ライフサイエンスコーパス: prejudice

1 s (for example, increased empathy or reduced prejudice).

2 ting social stereotyping and contributing to prejudice.

3 ides, it must, on balance, be good to reduce prejudice.

4 osed shift toward more interactive models of prejudice.

5 upport the call for a reconceptualization of prejudice.

6 to the puzzle for determining how to address prejudice.

7 tervention-based solutions to the problem of prejudice.

8 rison of public endorsement of treatment and prejudice.

9 decision making; and the self-regulation of prejudice.

10 e nonidealities across the multiplex without prejudice.

11 al literatures on interventions for reducing prejudice.

12 t how they advance psychological theories of prejudice.

13 so contribute to the formation and spread of prejudice.

14 taly, Japan, and Greece, and (3) trait-level prejudice.

15 ormation and propagation of individual-level prejudice.

16 ingroup favoritism, among Americans prone to prejudice.

17 ial norms appear to explain these changes in prejudice.

18 research that evaluates methods for reducing prejudice.

19 at brief contact with an Arab doctor reduces prejudice.

20 evidence-based recommendations for reducing prejudice.

21 ed groups in media have been shown to reduce prejudice.

22 ol and mitigate the negative consequences of prejudice.

23 ing, humiliation, stereotyping, and negative prejudice.

24 om China, an effect moderated by trait-level prejudice.

25 reotypical generalizations, and (6) negative prejudice.

26 uals opposed to Trump exhibited decreases in prejudice.

27 even among individuals who explicitly reject prejudice.

28 n in South Florida targeting antitransgender prejudice.

29 intervention uses mentalizing as a salve for prejudice.

30 t thinking, and how they are associated with prejudice.

31 n all scientific disciplines without bias or prejudice.

32 studies of the effects of religion on racial prejudice.

33 rspectives and politics of those targeted by prejudice.

34 that liberals and conservatives are equally prejudiced.

35 to pose different threats, elicit different prejudices.

36 fail to deliver, will reinforce unproductive prejudices.

37 nce of art experience as a medium to counter prejudices.

38 formation of people's political beliefs and prejudices.

39 ispute the idea that there are many distinct prejudices.

40 world is one of the best antidotes to racial prejudices.

41 veness of such measures, such as preexisting prejudices.

42 igidity of children's social stereotypes and prejudices.

43 group, such that it induces individual-level prejudice-a process involving the interplay of semantic

44 nd make the case for the current theoretical prejudice: a flat Universe whose dominant constituent is

45 arch on pain control; and misconceptions and prejudices about drug abuse and addiction contribute to

46 t by merely observing interactions between a prejudiced actor and social group members, observers acq

47 t social norms can contain the expression of prejudice after the attacks.

48 ans' fear of contracting the virus relate to prejudice against Asian individuals?

49 elief that extreme behavioral expressions of prejudice against marginalized groups are justified.

50 Ableism-discrimination and social prejudice against people with disabilities-defines peopl

51 wing: New findings challenge a long-standing prejudice against studies with low response rates; innov

52 In recent decades, prejudices against Arab/Middle Eastern Muslim individual

53 should take care not to endorse or reinforce prejudices against psychiatric treatment and people who

54 rior social contact with Hispanics mitigated prejudices against them.

55 has long been established as a way to reduce prejudice among society, but in-person interventions can

56 , efforts to treat addiction are hampered by prejudice and a public view that treats it as a disorder

57 e narrative meaningfully and durably reduced prejudice and changed policy attitudes.

58 nize each other but think that the levels of prejudice and dehumanization held by the outgroup party

59 gate the extent to which COVID-19 has fueled prejudice and discrimination against multiple racial/eth

60 t that the COVID-19 pandemic has intensified prejudice and discrimination against racial/ethnic minor

61 Stigma, the prejudice and discrimination attached to mental illness,

62 These findings suggest that COVID-19-fueled prejudice and discrimination have not been limited to Ea

63 raising children, and the impact of societal prejudice and discrimination on same-sex partners.

64 Prejudice and discrimination toward immigrants, and the

65 literature on the determinants and nature of prejudice and discrimination toward immigrants, summariz

66 ure, and the promotion of social change; (c) prejudice and discrimination toward Indigenous peoples a

67 h toward addressing major societal issues of prejudice and discrimination.

68 real-world instances of essentialism-fuelled prejudice and discrimination.

69 s in the treatment group exhibited increased prejudice and discriminatory intent against East Asian,

70 r illuminate the connection between implicit prejudice and embodied perception, suggesting new perspe

71 ncrease in positive attitudes in relation to prejudice and exclusion after the launch of Time to Chan

72 t increases in positive attitudes related to prejudice and exclusion occurred after the Time to Chang

73 nd discrimination, especially in relation to prejudice and exclusion of people with mental health pro

74 d attitudes (tolerance and support p<0.0001; prejudice and exclusion p=0.001), but not intended behav

75 al mean scores for attitude items related to prejudice and exclusion, and tolerance and support for c

76 tive intergroup contact, can serve to reduce prejudice and facilitate more inclusive attitudes among

77 for greater contact between groups to reduce prejudice and increase social cohesion.

78 r intervention successfully reduced explicit prejudice and intergroup anxiety.

79 ial categories in these terms contributes to prejudice and intergroup conflict.

80 other and contribute to our understanding of prejudice and its reduction.

81 RH, acting as the mediator between implicit prejudice and magnitude of the RH illusion and proprioce

82 Finally, we show that meta-prejudice and meta-dehumanization are independently asso

83 ark matter, emphasizing that this is still a prejudice and not yet fact.

84 suggest that it is essential for analyses of prejudice and prejudice reduction to take the predictive

85 onal or contemporary frameworks for studying prejudice and prejudice reduction.

86 er that was launched with the publication of Prejudice and Racism in 1972.

87 t issues, we discuss linkages between sexual prejudice and religion, gender, sexuality, and related v

88 understand stereotypes, and the emergence of prejudice and sexism.

89 ve, must happen early in development, before prejudice and stereotypes are deeply entrenched.

90 ed categorization; formation and updating of prejudice and stereotypes; effects of prejudice on perce

91 ests with survey data containing measures of prejudice and support for police reform.

92 ourages research to move beyond the study of prejudice and to consider institutional and structural f

93 ts supporting research help us to understand prejudice and ways to ameliorate the problem.

94 ciated with psychiatric disorders as well as prejudices and conspiracy thinking.

95 s social biases, often reflecting attitudes, prejudices and stereotypes.

96 limited, leaving gaps in understanding these prejudices and the potential role of white supremacist b

97 tween the negative evaluation definition of "prejudice" and the implications of this definition for c

98 WHO defines ageism as stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination based on age.

99 Interview assessing knowledge, stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination related to obesity, along

100 our most powerful analgesics, but politics, prejudice, and our continuing ignorance still impede opt

101 t routine types of age-based discrimination, prejudice, and stereotyping that older adults encounter

102 ical asymmetries in the expression of online prejudice, and they are inconsistent with the view that

103 ditional gendered arrangements-norms, roles, prejudices, and hierarchies-shape every human life.

104 to acknowledge that the attitudes that drive prejudice are attitudes that are constructed in particul

105 Ingroup bias and outgroup prejudice are pervasive features of human behavior, moti

106 dynamic nature of Blumer's (1958) theory of prejudice as a sense of relative group position.

107 pattern is generated by actual interpersonal prejudice as opposed to structural constraints on meetin

108 Existing research depicts intergroup prejudices as deeply ingrained, requiring intense interv

109 ontent (e.g., stereotypes) and affect (e.g., prejudices) associated with social groups.

110 n programs are a promising route to reducing prejudice at a young age.

111 uations of Trump, across studies, social and prejudiced attitudes predicted evaluations of his democr

112 ocused on the impact of terrorist attacks on prejudiced attitudes toward groups linked to the perpetr

113 Also evident is the extent to which prejudices born in the days of applying earlier techniqu

114 tests were not associated with reductions in prejudice, but were associated with increases in support

115 groups together oppose dominant groups, that prejudice can be overcome.

116 ntext within which individual expressions of prejudice can meet important psychological needs.

117 0,000 participants, we tested how Americans' prejudice changed following the political ascension of D

118 However, evidence for this link to implicit prejudice comes from self-report questionnaire data rega

119 oblems ranging from psychiatric disorders to prejudices, conspiracy theories, and posttruth politics.

120 f social cognitive and moral judgments about prejudice, discrimination, bias, and exclusion.

121 ess to transplantation, reciprocity, prevent prejudice, donor safety net), decisional autonomy (body

122 pursued three theories related to intergroup prejudice--each with a different mentor.

123 event such extreme behavioral expressions of prejudice (EBEPs) against marginalized groups.

124 ialities of heme proteins that have not been prejudiced either by explicit design or by evolutionary

125 finition for correcting the social ills that prejudice engenders.

126 r, Kodachrome film was also the product of a prejudiced era when color film technology and photograph

127 akeup of public institutions can reduce mass prejudice, even in a context of intractable conflict.

128 embody covert racism in the form of dialect prejudice, exhibiting raciolinguistic stereotypes about

129 theoretical architecture of concepts (e.g., prejudice, experienced/received discrimination), drawn t

130 high on SDO (i.e., a key antecedent of group prejudice) expressed even less favorable sentiments towa

131 communication, which includes addressing the prejudices faced by female scientists and scientists of

132 he perspective of others can markedly reduce prejudice for at least 3 months.

133 ify social learning as a potent mechanism of prejudice formation that operates implicitly and support

134 including structural stigma, community-level prejudice, gender inequality, neighbourhood disadvantage

135 warm ischemia before cold storage which may prejudice graft survival and result in a greater risk of

136 Implicit prejudice has been shown to reduce the intensity of Whit

137 Dialect prejudice has the potential for harmful consequences: la

138 t properties that hinder food digestibility, prejudicing human and animal nutrition.

139 and give up stigmatizing some attitudes as "prejudice." I recommend that we avoid assuming that race

140 resources and have been shown to help reduce prejudice in an extended version of contact theory.

141 Is the orthodox concept of prejudice in danger of side-tracking, if not obstructing

142 from stepping trajectories with very little prejudice in data analysis.

143 and evil, which may foster a tendency toward prejudice in our society directed at those with skin dis

144 th a substantial change in the topography of prejudice in the United States.

145 ceived System Justification Deficit Model of Prejudice" in which expectations about others' degree of

146 ate heterosexuals to reduce their own sexual prejudice, including intergroup contact, as well as aven

147 According to intergroup threat theory, prejudice increases toward groups of people when they ar

148 the nature of racism as being solely due to prejudiced individuals rather than structural factors th

149 ele of the MAOA u-VNTR (MAOA-L) in adversely prejudicing information processing within a corticolimbi

150 , we examined three categories of mechanisms-prejudice (intergroup), motivation (intrapersonal), and

151 ctive accuracy and adaptivity of the studied prejudices into account.

152 The social neuroscience approach to prejudice investigates the psychology of intergroup bias

153 First, what counts as prejudice is a political judgement.

154 Existing research suggests that prejudice is acquired at an early age and that durably i

155 I argue that prejudice is an affective representation of a social gro

156 Racial prejudice is associated with a fundamental distinction b

157 texts (the between-level effect) on outgroup prejudice is greater than the effect of individual-level

158 Third, prejudice is identified in out-groups, not in-groups.

159 Intergroup prejudice is pervasive in many contexts worldwide, leadi

160 sagree with Dixon et al. by maintaining that prejudice is primarily rooted in aversive reactions towa

161 Preliminary findings suggest that this lower prejudice is sustained over time.

162 ts on meeting opportunities, how severe this prejudice is, and the circumstances under which it can b

163 effects through causal analyses, where lower prejudice levels were mediated by the strength of paraso

164 Prejudice, like contempt, is a general evaluation rather

165 ls are known to perpetuate systematic racial prejudices, making their judgements biased in problemati

166 ated the prevalence of "benevolent" forms of prejudice; many stigmatised groups are currently the tar

167 By this definition, prejudice occurs when we dislike or derogate members of

168 DKT suffers from a prejudice of heaviness and is considered to be useless b

169 social group members, observers acquired the prejudices of the actor.

170 rm violations may have reshaped the personal prejudices of the American people.

171 rovide an organic method to passively reduce prejudice on a large scale.

172 Thus, positive contact reduces prejudice on a macrolevel, whereby people are influenced

173 ing of prejudice and stereotypes; effects of prejudice on perception, emotion, and decision making; a

174 interventions and the mainstream concept of "prejudice" on which they are based.

175 only lack specificity on addressing implicit prejudice or stereotyping (67.5%).

176 s and burdens to health systems, rather than prejudice or unfounded fears.

177 ular scrutiny, since they may mask unethical prejudices or bias.

178 Sexual harassment, racial/ethnic prejudice, or discrimination based on sexual orientation

179 bers of kidney transplants performed without prejudicing outcomes.

180 ns us against overemphasizing evidence about prejudice over evidence about accuracy, when both are sc

181 n bias limits cross-sectional studies, since prejudiced people avoid intergroup contact.

182 e affected by those values (e.g., intergroup prejudices, political attitudes, legal judgments).

183 .'s paradigm-challenging paper serve to make prejudice potent.

184 ations of value differences for religiosity, prejudice, pro- and antisocial behavior, political and e

185 desires; expression of objectionable social prejudices; production of movement errors; and rebounds

186 Developmental perspectives on prejudice provide a fundamental and important key to the

187 te prospective helpers' motivations to avoid prejudiced reactions and increase their willingness to p

188 er groups has led to a dichotomy between the prejudice reduction and the collective action approach.

189 Nor does it dispute that prejudice reduction can be an effective way of tackling

190 ions recently reviewed in a meta-analysis of prejudice reduction experiments.

191 itique is the model of change that underlies prejudice reduction interventions and the mainstream con

192 Notably, prejudice reduction interventions may have ironic effect

193 Criticism of orthodox models of prejudice reduction is particularly relevant for lesbian

194 What are the prospects for reconciling a prejudice reduction model of change, designed to get peo

195 Thus, prejudice reduction models should and do improve intergr

196 nate identification, intergroup contact, and prejudice reduction techniques can undermine social chan

197 f Dixon et al. in the target article is that prejudice reduction through intergroup contact and colle

198 t is essential for analyses of prejudice and prejudice reduction to take the predictive accuracy and

199 roup relations should shift from theorizing "prejudice reduction" to "social change." A focus on soci

200 at contact has a significant role to play in prejudice reduction, and has great policy potential as a

201 of analysis involving a broader approach to prejudice reduction, awareness of potential conflict esc

202 We also critique the myopic focus on prejudice reduction, but we do not support the call for

203 p contact, originally designed as a tool for prejudice reduction, offers a promising means to resolve

204 et article challenges standard approaches to prejudice reduction, warning that they may inure people

205 eractive prejudice, which can interfere with prejudice reduction.

206 porary frameworks for studying prejudice and prejudice reduction.

207 -group interaction as a key mechanism in the prejudice reduction/collective action paradox and point

208 al.'s discussion on the dangers of employing prejudice-reduction interventions that seek to promote i

209 e that the causal effects of many widespread prejudice-reduction interventions, such as workplace div

210 us and broad-ranging empirical assessment of prejudice-reduction strategies is needed to determine wh

211 First, prejudice reflects understandings of social identity - t

212 re from Jewish or Arab doctors and embedding prejudice-related questions in a routine evaluation surv

213 ods for reducing bias, including reweighing, Prejudice Remover, and removing race from the models, we

214 For most of the history of prejudice research, negativity has been treated as its e

215 t article oversimplifies its presentation of prejudice researchers' primary theoretical and policy go

216 ully consider the threat-based psychology of prejudice(s) before implementing any strategy intended t

217 with Dixon et al.'s argument, I contend that prejudice should be understood in broadly political rath

218 ipants high (but not medium or low) in trait prejudice showed a significant relationship between thre

219 We found that explicit racial and religious prejudice significantly increased amongst Trump's suppor

220 cial biases are the result of preferences or prejudices similar to those displayed toward members of

221 f neuroscience with the social psychology of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination.

222 personal perceptions and behaviors (empathy, prejudice, stereotyping, and violence).

223 are more violent, traditional overt forms of prejudice still exist and predict discrimination of ethn

224 that the gunman was motivated by hatred and prejudice (study 1).

225 mic discourse on ageism focuses primarily on prejudices targeting older adults, implicitly assuming t

226 nalyses revealed that East Asians faced less prejudice than South Asians and were equally motivated b

227 ised people and places, was justified by the prejudice that colonised people's ways of knowing and be

228 The former prejudices that vegetarianism leads to malnutrition were

229 article reviews empirical research on sexual prejudice, that is, heterosexuals' internalization of cu

230 n of the optic nerve by leukemic cells might prejudice the flow of cerebrospinal fluid between the cr

231 a-d-galactoside, reducing their affinity and prejudicing the protein activity.

232 had little effect on overall survival while prejudicing the transplant candidacy of African-American

233 irectories of participating physicians might prejudice those determinations.OBJECTIVE To determine th

234 ffective where it could tap into preexisting prejudices; those born in districts that supported anti-

235 lly defined by an excess of body fat causing prejudice to health, can no longer be evaluated solely b

236 This was achieved with no prejudice to the viscosity of the material and following

237 ublic institutions shapes majority citizens' prejudice toward minorities are unclear.

238 disease vectors(1) but is also implicated in prejudice toward minority groups; avoidance of environme

239 c subgroup (e.g., Irish, Italian) can reduce prejudice toward racial and ethnic minorities, we predic

240 at of COVID-19 infection may correspond with prejudice toward the national outgroup associated with t

241 ed his supporters to increase their reported prejudice toward traditionally minoritized racial and re

242 al, more community participation and reduced prejudice towards immigrants.

243 ssed whether parasocial interventions reduce prejudice towards people with mental health issues by fi

244 nging, due mainly to nurses' assumptions and prejudices towards sexuality, lack of professional confi

245 ffectiveness of intergroup contact to reduce prejudice under a wide range of conditions.

246 g intense fear of consequences, experiencing prejudice undermining help-seeking efforts, and experien

247 wledge can bypass explicit beliefs to induce prejudice, via the interplay of semantic and instrumenta

248 ssociation between context-level contact and prejudice was largely mediated by more tolerant norms.

249 he perspective of minority groups can reduce prejudice, we randomized four counterspeech strategies a

250 and asymmetries in the expression of online prejudice, we used machine-learning methods to estimate

251 ey adduce little evidence to suggest that if prejudice were diminished, commensurate reductions in di

252 nity to observe reverse forms of interactive prejudice, which can interfere with prejudice reduction.