コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 a dairy bull with extreme subfertility (10% pregnancy rate).
2 , CSF2 blocked the negative effect of FBS on pregnancy rate.
3 of the different surgical approaches on the pregnancy rate.
4 The outcome studied was clinical pregnancy rate.
5 ng the two groups, we found no difference in pregnancy rate.
6 s with lymphoma and did not influence future pregnancy rate.
7 tions, which improved oocyte development and pregnancy rate.
8 ut a statistically significant difference in pregnancy rate.
9 ficant differences were observed in terms of pregnancy rates.
10 as associated with a reduction in multifetal pregnancy rates.
11 , rectal shaving, disc excision) in terms of pregnancy rates.
12 -acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) on pregnancy rates.
13 ection, and used survival analysis to assess pregnancy rates.
14 appendicitis were associated with increased pregnancy rates.
15 ificantly enhance semen quality and increase pregnancy rates.
16 g, and is thus unlikely to reduce unintended pregnancy rates.
17 limited extent and at the expense of overall pregnancy rates.
18 wer two-pronuclear zygotes and had a reduced pregnancy rate (19.2% pregnant with >15% SPTRX3-positive
19 There were no differences in biochemical pregnancy rates 52 (3.57%) versus 38 (2.50%) (p = 0.089)
20 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.14]; P = .48) and clinical pregnancy rate (68.8% vs 72.8%, respectively; difference
21 ed secondary outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy rate (77.2% vs 79.5%, respectively; difference
23 ociated with graded reductions in unintended pregnancy rates across the 12-month trial (usual care: 2
26 ryos becoming blastocysts in culture and the pregnancy rate after embryo transfer are affected by typ
28 st spontaneous pregnancy and showed a higher pregnancy rate after laparoscopic IPAA (log-rank, P = 0.
29 ngly advocated, but concerns about the lower pregnancy rate after reducing the number of embryos tran
33 of sexual experience increased even faster, pregnancy rates among sexually experienced teens aged 15
34 ehavioural, and clinical factors, to compare pregnancy rates among women receiving different contrace
35 1alpha-KO mice showed a substantially higher pregnancy rate and litter size compared with WT mice at
36 ificant decreases in embryonic implantation, pregnancy rate and litter size were observed in matings
38 arious strategies to decrease the adolescent pregnancy rate and the effectiveness of these strategies
39 ception and infertility treatment to improve pregnancy rates and birth outcomes, although confirmator
42 Ablation of NLRP3 improved the survival and pregnancy rates and increased anti-Mullerian hormone lev
43 ly = 11 mm in diameter resulted in decreased pregnancy rates and increased late embryonic mortality.
46 ecoming increasingly important for improving pregnancy rates and reducing the risks associated with m
47 focuses on the recent decline in adolescent pregnancy rates and the recent slight decline in the num
54 ad at least 1 pregnancy after breast cancer (pregnancy rate at 10 years, 19%; 95% CI, 17% to 22%).
56 ects on development to the blastocyst stage, pregnancy rate at day 30, calving rate and pregnancy los
58 was no statistical significance in clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (38.63% vs 32.46%,
60 included live birth rate (LBR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), miscarriage, pregnancy of unknown
62 nd the rate of resulting twin births so that pregnancy rates can be improved and multiple gestations
63 y in women with breast cancer and results in pregnancy rates comparable to those expected in a noncan
64 for endometriosis is associated with a lower pregnancy rate compared with other type of surgery, such
65 rectal resection was associated with a lower pregnancy rate compared with the other techniques (N = 2
68 tes, first-trimester pregnancy loss, ectopic pregnancy rate, cumulative number of pregnancies, time t
69 of 2006 to 2011 and 2016 to 2021, multifetal pregnancy rates decreased from 12.9% to 9.1% with OI/IUI
70 sh, embryo quality, and subsequent recipient pregnancy rates did not differ by fertility classificati
71 randomized clinical trial found that ongoing pregnancy rates did not improve with the antioxidant sup
74 ; n = 288) or low (</= -2; n = 262) daughter pregnancy rate (DPR) was genotyped for 434 candidate SNP
75 sed on documented decreases in fertility and pregnancy rates during previous major societal and econo
76 of childbearing age who used valproic acid, pregnancy rates during valproic acid use did not decreas
77 after IVF or ICSI, biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates, first-trimester pregnancy loss, ectopic
80 for all patients with UC showed an increased pregnancy rate for the laparoscopic group (log-rank, P =
81 A statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates for SRI versus IUI was detected in women
82 were observed for pup weight, prenatal loss, pregnancy rate, gestation length, puberty onset in males
83 n 1990-94 and 2015-19, the global unintended pregnancy rate has declined, whereas the proportion of u
85 exogenous progesterone, is used to optimize pregnancy rates; however, luteal phase support remains l
86 meta-analysis has reported a 6% spontaneous pregnancy rate in amongst NOA patients who underwent var
87 , ghrelin and leptin concentrations, and the pregnancy rate in overweight and obese infertile women w
88 transplantation, and the baseline unplanned pregnancy rate in the United States is approximately 50%
90 ated tyrosine kinase 3 ligand, led to normal pregnancy rates in a spontaneous abortion-prone model.
92 ocols (LPS) over placebo in view of improved pregnancy rates in fresh cycles of IVF (in vitro fertili
94 nd have important implications for improving pregnancy rates in infertile couples by assisted reprodu
96 e found a significant intervention effect on pregnancy rates in women attending family planning visit
97 a-uterine slow-release insemination (SRI) on pregnancy rates in women with confirmed infertility or t
101 s study was carried out to determine whether pregnancy rate is reduced after appendicitis or appendic
102 hese results support the hypothesis that the pregnancy rate might be improved with SRI compared to st
103 e via oocyte donation and experience similar pregnancy rates, multiple gestation rates, and spontaneo
110 and early pregnancy, midpregnancy, and late pregnancy rates of GWG (0-17, 17-27, and 27 wk to delive
111 Early pregnancy, midpregnancy, and late pregnancy rates of GWG were independently associated wit
115 % CI = 1.00-1.36, I(2) = 48.3%) and multiple pregnancy rates (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.11-2.01, I(2) = 4
116 atching (AH) techniques may improve clinical pregnancy rates, particularly in poor prognosis patients
119 en in the water group (29.1%) had an ongoing pregnancy (rate ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI
121 te 1980s, the abortion rate declined and the pregnancy rate remained stable, resulting in a 26% incre
122 ns were associated with an increase in total pregnancy rates (risk ratio [RR], 1.21 [95% CI, 1.02 to
125 ung women with early appendicitis had better pregnancy rates than those with advanced appendicitis.
126 whales were used to investigate variation in pregnancy rates through the quantification of progestero
127 y rate) and 0.01, respectively, reducing the pregnancy rate up to 15%, thus, supporting the biologica
131 ul over the 15 years, and the average annual pregnancy rate was higher than the average annual calvin
133 a spermatogenesis cycle of 72 days), ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the antioxidan
135 ntention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, pregnancy rates were 1 in 317 (0.3%; 95% confidence inte
144 e proportion for 1990-94, and the unintended pregnancy rates were higher than in countries where abor
148 ts of clinical pregnancy as well as multiple pregnancy rates were observed among women who received i
150 noninferiority of deep learning for clinical pregnancy rate when compared to standard morphology and
151 ded embryo transfers (4D UGET) could improve pregnancy rates when compared with clinical touch techni
152 ion of valproic acid use and had the highest pregnancy rates, while patients with epilepsy had the lo
153 s achieved with ICSI allowing a 50% clinical pregnancy rate with a live birth rate of 42% overall.
156 th in 32.2%, 23.3%, and 18.7%, respectively; pregnancy rates with letrozole were significantly lower