コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 re the prospects for nonparochial "religious prosociality"?
2 pth in the TPJ that is positively related to prosociality.
3 er diminish or strengthen audience-dependent prosociality.
4 al system of a universalist and internalized prosociality.
5 and a gender stereotype, were used to infer prosociality.
6 ur and is sometimes referred to as proactive prosociality.
7 e unique scale and cultural diversity of our prosociality.
8 utational mechanisms of such audience-driven prosociality.
9 affects one key noncognitive skill, that is, prosociality.
10 show an inherent tendency toward "intuitive" prosociality.
11 ualism, less conformity, and more impersonal prosociality.
12 ous results on the effect of social class on prosociality.
13 d strong lay theories that hunger undermines prosociality.
14 do not find significant effects of hunger on prosociality.
15 therefore can contribute to the expansion of prosociality.
16 lity, rather than a need to induce or assess prosociality.
17 n social conditions may foster credulity and prosociality.
18 influences the development and expression of prosociality.
19 -making, and other behaviors associated with prosociality.
20 ctor of interspecific variation in proactive prosociality.
21 ls, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality.
22 rk to understand the role of social class in prosociality.
23 cal decision-making processes that result in prosociality.
24 insect selectivity, social transmission, and prosociality.
25 tically linked with cooperative altruism and prosociality.
26 sus shame and external reputation-to promote prosociality.
27 Taking, and Personal Distress-may relate to prosociality.
28 ual association between religious belief and prosociality.
29 ility by strangers had negligible effects on prosociality.
30 ation between socioeconomic status (SES) and prosociality.
31 ial cognition brain network that facilitates prosociality.
33 l psychology corresponding to the concept of prosociality among 146 healthy young adults between 18 a
34 ing to chart the biological underpinnings of prosociality and apply our framework to understand the r
36 successfully did so because they facilitated prosociality and cooperation in large-scale, anonymous g
39 is uses experimentally validated measures of prosociality and is based on about 80,000 individuals in
41 sizable and robust positive relation between prosociality and labor market success around the world t
42 ngs generalize the positive relation between prosociality and labor market success to a wide geograph
44 ks play a crucial role in the development of prosociality and large-scale cooperation by allowing coo
45 age is associated with an increased sense of prosociality and prioritization of humanitarian behavior
46 estigations of how cultural norms related to prosociality and relational striving may also covary wit
49 e fully eliminated strategic, i.e., feigned, prosociality and thus decreased submission to audience e
51 he neurobiological underpinnings of empathy, prosociality, and callous-unemotional traits at the earl
52 was associated with early-emerging empathy, prosociality, and callous-unemotional traits, even when
54 ng condition increased the payoffs of mutual prosociality, and prosocial choice increased accordingly
55 ochialism, rather than extended or universal prosociality, and that the same general mechanisms under
61 ehavior per se, but fine-tunes the degree of prosociality as a function of the social distance betwee
63 also associated with lower empathy and lower prosociality at ages 1, 2, and 3 years using multilevel
64 may foster an internalized and universalist prosociality because it supports market-based cooperatio
65 lenges standard evolutionary explanations of prosociality because well-studied mechanisms of cooperat
67 ations and suggest that oxytocin may promote prosociality by modulating social-value representations
68 e of poor substitutes, so even low levels of prosociality can lead to social welfare near the social
71 ing can inform training programs to increase prosociality, considering their "fit" with different ind
73 gy relevant symptoms, such as hyperactivity, prosociality, depression, anxiety, and peer and conduct
74 pproached middle childhood and then rates of prosociality diverged as children tracked toward the beh
75 sed for its perceived emotional effects (eg, prosociality, empathy, psychotherapy), but surprisingly
77 herefore present the results of standardized prosociality experiments in 24 groups of 15 primate spec
78 ication (e.g., reduced aggression, increased prosociality, extended juvenile period, increased playfu
79 hough psychologists have studied empathy and prosociality for decades, this question has yet to be cl
80 we can examine the consequences of localized prosociality for the economic outcomes of society as a w
81 large literature points to the importance of prosociality for the well-being of societies and individ
82 ID-19 infections within families amplify the prosociality gap between French high school students of
83 pecific types of social behaviors, including prosociality, gratitude, extraversion, and brief social
85 gh the psychological mechanisms behind human prosociality have extensively been studied, the specific
87 ), we examine the effects of acute hunger on prosociality in a wide variety of non-interdependent tas
91 ees do not satisfy experimental criteria for prosociality in food delivery tasks, they help others co
92 ituations of existential threat will enhance prosociality in general and particularly toward others p
93 sks reveals a very small effect of hunger on prosociality in non-interdependent tasks (d = 0.108), an
95 closes is a concave function of the level of prosociality in the case of poor substitutes, so even lo
97 n in accounting for differences in levels of prosociality: In areas where market exchange is dominant
105 l life, it remains open how such a degree of prosociality is possible despite the risks of exploitati
106 to produce general scholarly consensus that prosociality is widespread, intuitive, and rooted deeply
107 t a biologically novel form of altruism (or "prosociality"), many participants also typically learn t
108 integration should lead to greater levels of prosociality: Market exchange forces people to interact
109 natural selection favored increased in-group prosociality over aggression in late human evolution.
111 however, more complex normative behaviours (prosociality, punishment) that require integration of so
112 combination with a relatively high level of prosociality, rather than a need to induce or assess pro
116 rather suggested that joint action promotes prosociality, resulting in so-called attitudinal recipro
117 he relationship between ingroup and outgroup prosociality: Return rates for both Italian and foreign
119 generated species-level scores of proactive prosociality, social tolerance (both n = 15 primate spec
120 evidence suggests that it promoted proactive prosociality, social transmission, and communication in
121 g some authors to conclude that the forms of prosociality studied evolved in humans since our common
124 get article develops an account of religious prosociality that is driven by increases in self-control
125 g through verbal instruction, imitation, and prosociality-that were observed only in the children and
126 survey studies on self-reported measures of prosociality, the insufficient control of relative incen
127 xpanding on laboratory research on religious prosociality, this is the first study to tie religious b
130 ally large circles of trust that form due to prosociality toward unfamiliar people (i.e. xenophilia).
131 h has documented cross-societal variation in prosociality using monetary allocation tasks such as dic
135 Previous studies have mainly investigated prosociality with financial transfers in economic games
136 ies that have been proposed to explain human prosociality, with an emphasis on kinship, reciprocity,
137 g strangers are two important expressions of prosociality; yet we know little about how these behavio