ライフサイエンスコーパス: pollinator

1 better management and utilization of bees as pollinators.

2 crops have focused on reducing the need for pollinators.

3 n restores pollination accuracy and fit with pollinators.

4 major group of wild and commercially-reared pollinators.

5 ductive services provided by animals such as pollinators.

6 oadening the drivers of floral traits beyond pollinators.

7 in mediating interactions between plants and pollinators.

8 icide flupyradifurone than other managed bee pollinators.

9 ce of floral morphology in relation to their pollinators.

10 g concern over current and future impacts on pollinators.

11 d in areas with high abundance of vertebrate pollinators.

12 creased specificity between plants and their pollinators.

13 adaptation to selection imposed by distinct pollinators.

14 with pollinator dependence in the absence of pollinators.

15 n co-evolutionary process between plants and pollinators.

16 fee-suitable areas will also be suitable for pollinators.

17 species-specific mutualism system with wasp pollinators.

18 defenses to limit pollen loss to generalist pollinators.

19 produced by nectaries to attract and reward pollinators.

20 and to declines in the abundance of dipteran pollinators.

21 d among populations, compared to less mobile pollinators.

22 al resources to produce nectar that attracts pollinators [3], but toxins in this reward could disrupt

23 ly term "migrant hoverflies." Adults are key pollinators [7-10] and larvae are significant biocontrol

24 sehold income was positively associated with pollinator abundance in gardens, highlighting the influe

25 plant-pollinator interactions by decreasing pollinator abundance with implications for pollination a

26 Management practices increasing not just pollinator abundance, but also functional divergence, co

27 nspecifically, to evolve only when plant and pollinator abundances are well balanced.

28 short growing seasons, low temperatures, low pollinator activity or unstable weather may hamper sexua

29 iation, and one intuitive hypothesis is that pollinators affect rates of plant diversification throug

30 in landscapes with high edge density, 70% of pollinator and 44% of natural enemy species reached high

31 In mutualistic pollinators and antagonistic herbivores, past experience

32 ticides' may also have non-target effects on pollinators and biocontrol services.

33 y bees are agriculturally important, both as pollinators and by providing products such as honey.

34 manipulate physical forces to attract animal pollinators and ensure reproductive success.

35 of size matching among Asteraceae and their pollinators and its relationship with foraging efficienc

36 f the species that remain are more effective pollinators and less effective pollenivores.

37 actions with beneficial organisms, including pollinators and nitrogen-fixing microbes.

38 ortant negative side effects, especially for pollinators and other beneficial insects feeding on nect

39 ow naturally occurring extreme events impact pollinators and pollination has not yet been synthesized

40 the potential impacts of natural hazards on pollinators and pollination in natural and cultivated sy

41 ersity and species richness of phytophagous, pollinators and predators arthropods, as well as the per

42 rsification exerted the strongest effects on pollinators and predators, suggesting these management s

43 plexity impacts interactions between plants, pollinators, and co-flowering competitors is unknown.

44 nd antagonistic interactions between plants, pollinators, and herbivores.

45 uture climate and land-use change on plants, pollinators, and herbivores.

46 The ecological indices of phytophagous, pollinators, and predator arthopods increased on Termina

47 on of self-pollination, attraction of animal pollinators, and the effective use of wind pollination.

48 ried by individuals of the dominant invasive pollinator, Apis mellifera.

49 behaviour of the introduced super-generalist pollinator are implicated as key in determining the role

50 In flowering plants, pollinators are considered a driver of sexual dimorphism

51 Wild pollinators are declining and the number of managed hone

52 idence on species-specific trends among wild pollinators are lacking.

53 Plants functionally specialized on bee pollinators are more pollen limited in natural than mana

54 functional redundancy and complementarity of pollinator assemblages and, therefore, might alter the p

55 nt of these shifts and their consequences on pollinator assemblages is still lacking.

56 of the predators of pests during the day and pollinators at night.

57 ecosystem function and the global decline in pollinators attenuates the resistance of natural areas a

58 tile apocarotenoids that presumably serve as pollinator attractants.

59 wy ventral ligules that play a major role in pollinator attraction.

60 ight thus facilitate pollen movement through pollinator behavior.

61 bat flowers or negative correlations between pollinator body size and average concentration.

62 en predators and prey and between plants and pollinators, but studies have rarely demonstrated signif

63 gate visitors of plants, like bees and other pollinators, but these impacts can be difficult to inter

64 Applying these approaches to pollinators can significantly improve the efficiency and

65 These results demonstrate that competing pollinators can take advantage of alarm signal informati

66 The pollinators can transfer the Streptomyces bacteria among

67 Pollinators can transmit diseases during foraging, but t

68 at sexually dimorphic traits would evolve if pollinators changed behavior depending on the traits of

69 iscuss more broadly how pesticide effects on pollinator cognition might be studied.

70 in sensory drive probably play out in plant-pollinator communication, the theory has not been formal

71 We found that pollinator communities differed substantially across the

72 tensive designed greenspaces, the support of pollinator communities hinges significantly on floral re

73 Pollinator communities in highly agricultural landscapes

74 stem functions and services requires diverse pollinator communities over the seasons.

75 e plants will likely interact with different pollinator communities with warming climate.

76 them to warmer climates and novel plant and pollinator communities.

77 bly/disassembly processes in empirical plant-pollinator communities.

78 d the effects of mass flowering apple on the pollinator community and yield of co-blooming strawberry

79 asynchronous range shifts in an alpine plant-pollinator community by transplanting replicated alpine

80 om bark beetle outbreaks may drive shifts in pollinator community composition through cascading effec

81 effects of management interventions on plant-pollinator community robustness to species loss.

82 r diversity and leverage on city-scale plant-pollinator community robustness.

83 These studies suggest that highly mobile pollinators conduct greater gene flow within and among p

84 context remain poorly understood, hindering pollinator conservation tactics.

85 in urban planning recommendations to enhance pollinator conservation, using increasing city-scale com

86 Alternatively, wild pollinators could recognize an exclusive signature of cu

87 whether wildflower gardens, while benefiting pollinators, could also hasten the extinction of native

88 volved interactions between plants and their pollinators, could be causing plant reproduction to be l

89 Pollinator decline is expected to cause significant redu

90 Quantifying the impact of pollinator decline on food production requires survey me

91 f a study is to identify pollinators or link pollinator decline to food production.

92 Intensive agriculture can contribute to pollinator decline, exemplified by alarmingly high annua

93 evolution in the face of global changes and pollinator decline.

94 can contribute to mitigating the drivers of pollinator decline.

95 A potential driver of pollinator declines that has been hypothesized but seldo

96 ecause infectious diseases are implicated in pollinator declines worldwide, a better understanding of

97 d exacerbate the contribution of diseases to pollinator declines.

98 Because of these contrasting trends in pollinator demand and availability, breeding programs fo

99 Seed production decreased with pollinator dependence in the absence of pollinators.

100 Reproductive output and pollinator dependence were defined by strong trait trade

101 e populations with generalist pollination or pollinator dependence were less pollen limited than nati

102 increasing seed production and quality, and pollinator dependence.

103 When contrasting between pollinator-dependent and pollinator-independent crops, w

104 and availability, breeding programs for many pollinator-dependent crops have focused on reducing the

105 nd that the positive effects emerge only for pollinator-dependent crops, while pollinator-independent

106 favouring early reproductive effort, to less pollinator-dependent plants favouring a prolonged phenol

107 ong trait trade-offs, which ranged from more pollinator-dependent plants favouring early reproductive

108 stic insights into how phytochemicals affect pollinator diseases and (2) the restriction to few, comm

109 eveloped Bayesian network models integrating pollinator dispersal and resource switching to estimate

110 nsive area, and allotments due to their high pollinator diversity and leverage on city-scale plant-po

111 pulses that may be important determinants of pollinator dynamics.

112 edictions, we surveyed visitation frequency, pollinator effectiveness (pollen deposition ability) and

113 mpact of plant removal on flower visitation, pollinator effectiveness and insect foraging in several

114 Moreover, pollinator effectiveness fluctuated but was not directly

115 edea and conducted field experiments to test pollinator effectiveness.

116 trade often involves movement of many insect pollinators, especially bees, beyond their natural range

117 The majority of pollinators, especially Hymenoptera, choose plant specie

118 Declines in pollinator evenness suggest that losses were concentrate

119 availability of medicinal nectar plants for pollinators, exacerbating their decline [12].

120 and services and their robustness to ongoing pollinator extinctions.

121 variation in the prevalence of mutualism and pollinators feeding upon resources in addition to reward

122 e results demonstrate that alkaloids enhance pollinator flower constancy, opening new perspectives in

123 ired for plant defense as well as to attract pollinators for the successful reproduction of plumeria.

124 st contributions by natural habitats of wild pollinators - forests - to plot-level crop revenue, wher

125 In two-choice experiments, pollinators frequently moved from male to female flowers

126 etween practitioners' bumblebee-friendly and pollinator-friendly lists: r = 0.75), appropriateness an

127 ransformative personal learning journeys and pollinator-friendly management of garden spaces.

128 ghted in our data as potential components of pollinator-friendly ornamental greenspace.

129 ween BeeWatch records and the practitioners' pollinator-friendly plant list (465 plants from 9 differ

130 We found pollinator-friendly plant lists to lack independence (co

131 as led to numerous recommendations of which "pollinator-friendly" plants to grow and help turn urban

132 y and population-level impacts to plants and pollinators from seven hazard types, including climatolo

133 ornamental butterfly "hibernation boxes" in pollinator gardens as nesting habitat.

134 paper wasp seen foraging in central Kentucky pollinator gardens.

135 pis mellifera, is the most important managed pollinator globally and has recently experienced unsusta

136 nown pollination syndrome(s) with functional pollinator group(s) that are attracted to blue flowers,

137 stark differences therein among species and pollinator groups.

138 ong plant species, the redistribution of the pollinator guild affected mostly the other plants with h

139 trips or hedgerows are often used to augment pollinator habitat.

140 and national initiatives aimed at restoring pollinator habitats and populations have been developed.

141 this change in the natural habitats of wild pollinators has reduced crop revenue possibly by as much

142 Pollinators have been declining worldwide, and pesticide

143 loral traits affecting the visiting order of pollinators have evolved in plants.

144 re, field observations show that bee and fly pollinators have opposite colour preferences; this resul

145 despread reports of declining populations of pollinators have raised concerns that plant populations

146 Pathogens pose significant threats to pollinator health and food security.

147 cological stressors are drivers of declining pollinator health and responsible for observed populatio

148 lights the potential of CRP lands to improve pollinator health and the utility of colony-level molecu

149 actions is therefore critical for conserving pollinator health.

150 d viruses, making them a potential threat to pollinator health.

151 ecently sparked research interests regarding pollinator health.

152 e-induced chemical defenses and signaling on pollinators (herbivore-induced pollinator limitation).

153 rdens and allotments (community gardens) are pollinator 'hotspots': gardens due to their extensive ar

154 The attractiveness of ornamental plants to pollinators, however, cannot be presumed, and some studi

155 our study supports the pooling of different pollinators (hummingbirds, bats, rodents and flowerpierc

156 gy of long-spurred orchids, and new multiple pollinator hypotheses are proposed.

157 ies, reproduction appears to be dependent on pollinator identity such that reduced reproduction may b

158 ll pollinator visitation rate, regardless of pollinator identity.

159 ffectiveness (pollen deposition ability) and pollinator importance (the product of visitation frequen

160 s, which is an important wild and commercial pollinator in eastern North America.

161 ell-replicated study of floral resources and pollinators in 360 sites incorporating all major land us

162 Honey bees are critical pollinators in ecosystems and agriculture, but their num

163 represent a new floral cue that could assist pollinators in the recognition and learning of rewarding

164 Here we report that plants reliant on pollinators in urban settings are more pollen limited th

165 ransmission involving economically important pollinators, including honey bees (Apis mellifera), has

166 ompanied by a reduction in traits attracting pollinators, including reduced emission of floral scent.

167 We evaluated the hypothesis of pollinator independence in the Independence almond varie

168 e only for pollinator-dependent crops, while pollinator-independent crops show no benefits.

169 contrasting between pollinator-dependent and pollinator-independent crops, we find that the positive

170 In this presumed pollinator-independent variety, we measured the effect o

171 ow available in the market with the label of pollinator-independent, the real dependence of these var

172 Pollinators influence patterns of plant speciation, and

173 ; abundance and species richness of Diptera, pollinator insects, spiders, and predators (predator ins

174 We asked how these novel plant-pollinator interactions affect plant reproduction.

175 ighlighting a little-studied aspect of plant-pollinator interactions and plant evolution.

176 t the loss of generalist plants alters plant-pollinator interactions by decreasing pollinator abundan

177 for restoration to re-establish native plant-pollinator interactions critical for production of outcr

178 hypothesis that impacts of climate on plant-pollinator interactions operate through changes in water

179 ent plant traits, such as light driven plant-pollinator interactions or light emitting plant-based se

180 hanges in water availability to impact plant-pollinator interactions through pollinator responses to

181 velop a framework of sensory drive for plant-pollinator interactions, identifying similarities and di

182 than focusing primarily on effects of plant-pollinator interactions.

183 fect plant reproduction via changes in plant-pollinator interactions.

184 se they sustain the complex pattern of plant-pollinator interactions.

185 d ecological consequences for bees and plant-pollinator interactions.

186 n about the effects of species loss on plant-pollinator interactions.

187 mptions about the cognitive abilities of bat pollinators, invoke Weber's law inappropriately, and can

188 al and physiological coadaptation with their pollinators involving terpenoid- and benzenoid-derived c

189 Adaptation to different pollinators is an important driver of speciation in the

190 pecific pollen (HP) transfer by their shared pollinators is common and has consequences for plant rep

191 t, the real dependence of these varieties on pollinators is mostly unknown.

192 such substances on the foraging behaviour of pollinators is poorly understood.

193 impact of Apis-affiliated viruses on native pollinators is prompting concern.

194 versality of this finding across managed bee pollinators is unclear.

195 signaling on pollinators (herbivore-induced pollinator limitation).

196 Adopting an Integrated Pest and Pollinator Management strategy requires an evaluation of

197 flow across the landscape, distinct types of pollinators may cause different opportunities for allopa

198 plants exhibited species-specific direct and pollinator-mediated indirect responses to frost, thus su

199 The transition from pollinator-mediated outbreeding to selfing has occurred

200 For example, while pollinator-mediated selection has been considered the pr

201 , habitat selection and dispersal in shaping pollinator metacommunity dynamics.

202 that the induction of sequential behavior in pollinators might be crucial to the evolution of sexual

203 onsumer-resource mechanisms underlying plant-pollinator mutualisms can increase persistence, producti

204 ts of forest conservation, as this preserves pollinators' natural habitats, and by extension its inha

205 However, without a priori knowledge of pollinators, neither survey method could identify which

206 reward and handling time as drivers of plant-pollinator network structure.

207 ns, we constructed 16 hybrid herbivore-plant-pollinator networks along an agricultural intensificatio

208 delling and data from eleven bipartite plant-pollinator networks observed along a landscape simplific

209 ique to study the seasonal dynamics of plant-pollinator networks.

210 bee, Osmia cornifrons, which is an important pollinator of apples and other fruit crops.

211 ify key traits associated with the different pollinators of 19 Merianieae species and estimated the p

212 pis mellifera) are one of the most important pollinators of agricultural crops and wild plants.

213 etting was more effective at capturing known pollinators of alfalfa, especially those belonging to th

214 ods, netting and pan traps, at capturing the pollinators of alfalfa, Medicago sativa.

215 toes, including Aedes aegypti, are effective pollinators of the Platanthera obtusata orchid, and demo

216 Honeybees Apis mellifera are important pollinators of wild plants and commercial crops.

217 ions when the goal of a study is to identify pollinators or link pollinator decline to food productio

218 te mutualism between Streptomyces, plant and pollinator partners.

219 To improve measurements of pollinator performance underlying such predictions, we s

220 and services by decreasing the overlap among pollinators' phenologies within European assemblages, ex

221 Despite evidence that climate warming shifts pollinator phenology, a general assessment of these shif

222 ets to examine relationships among land use, pollinator phylogenetic structure, and crop production.

223 Pollinators play an important role in terrestrial ecosys

224 vent the establishment of this threat to the pollinator population.

225 rm the conservation benefit of hedgerows for pollinator populations and demonstrate the importance of

226 Declines in pollinator populations are thought to be due to multiple

227 some urban land uses can support substantial pollinator populations.

228 revalence are needed to effectively conserve pollinator populations.

229 y mounting evidence of widespread decline of pollinator populations.

230 o explain mechanisms underlying variation in pollinator preferences across populations, and how envir

231 r cosmopolitan status to understand how wild pollinator preferences change across different continent

232 atching between floral nectar tube depth and pollinator proboscis length of interacting species, such

233 community subsets, such as known tree fruit pollinators, rare pollinator species, and bees collected

234 A fundamental question is how generalist pollinators recognize "flower objects" in vastly differe

235 Pollinator reductions can leave communities less diverse

236 increase confidence in existing measures of pollinator redundancy at the community level using visit

237 in the fitness benefits of specialized plant-pollinator relationships.

238 tings are more pollen limited than similarly pollinator-reliant plants in other landscapes.

239 For effective foraging, many insect pollinators rely on the ability to learn and recall flor

240 Plant and pollinator response depended on the type of natural haza

241 impact plant-pollinator interactions through pollinator responses to differences in floral attractant

242 nonpollinator agents can reinforce or oppose pollinator selection, and, therefore, affect floral trai

243 lth of research on the way interactions with pollinators shape flower traits.

244 r basis of floral trait variation underlying pollinator shift 698 VII.

245 basis of floral trait divergence underlying pollinator shift.

246 on average, the mean flight date of European pollinators shifted to be 6 d earlier over the last 60 y

247 aria, which is consistent with a scenario of pollinator shifts driving diversification.

248 g diversification in angiosperms by means of pollinator shifts.

249 Both pollinator shortage and oversupply select for more ineff

250 urs are more chromatic where there are fewer pollinators, solar radiation is high, precipitation and

251 bility to promote reproductive isolation via pollinator specialization.

252 we quantify pollen dispersal for individual pollinator species across more than 690 ha of tropical f

253 l networks, we discovered that few plant and pollinator species acted as connectors or hubs, both wit

254 cies, provide food and nesting resources for pollinator species and other beneficial arthropods.

255 ience) data, with the possibility to specify pollinator species or group, to powerfully support trans

256 , such as known tree fruit pollinators, rare pollinator species, and bees collected during apple bloo

257 ttributable to decreased visitation from key pollinator species, such as bumble bees, at warmer sites

258 restoration resulted in a marked increase in pollinator species, visits to flowers and interaction di

259 dom documented is the introduction of exotic pollinator species.

260 requires an evaluation of pesticide risk for pollinator species.

261 While this focus has established pollinators such as bees as classic models in foraging e

262 on non-target organisms, including important pollinators such as the European honeybee Apis mellifera

263 Honey bees, the primary managed insect pollinator, suffer considerable losses due to Deformed w

264 Wild bees are indispensable pollinators, supporting global agricultural yield and an

265 ding the evolution of phenotypically similar pollinator syndromes.

266 Plant-pollinator systems may be susceptible to temporal mismat

267 Plants ecologically specialized on a single pollinator taxon were extremely pollen limited across la

268 Floral syndromes are complex adaptations to pollinators that include color, nectar, and shape variat

269 n for having elaborate arms races with their pollinators that result in intricate morphologies in bot

270 In addition to pollinators, the FES should consider nonpollinator bioti

271 Honey bees are essential pollinators threatened by colony losses linked to the sp

272 , we find the holistic dynamic of plants and pollinators to be remarkably coherent across years, allo

273 Plants benefit by inducing pollinators to carry pollen from male to female flowers,

274 er maps to identify the contribution of wild pollinators to crop revenue.

275 t diverse landscapes promote the response of pollinators to regionally rare plant species.

276 th overlaps substantially with that of other pollinators, to survey the utilization of ornamental pla

277 show substantial inter-specific variation in pollinator trends, based on occupancy models for 353 wil

278 to open-pollinated varieties, but, even so, pollinators typically enhance seed production of both ty

279 tential for reduced synchrony of flowers and pollinators under climate change.

280 potential distributions of coffee and coffee pollinators under current and future climates in Latin A

281 flowers appear to manipulate the behavior of pollinators using sexually dimorphic traits in the dioec

282 r animal pollination, understanding how wild pollinators utilize resources across environments can en

283 in Aconitum spp. nectar affect rates of both pollinator visitation and robbery but may have co-evolve

284 red effects on vegetative and floral traits, pollinator visitation and seed set.

285 ttractants, and that the effects of water on pollinator visitation can be nonlinear.

286 ility, in this bumblebee-pollinated species, pollinator visitation peaked at intermediate water level

287 es appears to be primarily driven by overall pollinator visitation rate, regardless of pollinator ide

288 rather than specific plant species, promotes pollinator visitation, and that diverse landscapes promo

289 amental plant varieties receive little or no pollinator visitation.

290 sugary solution produced by plants to entice pollinator visitation.

291 Notably, disrupting this pattern impacts pollinator visitation.

292 tomato, Solanum peruvianum, herbivory limits pollinator visits, which reduces individual plant fitnes

293 During apple bloom, the known tree fruit pollinators were more frequently captured in the orchard

294 flowers present a higher-quality reward for pollinators, whereas male flowers have a more conspicuou

295 eton to keep their structures on display for pollinators, which has important implications for both t

296 This contrasts with dominant crop pollinators, which increased by 12%, potentially in resp

297 M. sexta Hence, the hawkmoth is an important pollinator while the M. sexta larvae are specialized her

298 How do plants use scent to attract pollinators while preventing herbivory?

299 ble bees are important and widespread insect pollinators who face many environmental challenges.

300 power of the western honey bee, a generalist pollinator whose diet breadth overlaps substantially wit