戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  to support the avian-origin influenza virus polymerase.
2 and the evolutionary implications of the RSV polymerase.
3 a block in the initiation phase of the viral polymerase.
4 or, but not by a host-like high fidelity DNA polymerase.
5 me an efficient and faithful replicative DNA polymerase.
6 arboring a mutation in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.
7 ty map to individual modular domains of this polymerase.
8 aracterized by low expression and poised RNA-polymerase.
9 ropensity to interact with influenza A virus polymerase.
10  in plants) are copied by host transcription polymerases.
11 suppressed in the catalytic site of most DNA polymerases.
12 ion forks lead to recruitment of error-prone polymerases.
13 n misincorporated by viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases.
14 plication mode and nature of the replicative polymerases.
15 ding high selectivity and compatibility with polymerases.
16  with complementary DNA templates behind RNA polymerases.
17                             Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) is a nuclear enzyme involved in DN
18 at catalyses this reaction, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), were discovered more than 50 years
19 tion forks from stalling at poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1)-DNA complexes trapped by PARP inhib
20 ebellar neurons, supporting poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 upregulation.
21 are instead processed into RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6-dependent small RNAs, resulting in their co
22 aloxavir is a cap-dependent inhibitor of the polymerase acid (PA) protein of influenza viruses.
23 3N2 viruses carrying an I38T mutation in the polymerase acidic protein-a mutation that confers reduce
24 sDNA showed binding of the conjugates at the polymerase active site, however, in different modes in t
25 s in a manner dependent on RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity and on DRH-1.
26            We show that DNA-dependent NP-DNA polymerase activity depends on conserved active site res
27  M317V, and NP I109T) identified to increase polymerase activity in chicken cells.
28 HP-88309-a non-nucleoside inhibitor of viral polymerase activity that possesses unusual broad-spectru
29 er sequence as essential to the in vitro RSV polymerase activity, consistent with the results previou
30           Yeast Pole-P301R has increased DNA polymerase activity, which could underlie its high mutag
31       A combination of highly processive RNA polymerases, allosteric protein transcription factors an
32                 Translocation of DNA and RNA polymerases along their duplex substrates results in DNA
33              In the DAMR system, recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and CRISPR-Cas12a derived
34 DNA amplification assay based on recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) was developed.
35 like domain containing the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and an appendage of globular domains containi
36 on of AceR to enable interaction between RNA polymerase and promoter DNA were also observed following
37 ted CD38 NADase and reduced poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and SIRT1 activities, respectively, affecting
38 g of the functional relationship between RNA polymerase and the ribosome as well as the basis of tran
39                                              Polymerases and exonucleases act on 3' ends of nascent R
40 in the absence of this system, accessory DNA polymerases and MutY/M contribute to antibiotic-induced
41            Recent biophysical studies of RNA polymerases and their inhibition, as well as transcripti
42 ic RNA, nucleoprotein, the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and a polymerase cofactor, the phosphoprotei
43                                              Polymerases are commonly targeted by nucleotide analog i
44 de novo RNA synthesis using the purified RSV polymerase as 8 nucleotides (nt), shorter than previousl
45 escribe the well-known interactions with RNA polymerase as well as a broader range of cellular target
46 through viral RNA profiling and in vitro MeV polymerase assays identified a block in the initiation p
47         Both intra- and interchromosomal RNA polymerase-associated contacts involve multiple genes di
48 ase-polymerase, increase DNA reannealing and polymerase backtracking, and generate frayed primer-ends
49              These results indicate that DNA polymerase beta can induce a strain in the DNA that modu
50                                          DNA polymerase beta has two DNA-binding domains that interac
51                                      The RNA polymerase-binding protein DksA, together with the alarm
52 e rate of transcription by DNA-dependent RNA polymerases, but the influence of DNA sequence on transc
53                      The evidence that a DNA polymerase can configure its active site entirely differ
54                      We used droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to demonstrate that hu
55 tein expression were assessed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (n=4-6/group) and Western blot
56 parum infections, using both microscopy- and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) -based methods, was perf
57                      The evaluation of miRNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) arrays indicated that th
58                                  Multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays increase the dete
59                                        While polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection corresponded w
60  to test positive for the causative virus by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) even after clinical reco
61                                          The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been the gold standa
62 cidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in seropositive and sero
63  for haemosporidian parasites using a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol that targets th
64 navirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection detected on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening of a large hom
65 n epidemiology study characterizes trends in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test positivity for seve
66   This study documents results of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of environmental
67 te swabs daily (days 1 to 14) for SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing.
68  observed significant reaction inhibition of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), loop-mediated isotherma
69 ries of the first 18 patients diagnosed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 inf
70  genotyped for the rs4680 SNP using realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
71                         Through quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis, we found that
72        In this paper, multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay using TaqMan prob
73                                 Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is the technique of cho
74 id or ventricular disease using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
75  (SARS-CoV-2) based on reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are being used to rul
76 eptic ulcer, real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) examination of abdomi
77 r influenza viruses by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in Australia, Canada,
78  currently employed is reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which can have good
79 n of several genes via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
80 lysis and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
81           We performed reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses of 166 samples and im
82                                 quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of representative gen
83 eloping palatal tissues was verified by ChIP-polymerase chain reaction analyses.
84 termined using Western blot and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses.
85  Toxoplasma gondii coinfection documented by polymerase chain reaction analysis.
86    Among 12 persons who infected mosquitoes, polymerase chain reaction and amplicon deep sequencing w
87 ase serum by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and analyzed in relation to pr
88  (TLs) by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and evaluated the prognostic i
89 were tested for PeV by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and genotypes determined by su
90 nd IL34 mRNA in GF was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and protein expression visuali
91 files (by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and RNAscope) of small intesti
92                                              Polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing therefor
93 icity and apoptotic assays, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analyses, wer
94 and a previously developed RLEP quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for M. leprae, were vali
95           Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay, flow cytometry analysis
96 plasma ctHPVDNA using a multianalyte digital polymerase chain reaction assay.
97  vaginalis species-specific and clade-typing polymerase chain reaction assays.
98 ges were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction at the end of each incubation
99 r SARS-CoV-2 RNA by nasal swab and real-time polymerase chain reaction between March 21 and May 4, 20
100 s (classical and nonclassical), custom-built polymerase chain reaction devices, gas-phase analyte det
101 t) for viremia detected by weekly plasma CMV polymerase chain reaction for 100 days (n = 100) or valg
102 blot, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for markers of autophagy, DNA
103                                              Polymerase chain reaction for severe acute respiratory s
104           TL was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction in leukocytes extracted from c
105  tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection by polymerase chain reaction of nasopharyngeal swab or sero
106 , a negative result on reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction testing, and no oligoclonal ba
107 This study describes the point prevalence of polymerase chain reaction tests positive for severe acut
108         We used patch clamp and quantitative polymerase chain reaction to measure electrophysiologica
109 microscopy) or expensive and time-consuming (polymerase chain reaction) to perform.
110 ove duplicates in read counts resulting from polymerase chain reaction, a major source of noise.
111 ues were analyzed by histology, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and 16S ribosomal RNA gene se
112 estern blot, immunohistochemistry, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and enzyme-linked immunosorbe
113 unohistochemistry, immunoblotting, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytometry.
114 al tumors by immunohistochemistry, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytometry.
115  chromatin immunoprecipitation, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and immunoblot assays.
116 ls were analyzed by immunoblot, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, chromosome immunoprecipitatio
117  by gene-expression microarray, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunoblot, and immunofluores
118 nger RNA (quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, RNAscope) content.
119                                 We genotyped polymerase chain reaction-detected parasites using deep
120                                              Polymerase chain reaction-positive (+) measles cases not
121 SAA) were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.
122 t proof of COVID-19 by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
123 ion was assessed by culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
124 est CT versus those of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
125 ime using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
126  CoPEC by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
127  18S rDNA by photo-induced electron transfer polymerase chain reaction.
128  immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and polymerase chain reaction.
129 sted for SARS-CoV-2 by means of quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction (qPCR) assay of nares swab spe
130  confirmed by means of reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay.
131 sa virus depends on host mRNA, because viral polymerases cleave 5'-m7G-capped host transcripts to pri
132 ein, the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and a polymerase cofactor, the phosphoprotein (P), for transcr
133 are host factors that act as influenza virus polymerase cofactors.
134              These novel compounds inhibited polymerase complex activity, inhibited virus replication
135 icken ANP32A and the PB2 627 domain of viral polymerase complex both contribute to this enhanced inte
136 s backbone and either PB1, NP, or the entire polymerase complex of the chicken isolate, caused higher
137                                          The polymerase complex plays an important role in influenza
138 sorted polymerase complexes, showed that the polymerase complexes from the 2014-15 outbreak induced h
139 ) viruses, including viruses with reassorted polymerase complexes, showed that the polymerase complex
140  Consequently, here we exploited the capsule polymerase Cps1B of App1 as an in vitro synthesis tool a
141 nds cyclic oligoA (cOA) synthesized by Cas10 polymerase-cyclase and allosterically activates the effe
142                 Both sites are important for polymerase de novo initiation and elongation activities
143                           In eukaryotes, DNA polymerase delta (Pol delta) bound to the proliferating
144 than correcting OG incorporated by accessory polymerases (DinB1/DinB2/DinB3/DnaE2).
145 kly rejected, they nonetheless stabilize the polymerase-DNA complex, suggesting that Pol beta, when b
146 NA template/blocker scaffolds coupled to the polymerase/dNTP replication machinery leads, in the pres
147   P-OD associates with the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase domain of L and protrudes away from it, while
148 te residues in the metal-binding site of the polymerase domain were replaced by alanine is highly tox
149  onto the nascent RNA strand as it exits the polymerase during RNA replication.
150 X-ray crystal structure of the bacterial RNA polymerase engaged in reiterative transcription from the
151 his task, ribosomes make ribosomal proteins, polymerases, enzymes, and signaling proteins.
152 se domain mutations in the gene encoding DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) have incredibly high mutation
153 mutant of the POL2A catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon and show that POL2A is required to st
154 domain substitution raised the organelle DNA polymerase error rate by 140-fold relative to the wild t
155                     Interestingly, human DNA polymerase eta (poleta) proficiently incorporates dGTP o
156                          Two mouse models of polymerase exonuclease deficiency shed light on mechanis
157 n microscopy structures of influenza C virus polymerase (FluPolC) in complex with human and chicken A
158                        Ena/VASP-family actin polymerases, for example, modulate cell shape by acceler
159 allenging the notion that lagging-strand DNA polymerases frequently dissociate from replisomes during
160                                          DNA polymerase from bacteriophage T7 undergoes large, substr
161 involves removing the covalently bound viral polymerase from rcDNA, which produces a deproteinated-rc
162 s the removal of the covalently linked viral polymerase from the 5' end of the minus strand [(-)stran
163 ified Pol establishes a new paradigm for DNA polymerase function.
164 Direct-acting agents, targeting protease and polymerase functionalities, represent a milestone in ant
165 ork blocks, the coupling of DNA helicase and polymerase functions during replication stress (RS) and
166 f off-target inhibition of mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma (Polgamma).
167 ed on nuclear chromosome 15, encodes the DNA polymerase gamma(Pol gamma).
168 ans and caused the 2009 pandemic, it evolved polymerase gene mutations that enabled it to more effici
169 ucleic acids and are often incompatible with polymerase-generated sequences.
170 istance mutations (DRMs) on individual HIV-1 polymerase genomes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and
171 nce of viral RNA and the processivity of the polymerase, giving insights into the way that ANP32A mig
172 fying enzymes (Taq DNA polymerase, Phi29 DNA polymerase) have been widely used for the diagnosis of v
173 tion elongation properties of eukaryotic RNA polymerase I (Pol I) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has n
174    Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is the first key step of ribosome b
175                CSB and CSA also increase RNA Polymerase I loading to the coding region of the rDNA an
176                                          RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and its general transcription fac
177  domain (CTD) of the RPB1 subunit of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) has been revived in recent years,
178 iption, and promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is a critical step in transcripti
179                   Condensates containing RNA polymerase II (Pol II) materialize at sites of active tr
180                                          RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) contains a disordered C-termi
181 increases Mediator-driven recruitment of RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) to promoters and enhancers.
182 hosphorylating the C-terminal domain for RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) for activation.
183 n of transcription termination (DoTT) of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) in host genes.
184                           In eukaryotes, RNA polymerase II (RNApII) transcribes messenger RNA from te
185                                          RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription is governed by the
186 (Ser2) of the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), which is initiated when RNAPII r
187                            Elongin is an RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-associated factor that has been s
188 ription factor II H (TFIIH) it activates RNA polymerase II by hyperphosphorylation of its C-terminal
189 fluenced by the Thr4 phospho-site in the RNA polymerase II CTD and the 3' processing/termination fact
190 lex as a terminator of promoter-proximal RNA polymerase II during piRNA biogenesis.
191                                          RNA polymerase II interacts with various other complexes and
192 he molecular process of transcription by RNA Polymerase II is highly conserved among eukaryotes ("cla
193 t at HIF target gene promoters increased RNA polymerase II loading through p300.
194 -kB, P-TEFb, and serine 2 phosphorylated RNA Polymerase II on the HEXIM1 gene.
195 was found across the range of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II subunits and their associated basal transc
196 nk the SnRK2.6-mediated ABA signaling to RNA polymerase II to promote immediate transcriptional respo
197 bly through promoting the recruitment of RNA polymerase II to their promoters.
198  Drosophila cells, splicing occurs after RNA polymerase II transcribes several kilobases of pre-mRNA,
199 ssed from an intron that is generated by RNA polymerase II transcribing the circular viral genome mor
200 2 (TBP2 or TRF3), which is essential for RNA polymerase II transcription.
201 al to the regulation of transcription by RNA-polymerase II, via its interaction with the positive tra
202                                  PAF1, a RNA polymerase II-associated factor 1 complex (PAF1C) compon
203 lpha-satellite expression occurs through RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription, but does not requ
204 pair, mRNA processing, and regulation of RNA polymerase II.
205 interacts with transcriptionally engaged RNA polymerase II.
206 ctors and transcriptional machinery like RNA Polymerase II.
207 y stimulates transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II.
208  mediated by paradoxical upregulation of RNA polymerase in response to rifampicin.
209  Here we examined the functions of these two polymerases in bypassing major-groove O (6)-alkyl-2'-deo
210 tion initiation factors of mitochondrial RNA polymerases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and humans, resp
211 e efficiency with which Escherichia coli RNA polymerase incorporates dinucleoside polyphosphates at t
212 late, slowed helicase, or uncoupled helicase-polymerase, increase DNA reannealing and polymerase back
213 grown in the presence and absence of the RNA polymerase inhibitor rifampicin, we identify hundreds of
214                             Poly(ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have efficacy in triple ne
215 AF, and Onc-1 sensitized to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors both in vitro and ex vivo These fi
216             However, it is not clear how RNA polymerase initially recognizes such sequences.
217                                          RNA polymerases initiate transcription at DNA sequences call
218                The error prone organelle DNA polymerase introduced mutations at multiple locations ra
219 hogens and commensals, and the bacterial RNA polymerase is a proven target for antibiotics.
220 he enzyme responsible for transcription, RNA polymerase, is conserved in general architecture and cat
221 ng processes of the multidomain Y-family DNA polymerase IV (DPO4).
222 IBs, including VP35, VP24, VP30, and the RNA polymerase L.
223                        The RNA-dependent-RNA polymerase (L) gene revealed phylogenetic relationship a
224 ding site in the central cavity of the viral polymerase (L) protein that was validated by photoaffini
225                              Translesion DNA polymerases may also contribute.
226                            Mitochondrial RNA polymerase (mtRNAP) is crucial in cellular energy produc
227                                    These RNA polymerase mutations cause large-scale transcriptional c
228  the cytoplasm, ZIKV and Dengue virus (DENV) polymerases, NS5 proteins, are predominantly trafficked
229 l to be highly mutagenic because it uses DNA polymerases, nucleases, and other enzymes that modify in
230 wo copies of the catalytic module of poly(A) polymerase (PAP) are recruited by the CPSF30-hFip1 compl
231 in and, at least in part, on poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) activity.
232 on of autophagy, and robust poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage indicative of DNA damage and
233 Synthetic lethality between poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition and BRCA deficiency is expl
234 diolabled poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor called (125)I-KX1 to deliver
235 quired tumour resistance to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and other therapeutics and
236 ow increased sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, especially when combined w
237                             Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) superfamily members covalently link ei
238 nsitivity to inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) that are being tested in clinical tria
239  targets available such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF
240 ision repair (BER) protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP).
241 nscriptional machinery, and facilitating RNA polymerase pause-release to regulate gene expression.
242     Recently, DNA-modifying enzymes (Taq DNA polymerase, Phi29 DNA polymerase) have been widely used
243 stimulates transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase (Pol) II and regulates cell growth and differ
244 rylation in RPB1, the largest subunit of RNA polymerase (pol) II.
245 owth control as the central regulator of RNA polymerase (Pol) III activity.
246                                          RNA polymerase (Pol) III has a noncanonical role of viral DN
247                           In eukaryotes, RNA Polymerase (Pol) III is specialized for the transcriptio
248 licative and translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases (Pols) are retained in their cellular roles.
249                                          DNA polymerases (Pols) provide roles in both replication of
250 ed, including unusual ones such as giant RNA polymerase polyproteins.
251 ork reversal in vivo and rely on the primase-polymerase PRIMPOL for repriming, unrestrained replicati
252  the primary function of MeV C is to improve polymerase processivity and accuracy, rather than unique
253     Silencing expression of RNA-directed RNA polymerases RdR1 and RdR2 (but not RdR3) and Dicer-like3
254 the thumb subdomain of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and the methyltransferase (MTase) doma
255 e (3CL(pro)) and the nsp12 RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) are the best characterized SARS-CoV-2
256  NS5 methyltransferase and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) domains form a conserved interdomain c
257  expressing a picornavirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) outside the viral context (RdRP mice)
258    Dengue virus (DENV) NS5 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), an important drug target, synthesizes
259 s motifs representative of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), whereas the dsRNA2 ORF sequence showe
260  is performed by the viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp).
261 ty SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRps), serving as an immediate polymerase
262 polymerases (RdRps), serving as an immediate polymerase reaction terminator, but not by a host-like h
263 htly more thermodynamically favorable in the polymerase relative to these DNA duplexes.
264 tions and components on bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) activity using a common quantitative P
265                               Pausing by RNA polymerase (RNAP) during transcription elongation, in wh
266 additional initiation factor Bdp1 in the RNA polymerase (RNAP) III system, however, remained elusive.
267 nation factor playing essential roles in RNA polymerase (RNAP) recycling, gene regulation, and genomi
268 gella-specific sigma factor that targets RNA polymerase (RNAP) to control the expression of flagella-
269 vitro transcription system with purified RNA polymerase (RNAP) to investigate rRNA synthesis in the p
270                                      The RNA polymerase (RNAP) trigger loop (TL) is a mobile structur
271 ortant DNA repair mechanism that removes RNA polymerase (RNAP)-stalling DNA damage from the transcrib
272 1) [comparable to the speed of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP)].
273 63) and previously published (N = 495) HIV-1 polymerase sequences collected during 2005-2019.
274 NAD-consuming enzymes (e.g. poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases, sirtuins, and others).
275 verse, their repetitive sequences induce DNA polymerase slippage and stalling, leading to length and
276 n, replication error by polymerase zeta, and polymerase slippage at repeat junctions - on the generat
277 edicted virion proteins, including three RNA polymerase subunits.
278 eactions is predicted to be different in the polymerase than in aqueous solution and the DNA duplexes
279 s, gene expression is performed by three RNA polymerases that are targeted to promoters by molecular
280 t of specialized translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases that have evolved to incorporate nucleotides
281         Bacteriophage T7 encodes its own DNA polymerase, the product of gene 5 (gp5).
282 t evidence suggests that in Arabidopsis, DNA polymerase theta (PolQ) may be a crucial enzyme involved
283           Recent studies have implicated DNA polymerases theta (Pol theta) and beta (Pol beta) as med
284 eam effector TCDD-inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (TiPARP) during infection.
285 thers change domain-domain interfaces in the polymerase to enable RNA-DNA hybrid binding and reverse
286 that the response of a model replicative DNA polymerase to variously structured DNA is sufficient to
287 esults in the recruitment of error-prone DNA polymerases to the replication fork.
288                                          RNA polymerase transcribes certain genomic loci with higher
289 istant from the active site in a Klentaq DNA polymerase variant (ZP Klentaq) contribute to its abilit
290                                          RNA polymerase variants that are thought to increase or decr
291                  The viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (vRdRp) of MuV consists of the large protein
292       The virus encodes an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which replicates and transcribes the vRNA ge
293 parameters of cellular and viral DNA and RNA polymerases with respect to cellular levels of their nuc
294 he DNA duplexes but slightly exoergic in the polymerase, with Arg517 and Asn513 providing electrostat
295 e same B-family as high-fidelity replicative polymerases, yet is specialized for the extension reacti
296 fically dependent on the Polzeta translesion polymerase, yields COSMIC signature 3 observed in BRCA1/
297                                          DNA polymerase zeta (Polzeta) belongs to the same B-family a
298 During translesion synthesis, eukaryotic DNA polymerase zeta (zeta) carries out extension from a wide
299 isms - CpG deamination, replication error by polymerase zeta, and polymerase slippage at repeat junct
300 flection of distal upstream DNA over the RNA polymerase zinc-binding domain, NusA rotates underneath

 
Page Top