コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 the immunomodulatory drugs lenalidomide and pomalidomide.
2 mplex bound to thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide.
3 e sensitive or resistant to lenalidomide and pomalidomide.
4 c activity of another immunomodulatory drug, pomalidomide.
5 on with the IMiD derivatives lenalidomide or pomalidomide.
6 GDC-0853 and the cereblon recruitment ligand pomalidomide.
7 inant negative Cullin 4A mutant, and by free pomalidomide.
8 38 refractory disease or previously received pomalidomide.
9 d by the anti-myeloma drugs lenalidomide and pomalidomide.
10 17, to the cereblon (CRBN) E3 ligase ligand, pomalidomide.
11 phase 2 dose for indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide.
12 r treatment with HbF inducers hydroxyurea or pomalidomide.
13 with a higher affinity than lenalidomide or pomalidomide.
14 oidosis responding to salvage treatment with pomalidomide.
15 nation of immunotherapy with lenalidomide or pomalidomide.
17 cebo, pomalidomide (2 mg/d) plus prednisone, pomalidomide (0.5 mg/d) plus prednisone, and prednisone
19 n study, four treatment arms were evaluated: pomalidomide (2 mg/d) plus placebo, pomalidomide (2 mg/d
20 aluated: pomalidomide (2 mg/d) plus placebo, pomalidomide (2 mg/d) plus prednisone, pomalidomide (0.5
22 kly for 4 weeks, followed by every 2 weeks), pomalidomide 4 mg (days 1-21), and dexamethasone 40 mg (
23 16 mg/kg at the recommended dosing schedule, pomalidomide 4 mg daily for 21 days of each 28-day cycle
24 s of pembrolizumab, 200 mg IV every 2 weeks, pomalidomide 4 mg daily for 21 days, and dexamethasone 4
26 Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pomalidomide 4 mg on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle in c
28 in the pomalidomide group, patients received pomalidomide 4 mg orally daily on days 1 to 21 of each c
29 data from other phase 2 trials, suggest that pomalidomide 4 mg per day on days 1 to 21 of 28 with dex
31 nts (1:1) to either isatuximab 10 mg/kg plus pomalidomide 4 mg plus dexamethasone 40 mg (20 mg for pa
35 5 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days, or oral pomalidomide 4.0 mg daily (days 1-21) and dexamethasone
36 ned the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral pomalidomide (4 dose levels) administered on days 1 to 2
38 day 1 of cycle 2 onward) combined with oral pomalidomide (4 mg on days 1 to 21) and oral dexamethaso
42 Blood, Dulmovits and colleagues report that pomalidomide, a drug approved by the US Food and Drug Ad
48 o our knowledge, the first phase II trial of pomalidomide administered in combination with low-dose d
49 ere show that thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide affect stem cell mesendoderm differentiatio
50 nd switch-off CRISPR-based technologies with pomalidomide allowed complete control over their activit
51 rable pharmacological attributes of the drug pomalidomide allowed control of activity of base editor
52 indicated that vactosertib co-treatment with pomalidomide also reduced TGFbeta levels in patient bone
55 lines of therapy, including lenalidomide or pomalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor, were enrolled i
56 and systemic antiangiogenic drugs including pomalidomide and bevacizumab for moderate-to-severe blee
57 nts treated with indatuximab ravtansine with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (indatuximab ravtansine p
58 rial, we assessed the safety and efficacy of pomalidomide and dexamethasone (PDex) in patients with A
60 lufen and dexamethasone (melflufen group) or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (pomalidomide group).
61 risk of disease progression or death versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone alone and could be consid
62 random block size of two or four to receive pomalidomide and dexamethasone alone or daratumumab plus
64 ays 1 and 8 of cycle 9 onward) combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone at the same doses and sch
66 ion-free survival benefit of isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone compared with pomalidomid
67 group versus 23.7 months (19.6-29.4) in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (hazard ratio [HR]
68 progression-free survival compared with the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (median 12.4 months
70 ly assigned to either the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (n=125) or the poma
71 re randomly assigned to the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (n=151) or the poma
73 ed deaths occurred in the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (one each of unknow
74 ndomly assigned: 151 to the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group and 153 to the poma
75 54%) of 149 patients in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group and in 60 (40%) of
76 domly assigned 1:1 to the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group or the pomalidomide
78 months (IQR 14.4-20.6), the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group showed improved pro
79 s (95% CI 23.7-40.3) in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group versus 23.7 months
80 %) of 120 patients in the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group versus 56 (46%) of
81 50%) of 149 patients in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group versus 59 (39%) of
82 s (95% CI 3.7-7.5) in the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group versus 8.4 months (
83 pomalidomide and dexamethasone group or the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group via an interactive
84 68%] of 149 patients in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group vs 76 [51%] of 150
85 one group vs 76 [51%] of 150 patients in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group), anaemia (25 [17%]
86 group and in 60 (40%) of 150 patients in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group, the most common of
90 group versus 59 (39%) of 150 patients in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group; pneumonia (23 [15%
91 p versus 8.4 months (5.9-not reached) in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group; progression-free s
93 eagues(2) publish two different trials using pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed
94 tinue to support the use of daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed
95 pomalidomide and dexamethasone compared with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed
96 phase 1b study, intravenous daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone induced a very good parti
98 e benefit-risk profile of pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone is unfavourable for patie
99 n patients (1:1) to receive daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone or pomalidomide and dexam
100 efractory multiple myeloma, daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone reduced the risk of disea
101 ed in 44 refractory MM patients treated with pomalidomide and dexamethasone therapy in whom low IKZF1
102 KEYNOTE-183 assessed efficacy and safety of pomalidomide and dexamethasone with or without pembroliz
103 ons for adverse reactions were permitted for pomalidomide and dexamethasone, but not for isatuximab.
105 mumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone or pomalidomide and dexamethasone; patients were stratified
106 e believe to be a new mechanism of action of pomalidomide and lenalidomide and support the hypothesis
107 e new insights on the mechanism of action of pomalidomide and lenalidomide in the regulation of gene
108 on our findings, we propose a model in which pomalidomide and lenalidomide modify the chromatin struc
110 demethylase-1 (LSD1) silencing reduced both pomalidomide and lenalidomide up-regulation of p21(WAF-1
111 ves of thalidomide (IMiD compounds), such as pomalidomide and lenalidomide, are highly active in mult
116 Our data indicate antifibrotic effects of pomalidomide and possible association with increases in
118 reactions with E3 ligase recruiters such as pomalidomide and related derivatives provide new degrade
119 etermine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pomalidomide and to explore its efficacy when combined w
121 immunomodulators (lenalidomide, thalidomide, pomalidomide and/or methotrexate) in the past month.
123 ith at least two lines of therapy (excluding pomalidomide) and refractory to the last line were rando
124 l blood during treatment with durvalumab and pomalidomide, and combination therapy induced significan
125 el trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (BPd), as compared with
126 erapeutic regimen consisting of carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (CPD) in an open-label,
127 In the DREAMM-8 trial, belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone demonstrated a statistic
128 ogression or death compared with bortezomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in lenalidomide-exposed
129 e myeloma treated with belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone or bortezomib, pomalidom
130 malidomide, and dexamethasone or bortezomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone reported stable HRQOL.
131 l (n=254) or standard regimens (daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone; daratumumab, bortezomib
133 cells/kg) or standard of care (daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone; pomalidomide, bortezomi
134 ory imide drugs (IMiDs) such as thalidomide, pomalidomide, and lenalidomide are the most common cereb
138 unomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) lenalidomide and pomalidomide are Food and Drug Administration-approved d
139 and its structural analogs lenalidomide and pomalidomide are highly effective in treating clinical i
140 unomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) lenalidomide and pomalidomide are highly effective treatments for multipl
142 revealed that everolimus, temsirolimus, and pomalidomide are predicted to target the calcificasome.
145 These findings support the evaluation of pomalidomide as an innovative new therapy for beta-hemog
147 t to hydroxyurea's myelosuppressive effects, pomalidomide augmented erythropoiesis and preserved bone
148 we selected three compounds: (a) a Ro5 drug (Pomalidomide), (b) a bRo5 orally available drug (Saquina
149 f-target degradation and found that reported pomalidomide-based PROTACs induce degradation of several
151 (2%) were recorded in patients who received pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (pneumonia [
152 mum tolerated doses, safety, and efficacy of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVD) combin
153 e, and dexamethasone (BPd), as compared with pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd), in le
154 278 patients received at least one dose of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone and 270 pati
157 progression-free survival when treated with pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone compared wit
160 how pharmacologic agents (eg, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) and autolog
163 me highly resistant to both lenalidomide and pomalidomide, but not to the unrelated drugs bortezomib,
164 han double that observed with decitabine and pomalidomide; butyrate had an intermediate effect wherea
165 ently developed and offer new possibilities (pomalidomide, carfilzomib and ixazomib, panobinostat, el
166 second zinc finger of SALL4 in complex with pomalidomide, cereblon and DDB1 reveals the molecular de
167 vitro experiments indicated that vactosertib+pomalidomide co-treatment decreased the viability of MM
170 re to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, daratumumab, and an alkylating agent and h
171 over, multiple myeloma patients treated with pomalidomide demonstrated increased in vivo gamma-globin
172 ere, we show that the immunomodulatory agent pomalidomide depletes pancreatic lesion areas of alterna
173 ination with weekly dexamethasone (arm B) or pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide (PomCy
175 amab mafodotin and 7.0 months (4.6-10.6) for pomalidomide-dexamethasone (hazard ratio 1.03 [0.72-1.47
176 and aged (<75 vs >=75 years), to isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (isatuximab group) or pomalid
177 clonal antibody approved in combination with pomalidomide-dexamethasone and carfilzomib-dexamethasone
178 nce in median overall survival compared with pomalidomide-dexamethasone and is a new standard of care
179 methasone group (sepsis) and two (1%) in the pomalidomide-dexamethasone group (pneumonia and urinary
180 rted for one patient (<1%) in the isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone group (sepsis) and two (1%) i
181 ported in 12 patients (8%) in the isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone group and 14 (9%) in the poma
183 5 months (95% CI 8.9-13.9) in the isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone group versus 6.5 months (4.5-
184 he belantamab mafodotin group and 107 to the pomalidomide-dexamethasone group); 184 (57%) of 325 were
186 one group versus 6.5 months (4.5-8.3) in the pomalidomide-dexamethasone group; hazard ratio 0.596, 95
189 ergent adverse events (any grade; isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone vs pomalidomide-dexamethasone
190 de; isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone vs pomalidomide-dexamethasone) were infusion reactions (56
191 307 patients to treatment: 154 to isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone, and 153 to pomalidomide-dexa
195 manageable safety profile of isatuximab plus pomalidomide/dexamethasone in heavily pretreated patient
196 tinuous or intermittent dosing strategies of pomalidomide/dexamethasone in lenalidomide-refractory my
197 e-escalation study evaluated isatuximab plus pomalidomide/dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/ref
199 atory drug (IMiD) analogs, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide, dose-dependently inhibited hiPSC mesendode
200 he clinical and pharmacodynamics analysis of pomalidomide dosing strategies in multiple myeloma (MM)
201 inhibition in combination with lenalidomide/pomalidomide, double autologous stem cell transplant plu
202 onal or investigational (eg, JAK inhibitors, pomalidomide) drug therapy, allogenic stem cell transpla
204 the activation of Rho GTPases, we found that pomalidomide enhanced F-actin formation, stabilized micr
205 0 [76%] of 249 patients had an event) in the pomalidomide group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, [95% CI 0.64
206 0-72]; 107 [43%] were female) and 249 to the pomalidomide group (median age 68 years [IQR 61-72]; 109
207 te cardiac failure) and four patients in the pomalidomide group (two patients with pneumonia, one wit
208 At 24 weeks, the mean difference between the pomalidomide group and the placebo group in the change f
209 up and 25.0 months (95% CI 18.1-31.9) in the pomalidomide group at a median follow-up of 18.6 months
210 s in the melflufen group and 32 [13%] in the pomalidomide group had fatal treatment-emergent adverse
212 Adverse events that were more common in the pomalidomide group than in the placebo group included ne
213 he melflufen group vs 26 [11%] of 246 in the pomalidomide group), neutropenia (123 [54%] vs 102 [41%]
215 ver 30 min on day 1 of each cycle and in the pomalidomide group, patients received pomalidomide 4 mg
216 in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumo
219 global sales, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and pomalidomide had the lowest eligibility rates for data s
220 d dexamethasone (indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide) had failure of at least two previous thera
223 drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide have revolutionized the treatment of patien
224 and immunomodulatory drugs (lenalidomide or pomalidomide) have shown promising clinical response rat
225 idomide and its derivatives lenalidomide and pomalidomide (IMiDs) are effective treatments of haemato
228 domide analogues, including lenalidomide and pomalidomide, in the treatment of haematological maligna
229 e selectively and differentially affected by pomalidomide including BCL11A, SOX6, IKZF1, KLF1, and LS
230 dulatory (IMiD) agents like lenalidomide and pomalidomide induce the recruitment of IKZF1 and other t
232 We found that 8 weeks of treatment with pomalidomide induced modest increases of HbF with simila
235 hat the activation of RhoA was essential for pomalidomide-induced interleukin-2 expression in T cells
240 We demonstrate that in vivo embryonic assays Pomalidomide is a significantly more potent anti-inflamm
243 e antimyeloma cellular immunity generated by pomalidomide, leading to improved clinical responses.
252 investigated the effects of lenalidomide and pomalidomide on erythropoiesis and hemoglobin synthesis.
253 ry effects of thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide on LPM differentiation while retaining sens
254 15, and 16 (starting dose of 20/27 mg/m(2)), pomalidomide once daily on days 1 to 21 (4 mg as the ini
255 Further, we showed that in Swiss 3T3 cells, pomalidomide only activated RhoA, not Rac1 or Cdc42, and
257 utic value of new drugs (eg, JAK inhibitors, pomalidomide) or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.
259 owed superior progression-free survival than pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapse
260 present the largest trial to date evaluating pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients wit
261 TRATUS study assessed safety and efficacy of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in the largest
263 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide (POM) with/without low-dose dexamethasone (
265 Specifically, we designed a folate-caged pomalidomide prodrug, FA-S2-POMA, by incorporating a fol
266 and primary human monocytes, we report that pomalidomide rapidly and selectively activated RhoA and
267 ata reveal the molecular mechanisms by which pomalidomide reactivates fetal hemoglobin, reinforcing i
269 drugs such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide, recognizes an acetyl degron of GS, resulti
271 ti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) and pomalidomide reduced the T-cell exhaustion that occurs i
273 modulatory drugs, including lenalidomide and pomalidomide represent a novel class of small molecule a
274 ew agents, such as the third-generation IMiD pomalidomide, the second-generation PIs carfilzomib and
276 idomide and its derivatives lenalidomide and pomalidomide, these immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) recen
277 ducing the E3 ligase cereblon-binding ligand pomalidomide to Mcl-1/Bcl-2 dual inhibitors S1-6 and Nap
278 nations adding 1 of these new agents (except pomalidomide) to the RD or VD regimens were superior to
282 lenalidomide and support the hypothesis that pomalidomide, used alone or in combination with hydroxyu
283 bortezomib and dexamethasone with or without pomalidomide using a permutated blocked design in blocks
293 the second-generation immunomodulatory drug pomalidomide, which was recently approved by the US Food
294 t correlation of immune effects triggered by pomalidomide with clinical responses in MM patients.
298 opened 2 sequential phase 2 trials using the pomalidomide with weekly dexamethasone (Pom/dex) regimen
299 alumab as monotherapy or in combination with pomalidomide with/without dexamethasone were characteriz
300 unomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) lenalidomide and pomalidomide yield high response rates in patients with