induction kinetics of
175   Pectin is thus an important contributor to plant immunity, and this is due at least in part to the
176 at the SRG family has separable functions in plant immunity, and, surprisingly, these ZF-TFs exhibit
177        While conceptual principles governing plant immunity are becoming clear, its systems-level org
178 edicted interactions and hormonal effects on plant immunity are confirmed in subsequent experiments w
179                                 Responses to plant immunity are initiated upon the perception of path
180 the molecular mechanisms of their role(s) in plant immunity are largely unknown.
181 owever, the cellular components required for plant immunity are not fully understood.
182 tance (R) proteins, as central regulators of plant immunity, are tightly regulated for effective defe
183 Finally, we use our current understanding of plant immunity as context to discuss the potential of en
184 MKK1 was shown to be a negative regulator of plant immunity, as determined by overexpression and gene
185 hese MAPKs may function downstream of ROS in plant immunity because of their activation by exogenousl
186 tion that SAR represents a distinct phase of plant immunity beyond local resistance.
187 Melatonin is known to play a pivotal role in plant immunity, but the regulation of melatonin producti
188 Both MED15 and MED16 have been implicated in plant immunity, but the role of MED14 has not been estab
189 animal immune cells, in that it might expand plant immunity by acting as an autonomous, anti-pathogen
190 t AtRAP functions as a negative regulator in plant immunity by characterizing molecular and biologica
191  However, pathogens have evolved to overcome plant immunity by delivering effectors into the plant ce
192 s, two distinct bacterial effectors activate plant immunity by interacting with the same host protein
193 athogen Pseudomonas syringae that suppresses plant immunity by interfering with plant immune receptor
194  is a redox sensor that negatively regulates plant immunity by linking reactive oxygen and reactive n
195 into the cell death or survival decisions in plant immunity by modulating multiple stress-responsive
196 rscore how effector-mediated manipulation of plant immunity by one pathogen may also affect the disea
197 echanism by which CPCK2 negatively regulates plant immunity by promoting S-nitrosylation of SABP3 thr
198           Hence, SR1IP1 positively regulates plant immunity by removing the defense suppressor AtSR1.
199 the suppression of beta-1,3-glucan-triggered plant immunity by the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae.
200 tablishment of the broad-spectrum, inducible plant immunity called systemic acquired resistance (SAR)
201 al requirement of individual SERK members in plant immunity, cell-death control, and brassinosteroid
202                        As a critical part of plant immunity, cells that are attacked by pathogens und
203  broad involvement of the host proteasome in plant immunity, certain bacterial effectors exploit or r
204                                              Plant immunity consists of two arms: pathogen-associated
205                                    Facets of plant immunity counteract niche establishment by restric
206 hat such alterations could promote or impede plant immunity, depending on the nature of the alteratio
207                                              Plant immunity depends on fast and specific transcriptio
208 grobacterial EF-Tu and resulted in decreased plant immunity detection.
209 re two independent early signaling events in plant immunity, downstream of FLS2.
210 gnize NLPs as molecular patterns and trigger plant immunity, e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana detects nlp p
211        Nonribosomal lipopeptides such as the plant immunity elicitor surfactin or the highly fungitox
212 tenuates invasive hyphal growth and triggers plant immunity; exogenous addition of alpha-ketoglutarat
213  article, we describe the development of the plant immunity field, starting with efforts to understan
214 ED18 is a multifunctional protein regulating plant immunity, flowering time and responses to hormones
215 entified differential phytochrome control of plant immunity genes and confirmed that far-red enrichme
216  calcium signatures to control expression of plant immunity genes enhanced disease susceptibility 1 (
217 fector molecules into plant cells to silence plant immunity genes, whereas plants also transport sRNA
218  phytohormone jasmonoyl-isoleucine regulates plant immunity, growth and development in vascular plant
219 has a conserved function in interfering with plant immunity, growth, and development by affecting aux
220         While the important role of PLCPs in plant immunity has become more evident, it remains large
221  Although the importance of specific RBPs in plant immunity has been known for many years, this field
222 ly downregulated by viruses and its roles in plant immunity have been brought into focus over the pas
223 oduction.(4)(,)(5) PBL and RBOH functions in plant immunity have been extensively characterized in fl
224 istic studies of plant iron home-ostasis and plant immunity have traditionally been carried out in is
225              Ca(2+) signaling is critical to plant immunity; however, the channels involved are poorl
226 merging roles of biomolecular condensates in plant immunity, identify critical questions for future r
227  is well known to be a positive regulator of plant immunity in Arabidopsis.
228 es evolutionary evidence for the rewiring of plant immunity in some plant lineages, as well as the co
229  hypothesis that TaADF4 positively modulates plant immunity in wheat via the modulation of actin cyto
230  the link between their redox regulation and plant immunity in wild-type and mutant Arabidopsis lines
231 ation of a small-molecule compound affecting plant immunity indicate that chemical genetics is a powe
232 tance (SAR) is a long-lasting broad-spectrum plant immunity induced by mobile signals produced in the
233  ADR1-L1, and ADR1-L2), which are crucial in plant immunity initiated by intracellular receptors.
234                Recent evidence suggests that plant immunity involves regulation by chromatin remodeli
235 ve now coalesced into an integrated model of plant immunity involving cell surface and intracellular
236                           The first layer of plant immunity is activated by cell surface receptor-lik
237                                            * Plant immunity is activated by sensing either conserved
238                                              Plant immunity is activated through complex and cross-ta
239                    Importantly, we show that plant immunity is activated upon infection of a nuclear-
240                                              Plant immunity is controlled by both positive regulators
241 on transporter activity in the regulation of plant immunity is corroborated by experiments using the
242                         SDE15 suppression of plant immunity is dependent on CsACD2, and overexpressio
243                   Constitutive activation of plant immunity is detrimental to plant growth and develo
244                 However, the role of CSN5 in plant immunity is largely unexplored.
245 tional data showing that the role of EDM2 in plant immunity is limited and does not include a functio
246  that suppress PCD suggests that suppressing plant immunity is one of the primary roles for DC3000 ef
247 intracellular ROS, yet their contribution to plant immunity is poorly characterized.
248  and identifies a genetic intersection among plant immunity, leaf microbiota, and abiotic stress tole
249 e is to review the progress in understanding plant immunity made so far by applying network modeling
250 ynamic mathematical model of the SA-mediated plant immunity network was developed.
251          Further, CKC_05770 did not suppress plant immunity nor did it have a peroxidase activity as
252  show a genetic relationship between a basal plant immunity pathway and relative abundances of root m
253 nic microbes are capable of hacking into the plants' immunity programs.
254                            Recent studies in plant immunity provide a link between heterotrimeric G p
255 eract with a specific host MAPKKK to perturb plant immunity-related signaling.
256                                Activation of plant immunity relies on recognition of pathogen effecto
257 ng mechanisms by which AtHIRs participate in plant immunity remain elusive.
258  hormones, the detailed role of cytokinin in plant immunity remains to be fully elucidated.
259 s contribute to T3Es' function in subverting plant immunity remains unclear.
260                                              Plant immunity requires recognition of pathogen effector
261 erstanding SA biosynthesis is fundamental to plant immunity research and crop improvement.
262 45, which positively and negatively regulate plant immunity, respectively.
263           In addition, Liberibacters trigger plant immunity response via pathogen-associated molecula
264 e signaling, and sugar allocation related to plant immunity, revealing the complex nature of SSR resi
265  tools, cell biology, development, hormones, plant immunity, signaling in response to abiotic stress,
266 decoding of the salicylic acid (SA)-mediated plant immunity signalling network controlling gene expre
267 le is now known to play an important role in plant immunity, stress responses, environmental interact
268 cted link between cell cycle progression and plant immunity, suggesting that cell cycle misregulation
269 lish 3'cADPR in bacteria as an antiviral and plant immunity-suppressing signaling molecule.
270 de a molecular basis for proposing 2OGO as a plant immunity suppressor in Arabidopsis and potentially
271  and simple screening of novel components of plant immunity system and is well suited for whole-trans
272 terns (MAMPs) to activate the first layer of plant immunity termed pattern-triggered immunity (PTI).
273 t proteins (NLRs) are important receptors in plant immunity that allow recognition of pathogen effect
274 subfamily proteins as negative regulators of plant immunity that are exploited by multiple Avr3a-like
275 e identified CAD7s as negative regulators of plant immunity that are induced by Phytophthora infectio
276 downstream protein of ERD15La, can stimulate plant immunity that is compromised after binding with ER
277 ease resistance (QDR) is a conserved form of plant immunity that limits infections caused by a broad
278 IENT1 (SARD1), encode positive regulators of plant immunity that promote the production of salicylic
279                     SARD1 is an activator of plant immunity that promotes production of the hormone s
280 ic oxide-dependent host strategy involved in plant immunity that works by directly disarming effector
281                         Here we show that in plant immunity the oxidoreductase Thioredoxin-h5 (TRXh5)
282                                           In plant immunity, the innate Nucleotide-Binding Leucine-Ri
283 Despite substantial progress in the study of plant immunity, the mechanism by which plants limit path
284 ified a priori candidate genes with roles in plant immunity; the root microbiome also appears to be s
285  functions will enhance our understanding of plant immunity to necrotrophic pathogens.
286 gae type III effectors are known to suppress plant immunity to promote bacterial virulence.
287 gae type III effectors are known to suppress plant immunity to promote bacterial virulence.
288 set of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), a plant immunity, to a broad spectrum of pathogens that is
289 overed MOS7 and Nup98 as novel components of plant immunity toward a necrotrophic pathogen and provid
290 rs, some of which have been shown to inhibit plant immunity triggered upon perception of conserved pa
291 ibute to the execution of different forms of plant immunity upon challenge with diverse leaf pathogen
292        Here, we analyzed the role of PLC2 in plant immunity using an artificial microRNA to silence P
293  demonstrate that PLSs are key modulators of plant immunity via the G-protein pathway and highlight t
294 oncept, Arabidopsis MAPK4 (MPK4) function in plant immunity was investigated.
295 I1), involved in defense priming in systemic plant immunity, was down-regulated in leaves by joint st
296 To characterize the long-term persistence of plant immunity, we challenged Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis t
297            To promote an integrated model of plant immunity, we discuss analogous viral and nonviral
298 lar underpinnings of GA- and DELLA-modulated plant immunity, we studied the dynamics and impact of GA
299                Here, we provide a roadmap to plant immunity, with a focus on cell-surface and intrace
300 rent understanding of the main principles of plant immunity, with an emphasis on the key scientific m

 
Page Top