コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ividual, be they physical, physiological, or psychosocial.
4 e rather young survivors of HL regarding the psychosocial adverse effects of the cancer experience.
5 r, a wealth of evidence supports the role of psychosocial adversities (eg, stressful life events, int
6 inergic function (p=0.03, d = 0.80) and that psychosocial adversity blunted physiological yet potenti
7 data on multiple sources of nutritional and psychosocial adversity in early life; reproductive pace;
8 se insights with knowledge about the role of psychosocial adversity in shaping psychopathology risk t
11 e investigated whether long-term exposure to psychosocial adversity was associated with dopamine dysf
12 articipants with high cumulative exposure to psychosocial adversity with n = 17 age- and sex-matched
14 d evidence from the United States shows that psychosocial and behavioral explanations only partially
16 prevalence for patient reported structural, psychosocial and clinic-level barriers was 27.3%, 13.9%
18 =5 at baseline showed greater improvement in psychosocial and CV outcomes, that persisted at 9 months
21 We test whether repeated reports of chronic psychosocial and financial burden is associated with tel
23 al abuse was associated with a wide range of psychosocial and health outcomes, systematic reviews on
24 d found that whilst PRS were associated with psychosocial and mental health phenotypes, MRS were more
27 satisfied with their breasts and had greater psychosocial and sexual well-being than those who underw
30 , adherence support interventions focused on psychosocial and structural challenges for subpopulation
32 ate functional connectivity) and individual, psychosocial, and environmental factors in a nationally
34 es on a wide range of long-term psychiatric, psychosocial, and physical health outcomes of childhood
35 D-19 lockdowns present significant economic, psychosocial, and physical risks to the wellbeing of wom
36 e human health and mortality via behavioral, psychosocial, and physiological mechanisms, including in
37 ng phenotypes and 617 cognitive, behavioral, psychosocial, and socioeconomic measures revealed three
40 tive tools-including the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation, Psychosocia
42 Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation, Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantatio
46 with the neuropsychosocial (AUC = 0.86) and psychosocial (AUC = 0.84) performing better than the neu
50 problems among high-risk children, yielding psychosocial benefits that endure through at least middl
51 effects by 5 intervention types: behavioral-psychosocial (BPS), syringe service programs (SSP), opio
53 ildren using validated instruments to assess psychosocial burden and the factors influencing burden.
55 t children with PA experience high levels of psychosocial burden, particularly those with more severe
56 with its considerable physical symptoms and psychosocial burdens, represents an existential threat a
57 tlement-related stressors through augmenting psychosocial care programmes and social integration woul
58 recommendations for the provision of routine psychosocial care to survivors, as well as the challenge
60 Y: To compare sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics of children with AD, ADHD,
61 relating to demographic, anthropometric, and psychosocial characteristics) were available on 1476 IMA
62 liver many such interventions, but a core of psychosocial clinicians, including social workers, psych
63 We consider cognitive, psychological, and psychosocial comorbidities and the effect that epilepsy
65 anagement of physical symptoms and distress, psychosocial concerns, and spiritual considerations of t
67 fficult to address the wider socio-cultural, psychosocial context, and genetic factors in which risk
68 ification of accepted selection clinical and psychosocial criteria that can provide the best long-ter
74 e domains implicated in PD-ICBs and identify psychosocial determinants that may perpetuate the cycle
80 statement in 2018 to promote consistency of psychosocial evaluation across advanced heart failure pr
81 able objective assessment tools, proposing a psychosocial evaluation framework that uses a multidisci
82 intersection of the patient's ecological and psychosocial experience with cardiovascular biology.
83 These include (i) adverse socioeconomic and psychosocial experiences during childhood and (ii) socio
84 ever, after adjustment for health status and psychosocial factors (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence
85 ssure, diabetes, obesity), socioeconomic and psychosocial factors (ie, education, symptoms of depress
87 influence genetic risk for psychopathology, psychosocial factors and EDU and/or SES (EDU/SES) indivi
89 ion and (2) to identify the contributions of psychosocial factors and somatic disease on symptom repo
92 teristics, health conditions, behaviors, and psychosocial factors between regular and nonregular user
93 cations alongside other sociodemographic and psychosocial factors contribute to changes in QoL; the r
94 dies should emphasize collection of relevant psychosocial factors in addition to the development of i
95 s perspective integrates neurobiological and psychosocial factors in FND and proposes a research agen
96 or two obesity indicators, and lifestyle and psychosocial factors in the prediction of the two indica
97 GI symptom groups were then compared on key psychosocial factors including self-reported mood, anxie
98 c discoveries related to psychopathology and psychosocial factors may be limited by genetic overlap w
99 eloping interventions targeting cultural and psychosocial factors may enhance equity in access to tra
100 mechanisms consequent to the illness and/or psychosocial factors may underlie impairments across dif
102 ence on the possible influence of social and psychosocial factors on gingival status in socially disa
103 t the importance of socioeconomic status and psychosocial factors on gingival status in underprivileg
104 e biological, environmental, behavioral, and psychosocial factors on individual risk for chronic dise
106 on participant expectancies and other potent psychosocial factors that perpetuate placebo response, n
107 djustable correlates such as behavioural and psychosocial factors to promote HRQoL among patients aft
108 stigation is needed to identify biologic and psychosocial factors underlying these sex-related differ
109 A to real data on neurodevelopmental status, psychosocial factors, clinical problems as well as neuro
110 ions among sleep, conventional risk factors, psychosocial factors, dietary habits, and inflammation.
112 nonregular users across sociodemographic and psychosocial factors, with modestly worse health regardi
117 hysical frailty traits, but not cognitive or psychosocial frailty traits, and global indices of frail
123 all cognition, individual cognitive domains, psychosocial function, and activities of daily living we
124 DUP patients experienced similar declines in psychosocial function, but declines occurred at differen
126 en's neural processing of parent cues and on psychosocial functioning in a longitudinal randomized cl
127 ct of early intervention on middle childhood psychosocial functioning mediated through increased acti
128 vely affects patient-provider relationships, psychosocial functioning, and health-related quality of
134 preservation, transgender surgical care and psychosocial health, all of which must be considered and
135 ms of EoE, allergy and mindfulness regarding psychosocial impact of chronic disease on the family and
139 all ages and ethnicities, has a substantial psychosocial impact on patients and relatives, and is th
141 as a highly reproducible tool to assess for psychosocial impairment and is associated with negative
143 xtend beyond the current primary emphasis on psychosocial individual-level measures; (b) analyzing ex
145 ed factors that can be explored as potential psychosocial influences in the relationship between copi
147 d current rug use) to receive a personalised psychosocial intervention (comprising a flexible toolkit
148 last 7 days [95% CI, -0.85 to -0.13]) vs no psychosocial intervention at 3- to 4-month follow-up.
149 significantly between patients in the brief psychosocial intervention group (n=6 [IQR 4-11]), CBT gr
150 e randomly allocated 136 participants to the psychosocial intervention group and 137 to the control g
155 acy and cost-effectiveness of a personalised psychosocial intervention implemented with a toolkit of
156 agonist therapy, an adjunctive personalised psychosocial intervention in addition to standard therap
158 as effective as CBT and, together with brief psychosocial intervention, offers additional patient cho
159 e two psychological therapies with the brief psychosocial intervention, we first established whether
161 that reduce stimulant use, and the available psychosocial interventions (except for contingency manag
165 esigned studies demonstrates the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for patients with advanced di
169 were evaluated in 52 trials (n = 15 659) of psychosocial interventions, 7 trials (n = 1109) of opioi
170 marily involves parent-based or family-based psychosocial interventions, although stimulants and atyp
173 distinct anatomic, hormonal, infectious, and psychosocial issues among transgender kidney transplant
175 nt was associated with poor disease control, psychosocial issues, adolescent-onset allergic disease a
176 nants of health (eg, demographics, cultural, psychosocial, knowledge factors) could account for diffe
180 and mental health-related socioeconomic and psychosocial measures in adoptees compared with nonadopt
182 frequency) and various subsequent offspring psychosocial, mental, behavioural and physical health an
184 cent progress in the field, highlighting key psychosocial milestones and accompanying biological chan
185 surgery might require regular postoperative psychosocial monitoring to reduce the risk for future se
186 increasingly recognised as major drivers of psychosocial morbidity in affected individuals and their
188 se; hence there is a critical gap to address psychosocial needs of cardiac patients after an event.
190 algorithms to classify participants based on psychosocial, neural, or both (neuropsychosocial) data.
192 c stress disorder and schizophrenia) and one psychosocial outcome (substance misuse) met high quality
193 c stress disorder and schizophrenia) and one psychosocial outcome (substance misuse) were of a high q
194 2.8] to 3.3 [2.2-4.8]), all studied negative psychosocial outcomes (ORs ranged from 1.2 [1.1-1.4] to
196 ce delivery intervention on HIV clinical and psychosocial outcomes among adolescents with HIV in Zimb
203 lant, but was associated with posttransplant psychosocial problems such as alcohol abuse, other drug
204 sociated with cardiovascular, pulmonary, and psychosocial problems, and with events such as accidents
206 fects; and scant investigation of underlying psychosocial processes to explain projected behavioral i
207 litation programs; 2) follow-up services; 3) psychosocial programs; 4) diaries; 5) information and ed
208 cades of research have identified a range of psychosocial protective factors in the face of stress an
209 ed to surgical/medical transplant providers, psychosocial providers had 2.13 greater odds of supporti
210 d non-cancer participants (n = 50) completed psychosocial questionnaires and provided blood samples t
213 ive field notes, debriefing and the use of a psychosocial research group, also formed data sources.
215 objective was to examine whether individual psychosocial resilience and neighborhood-level cardiovas
217 S7 score was between those with high and low psychosocial resilience living in low-resilience neighbo
220 o examine the association between individual psychosocial resilience, neighborhood cardiovascular res
221 ue is a need-adapted approach that mobilizes psychosocial resources in a crisis struck person's socia
222 basis of this evidence is required to build psychosocial resources in cancer treatment settings and
226 per month), and high prevalence of maternal psychosocial risk factors including alcohol use in pregn
234 ent-reported outcome measure to be used as a psychosocial screening and monitoring tool for patients
235 Craniofacial deformities have functional and psychosocial sequelae and can profoundly affect quality
237 ions of modifiable biological, neighborhood, psychosocial, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors in y
238 an adaptive response to both nutritional and psychosocial sources of early-life adversity in baboons
240 examined the relationship between cumulative psychosocial stress (CPS) and ideal cardiovascular healt
241 on is a mediator in the relationship between psychosocial stress and offspring neuropsychiatric outco
242 inflammation as a mediator between maternal psychosocial stress and offspring neuropsychiatric outco
248 ure with a focus on studies that investigate psychosocial stress exposures and experiences in early l
251 ess cessation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Chronic psychosocial stress is associated with psychiatric disor
253 ical and behavioral mechanisms through which psychosocial stress may influence TL, and we discuss dir
258 ated social defeat (RSD) is a mouse model of psychosocial stress that activates microglia, increases
259 took place 2 hr after the induction of acute psychosocial stress using the Montreal Imaging Stress Ta
268 nd female participants who were exposed to a psychosocial stressor, and subsequently played an interg
271 function, is sensitive to exposures such as psychosocial stressors and health-maintaining behaviors.
272 ere has been reduced emphasis on the role of psychosocial stressors in recent years, with a correspon
273 mmune system makes it possible for childhood psychosocial stressors to affect immune system developme
274 status, cardiovascular disease risk factors, psychosocial stressors, and medication use) in linear re
275 o synthetic chemicals, dietary constituents, psychosocial stressors, and physical factors, as well as
276 le associations at the neural level as other psychosocial stressors, and that (ii) the mechanisms und
277 African (SSA) migrants in Europe experience psychosocial stressors, such as perceived discrimination
279 tions of caregivers might need more targeted psychosocial support to reduce the long-term effect of t
280 iables, the child's medical characteristics, psychosocial support use, and the World Health Organizat
281 of differentiated care models and providing psychosocial support will be key in reaching populations
282 e training and educational, nutritional, and psychosocial support, improves symptoms and exercise tol
283 al organizational-level solutions to enhance psychosocial support, including respite services, online
285 difference, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.0 to 1.04]), and psychosocial therapy-based approaches improved quality o
287 essing the quality of mentalizing as part of psychosocial treatments may benefit individuals with var
288 chiatric comorbidity, integrating adjunctive psychosocial treatments, and involving caregivers have b
292 AMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -4.42 to 3.06; P = .72), psychosocial well-being (AMD, -0.59; 95% CI, -3.92 to 2.
293 with breasts (difference, 8.0; P = .002) and psychosocial well-being (difference, 4.6; P = .047) comp
294 ce of MBSR's potential to improve short term psychosocial well-being in cardiac patients during their
295 sion-and a wide range of outcomes related to psychosocial well-being, mental health, health behaviors
296 tion with breast, satisfaction with outcome, psychosocial well-being, physical well-being of the ches
297 ant differences in satisfaction with breast, psychosocial well-being, physical well-being or sexual w
299 patients that attempts to tackle stress and psychosocial wellbeing, but it is under-utilized and lac
300 present study supports the effect of adverse psychosocial work factors from the ERI model on BP contr