ライフサイエンスコーパス: primary care

1 location, 26.8% hospital-based, and 24.6% in primary care).

2 er presenting with influenza-like illness in primary care.

3 an cancer in symptomatic women presenting to primary care.

4 ELF as a prognostic tool in health checks in primary care.

5 ing asymptomatic children and adolescents in primary care.

6 (SMASH) intervention on medication safety in primary care.

7 of fibrosis in the general population and in primary care.

8 infection (BSI) in adults aged >=65 years in primary care.

9 million antibiotic items were prescribed in primary care.

10 to assess the effectiveness of this model in primary care.

11 pared with conventional FHH ascertainment in primary care.

12 are deemed to be preventable with effective primary care.

13 covered interventions and encouraged better primary care.

14 tional Health Service (NHS) Health Checks in primary care.

15 ple to current use of antidepressants within primary care.

16 tection of familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care.

17 a higher likelihood of testing compared with primary care.

18 have not been widely implemented in routine primary care.

19 ing OUD and integrating behavioral health in primary care.

20 itoring system for hypertension into routine primary care.

21 sease interventions (PEN) and South Africa's Primary Care 101 (SA PC 101) guidelines.

22 , and facilitating patient engagement in HIV primary care (13% increase, p < 0.001).

23 inicians (41% female, 83% physicians, 50% in primary care, 17% in rural areas), including 48.6% who w

24 ii, introduced Population-based Payments for Primary Care (3PC), a new capitation-based primary care

25 pport received in hospital (95%) compared to primary care (76%) or community (61%) settings.

26 Antibiotics are highly prescribed in primary care across LMICs.

27 Access to pharmacotherapy was via primary care after discussion with the smoking cessation

28 ommendations include increased investment in primary care; alignment of financial incentives to achie

29 e of perceived ineffectiveness in real world primary care and because individuals who will especially

30 as limited to patients prescribed opioids in primary care and does not include opioids available over

31 gap between clinicians and families, between primary care and hospital care, and provide medical educ

32 ge of such prescriptions grew as scrutiny of primary care and pain medicine opioid prescribing increa

33 ead adoption of rapid diet screener tools in primary care and relevant specialty care prevention sett

34 es enables fuller patient profiles using the primary care and screening database interface.

35 t (by migrant status) of those only seen via primary care and that our findings may not generalize to

36 mean age, 34.0 years; 77.8% female; 57.7% in primary care), and 178 completed the study.

37 y, radiation oncology, pulmonary, radiology, primary care, and advocacy experts to conduct a literatu

38 larly among older patients, those engaged in primary care, and providers with large patient panels.

39 Primary care antimicrobial stewardship interventions can

40 ple with screen-detected diabetes managed in primary care are achievable.

41 Workload and workforce issues in primary care are key drivers for the growing internation

42 of participants commencing treatment in the primary care arm (75%, 43/57) was significantly higher t

43 0 participants and randomized 136: 70 to the primary care arm and 66 to the SOC arm.

44 s with SVR12 was significantly higher in the primary care arm, compared to in the SOC arm (49% [28/57

45 ers who prescribed PrEP, two-thirds reported primary care as their specialty.

46 hypertension can be implemented into routine primary care at scale with little impact on clinician wo

47 tween Jan 1, 1994, and July 31, 2018, to the primary care audit programme, the Diabetes Care Support

48 assess the balance of benefits and harms of primary care-based behavioral counseling interventions t

49 Importantly, the primary care-based Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial (Di

50 STF concludes that the benefits and harms of primary care-based interventions to prevent illicit drug

51 The available literature suggests that primary care-based longitudinal payment models have indi

52 to 5 years in Bavaria, Germany, a program of primary care-based screening showed an islet autoantibod

53 (4) treatment outcomes of patients receiving primary-care-based mental health services, evaluated thr

54 hinitis [AR]) was ascertained in a pediatric primary care birth cohort of 158,510 subjects.

55 reduce depressive symptoms within 6 weeks in primary care but we observed improvements in anxiety, qu

56 Depression is usually managed in primary care, but most antidepressant trials are of pati

57 Text messages, sent via primary care centers in London, United Kingdom, invited

58 d (1:1) controlled noninferiority trial in 9 primary care centers in Tanzania (substudy of the ePOCT

59 ate molecular subtyping of bladder cancer in primary care centers, we analyzed the protein expression

60 and low-income Lebanese mothers accessing a primary care centre in Beirut between January and June 2

61 , Nigeria, we randomly allocated clusters (a primary care clinic and neighbouring TFH facilities) 1:1

62 women aged 13 to 54 years registered with a primary care clinic in Britain (England, Wales, and Scot

63 d diabetic retinopathy screening system in a primary care clinic serving a low-income metropolitan pa

64 g patients with a diagnosis of COPD in their primary care clinical record who consulted a clinician a

65 We performed a matched cohort study set in primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD 1

66 staging, and appropriate referral of CKD by primary care clinicians are important in reducing the bu

67 The USPSTF recommends that primary care clinicians provide interventions, including

68 = 19) that included asthma content experts, primary care clinicians, dissemination and implementatio

69 re knowledge area for all cardiovascular and primary care clinicians.

70 The TECS services are located in primary care clinics and provide basic screening eye car

71 y was carried out among 250 adults attending primary care clinics in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia).

72 s of CQI on quality of antenatal HIV care in primary care clinics in rural South Africa.

73 d program for obesity treatment delivered in primary care clinics in which a high percentage of the p

74 e, and the van was sent with a technician to primary care clinics throughout the city on a rotation s

75 cted a prospective, observational study in 7 primary care clinics, in which an intervention comprised

76 cted a prospective, observational study in 7 primary care clinics, in which an intervention comprised

77 tal care (ANC) in 7 nurse-led, public-sector primary care clinics-combined into 6 clusters-over 8 ste

78 Practice Research Datalink, a UK database of primary care clinics.

79 in home settings, and two were delivered in primary care clinics; clinical setting was not reported

80 idation cohort (BioFINDER-2), and 105 in the primary care cohort (n=1131 individuals).

81 In the primary care cohort, plasma p-tau181 discriminated Alzhe

82 The primary care cohort, which recruited participants in Mon

83 ere is scope to optimise the contribution of primary care, community care and advocacy services to ca

84 rmine the effectiveness of providing DAAs in primary care, compared with hospital-based specialist ca

85 could rationalise antibiotic prescription in primary care, comparing two proposed thresholds to class

86 Primary care consultation rates increased from 87.8 (95%

87 90 days' duration who were making an initial primary care consultation.

88 Tendinopathy accounts for over 30% of primary care consultations and represents a growing heal

89 cioeconomic status, despite a higher rate of primary care consultations.

90 ations, drug prescriptions and contacts with primary care contractors from >200,000 individuals newly

91 Anonymised UK primary care data (the Clinical Practice Research Datali

92 try, and death certificate records, and from primary care data among a subset of participants for who

93 l, cohort study was conducted using historic primary care data from The Health Improvement Network.

94 rm to analyse routinely collected electronic primary care data linked to national death registrations

95 Routine primary care data used to assess long-term trial outcome

96 and that our findings are based solely on UK primary care data, so caution is need in extrapolating t

97 llness in the UK between 2005 and 2017 using primary care data.

98 risk factor measurements from the UK routine primary care database and limited albuminuria measuremen

99 QResearch is a primary care database containing anonymised healthcare r

100 ptimum Patient Care Database, a longitudinal primary care database from across the United Kingdom.

101 atient Care Research Database, a UK national primary care database, we constructed an open cohort of

102 Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a large primary-care database, we illustrate how it can answer a

103 Absence of formal primary care diagnoses was a limitation since ascertaini

104 physicians of various specialties, including primary care doctors, hospital internists, intensivists

105 Young people should be offered help by primary care, educational, and other services to find sa

106 A retrospective cohort study using UK primary care electronic health records from the Clinical

107 he existing data centre of a major vendor of primary care electronic health records.

108 Overall, 92 187 individuals had a primary care EMR record of ccIIV4 and 1 261 675 had a re

109 interpersonal interventions; observations of primary care encounters in 3 diverse clinics (n = 27 enc

110 16 public primary care facilities (clusters) in two rural district

111 tal illness among participants presenting in primary care facilities, evaluated through a facility st

112 d HIV-positive women aged 30-65 years from a primary care facility and a referral colposcopy clinic i

113 SPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that primary care-feasible behavioral interventions, includin

114 assess the balance of benefits and harms of primary care-feasible interventions for the cessation of

115 office), otolaryngologist/ED doctors (versus primary care), fewer comorbidities, and older patient ag

116 Primary care for a panel of patients is a central compon

117 rals are infrequently prescribed in European primary care for influenza-like illness, mostly because

118 whether adding antiviral treatment to usual primary care for patients with influenza-like illness re

119 We evaluated the performance of CA125 in primary care for the detection of ovarian and non-ovaria

120 Comprehensive evidence-based HIV primary care guidance is, therefore, more important than

121 ses Society of America updates previous 2013 primary care guidelines.

122 e was to determine whether people treated in primary care had a noninferior rate of sustained virolog

123 In Cuba, hypertension control in primary care has been prioritised as a cost-effective me

124 orary overview of the patterns and trends in primary care healthcare utilization and treatment is lac

125 ved quality metric performance compared with primary care; however, shared visits between gastroenter

126 population of 8597 patients followed for HIV primary care in a large, urban county system from Januar

127 ew and meta-analysis of studies conducted in primary care in LMICs to estimate the prevalence of anti

128 bedded qualitative process evaluation set in primary care in Lothian, Scotland.

129 from the first year of routine use of FIT in primary care in one NHS Board in Scotland were examined:

130 QI can be effective at increasing quality of primary care in rural Africa.

131 s a routine intervention to boost quality of primary care in rural African communities.

132 decline in patients with CKD (stages 3-5) in primary care in the United Kingdom, we conducted a clust

133 Providing HCV treatment in primary care increases treatment uptake and cure rates.

134 , to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of four primary care initiated strategies: (1) routine liver fun

135 termine the balance of benefits and harms of primary care interventions for tobacco cessation among s

136 Primary care is an ideal place to screen for AF; however

137 c prescription in febrile patients attending primary care is common, and a probable contributor to th

138 Primary care is known to improve outcomes and lower heal

139 ams improve outcomes in patients with CKD in primary care is unclear.

140 ncome countries (LMICs), particularly at the primary care level.

141 in the number of clinical pharmacists within primary care makes them ideally placed to conduct AF scr

142 Few studies have examined primary care management for acute sciatica, including re

143 non-invasive liver fibrosis tests (NILT) in primary care may permit earlier detection of patients wi

144 We used nationwide UK primary care medical records, 2001-2017, to identify 508

145 ce delivery pathway: (1) contact coverage of primary care mental health services, evaluated through a

146 In primary care, multiple priorities and system pressures m

147 uidelines provide recommendations to support primary care of adults with Down syndrome.

148 d a cross-sectional analysis of 24.4 million primary care office visits in 2017 and performed compari

149 lly, we investigated the effect of access to primary care on tuberculosis incidence in this populatio

150 needs, which were not addressed by oncology, primary care or advocacy professionals.

151 omized single-blind trial was conducted in a primary care outpatient setting.

152 ence-based recommendations about the optimal primary care panel size for achieving beneficial health

153 Sustained virological response among primary care participants (98%, 95%CI:93-100%) was not d

154 useful test for ovarian cancer detection in primary care, particularly in women >=50 years old.

155 We did a retrospective cohort study in primary care patients aged 30-79 years without cardiovas

156 f CRP tests to rationalise antibiotic use in primary care patients with an acute febrile illness.

157 In an analysis of 15,946 Black and White primary care patients with diabetes and eGFR>=30 ml/min

158 Primary care patients with influenza-like illness treate

159 Among primary care patients with overweight or obesity and hyp

160 selected from a source population of 200 769 primary care patients.

161 In its first year, the 3PC population-based primary care payment system in Hawaii was associated wit

162 r Primary Care (3PC), a new capitation-based primary care payment system, in 2016.

163 ED, while patients from rural zip codes used primary care pediatricians and EDs equally.

164 n Bavaria, Germany, between 2015 and 2019 by primary care pediatricians during well-baby visits.

165 Short-term primary care pedometer-based walking interventions can p

166 Whether readmission rates vary by primary care physician (PCP) is unknown, although federa

167 Participants, whose primary care physician considered them appropriate for m

168 alists in a variety of fields as well as the primary care physician was important.

169 re reviewed by telephone and shared with the primary care physician.

170 antly more likely to be female (46% vs 37%), primary care physicians (36% vs 30%), and classified as

171 six other dermatologists and superior to six primary care physicians (PCPs) and six nurse practitione

172 e (P4P) scheme in Britain was introduced for primary care physicians (PCPs) to offer advice about LAR

173 after adjustment for characteristics of the primary care physicians (PCPs), patients, and types of v

174 e potential of real-time monitoring by their primary care physicians (PCPs).

175 ellows), provide professional development to primary care physicians and advance practice providers,

176 ensive model of care led by NPHWs, involving primary care physicians and family that was informed by

177 This online survey of primary care physicians and general practitioners in the

178 tegies were more likely to be implemented by primary care physicians and in patients with depression

179 include are numbers of Nurse Practitioners, Primary Care Physicians and rural hospitals per capita,

180 Primary care physicians are often not adequately trained

181 ere provided by surgeons in 52% of cases and primary care physicians in 16% of cases.

182 logical condition and patients referred from primary care physicians of the Canadian National Health

183 an initial in-person clinic appointment with primary care physicians providing usual care within the

184 ologists, diabetologists, nephrologists, and primary care physicians to be familiar with this drug cl

185 of performance, we evaluate the accuracy of primary care physicians to categorize skin lesion morpho

186 ogists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians to facilitate the prompt and app

187 It is important for primary care physicians to gain knowledge in this field

188 In comparison, the diagnostic accuracy of primary care physicians was 36% without any aids and 68%

189 olving non-physician health workers (NPHWs), primary care physicians, family, and the provision of ef

190 f this Seminar, which is intended mainly for primary care physicians, is to provide an overview of di

191 aspects that are commonly in the purview of primary care physicians.

192 er meetings with local community members and primary care physicians.

193 orce shortages, including the undersupply of primary care physicians; and understanding and ameliorat

194 gram for obesity delivered in an underserved primary care population resulted in clinically significa

195 12-2016) data of 916,619 participants from a primary care, population-based electronic health record

196 from a healthcare professional (HCP) in the primary care practice.

197 (505) or control group (502), stratified by primary care practice.

198 A total of 86 primary care practices across 10 health care systems wer

199 previous blood tests were recruited from 32 primary care practices across Derbyshire, United Kingdom

200 sessed, who were randomly selected from 1500 primary care practices across the UK contributing to the

201 cohort analysis of medical records from 389 primary care practices contributing data to the United K

202 Seventy-five primary care practices enrolled 3,200 patients with esta

203 Patients were recruited from 3 hospitals and primary care practices in England from 2016 through 2018

204 RCT) with 3-month follow-up, conducted in 23 primary care practices in the East of England.

205 cluster-randomised, controlled trial done at primary care practices in the UK.

206 uly 19, 2016, through August 10, 2017, at 15 primary care practices in the US.

207 al, 2,012 participants were selected from 16 primary care practices using these criteria: 1) aged 60

208 its of estrogen therapy, and the role of the primary care practitioner in the care of transgender per

209 invitation, and reminder letters from their primary care practitioner offering prescheduled appointm

210 ires an interdisciplinary approach including primary care practitioners, gastroenterologists, surgeon

211 , multidisciplinary teamwork, involvement of primary care practitioners, patient networks, support gr

212 rocess by which others may be considered for primary care preventive recommendations.

213 ging and medication at the discretion of the primary care provider before enrollment.

214 verification of vaccination status by their primary care provider.

215 enty-seven percent of survivors and 20.0% of primary care providers (PCPs) had a survivorship care pl

216 Primary care providers accounted for 13% of all prescrip

217 ack of bariatric surgery guidelines, limited primary care providers and referring provider knowledge

218 om low-income families and support nondental primary care providers delivering preventive oral health

219 Nodes represent all primary care providers in a country; links indicate pati

220 of the disease burden, an increased role of primary care providers in screening, patient stratificat

221 sation of systemic risk factors by patients' primary care providers is an important component of the

222 Individuals with primary care providers were most likely to start treatme

223 ervice-based categories (birth-attending and primary care providers), and across the entire women's h

224 evere obesity, including bariatric surgeons, primary care providers, registered dietitians, and healt

225 ms with respect to changes in the density of primary care providers.

226 e to the availability of birth-attending and primary care providers.

227 th expertise in LCS, implementation science, primary care, pulmonology, health behavior, smoking cess

228 People with a primary care record for HIV infection were compared with

229 eczema (two eczema records appearing in the primary care record within any one-year period).

230 rst-ever diagnosis of eczema recorded in the primary care record, and eczema prevalence was defined a

231 rescriptions without these being recorded in primary care; recording of sepsis has increased over the

232 l influenza vaccination was determined using primary care records and stratified by trimester.

233 We analyzed primary care records from patients aged >=65 years in En

234 We analyzed UK primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research

235 nested case-control study was created using primary care records of >1 million individuals, >50% of

236 Primary care records of 17,278,392 adults were pseudonym

237 rtainment of major malformations from infant primary care records was maximized by linkage to hospita

238 t rates were low and only events recorded in primary care records were counted; however, any underrec

239 (BCSP) derives participant information from primary care records.

240 Primary care referral for diagnostic investigations and

241 Pre-entry tuberculosis screening, early primary care registration, and LTBI screening are strong

242 actitioners Research and Surveillance Centre primary care research database of 3.85 million children

243 A large primary care research database was used to examine healt

244 stitute for Health Research (NIHR) School of Primary Care Research, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre O

245 nical screening tools (Wells score and Dutch Primary Care Rule) had no utility.

246 to provide evidence-based recommendations on primary care screening, behavioral counseling, and preve

247 on nonpsychiatric inpatient, emergency, and primary care service use in adults.

248 SMI) on the use of inpatient, emergency, and primary care services for nonpsychiatric medical disorde

249 es electronic health record data to describe primary care services offered by US community health cen

250 Primary care services within the catchment areas of the

251 ncreases in use of inpatient, emergency, and primary care services.

252 ds to be more integrated, in particular with primary care services.

253 hophysiology would have greater utility in a primary care setting and in eligibility screening for cl

254 therapy with glucocorticoid injection in the primary care setting in the U.S. Military Health System.

255 sk factors for T2D regularly recorded in the primary care setting were used to evaluate future T2D ri

256 gnosis and management of hypertension in the primary care setting.

257 ation on readily available predictors in the primary care setting.

258 orming DD screening tool, appropriate to the Primary Care Setting.

259 ood-quality, 26 fair-quality) recruited from primary care settings in the US.

260 veness of treatment for obesity delivered in primary care settings in underserved populations is lack

261 ions for adolescents and adults conducted in primary care settings were included.

262 on-developed countries, and those limited to primary care settings, the public health sector, and ped

263 n of the advanced nurse practitioner role in primary care settings.

264 entive health care to women, particularly in primary care settings.

265 tes clinical parameters readily available in primary care settings.

266 sons, and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years in primary care settings.

267 be needed beyond endocrinology practices to primary-care settings and broader populations of patient

268 The Primary Care Shopping Intervention for Cardiovascular Di

269 e Practitioners have the potential to reduce primary care shortages for underserved populations.

270 database (Information System for Research in Primary Care, SIDIAP) were included in this retrospectiv

271 alia or New Zealand to receive DAAs at their primary care site or local hospital (standard of care [S

272 ed controlled trial in 12 hospitals and four primary care sites across the UK.

273 December 2012, conducted at 607 hospital and primary care sites in 43 countries involving 6042 partic

274 We randomized PWID with HCV attending primary care sites in Australia or New Zealand to receiv

275 linded, noninferiority trial conducted in 69 primary care sites in England.

276 and 3476 GBM with HIV-infection attended our primary-care sites annually providing 13,801 person-year

277 care group received standard care from their primary care team.

278 rventions on social determinants relevant to primary care, the USPSTF will continue to provide recomm

279 wn it is feasible to deliver brief advice in primary care to encourage reductions in SFA intake and t

280 of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are used in primary care to identify high-risk individuals among the

281 before and after diagnosis of comorbidity in primary care to identify opportunities for antibiotic st

282 Referral from primary care to physical therapy for recent-onset sciati

283 Effective and cost-effective primary care treatments for low back pain (LBP) are requ

284 is needed regarding the cost and accuracy of primary care ultrasound, and the potential impact of the

285 25 years old were recruited from 119 public primary care units, including all 26 state capitals and

286 Using primary-care veterinary clinical data, this study aimed

287 In 3 weeks, express care and primary care video visits increased from less than 10% t

288 Eligible participants had a scheduled primary care visit and were aged 20 to 70 years, had a b

289 PLWH with >=1 HIV primary care visit from 2010-2016 at 7 sites in the Cent

290 is early evidence of a decline in per capita primary care visit rates, and little is understood about

291 with obesity and hypertension presents for a primary care visit, during which he expresses concern ab

292 In total, 142 million primary care visits among 94 million member-years were e

293 point-of-care screening administered during primary care visits would increase the adherence to reco

294 interval [CI] 87.7-100) of people treated in primary care was noninferior when compared to historical

295 criteria) reporting data on medicine use in primary care were included.

296 sepsis following infection consultations in primary care when antibiotics were or were not prescribe

297 onditions, representing 80% of cases seen in primary care, while also providing a secondary predictio

298 remia and link to substance use treatment or primary care with hepatitis C prescribers.

299 n the period after the P4P scheme in British primary care, with additional impact for young women age

300 th biochemically confirmed PHPT who received primary care within an academic health system were ident