ライフサイエンスコーパス: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

1 erythromycin (for isolates not available for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis).

2 erized (mecA confirmation, SCCmec typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis).

3 Double-strand DNA damage was detected by pulsed field gel electrophoresis.

4 elonged to 1 of 7 clonal types as defined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

5 The isolates were subtyped by ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

6 Isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

7 IV-negative patients; isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

8 dom amplification of polymorphic DNA PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

9 llected from 2000 to 2008 were identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

10 and clonal relationships were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

11 eus isolates were unrelated as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

12 e the strains by standard techniques such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

13 were identical by biochemical profiling and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

14 ns lacking the mre11 gene was observed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

15 paced breaks yield DSBs that are observed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

16 andom-amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

17 82 isolates, which were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

18 , IL, between 2004 and 2007 were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

19 striction enzyme and size-fractionated using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

20 hat of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

21 treatment daptomycin-susceptible isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

22 A from PBCV-1-infected cells was examined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

23 Isolates were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

24 olonized subjects were initially compared by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

25 ant, as determined by infectivity assays and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

26 -induced chromosomal DNA damage monitored by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

27 ominissuisisolates is easier and faster than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

28 sequencing for genospecies and genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

29 oquinolone resistance-determining loci), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

30 yping of the E. coli isolates was done using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

31 and clonal relatedness was established using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

32 able to more arduous typing systems, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

33 nly to MRSA isolates that were available for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, 91% (159 of 175 isolat

34 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis allows the number of DN

35 These results reveal why pulsed field gel electrophoresis analysis of SmaI-digest

36 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis confirmed that

37 Standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis facilitates st

38 Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis in eight Sos p

39 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis indicated that

40 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis indicated that

41 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis suggested that

42 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis using probes a

43 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis yielded multip

44 genetically distant rectal isolate (based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis) with a profil

45 confirmed by multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis.

46 Using quantitative pulsed field gel electrophoresis and sensitive DNA synth

47 All S. aureus isolates were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and agr group.

48 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and antimicrobial susce

49 Genomic analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and array based genomic

50 olates were closely related to each other by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and contained a common

51 mosomal damage was directly visualized using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and demonstrated repair

52 rUTI strains were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and genomic virulence p

53 he formation of DNA DSBs, as demonstrated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and H2AX phosphorylatio

54 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and hybridization analy

55 mpared with those from the United Kingdom by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and integron analysis.

56 racterize possible transmission routes using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multi-locus variabl

57 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence

58 Genotyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence

59 ed both environmental and clinical ESBLEC by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence

60 to the maximum parsimony trees inferred from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus variable

61 ned laboratory characteristics of EAEC using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and next-generation seq

62 sequence type 94, were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and optical mapping, an

63 University Hospital (SUH) were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and PCR for SCCmec and

64 ir proficiency in G0/G1 phase as measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and repair focus resolu

65 performed two band-based typing techniques (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and repetitive extragen

66 We used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and restriction fragmen

67 urfaces were evaluated for relatedness using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and staphylococcal cass

68 al isolates were characterized as CA-MRSA by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and susceptibility test

69 solates from seven patients were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and VNTR typing.

70 lates from 15 other Belgian hospitals) using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and WGS.

71 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequen

72 terization of the 66 isolates was done using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequen

73 zed by antimicrobial-susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and detection of toxin

74 chain reaction (PCR) for 31 virulence genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and multilocus sequenc

75 erwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and multiplex PCR for

76 rRNA gene sequence analysis, genotyped using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and phenotyped for a r

77 lates utilized multilocus sequence typing or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, but high-resolution ex

78 ere tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis clonal type, toxin gene

79 he induction of cellular DNA breaks based on pulsed field gel electrophoresis, comet analysis, and ga

80 ion of YAC DNA from yeast chromosomal DNA by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, concentration to a ran

81 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, custom array comparati

82 clinical isolates labeled according to their pulsed-field gel electrophoresis data for strain differe

83 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis demonstrated the epidem

84 Pulsed field gel electrophoresis determined that 91% of

85 determined by polymerase chain reaction and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis differed from that of B

86 T131 and its ESBL-associated H30Rx subclone, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, extended virulence gen

87 ts in less than 5 h and, in conjunction with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, forms a very robust te

88 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotyping indicated th

89 tularensis isolates by DISA correlated with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotyping utilizing tw

90 Multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis identified 2 genotypes-

91 identify irregular clusters of illness, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in conjunction with who

92 Although pulsed-field gel electrophoresis indicated that multiple

93 Molecular analyses included strain typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, mec and accessory gene

94 Forty CR-Kp were genotyped by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

95 testing, sequencing of beta-lactamase genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

96 at 6 Canadian hospitals underwent typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

97 to a single genetic clone, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

98 hicillin susceptible) using a combination of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

99 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

100 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of 174 of 179 NTHi isol

101 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the CTX-M-positive i

102 tococcus pneumoniae serogroup 35 isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the genome and pbp2b

103 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis on 63 of the 70 isolate

104 We performed pulsed-field gel electrophoresis on Escherichia coli O15

105 hoc analysis using unique pathogens typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, overall success rates

106 m 6 confirmed cases had an indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern and belonged to

107 ak-associated E. coli O157:H7 or E. coli O61 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern combinations, o

108 ak-associated E. coli O157:H7 or E. coli O61 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern combinations, o

109 s Typhimurium and Newport that had different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns and in identif

110 Epidemiologic investigation and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns indicated a cl

111 ed PCR strategy was used to analyze the AscI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of Listeria mo

112 Isolates that differed in their pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns showed polymor

113 d to specific outbreaks and showed identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns were indisting

114 zed FQ(R) C. coli isolates had similar PFGE (pulsed field gel electrophoresis) patterns and the same

115 Isolates underwent pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PCR for 33 putative vi

116 Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) offers a high-re

117 on-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) screening, and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed t

118 olated in the United States were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after digestion

119 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis reveale

120 li isolates were compared using phylotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis, sequen

121 ersity of 248 strains was investigated using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis.

122 itional molecular subtyping methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and 7-gene multi

123 Outbreak-related cases were identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and confirmed by

124 Isolates were further characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and emm typing.

125 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multi-locus

126 -multiplex PCR) typing (SMT) with respect to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus s

127 udy compared the discriminatory abilities of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus s

128 exists: the two most widely used methods are pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus s

129 d during the same period were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus s

130 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus v

131 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multiple-loc

132 le nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) than with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and other method

133 gically evaluable patients were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and PCR for pvl

134 cordance of MLVA were compared with those of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and phage typing

135 ological and molecular techniques, including pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and plasmid prof

136 In this study, we combined pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and Southern hyb

137 ironmental cultures was analyzed by means of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and typing for r

138 robust molecular genetic approaches, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole-genome

139 For evaluating the genotypic diversity, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and/or enterobac

140 Isolates characterized as USA300 by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) are the predomin

141 properties, neurotoxin characterization, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) banding patterns

142 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) clonal type USA2

143 detection, toxinotyping, DNA sequencing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) DNA fingerprinti

144 ntification of Salmonella serotypes based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) fingerprints.

145 d H. haemolyticus isolates were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) following SmaI o

146 tandard method of SmaI restriction digestion pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for typing S. au

147 CR analysis for the spvA virulence gene, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) genotyping were

148 Among the CA-MRSA isolates, the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) groups detected

149 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been the gol

150 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been the sta

151 In contrast, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) identified 20 di

152 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a common meth

153 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a standard ty

154 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is considered th

155 Although pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the current "

156 Although pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the current "

157 AC) lung disease, but the "gold standard" of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is time-consumin

158 S. pneumoniae isolates by using two methods: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of SmaI-digested

159 strain is often determined by comparing its pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) or multilocus se

160 solution, and it can be directly analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) or used in appli

161 tered to the patients, grew P. putida with a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern identica

162 All isolates had the same pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern, suggest

163 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of the

164 y serotype 1/2a isolates with highly similar pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns.

165 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) played a key rol

166 lla serovar Typhimurium DT104 with different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles were an

167 They had indistinguishable plasmid and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles.

168 n of 55 virulence-associated genes, and XbaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiling.

169 Comparison of raccoon pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pulse type data

170 tically distinct despite having the outbreak pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pulsotype.

171 patient was positive and molecular typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) revealed clonal

172 eparating XbaI-restricted chromosomal DNA by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) separation.

173 coli cases with an indistinguishable, novel pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) subtyping patter

174 cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) subtyping.

175 These isolates were evaluated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to determine pos

176 ns, multilocus sequencing typing (MLST), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to molecularly c

177 nfection in the United States and to compare pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to the combinati

178 ts were used to investigate L. monocytogenes pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) type diversity.

179 The pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) type was determi

180 LVA) for Staphylococcus aureus could predict pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) types (i.e., USA

181 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was applied as a

182 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on

183 Strain typing using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on

184 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to

185 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to dete

186 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to type

187 ction analysis of genomic DNA using SmaI and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were both used t

188 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed f

189 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed o

190 stigated the use of whole-genome mapping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with isolates fr

191 e United States and Canada were analyzed via pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with XbaI.

192 By pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), 8 of 10 environ

193 This protocol describes pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), a method develo

194 Whole-genome-sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and a mouse inf

195 hat can be performed within a clinical lab), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and an antibiot

196 in, using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and array-based

197 dom amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and DNA-DNA hyb

198 otyped by repetitive-sequence PCR (rep-PCR), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus

199 sing surface protein profile identification, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus

200 Susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus

201 acterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and public arra

202 Typing was performed by PCR-ribotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and restriction

203 tine leukocidin (PVL) screening, and SCCmec, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and spa typing.

204 by restriction-endonuclease analysis (REA), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and toxinotypin

205 erase chain reaction (PCR) detection of GES, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and WGS for the

206 d thus further characterized by MLST typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and whole genom

207 We also performed DNA sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), cultures of the

208 Currently, the standard typing technique, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), is laborious an

209 acter databases at the CDC and the FDA using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequ

210 nrelated to prevalent MRSA, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequ

211 -producing isolates were determined by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequ

212 The typing methods included pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus vari

213 late characterisation included toxinotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), PCR ribotyping,

214 March 2014) included Western blot analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), polymerase chai

215 rived food products were characterized using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive elem

216 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), ribotyping, and

217 isolate and all MRSA isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), screened for mu

218 pneumonia, we analyzed 24 paired isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), serotyping, and

219 cal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), spa typing, and

220 MRSA isolates were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), staphylococcal

221 relatedness of isolates was determined using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), Staphylococcus

222 Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), the number of p

223 Using biochemical identification and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), we sought to id

224 revious molecular subtyping methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), were critical i

225 h were indistinguishable from one another by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), were obtained f

226 repetitive-sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which showed th

227 Salmonella serotype Typhi, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), with onset duri

228 uded multiple representatives of a number of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)-defined types.

229 m infections, or endocarditis, were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

230 using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

231 bial susceptibility testing and subtyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

232 hin ureaplasma serovars were investigated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

233 All isolates were subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

234 ically relevant level remains intangible for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

235 istance genes, and plasmids and genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

236 genes were compared to the data generated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

237 ab system (DL) to the results obtained using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

238 at were previously characterized by MLST and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

239 ing region of GyrA and ParC (ASLGP) and (ii) pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

240 s to identify genetically similar strains is pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

241 ral different clonal types, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

242 REA), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

243 sence of 31 virulence genes and subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

244 hosphoglucose isomerase (pgi) genotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

245 mplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

246 h limited resolution, especially compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

247 ping, antibiotic susceptibility testing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

248 aches: multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

249 nic consensus (ERIC2) PCR, serogrouping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

250 cus sequence typing (CRISPR-MVLST), and (iv) pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

251 well as SmaI macrorestriction patterns after pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

252 ose used for the interpretation of data from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

253 the current gold standard subtyping method, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

254 vailable Serratia isolates was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

255 Isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

256 tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

257 ental isolate relatedness was evaluated with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

258 er a 5-year period by using CRISPR-MVLST and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

259 ied fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

260 yping (MLST), spa typing, SCCmec typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

261 dvantages over length-based methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE); however, conven

262 Isolates were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE); SCCmec typing;

263 enes) and four groups of clonally linked (by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE]) isolates.

264 ethod for determining bacterial relatedness (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE]) remains essenti

265 ication using restriction digest technology (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE]) to shotgun sequ

266 T to those of other means (traditional MLST, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE], and single-nucl

267 f four molecular typing methods (ribotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE], random amplific

268 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, polymerase chain react

269 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles of a sample of

270 ic resistance patterns and indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles.

271 ilution, and selected isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, repetitive sequence-ba

272 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed the expected g

273 ut included (uniquely) K1 capsule and fimH64 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis separated ST1193-H64 is

274 Results of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed 17 strain types.

275 ates were evaluated for the MRSA genotype by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, staphylococcal protein

276 ST-1 (which corresponds to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis strain type NAP1/riboty

277 reased age and infection with North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis strains were associated

278 (n = 92) were characterized by toxinotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, tcdC and cdtB PCR, and

279 essus strains that were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis testing.

280 Montevideo infections with a rare pattern on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (the outbreak strain) w

281 icile isolates (n = 31) was also analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to determine the circul

282 leukocidin (PVL) cytotoxin genes, belongs to pulsed field gel electrophoresis type USA300 and multilo

283 the fluoroquinolone-resistant North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1 (NAP1) strain in

284 The North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1 (NAP1) strain wa

285 table strain of Staphylococcus aureus with a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type of USA300 and mult

286 ST-1-positive strains isolated, 6 (50%) were pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type USA200, multilocus

287 solates with chromosomal deletions, multiple pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types were identified,

288 s, repetitive-element-based PCR patterns, or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types.

289 by multilocus sequence typing [MLST]) and 79 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types.

290 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing showed wide gene

291 index (TI) of Pa isolates were derived from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing.

292 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was conducted to strain

293 release of monomeric genomes as assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was greatly diminished,

294 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed on all av

295 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to determine c

296 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to determine g

297 Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, we determined chromoso

298 Patterns on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis were highly related acr

299 ee strains appeared to be clonal by standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, whole-genome sequencin

300 a single strain by Automated RiboPrinter and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with ApaI or SmaI diges