ライフサイエンスコーパス: prick

1 ed pipetted DBS samples from the same finger prick.

2 The majority of samples (93.2% of heel prick and 89.9% of cord blood) were collected from term

3 for koayu fish and related allergens by skin prick and allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) (Immu

4 re effective on data obtained from both heel prick and cord blood, the latter being a more feasible o

5 a sampling through minimally invasive finger-pricking and allow generatation of volume-defined DPS fo

6 vention arm were provided with 2 free finger-prick-based HIVST kits at enrollment and could receive 2

7 ident adult (>/=16 y) was asked for a finger-prick blood sample, which was used to estimate HIV preva

8 ent assay) analyses were performed on finger-prick blood samples from a population-based survey in 3

9 Finger-prick blood samples from consenting individuals of all a

10 Matched urine and finger-prick blood samples from participants >/=2 years of age

11 device can detect N-acetylasparate in finger-prick blood samples from patients with TBI, and that the

12 Finger prick blood samples were collected using both volumetric

13 Using 100 microl finger-prick blood samples, the Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load

14 the microfluidic DBS card for direct finger prick blood sampling, and measured caffeine concentratio

15 Cord and heel prick blood spots were collected in Bangladesh and analy

16 ise for addressing the limitations of finger-prick blood testing toward tracking glucose trends over

17 ed venous blood and a fifth card from finger-prick blood were prepared from 103 HIV patients with a m

18 etocytes and asexual parasites in: i) finger prick blood, ii) venous blood, iii) skin biopsies, and i

19 owing detection of five stimulants in finger prick blood.

20 cipants from just a drop (~40 mul) of finger prick blood.

21 Using a skin prick by prick test (SPPT) and in vitro techniques, with

22 c tests, but these typically evaluate finger-prick capillary blood samples ( approximately 5 mul) and

23 When applied to heel prick data, algorithms correctly estimated gestational a

24 velopment and validation of a at-home finger-prick dried blood spot collection kit and an analysis me

25 ngle probe was assessed in an in vivo needle prick model to mimic sequelae of traumatic brain injury.

26 ve (SAW) biochips, to detect HIV in a finger prick of blood within 10 seconds (sample-in-result-out).

27 nd other environmental toxins using a finger prick of blood, thereby providing new insights into thei

28 lyze cell lysate in drug response studies or pricks of blood from small animal studies.

29 uation," "effects," "label," "de-labeling," "prick or epicutaneous," and "intradermal" skin testing,

30 vity to a specific allergen by means of skin prick or in vitro testing.

31 organisms probably enter the body by a thorn prick or other lesions of the skin.

32 double sensation: an initial Adelta-related pricking pain is followed by a C-related prolonged burni

33 ng a simple microcentrifugation step, finger-prick PoC testing was a quick and accurate approach for

34 ) survey, we measured the prevalence of skin prick positivity to a panel of allergens, and geometric

35 Prick-prick skin testing revealed positive responses to

36 Currently, the precise history and the prick-prick test using both raw and heated shrimps are u

37 The prick-prick test was positive for black tiger shrimp (ra

38 d material of his lunch was examined using a prick-prick test, allergen-specific IgE test (ImmunoCAP(

39 ive sample collection such as using a finger prick rather than a venous draw.

40 namic effects, including suppression of skin prick responses to allergen.

41 Positive skin prick results were obtained for Lake Biwa koayu fish (ra

42 cessfully to the determination of DBS finger-prick samples from 47 paediatric patients and results co

43 sure caffeine concentration in normal finger prick samples obtained from 44 human individuals.

44 off-label protocol using whole blood finger-prick samples tested with and without a simple three min

45 1036 cord blood and 487 heel prick samples were collected from 1069 unique newborns.

46 China), using two drops of blood from finger prick samples.

47 e, we demonstrated the feasibility of finger-prick sampling for Ab detection against SARS-CoV-2 using

48 and 3.83+/-1.19, p=0.042) and 12 months pin-prick score (63.84+/-28.26 and 92.67+/-19.43, p=0.025).

49 Pin-prick score of the 25 patients with neuropathic pain inc

50 d previously assessed pain intensity and pin-prick score.

51 lower-extremity motor, light touch, and pin prick scores after 1 year.

52 2-18.4; MD 4.3 [1.6-7.0]; p=0.0021), and pin prick scores improved by 18.3 points (13.7-22.9) versus

53 enance of neuropathic pain and increased pin-prick sensation.

54 Younger participants had higher skin prick sensitivity prevalence, but not total IgE, than ol

55 d at age 12 months: food sensitization (skin prick test >/= 2 mm) and allergy (oral food challenge) t

56 d/or gastrointestinal symptoms only and skin prick test < 8 mm) are considered for home-based milk re

57 Skin prick test (n = 51) and ImmunoCAP (Thermo Fisher) (n = 6

58 Using a skin prick by prick test (SPPT) and in vitro techniques, with natural

59 Food-specific serum IgE, skin prick test (SPT) and atopy patch test (APT) to foods inc

60 ze in last year, atopy assessed both by skin prick test (SPT) and by the measurement of allergen-spec

61 Skin prick test (SPT) and measurement of serum-specific IgE (

62 basophil activation test (BAT) and the skin prick test (SPT) and measuring the levels of peanut-spec

63 Skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) are often used

64 ht to determine the association between skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to egg proteins

65 nonallergic (n = 25) children underwent skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to peanut and i

66 rticaria upon CHX exposure and positive skin prick test (SPT) and/or positive CHX ImmunoCAP test (Pha

67 e, were all negative.The results of the skin prick test (SPT) for Citrus unshiu and specific IgE test

68 c sensitization was determined based on skin prick test (SPT) of five mites, three molds, and nine ot

69 of nut specifc IgE shown by a positive skin prick test (SPT) or specific IgE (sIgE) test.

70 ws' milk-specific IgE antibodies (IgE), skin prick test (SPT) reactivity and double-blind, placebo-co

71 Atopy was measured based on skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to 9 allergens at 36 months.

72 Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to grass, cypress, olive, mu

73 Infants with a skin prick test (SPT) response to egg white (EW) of less than

74 n to egg, milk, or both with a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to the trigger food and/or (2)

75 <=500 mg of peanut protein), a positive skin-prick test (SPT) result (>=5 mm wheal diameter above the

76 years of age and develop thresholds for skin prick test (SPT) results and specific IgE (sIgE) levels

77 peanut allergy, and the implications of skin prick test (SPT) screening before peanut introduction.

78 Skin prick test (SPT) sensitivity to house dust mite allergen

79 ein levels in household dust and peanut skin prick test (SPT) sensitization and likely allergy.

80 ile atopic dermatitis and preceding egg skin prick test (SPT) sensitization, we found a strong and si

81 dog allergens (Can f 1-6) in commercial skin prick test (SPT) solutions and to determine individual a

82 llergic sensitization was determined by skin prick test (SPT) to 17 aeroallergens.

83 276 one-year-old children who underwent skin prick test (SPT) to 4 food allergens and those with dete

84 A total of 433 patients with positive skin prick test (SPT) to birch pollen were analyzed regarding

85 Atopy was assessed by skin prick test (SPT) using inhalant and food allergens.

86 dermatitis (AD) and a positive egg/milk skin prick test (SPT), but no known PNA.

87 Patients with CMA and/or RA underwent skin prick test (SPT), intracutaneous test (ICT), and, when r

88 aeroallergens with and without positive skin prick test (SPT), respectively.

89 ures of allergic sensitisation (such as skin-prick test [SPT] and serum specific IgE [sIgE]) when stu

90 sk factors for atopy (allergen-specific skin prick test [SPT] reactivity and IgE [asIgE] sensitizatio

91 A larger wheal on the skin-prick test and a lower ratio of peanut-specific IgG4:IgE

92 sources, and latex was tested by using skin prick test and ImmunoCAP.

93 ut systemic IgE-sensitisation tested by skin prick test and serum allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) displa

94 Skin prick test and sIgE display moderate agreement, but have

95 -demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test and specific IgE were evaluated yearly.

96 fied for eczema status and test method (skin prick test and specific IgE).

97 agnose food allergy, when compared with skin prick test and specific IgE.

98 d for selected cases where the history, skin prick test and/or specific IgE are not definitive for th

99 itive ELISA results correlated with the skin prick test areas with the whole body and the setae extra

100 Identical ISAAC questionnaire and skin prick test data were collected and compared at 10 years

101 The esophageal prick test deserves further exploration because it may g

102 ore completed a questionnaire and had a skin prick test for atopy.

103 A skin prick test for poly-gamma-glutamic acid (PGA) which is a

104 Our skin prick test for several kinds of edible jellyfish suggest

105 specific IgE (sIgE) levels in serum or skin prick test has been shown to be a poor predictor of clin

106 The prick test is one of the most common medical methods for

107 Inclusion criteria included a positive skin prick test of 6 mm or more (wheal diameter, above the ne

108 ding detection of milk-specific IgE (by skin prick test or serum assay), diagnostic elimination diet,

109 ion, milk-specific IgE levels, and milk skin prick test performed at enrollment, 6 months, 12 months,

110 Primary outcomes were recent wheezing, skin prick test positivity (SPT), and allergen-specific immun

111 ed to measure geographical variation in skin prick test positivity and assess whether it was explaine

112 raphical variation in the prevalence of skin prick test positivity in Europe is unlikely to be explai

113 Skin prick test positivity to any one of the measured allerge

114 ociations of NVAS and atopy (defined as skin prick test reaction of >/=3 mm) were analysed using bino

115 Skin prick test reactions to pollen elicited larger weals whe

116 etween a chronic helminth infection and skin prick test reactivity even in a developed country.

117 tal IgE, grass pollen-specific IgE, and skin prick test reactivity to grass pollen were all reduced c

118 5 +/- 0.24 (P = .001) and a decrease in skin prick test reactivity to house dust mite from 7.0 +/- 1.

119 dren with eczema, wheeze, or a positive skin prick test response before ending exclusive breast-feedi

120 (n = 38) was defined as specific IgE or skin prick test response positivity to Aspergillus fumigatus,

121 dependent anaphylaxis to LTPs, positive skin prick test response to LTPs, and serum LTP IgE.

122 Peanut skin prick test responses and peanut- and Ara h 2-specific Ig

123 POIT was associated with reduced peanut skin prick test responses and peanut-specific IgE levels and

124 Skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels against 12

125 hildhood2000 birth cohort by using both skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels.

126 At year 1, skin prick test responses and wheat- and omega-5 gliadin-spec

127 ble by using routinely available peanut skin prick test responses or specific IgE levels, but this si

128 ith allergic disease) but with negative skin prick test responses to common allergens at randomizatio

129 history of ragweed allergy and positive skin prick test responses to ragweed were randomized and rece

130 Histamine skin prick test responses were diminished in patients with AD

131 ure and sensitization (as determined by skin prick test responses) was analyzed in more than 1000 ref

132 eanut- and Ara h 2-specific IgE levels, skin prick test responses, basophil activation, and TH2 cytok

133 Atopy was defined as a positive skin prick test result (>=3 mm) and/or a positive specific Ig

134 Overall, clinical allergy and skin prick test results complied with the specific IgE result

135 tivenoms and cetuximab induced positive skin prick test results in patients with sIgE to alpha-gal.

136 Negative prick test results were observed for regular ayu fish an

137 Based on available clinical data and skin prick test results, 922 (73%) patients would have been i

138 er IgG4 values (P = .001) and lower egg skin prick test scores (P = .0002) over time and a lower medi

139 g M+ participants tracked the following skin prick test sensitization statuses: M+P+C- > M+P+C+ > M+P

140 A skin-prick test showed positive reactions for Inavir inhaler

141 Prick to prick test shows a strongly positive response to nattou.

142 peanut-specific basophil activation and skin prick test titration compared with nonresponders.

143 nts aged 18 to 65 years with a positive skin prick test to Dactylis glomerata pollen were exposed to

144 phylaxis related to NSAID, (3) positive skin prick test to foods and/or specific IgE to food allergen

145 al allergic rhinitis (SAR) and positive skin prick test to grass and olive pollens and evaluate how k

146 action after peanut ingestion, positive skin prick test to peanuts, and positive by double-blind plac

147 Furthermore, a skin prick test using the same reagent showed a positive resu

148 Provided consent, a skin prick test was performed, and history of allergic sympto

149 The skin prick test was positive for raw pork and beef.

150 The result of enokitake skin prick to prick test was positive.

151 A skin prick test was used to ascertain atopy.

152 Atopy was defined as any skin prick test weal to common aeroallergens >/=4 mm.

153 (siitake, simeji, and eringi) skin prick to prick test were all positive.

154 allenges (OFCs) to egg, irrespective of skin prick test wheal sizes.

155 The negative predictive value of skin prick test with peanut extract and peanut butter and of

156 atopy (grass, house dust mite, and cat skin prick test) and atopic vs. non-atopic asthma at the age

157 ndard diagnostic methods (ImmunoCAP and skin prick test).

158 Of the 1430 children with a valid skin prick test, 228 (16%) were positive (more boys (20%) tha

159 y outcomes were desensitization, peanut skin prick test, and specific IgE and specific IgG4 measureme

160 In addition to clinical history, skin prick test, and specific IgE determination, BAT can be a

161 -demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test, and specific IgE to aeroallergens were done

162 Specific IgE values, skin prick test, and T-cell subsets of STAT3-HIES patients we

163 We investigated whether an esophageal prick test, in which the esophageal mucosa is challenged

164 Skin prick test, s-IgE and CRD to hazelnut, peanut, PR10 and

165 Skin prick test, sIgE measurements, and assessment of allergi

166 o initially had negative results on the skin-prick test, the prevalence of peanut allergy at 60 month

167 P and PEF treated samples were tested by the prick test, the skin response was dependent on the parti

168 which was determined with the use of a skin-prick test--one consisting of participants with no measu

169 ISA inhibition, basophil activation and skin prick test.

170 allergens: OR = 1.81, 95% CI 0.80-4.24; skin prick test/4+ allergens: OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.34-3.95).

171 ts were classified by clinical history, skin prick test/serum specific IgE (sIgE), and nasal allergen

172 of "atopic eczema," "any positive SPT [skin-prick test]," "sensitization to egg," and "sensitization

173 Children were skin prick tested (SPT).

174 Twelve-month-old infants were skin prick-tested to common food allergens, and sensitized in

175 blot and IgE-ELISA were complemented by Skin Prick Testing (SPT) and mediator release assay to determ

176 ommercial allergen extracts for allergy skin prick testing (SPT) are widely used for diagnosing fish

177 Skin prick testing (SPT) was conducted using standard procedu

178 y fever, eczema, food allergy, positive skin prick testing (SPT), or elevated allergen-specific serum

179 ated in a basophil activation assay and Skin Prick Testing (SPT).

180 llergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and perform skin prick testing (SPT).

181 determined using serum-specific IgE and skin prick testing against a panel of five fungi.

182 vention (structured allergy history and skin prick testing and appropriate advice on allergy avoidanc

183 tervention (structured allergy history, skin prick testing and appropriate allergy avoidance advice)

184 ined as one or more positive results on skin prick testing and clinically relevant symptoms of rhinit

185 nt (ST), or food allergic (FA) based on skin prick testing and food challenge at 12 months of age.

186 IgE sensitization tests, such as skin prick testing and serum-specific IgE, have been used to

187 eroallergens was determined by means of skin prick testing and specific IgE measurement.

188 aking a structured allergy history with skin prick testing and tailored advice on allergy avoidance r

189 Children completed skin prick testing at age 1 year.

190 Participants underwent skin prick testing for house dust mite, cat, grasses and moul

191 Skin prick testing for peanut sensitization was performed at

192 s family history (50.2%) and conducting skin prick testing in non-high-risk children (43.9%).

193 levant sensitizations are elucidated by skin prick testing or by the determination of specific IgE in

194 In addition, skin prick testing was performed to six study foods (cow's mi

195 s pollen allergic individuals underwent skin prick testing with allergen alone, allergen plus Bet-APE

196 cted to topical cowhage provocation and skin prick testing with histamine and assessed for difference

197 parental face-to-face interviews and/or skin prick testing, 238 (10.4%) were eligible for a DBPCFC.

198 Opishorchis felineus and specific IgE, skin prick testing, and atopic symptoms in Western Siberia, w

199 interviewer-administered questionnaire, skin prick testing, and measurement of lung function from the

200 ar in children positive and negative on skin prick testing, and were not appreciably altered by the e

201 Skin prick testing, lung function tests, exhaled nitric oxide

202 or scorings of symptoms and medication, skin prick testing, total IgE, specific IgE, and Der p 1-spec

203 hinitis but without positive results on skin prick testing.

204 were examined for eczema and underwent skin prick testing.

205 eport, clinical examination, and repeat skin prick testing.

206 tients assigned to immediate or delayed skin prick testing.

207 tatus were determined by spirometry and skin prick testing.

208 rat basophil leukaemia cell line and by skin prick testing.

209 th IL-31 and NaCl (negative control) by skin prick testing.

210 or more detailed assessments, including skin prick testing.

211 eeds of oilseed rape and turnip rape in skin prick tests (SPT) and open food challenges.

212 Skin prick tests (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) against food a

213 Skin prick tests (SPT), specific-IgE (sIgE), component-resolv

214 its including structured interviews and skin prick tests (SPT).

215 All subjects with skin prick tests (SPTs) for birch pollen conducted during 199

216 completed a questionnaire and underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) to egg, peanut, cow's milk, fish, soy

217 invited to a parental questionnaire and skin prick tests (SPTs) to ten airborne allergens, and 2148 (

218 eactions was obtained, and standardized skin prick tests (SPTs) using finely ground tree-nut solution

219 Skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to gain attention for

220 al work-up included a detailed history, skin prick tests (SPTs) with IVIP, and basophil activation te

221 lowing outcomes at age 2 years: eczema, skin prick tests (SPTs), increased allergen-specific IgE leve

222 h mollusc tolerance) were studied using skin prick tests (SPTs), specific IgEs (sIgEs) and SDS-PAGE i

223 lergic subjects (group 4) by performing skin prick tests and APTs with rBet v 1 and hypoallergenic rB

224 Skin prick tests and basophil activation test using cetuximab

225 Skin prick tests and basophil activation tests with N, P, or

226 We performed skin-prick tests and basophil degranulation tests using extra

227 aking a structured allergy history with skin prick tests and giving tailored advice on allergy avoida

228 ths, 18 months, 4 years, and 6 years by skin prick tests and IgE measurements.

229 dized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

230 Associations with allergic diseases, skin prick tests and lung function assessed at 12 and 18 year

231 th questionnaire, clinical examination, skin prick tests and measurements of specific IgE.

232 Clinic evaluation, which consisted of skin prick tests and OFC where eligible, was undertaken if st

233 years, infants had FS/FA screening with skin prick tests and oral food challenges.

234 At 6.5 years, paediatricians performed skin prick tests and parents reported asthma and AD symptoms

235 nts underwent a standardized interview, skin prick tests and pulmonary function tests.

236 d 5276 infants (74% participation) with skin prick tests and sensitized infants underwent food challe

237 Skin prick tests and sIgE were performed in 529 children.

238 Prick tests and specific IgE determinations were perform

239 ites was diagnosed longitudinally using skin prick tests and specific IgE measurements at (1/2), 1(1/

240 , because of the limited sensitivity of skin prick tests and specific IgE tests to meat extracts.

241 icity of Ory c 3 was confirmed by using skin prick tests and the basophil activation assay.

242 d consent; evidencing of an allergen by skin prick tests and/or serum-specific IgE dosages; being abl

243 itization (FAS) was identified by using skin prick tests conducted between 1 and 18 years of age to a

244 Food-specific serum IgE and skin prick tests for egg, soy, peanut, and cross-reactant foo

245 outperformed allergen-specific IgE and skin prick tests for predicting OFC outcomes.

246 etermine whether C+ assayed by means of skin prick tests influenced AR symptom severity in controlled

247 All pollen-specific IgE and >90% of skin prick tests remained positive 7 days and 3 months after

248 ort study of 5276 infants who underwent skin prick tests to 4 allergens, including egg.

249 were also more likely to have positive skin prick tests to cabbage, lettuce and mustard and sensitiz

250 uestionnaire, clinical examination, and skin prick tests to common allergens.

251 Subjects with positive skin prick tests to GOS (n = 30, 6.2%) underwent basophil act

252 structured questionnaire and underwent skin prick tests to GOS.

253 on between 10 loci and specific IgE and skin prick tests to individual allergens and poly-sensitizati

254 Because of the low sensitivity of skin prick tests to meat, we studied the possibility to perfo

255 ically confirmed fish allergy underwent skin prick tests to salmon and catfish.

256 Skin prick tests using wheat extract were performed on 3 pati

257 ements of eczema, asthma, rhinitis, and skin prick tests were available for all follow-ups.

258 E inhibition, ImmunoCAP inhibition, and skin prick tests were performed using samples from selected p

259 Skin prick tests were performed with commercial pollen extrac

260 Skin prick tests were performed with pollen extracts.

261 Lung function, airway reversibility and skin prick tests were performed.

262 His skin prick tests were positive, with a result of 2+to frankfu

263 Skin prick tests were used to identify sensitization to invol

264 , we studied the possibility to perform skin prick tests with cetuximab, which carries the alpha-gal

265 Blinded, quadruplicate skin prick tests with concentrate and three serial half-log d

266 Skin prick tests with purified rAed a 3 and Ae. aegypti bite

267 es with standardized doses of rMal d 1, skin prick tests with recombinant allergens, and measurements

268 Questionnaires, skin prick tests, and basophil activation assays were perform

269 c immunoglobulin E-antibodies in serum, skin prick tests, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food c

270 c inhalation challenge to argan powder, skin prick tests, and immunoblotting analysis.

271 e of testing (specific IgE measurement, skin prick tests, and oral food challenges), and the timing a

272 allergic sensitization were measured by skin prick tests, and physician-diagnosed inhalant and food a

273 Patients underwent skin prick tests, and received 0.1ml of influenza vaccine, fo

274 ad undergone objective OFCs, concurrent skin prick tests, and specific IgE tests.

275 unction samples, we performed histamine skin prick tests, investigated the contribution of STAT3 to a

276 Skin prick tests, measurements of specific IgE to peanut and

277 ood allergy by standardized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

278 Clinical data, skin prick tests, specific IgE to aero- and food allergens, a

279 terview combined with blood collection, skin prick tests, spirometry with bronchodilation, and exhale

280 6 years by specific IgE assessments and skin prick tests.

281 l examinations including serum IgEs and skin prick tests.

282 ne challenge tests, questionnaires, and skin prick tests.

283 ophils and elicit positive responses in skin prick tests.

284 l had negative results for aeroallergen skin prick tests.

285 tient's allergic triggers or performing skin prick tests.

286 thma Study completed questionnaires and skin prick tests.

287 Atopy was assessed by using skin prick tests.

288 lergy was primarily determined by using skin prick tests.

289 = 0.02), and with similar findings for skin prick tests.

290 ny offering blood tests obtained from finger prick (Theranos) and 2 major clinical testing services t

291 Prick to prick test shows a strongly positive response t

292 The result of enokitake skin prick to prick test was positive.

293 mushrooms (siitake, simeji, and eringi) skin prick to prick test were all positive.

294 y standardized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

295 a "sample-to-answer" diagnosis from a finger-prick volume of human blood, within 45 min, with minimal

296 capillary blood samples collected by finger-prick was noninferior to venous blood collected in PAXge

297 At Day 85, 6 weeks after the last dose, skin prick wheal responses to allergen were suppressed by > 9

298 rgen extracts are standardized based on skin prick wheal size in 20-30 allergic subjects.

299 In the field, we used finger-prick whole blood for the Determine and Vikia tests and

300 aminophen (paracetamol) in plasma and finger-prick whole blood was fabricated.