ライフサイエンスコーパス: potential difference

1 r lavage fluid, hypoxemia, and altered nasal potential difference.

2 model-based approach for accounting for the potential difference.

3 driven by an inside-negative apical membrane potential difference.

4 ctric current during application of electric potential difference.

5 urfaces separated with a small electrostatic potential difference.

6 y 8.5 mV hyperpolarization in ocular surface potential difference.

7 correcting for it to obtain true interfacial potential differences.

8 y related to the field-induced supramembrane potential differences.

9 ctive electrodes upon application of a small potential difference (1 V) and is capable of achieving o

10 al electrical resistance (750 Omega cm2) and potential difference (15.3 mV), with an inward short-cir

11 Contrary to our expectation, a large potential difference (-70 mV) slowly evolved across the

12 of amino acids and peptides are driven by a potential difference a countercurrent to a flow of heate

13 On the basis of this oxidative potential difference, a strategy for isomeric purificati

14 d electric field (PEF) increases the natural potential difference across the cell membrane until a cr

15 These charged segments relocate when the potential difference across the membrane changes, contro

16 Application of a potential difference across the membrane resulted in mig

17 enough to develop a sufficiently significant potential difference across the membrane.

18 ntial represent the overall/averaged surface potential difference across the nanopore.

19 Maximum potential difference after 2 wk off treatment in the aff

20 The change in potential difference after topical application of 10(-)4

21 bipolar electrode stabilizes the interfacial potential difference along its length.

22 (APDR) curves as well as augmented membrane potential differences among different cell types during

23 be avoided because it obscures the known or potential differences among the various types of TMA.

24 spectrum of effects of COX-2 inhibitors and potential differences among them.

25 is characterized by a higher transepithelial potential difference, an increase of amiloride-sensitive

26 ual mice over time by using rectal and nasal potential difference analyses and in vitro by Ussing cha

27 in those on placebo when assessed by in-vivo potential difference and chloride efflux.

28 e-lumen catheter technique allowing baseline potential difference and chloride secretion to be assess

29 of Evans blue and increased transendothelial potential difference and electrical resistance of this B

30 Functionally, nasal potential difference and large intestinal short-circuit

31 luminated thylakoid membrane into electrical potential difference and pH difference components.

32 l period, as were serial measurements of the potential difference and resistance values of the ileal

33 e tissue caused reproducible changes in both potential difference and short-circuit current.

34 Their large conduction band potential difference and the inner electrostatic field f

35 g, in the same scanning area, of the contact potential difference and the second derivative of the ca

36 g in homozygous mutant mice, restoring nasal potential differences and improving survival.

37 on all 62 samples to examine the groups for potential differences and the ability of the gene list t

38 proximal convoluted tubule, transepithelial potential differences and transepithelial potassium conc

39 antly increases mouse nasal trans-epithelial potential difference, and hindered the ability of excise

40 ctrolyte solutions, applying a transmembrane potential difference, and measuring the resulting ionic

41 water, formed under the influence of a high potential difference (approximately 15 kV).

42 the neuroendocrine mechanisms governing this potential difference are not fully established.

43 ickness in the paralimbic cortex and whether potential differences are evident only during a depressi

44 ice produces changes in the nasal epithelium potential difference assay, consistent with corrected CF

45 Potential difference between colonic lumen and a periphe

46 of approximately one-half of the 70 mV redox potential difference between cytochrome f of P. laminosu

47 in its structure and is altered in the redox potential difference between heme a and Cu(A): +18 mV fo

48 yte solution in which a BPE is immersed, the potential difference between the BPE and the solution dr

49 ltage (Vm), which is defined as the electric potential difference between the cytoplasm and the extra

50 table level of cob(I)alamin due to the large potential difference between the NADPH/NADP+ couple and

51 These data highlighted a potential difference between the role of Slit2 in guidin

52 reshold that would nevertheless minimize the potential difference between the sample and extraction s

53 The open circuit potential difference between the two aqueous compartment

54 redox potential of the bL-heme, shifting the potential difference between the two b-hemes from 140 mV

55 r expectation was that the net electrostatic potential difference between the two chambers should be

56 At this point, there is no potential difference between the two reference electrode

57 tput, we propose the systems with the lowest potential difference between the working and the counter

58 imity of the potential of the RE so that the potential difference between these two electrodes become

59 ternal circuit back and forth to balance the potential difference between two electrodes.

60 The potential difference between two microreference electrod

61 a four-electrode potentiostat to control the potential difference between two microreference electrod

62 The potential difference between two or more nESI emitters i

63 comparative efficacy studies to evaluate the potential differences between anti-TNF and non anti-TNF

64 Understanding of potential differences between approaches aids interpreta

65 At the same time, these studies have exposed potential differences between baroreflex activation and

66 Our data also highlight potential differences between behaviors regulated by sta

67 nctionality to prevent immunopathology, with potential differences between cancer and chronic infecti

68 tional studies are required to determine the potential differences between chronic, intraventricular

69 les at the 3 different periods and to assess potential differences between cyclosporine and tacrolimu

70 East-west comparisons highlighted potential differences between ecological (driven by phys

71 aracterize risk factors, long-term outcomes, potential differences between eyes having primary IOL vs

72 nondrinkers, the dose-response relation and potential differences between former and current drinkin

73 To further control for potential differences between hospitals, a within-hospit

74 human study component and the impact of the potential differences between human and mouse immune res

75 S number, location, spatial arrangement, and potential differences between individuals, we compared t

76 Establishing the extent of potential differences between laboratory animals and hum

77 e of a shared genetic liability and examined potential differences between low- and high-functioning

78 Then, we study potential differences between network centralities and t

79 Here, we discuss the potential differences between peripheral and CNS lymphat

80 To further investigate potential differences between rAAV-2 and rAAV-5 that mig

81 However, they also identify potential differences between regions and proteins, sugg

82 spite a large rural US population, there are potential differences between rural and urban regions in

83 in this nephron segment during fibrosis and potential differences between sexes remain undefined.

84 the active site of this protease, suggesting potential differences between species.

85 s study is to review disease progression and potential differences between subgroups of children with

86 (3D) geometry of mesophyll cells, leading to potential differences between the estimated and actual c

87 ident memory T cell (TRM), and emphasize the potential differences between the migratory patterns of

88 dues not covered in the structural model and potential differences between the modeled and solution h

89 vious studies conducted in China, reflecting potential differences between the present study and earl

90 Peak potential differences between the rescuer's wrist and th

91 of the two groups of hyperthermophiles; some potential differences between these habitats include flu

92 ement of host proteins in Ac/Ds activity and potential differences between these proteins among plant

93 ts of several previous studies and highlight potential differences between transcriptional and transl

94 To elucidate details of Env entry and potential differences between viruses that use CXCR4 (X4

95 ive ion fluxes driven by the electrochemical potential differences, but also primary or secondary act

96 oposed architecture, the variance of surface-potential difference can be determined by electrical dou

97 mpled to a single measurement of the contact potential difference (CPD) per pixel.

98 orrected these animals' characteristic nasal potential difference defect.

99 reduction of PutA by proline is favored by a potential difference (Delta E degrees ') of more than 0.

100 The biosensor exhibits excellent peak potential difference (DeltaEp (SS-RR) = 108 mV) between

101 rd one-way fluxes J = J+ - J-, with chemical potential difference deltamu = RT ln(J-/J+).

102 Nasal potential differences demonstrated a clear response to l

103 The effective potential difference deviates from the applied value due

104 The interfacial potential difference drives the transfer of ionic analyt

105 f the electric double layer that affects the potential difference driving the electrode reaction.

106 nduced asymmetric stresses generate chemical potential difference, driving lithium ion flux from the

107 channels can be modulated by a transmembrane potential difference, due to alterations on ion-mobility

108 The potential difference, EOE - ERE, between the oxidizing e

109 f vector-specific CFTR DNA and mRNA, in-vivo potential difference, epifluorescence assay of chloride

110 To test for such potential differences, especially in the context of the

111 Electric potential differences exist around the vascular endothel

112 Pdeb was expressed after Crx, highlighting a potential difference for the role of PDEB in human eye d

113 In addition to the potential differences for oxidation and reduction reacti

114 Our data highlight potential differences for the catalytic mechanism of NOH

115 technology that produces an electrochemical potential difference from a salinity gradient.

116 bsence of "looking back" behavior suggests a potential difference from the abilities shown by the gre

117 within these core zone communities to assess potential differences from peripheral communities in the

118 us Ag-mediated clonal deletion and highlight potential differences from their reported roles in tissu

119 low of electrons in the presence of electric potential difference, has been an important goal in the

120 severity of lung disease, we measured nasal potential difference in 51 young people with CF using a

121 A potential difference in all-cause hospitalization may me

122 s can be controlled by an externally applied potential difference in an electrochemical cell.

123 ctural covariance global metrics suggested a potential difference in brain reserve among groups.

124 isoprenaline led to a significant change in potential difference in children without CF, whereas no

125 uency in the p53 tumor suppressor gene and a potential difference in gender, we analyzed primary smal

126 bimodal coverage distributions, suggesting a potential difference in genomic architecture.

127 CFTR activity was measured by nasal potential difference in mice and by Ussing chamber elect

128 asound at baseline and 9 months indicating a potential difference in neointimal area at follow-up (O-

129 icated by rises in short-circuit current and potential difference in rat jejunal tissue mounted in Us

130 However, the potential difference in the pace of aging between the se

131 tory of Alzheimer disease and evidence for a potential difference in the pathophysiology of the devel

132 rferi in the infection cycle and highlight a potential difference in the requirements for purine salv

133 Survival analyses were used to account for potential differences in age, comorbidity, or intensity

134 ms may be clinically meaningful, given their potential differences in antifungal susceptibilities.

135 al membrane and soluble proteins, indicating potential differences in associated PAT specificity and

136 Potential differences in bacterial subspecies (oligotype

137 alizations among the Neandertals, indicating potential differences in behavior compared with modern h

138 The aim of this study was to investigate potential differences in BHI between euhydrated younger

139 Potential differences in cell signaling triggered by VEG

140 To examine potential differences in cerebral oxygen delivery in She

141 These results highlight potential differences in contextual encoding schemes by

142 rent oligomeric states among P5CDHs suggests potential differences in cooperativity and protein-prote

143 ator (CFTR)-deficient organoids and by nasal potential differences in DeltaF508 mice.

144 tistical hypothesis testing and investigates potential differences in discriminant statistics between

145 ctly different cytokine profiles, suggesting potential differences in disease pathogenesis and/or dis

146 pression of mGluR1 in DA neurons, suggesting potential differences in eCB synthesis between DA and GA

147 Medical educators should be aware of the potential differences in effectiveness for various CBE t

148 dle-to-gate lifecycle assessment focusing on potential differences in energy use, blue water footprin

149 In this study, we evaluated potential differences in epigenetic markers, i.e., histo

150 target biomarkers varied greatly, suggesting potential differences in exposure between the investigat

151 Shared attention experiments examine the potential differences in function or behavior when stimu

152 ndrosarcoma cell lines were used to test for potential differences in gene expression.

153 To explore potential differences in growth factor expression betwee

154 uration, medication, whole brain volume, and potential differences in hemispheric and anatomical subr

155 Our work also highlights potential differences in Hippo signal propagation betwee

156 Accounting for potential differences in home and away performance, trav

157 We used simulation to examine potential differences in how palliative care specialists

158 wever, little attention has been directed to potential differences in hypertension between Europe and

159 This suggests potential differences in immune surveillance of primary

160 out the prevalence of insulin resistance and potential differences in intracellular lipid distributio

161 d by using regression analysis corrected for potential differences in laboratory equipment and by usi

162 Further surveillance is necessary to confirm potential differences in laboratory findings and in feve

163 al diverse interactions with their hosts and potential differences in life history traits between maj

164 To investigate the potential differences in matrix properties between these

165 However, potential differences in mechanisms of motor learning an

166 Nasal potential differences in mice were measured in response

167 between AGM plasma and milk SIV populations, potential differences in milk cytokine profiles of natur

168 who no longer worked in nursing and testing potential differences in motivation with the likelihood

169 red cues, and underscore the consequences of potential differences in motivational behavior between i

170 Potential differences in myotoxicity between agents may

171 However, little is known about potential differences in native versus minimal ribozyme

172 However, little is known about potential differences in network architecture that under

173 ltreated individuals but have not focused on potential differences in network architecture.

174 terventions lead to clinical improvement and potential differences in network modulation are not full

175 tion of hemorrhage and lesion types suggests potential differences in origin.

176 A larger study might better define the potential differences in our secondary outcome measures

177 : Identification of potential differences in outcome associated with residen

178 To identify potential differences in outcomes, hospitals were divide

179 We contrast the potential differences in prevention of invasive pneumoco

180 re, in addition to analytical uncertainties, potential differences in qPCR data from filtered waters

181 In view of the diverse locations and potential differences in responsiveness between BAT depo

182 ents have been observed, less is known about potential differences in responsiveness to nondrug thera

183 nt condition; however, little is known about potential differences in risk factors by sex and ethnici

184 Additionally, potential differences in risk of gout posed by different

185 To identify potential differences in rumen function that lead to dif

186 nd posterior lateral line system, suggesting potential differences in sensitivity threshold or spatia

187 udies of acute kidney injury should consider potential differences in serum creatinine caused by chan

188 ded to MAPK inhibition in vitro, we observed potential differences in signaling and feedback mechanis

189 n concentration and duration of exposure and potential differences in signaling between the known E2

190 ensitivity analysis was used to test whether potential differences in smoking could account for the o

191 To eliminate potential differences in sorting due to the extracellula

192 In addition, potential differences in SSD parameters (mean and standa

193 nal extension not found in Cdc42, suggesting potential differences in subcellular location and functi

194 More research is needed to clarify potential differences in susceptibility between women an

195 varied by race/ethnicity, which may reflect potential differences in susceptibility.

196 been limited attention over the years on the potential differences in terms of driving mechanisms, pa

197 Overall these findings reveal potential differences in the active sites of these two P

198 However, potential differences in the amplification performance o

199 The goal of this study was to investigate potential differences in the biophysical properties of s

200 mic areas of the United States to search for potential differences in the clinical presentation.

201 Adding to this complexity are potential differences in the composition and configurati

202 ore rapidly than wild-type virions, implying potential differences in the composition of the two viri

203 These findings highlight the potential differences in the effects of nutritional immu

204 contact with psychosocial services highlight potential differences in the extent to which services ar

205 tation of motion-related information implies potential differences in the functional roles of these a

206 tion and those never vaccinated to allow for potential differences in the health seeking behaviour of

207 ootprints that are rare in maize, suggesting potential differences in the host proteins involved in e

208 published data were shown to demonstrate the potential differences in the identification of outliers.

209 atment modalities appears to be similar, but potential differences in the immunological mechanisms in

210 ncreased in asthma but not in AR, suggesting potential differences in the immunopathogenesis of these

211 Results also indicate potential differences in the mechanisms leading to parti

212 under-enriched in localized proteins and of potential differences in the mechanisms that target prot

213 d) are compared, in order to investigate the potential differences in the metabolic profiles.

214 ed in the microbial tree of life, leading to potential differences in the minerals produced by differ

215 , which reflect both demographic factors and potential differences in the natural history of TB.

216 The potential differences in the nature of the data derived

217 or immunotherapy of prostate cancer, despite potential differences in the pattern of expression betwe

218 ll lines and provides the first evidence for potential differences in the penetrance of mutations in

219 eadily elicited against the D1 arm; however, potential differences in the presentation of Man(4) on n

220 on of viral load in the infected population; potential differences in the prevalence of Incurable STD

221 To highlight potential differences in the processing of endogenous ve

222 1 and S6K2 by PDK1 were observed, suggesting potential differences in the regulation of these homolog

223 onatal rat cardiac myocyte assay to evaluate potential differences in the response of TNF-alpha-expos

224 nt role of RhoA in vivo can be attributed to potential differences in the signaling cues regulating a

225 The impact on measurement comparability of potential differences in the tertiary and quaternary str

226 fication technology to gain new insight into potential differences in the translatomes of DRG and TG

227 s, no neuroimaging studies have investigated potential differences in the underlying deliberative pro

228 The objective of this study was to identify potential differences in the upper airways inflammatory

229 gative transfer machinery, identification of potential differences in their adhesion mechanisms, and

230 ze or sensorimotor function, indicating that potential differences in these measures did not contribu

231 The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate potential differences in these US parameters between tre

232 s' glutamate and GABA levels; and to examine potential differences in this response in ASD, we used m

233 nducted from 1978 to 2002 were evaluated for potential differences in time to recurrence (TTR), time

234 the delivery of cardiac care have focused on potential differences in treatment by individual physici

235 pecies abundance distributions and points to potential differences in vertical structure among Centra

236 outcome of human H5N1 infections and suggest potential differences in virulence and antiviral respons

237 mg of VX-770, the median change in the nasal potential difference (in response to the administration

238 Results show that the measured potential difference increases as the internal probe tra

239 We derive an analytical model of the potential differences induced across plasma and internal

240 is study is to distinguish the supramembrane potential difference-induced electroconformational chang

241 The physical basis of the potential difference is a mixed interfacial potential wi

242 two nodes, a source and a drain, to which a potential difference is applied, selects two tree-like s

243 plied to an off-center position, an electric potential difference is built that can drive the transpo

244 al to 9.4 x 10(4) s(-1) M(-1) when the redox potential difference is large.

245 Although the etiology of such potential differences is currently not clear, age-depend

246 F diagnosis by sweat chloride testing, nasal potential difference measurement, and DNA analysis for a

247 We have made transnasal potential difference measurements (effective in detectio

248 iolet photoemission spectroscopy and contact potential difference measurements are conducted on MHP t

249 Nasal potential difference measurements are valuable endpoint

250 Potential difference measurements could form a useful fu

251 her kindreds with this condition, then nasal potential difference measurements could provide a simple

252 In vivo nasal potential difference measurements were performed in non-

253 Using EcFM, we demonstrate contact potential difference measurements, consistent with the p

254 weat testing, spirometry, or base-line nasal potential-difference measurements.

255 osed a planar nano-gap structure for surface-potential difference monitoring.

256 two different families with large oxidation potential differences, namely, dopamine (DA) and adenosi

257 Nasal potential difference (NPD) response patterns and sweat c

258 Nasal potential difference (NPD), a well-established in vivo c

259 ither the inhibitor resistance nor the redox potential differences observed between the bacterial (or

260 By applying an electric potential difference of 2000 V across the length of the

261 tween 2H and 1T' MoTe2 domains, possessing a potential difference of about 100 mV.

262 ode can be used only in cases when the redox potential difference of reactions occurring at opposite

263 Part of the reduction potential difference of the T1 sites in high vs low pote

264 ermined from simulations in which a chemical potential difference of water has been established on th

265 solved oxidation peaks with significant peak potential differences of 0.23 V.

266 ring power characteristics that include peak potential differences of 600 volts and currents of 1 amp

267 ction of the state of charge, we measure the potential differences of the two single-electron couples

268 Further analysis suggests that the reduction potential differences of type-1 copper sites are caused

269 uid movement, as well as the transepithelial potential difference (PD) across the in vitro ciliary ep

270 Previous measurements of the transepithelial potential difference (PD) of the proximal tubule have yi

271 Using nasal potential difference (PD) protocols in 8 subjects with C

272 t study demonstrated with a new open-circuit potential difference (PD) technique that Cl- moves acros

273 ted in vivo measures of CFTR function (nasal potential difference [PD] measurements and sweat chlorid

274 nificantly higher amiloride-sensitive rectal potential difference (PDamil) than control mice fed a hi

275 Open-circuit potential differences (PDs) across the fluid-bathed ocul

276 l membranes, the field-induced supramembrane potential difference plays a dominant role in damaging t

277 h K(+) , in parsing the H(+) electrochemical potential difference (proton motive force) across the il

278 unlight into a transmembrane electrochemical potential difference, providing chemical energy to almos

279 y, phase III time) and secretion (transmural potential difference), rectal sensorimotor (barostat; se

280 merous abnormalities such as reduced mucosal potential differences, reduced surface oxygenation, and

281 and give practitioners more insight into the potential differences resulting from different choices o

282 Transepithelial potential difference, short-circuit current (Isc), and r

283 biomarkers, such as sweat chloride and nasal potential difference, suggests that they may reset the c

284 c fibrosis (aged >/= 6 years; abnormal nasal potential difference; sweat chloride >40 mmol/L; forced

285 he epithelial sheet because the transcorneal potential difference (TCPD; +40 mV internally positive)

286 -independent mechanism based on the electric potential difference that builds up along the molecule a

287 These studies highlight the potential differences that exist between divergent Mga p

288 features to resource selection and identify potential differences that may facilitate long-term coex

289 To identify potential differences, the effects of GFs and radiation

290 pecies from the solution causes the measured potential difference to have nonzero values at distances

291 and histologic assessments, including nasal potential difference to measure electrophysiological fun

292 ntrol individuals (n = 32) were screened for potential differences using surface-enhanced laser desor

293 Trans-epithelial potential difference (Vt) measurements are routinely car

294 Tracheal epithelial potential difference was measured bronchoscopically by s

295 Rectosigmoid potential difference was measured.

296 significantly lower (p < .05) and epithelial potential difference was significantly higher (p = .03)

297 ld not be demonstrated, and (c) transtubular potential difference was zero.

298 ction of o-dopaquinone, which requires a low potential difference, was detected electrochemically.

299 Dipole potential is the potential difference within the membrane bilayer, which

300 omology modeling of RacE1 and RacE2 revealed potential differences within the active site pocket that