戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ) and reimbursement type (fee-for-service or prepaid).
2 he duration of the visits increased for both prepaid and nonprepaid visits.
3 ikely to undergo cataract extraction as were prepaid beneficiaries (P<.01).
4 he share of total health expenditure that is prepaid, especially through taxes and mandatory contribu
5             Types of practices included both prepaid group (72% of patients) and independent practice
6 hese terms and their principal predecessors, prepaid group practice and medical care foundations, are
7 11 years, the persons in fee-for-service and prepaid group practice settings did not differ in the cu
8   The persons with RA in fee-for-service and prepaid group practice settings did not differ in the qu
9  that persons with RA in fee-for-service and prepaid group practice settings received different quant
10 plan-Meier estimates, the persons with RA in prepaid group practice settings survived significantly l
11 h RA, 227 (22.2%) reported receiving care in prepaid group practice settings.
12 that the early forms of managed care, namely prepaid group practices, showed particular promise in im
13                          The rapid growth of prepaid health care and the increasing enrollment of Med
14 n the life insurance, private corporate, and prepaid health care industries; and medical expert panel
15  participants in a large Northern California prepaid health care program.
16 or visits covered by a managed-care or other prepaid health plan (prepaid visits) and non-prepaid vis
17 ases and 123 controls) and from members of a prepaid health plan in the United States (1986-1991; 50
18                                         At a prepaid health plan in Washington State, patients receiv
19                     Outpatient claims from a prepaid health plan were used to identify new episodes o
20 7 women diagnosed with EH (1970-2002) at one prepaid health plan who remained at risk for at least 1
21 ates varied considerably among the 7 largest prepaid health plans after adjusting for case mix.
22           Operating characteristics of these prepaid health plans, such as the method of reimbursing
23 mate future government out-of-pocket private prepaid health spending and development assistance for h
24 rmanente Southern California, which provides prepaid healthcare for 3.2 million residents by 6000 phy
25 eaders, policy makers, public, nonprofit and prepaid healthcare systems, and other systems, such as t
26 /prepaid insurance despite the growth in HMO/prepaid insurance as a form of payment; when all payors
27 logists was observed among patients with HMO/prepaid insurance despite the growth in HMO/prepaid insu
28                            Patients with HMO/prepaid insurance were less likely to have their skin ca
29  Questionnaires were returned anonymously in prepaid mailers.
30 he share of total health expenditure that is prepaid, particularly through taxes and mandatory contri
31 ians who were treating more patients who had prepaid plans reported a lower proclivity for face-to-fa
32 porting government, out-of-pocket (OOP), and prepaid private malaria spending, as well as malaria tre
33 sation by aggregating the government, donor, prepaid private, and household spending estimates.
34 of spending by domestic sources (government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket) and spending categor
35 cribe these countries' approaches to raising prepaid revenues, pooling risk, and purchasing services.
36 rent rates of cataract extraction in FFS and prepaid settings warrant further clinical investigation
37 ether there is overuse in FFS vs underuse in prepaid settings.
38 no extraction rate differences by sex in the prepaid settings.
39            Counseling rates were lower under prepaid than fee-for-service care in general medical pra
40 rises and the share of that spending that is prepaid through government or private mechanisms also ri
41 prepaid health plan (prepaid visits) and non-prepaid visits for primary and specialty care, for new a
42 a managed-care or other prepaid health plan (prepaid visits) and non-prepaid visits for primary and s
43 prepaid visits were consistently longer than prepaid visits, although the gap declined from 1 minute