ライフサイエンスコーパス: pure water

1 ced under "green" conditions (in 96% EtOH or pure water).

2 smotic thirst that drives animals to consume pure water.

3 the gas phase but occur much more rapidly in pure water.

4 0 ns simulation of the lattice solvated with pure water.

5 curs at shorter interplate distances than in pure water.

6 s in the perception of strong sweetness from pure water.

7 sis for understanding acid/base catalysis by pure water.

8 eories that describe density fluctuations in pure water.

9 e, tetrahydrofuran, and acetonitrile) and in pure water.

10 nonbound ions from the PCCA by washing with pure water.

11 the components of a system are insoluble in pure water.

12 the challenging goal of anion recognition in pure water.

13 , amplifying yields by up to 27X relative to pure water.

14 esulting in freezing dynamics different from pure water.

15 itions, do not induce icing differently than pure water.

16 dhesion force of 275 +/- 3.5 uN measured for pure water.

17 the same diffusional properties as those of pure water.

18 rsion in HF-SCAN ruins its high accuracy for pure water.

19 through pathways distinct from reactions in pure water.

20 % brine, which is ~20 % higher than that in pure water.

21 m show sigma(s/a) values approaching that of pure water.

22 cleaned regularly using large quantities of pure water.

23 ent in heat transfer performance compared to pure water.

24 models in predicting solubility of CO(2) in pure water.

25 ned against the known k(OH) of erythritol in pure water.

26 nent in melts along with the molar volume of pure water.

27 conductometrically in a background of nearly pure water.

28 ger than when measurements were performed in pure water.

29 bly more soluble in the studied DESs than in pure water.

30 ed drastically by 98% (from 200 to 4 ppb) in pure water.

31 ing at higher mole fractions of DOPE than in pure water.

32 um ascorbate/ascorbic acid electron donor in pure water.

33 pecies, whereas the second layer consists of pure water.

34 -polymeric carbon source in presence of only pure water.

35 ization was achieved by intense rinsing with pure water.

36 rst reported example of iron(V)oxo formed in pure water.

37 the fact that the suppressed IC effluent is pure water.

38 the bis-(acetylguanidinium)ferrocene salt in pure water.

39 adiation significantly reduced aflatoxins in pure water.

40 O)k = 0.81 in 50 mM HCl, and (D2O)k = 4.2 in pure water.

41 s for the efficient recognition of anions in pure water.

42 observed with respect to the conformation in pure water.

43 rates nearly as fast as they would penetrate pure water.

44 a critical concentration when solubilized in pure water.

45 found at room temperature is greater than in pure water.

46 rmations, followed by ethanol, methanol, and pure water.

47 emperatures well below the freezing point of pure water.

48 hich otherwise adopts a compact structure in pure water.

49 identical to that previously determined for pure water.

50 nly 12-fold lower than the same particles in pure water.

51 ride ions below the EPA contaminant level in pure water.

52 ed 6 times gas uptake compared to nonporous (pure) water.

53 ,2-diol (7.06x10(-2) at 298 K) and lowest in pure water (1.25x10(-3) at 298 K) over the entire temper

54 microM) and water concentration relative to pure water (10.9 %, 15.3 %, and 27.3 %) for postmenopaus

55 were found to be highly effective when using pure water, a full flux recovery could not be achieved w

56 In pure water, a limit of detection and quantification rang

57 weet & caloric, a sweet, a caloric drink, or pure water after baseline.

58 g/L PTFE was achieved under the condition of pure water, ambient atmosphere, and no sacrificial agent

59 Between pure water and 40% ethanol the diffraction shifts across

60 Moreover, the condensed DNA adopts B-form in pure water and A-form in 80% ethanol, which indicates th

61 tigated the structure and dynamics of HRP in pure water and aqueous [EMIm][EtSO(4)] (0.26 M), as well

62 of hydrocarbon components of natural gas in pure water and aqueous electrolyte solutions is importan

63 of mixtures or/and pure hydrocarbon gases in pure water and aqueous electrolyte systems up to high-pr

64 hane, ethane, propane, and n-butane gases in pure water and aqueous electrolyte systems.

65 Phase transition temperatures of pure water and aqueous sodium chloride (NaCl) solutions,

66 onsible for the destruction of aflatoxins in pure water and assesses the cytotoxicity in liver hepato

67 hy women tasted an aversive saline solution, pure water and chocolate while rCBF was measured with PE

68 be achieved in a zero-gap BPM device using a pure water and CO(2) feed.

69 The use of pure water and compressed air as the DESI spray solution

70 he highest anthocyanin extraction yield, but pure water and different proportions of acetone/water or

71 ocannabinol (delta 9-THC), and cannabinol in pure water and human saliva.

72 hylformamide (DMF) were compared to those in pure water and in 6 M urea in water systems.

73 s, Passerini reactions, and Ugi reactions in pure water and in aqueous solutions are dependent on the

74 replica exchange molecular dynamics in both pure water and in HFIP/water cosolvent.

75 552.2 CRM (certified reference material) in pure water and in three different water matrixes (tap, r

76 entative of a different structural class, in pure water and in two different effluents and reports ne

77 ants, t(1) and t(2), are similar to those of pure water and increase mildly with the concentration.

78 orbed layer shows abnormally high density as pure water and likely includes metal species, whereas th

79 ol g(-1) h(-1) with excellent reusability in pure water and O(2) under one standard sun light, that h

80 hosphatidylcholine bilayer systems: one with pure water and one with added NaCl.

81 cept under highly controlled conditions with pure water and only hydrophilic surfaces present.

82 midazolium-2-carboxylate 1 is stable in both pure water and pure acetonitrile.

83 rmeable membranes separating compartments of pure water and salt solution.

84 uch as 90% of HBQs (0.25 nmol L(-1)) in both pure water and tap water were transformed to other produ

85 threshold pressure between that generates in pure water and that in gelatin hydrogel is considered.

86 hieved with sacrificial oxidants but also in pure water and under an oxygen or air atmosphere.

87 glycerol was still some one-third of that in pure water, and one-half of that was regained even in 99

88 2 kbar), with fast kinetics (minutes), using pure water, and with a nearly complete water-to-hydrate

89 O4 > NaI > NaNO3 approximately NaBr > NaCl > pure water approximately NaF approximately Na2SO4.

90 f an all-chalcogen bonding anion receptor in pure water are compared with halogen bonding and hydroge

91 ion properties (xylose, glucose, sucrose) in pure water are determined.

92 Carboxymethyl Cellulose (Cmc) are used with pure water as a base fluid.

93 olved the removal of high voltage and use of pure water as a spray solvent instead of the organic sol

94 paration of ions or ionizable compounds with pure water as eluent and detecting them in a simple fash

95 tions, with advantages over methods that use pure water as solvent (e.g., inhomogeneous fluid solvati

96 simmondsins yield (23.35%) was obtained with pure water as solvent.

97 In addition, using pure water as the mobile phase, five phenols were separa

98 vorable under 80% ethanol conditions than in pure water, as a result of ethanol's role in enhancing e

99 ophilic gas, was considerably slower than in pure water, as expected from rate-limiting membrane perm

100 onal understanding of AEM-WEs operating with pure water, as well as discuss the effects of operating

101 mochirality in either THF/H2O mixtures or in pure water at 65 degrees C leads to disassembly into ste

102 eneration of high-valent iron derivatives in pure water at any pH.

103 8 x 10(-9) m(2) s(-1), close to the value in pure water at infinite dilution, and an area-specific me

104 e catalytic photoreduction of CO(2) to CO in pure water at pH 6-7 with an unprecedented combination o

105 s water soluble, complexes cyanide anions in pure water at pH 7.

106 approximately a factor of 10 slower than in pure water because of water binding and restriction to t

107 On the other hand, the pure water behaves as a molecular fluid below 15 GPa, gr

108 A single sample, in this case a sample of pure water both with and without an (insoluble) AgI crys

109 overpotentials of <10 mV at 20 mA.cm(-2) and pure water BPM electrolyzers that operate with an alkali

110 brational and intermolecular spectroscopy in pure water but not optimized for solvation, is used to d

111 overs and not only improves over HF-SCAN for pure water, but also captures vital noncovalent interact

112 Replacing pure water by electrolyte aqueous solutions enables to i

113 One distinct aquaporin subfamily contains pure water channels, whereas a second subfamily contains

114 insertion of the small sugar monomer in the pure water cluster in a way in which the oxygen atom fra

115 rix effects in positive ion mode compared to pure water cluster, while in negative ion mode, this eff

116 ogen bonding networks compared with those of pure water clusters show the influence of fenchone's top

117 While in the prototypical hydrogen-bonded pure water clusters this contribution amounts to 20-25%

118 First, we examine the dynamics of confined pure water clusters with Nw < 100 at temperatures of 200

119 a small organic molecule, mimicking those of pure water clusters.

120 mble those of the smallest three-dimensional pure water clusters.

121 At long times, the pure-water compartment is drained, and the net flow of w

122 a high STH efficiency of 9.2 per cent using pure water, concentrated solar light and an indium galli

123 IBCF was rapidly injected into 2 mL of ultra-pure water containing 150 muL of pyridine to induce form

124 with an apparent quantum yield of 10.0 % in pure water containing glycerol.

125 double dagger)(OH)) both in aqueous DMSO and pure water correlate with their binding constants to 4-n

126 Pure water could be used as the spray solution for DESI,

127 Cl, (D)k = 0.77 in 50 mM HCl, (D)k = 0.75 in pure water, (D)k = 0.88 in 50 mM NaOH, and (D)(V/K) = 0.

128 rature of maximum kappa(T) from T = 230 K in pure water down to T = 223 K in the solution.

129 ative reactive NO(2) dimer on the surface of pure water droplets is too small to host the whole proce

130 5.2 mV kh(-1), approaching the durability of pure water electrolysis.

131 2.0 V, twice that of the commercial alkaline pure water electrolyzer, contributing to an economically

132 y structure better than the simulation using pure water, even though the protein molecules display co

133 In pure water, exchange was too fast to observe a CEST effe

134 ssolving the original synthesized peptide in pure water) exists in a beta-sheet conformation, where t

135 ation percentages and rates were measured in pure water exposed to simulated natural sunlight at a co

136 tives that coassemble with ionomer, enabling pure water-fed AEMWEs to operate with a degradation rate

137 r a discussion of the possible advantages of pure-water-fed AEM-WEs, we cover the thermodynamic and k

138 We provide evidence for how the pure water feed engenders several issues related to the

139 s of 32-34 LMH and up to 57-65 LMH against a pure water feed using 2 M NaCl as the draw solution test

140 water fluxes of 30.6 and 82.0 LMH against a pure water feed using 2.0 M NaCl as the draw solution te

141 membrane by at least a 48% and increase the pure water flux by 39.4% compared to the control membran

142 water contact angle = 0-20 degrees ) and the pure water flux was generally improved by increasing the

143 the fundamental of triple proton transfer in pure water for azaindoles as well as pave a new avenue f

144 pesticides increased approximately 3-fold in pure water for each 25 degrees C temperature increment.

145 res appropriate to seafloor crust, plumes of pure water form naturally at approximately 400 degrees C

146 tion of the nanodroplets lead to demixing of pure water from the solutions.

147 The mechanism of aldol reactions in pure water has been studied with density functional calc

148 se functions observed during supercooling of pure water have been the source of much interest and con

149 ydrate, of the previously observed prismatic pure water heptamer motif.

150 trode assemblies that are only operated with pure water humidified gases.

151 adial variation is consistent with initially pure water ice bombarded by meteors, but smaller radial

152 eladus' surface is composed mostly of nearly pure water ice except near its south pole, where there a

153 e signal, suggesting a composition of nearly pure water ice.

154 tched if the buried layer consists of nearly pure water ice.

155 s indicates the presence of millimetre-sized pure water-ice grains, considerably larger than in all p

156 escence brightness and fatigue resistance in pure water improved.

157 Pure water in a highly (1)H spin-polarized state is prop

158 importantly, sense the hydrosulfide anion in pure water in a reversible chemosensing fashion are demo

159 pproximation can yield chemical accuracy for pure water in all its phases, but only when its density

160 (derived from PrP(C) simulated at low pH in pure water) in 1 M TMAO, similar structural reorganizati

161 -methanol outperform other solvents, such as pure water, in capturing carbanions, which is in contras

162 icantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the

163 90 degrees C, 100 times higher than that in pure water, indicating increased OH(-) ionic conductivit

164 ion of hydrogen atoms via dehydrogenation of pure water into hydrogen peroxide under visible light ir

165 his respect, the oxidative transformation of pure water is a sustainable solution to meet the global

166 A control model containing a 5 nm bubble in pure water is also created.

167 ton-exchange-membrane system (PEM-WE), where pure water is circulated (no support electrolyte), the c

168 The vitrification of pure water is compared with that of molecular solutions

169 the rate of hydrolysis of methyl formate in pure water is consistent with mechanisms involving coope

170 t extraction behavior of the cannabinoids in pure water is evaluated along with optimization of the m

171 e potential of the vapor-liquid interface of pure water is relevant to electrochemistry, solvation th

172 ultrasonic treatment of PuO2 suspensions in pure water is reported.

173 (t(3)), which does not have a counterpart in pure water, is 3 ps at 0.8 m and increases by a factor o

174 lpha(b) values far exceed those reported for pure water: it appears that both impurities in the water

175 unts of Pd(II) and excess magnesium metal in pure water leads to symmetrical/unsymmetrical biaryls, i

176 sensitivity for quinoline quantification in pure water (LoD of 1.15 ppb) but did not perform well fo

177 rt that presented the highest performance of pure water microdroplets in capturing carbocations.

178 By spraying pure water microdroplets into a mass spectrometer, we de

179 No ions at m/z 36 are detected with pure water, nor are significant oxidation products for t

180 e interactions of the MNPs with a solvent of pure water or a 0.5 M NaCl solution were studied by clas

181 h use of a probe aerosol, composed of either pure water or a sodium chloride solution of known concen

182 oxidation products in higher yields than in pure water or many common organic solvents.

183 n source into a catalytic cycle operating in pure water over a wide pH range.

184 ight cutoff of 255 Da, and a reasonably high pure water permeability (A) of 2.4 LMH/bar.

185 (MWCO) of 1000-2000 Da but also have a high pure water permeability (PWP) of 82.5-117.6 L m(-2) h(-1

186 NF hollow fiber membrane exhibits an average pure water permeability of 3.2 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1) and

187 he newly developed membrane exhibited a high pure water permeability of 5.01 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1) an

188 xhibits an unprecedented combination of high pure water permeance (25.8 LMH/bar) and excellent salt (

189 le to obtain high performance membranes with pure water permeation flux substantially higher than tho

190 reactions through surface modification allow pure water (pH 6.8) splitting with a solar-to-hydrogen e

191 Pure water proved to be a greener, more effective, and e

192 e variations in heat capacity and density of pure water, pure ethanol, and their mixture across diffe

193 The results for pure water, pure ethanol, and water-ethanol mixture were

194 this method, recoveries relative to SPME in pure water ranged from 21 to 47% depending on the cannab

195 ins leave the surface when in contact with a pure water solution.

196 es (where 0 x 220, ~10 nm) and show that, in pure water solvent, H(2)O(2) selectivity increases with

197 reduced by approximately 200 mV relative to pure water splitting to achieve 100 mA cm(-2), while the

198 oltage at least 200 mV smaller compared with pure water splitting to achieve the same current density

199 ation (MD), which generates concentrated and pure water streams by thermal separation, and pressure r

200 ximal surface pressure attained by P188 on a pure water subphase.

201 rved only in wastewater effluents and not in pure water, suggesting that complex secondary reactions

202 over twice as fast in seawater compared with pure water, suggesting that seawater salts accelerate di

203 ciency and poor selectivity, especially in a pure-water system, hinder the development of photocataly

204 hibits outstanding CO(2) RR performance in a pure-water system.

205 between the mineral brucite [Mg(OH)(2)] and pure water systematically increases by 12.4 per mil as p

206 These results obtained for pure water systems have important implications for our u

207 rturb water configurations compared with the pure water tetramer and pentamer.

208 n pretreatment, and it was confirmed that in pure water, the acid generated promotes the polypropylen

209 On pure water, the area is 30 +/- 3 A(2)/molecule, and it i

210 In pure water, the association constant of 1-F is estimated

211 tructure in apolar organic solvent, while in pure water, the peptide adopts collapsed coil conformati

212 Employing pure water, the ultimate green source of hydrogen donor

213 In the case of pure water, this is estimated(1) to require a pressure o

214 ps as the NaBr concentration increases from pure water to approximately 6 M NaBr.

215 the effect being equivalent to pressurizing pure water to pressures of order 2 GPa or more.

216 The osmotic force drives water flow from the pure-water to the salt-solution compartment.

217 entational relaxation increases from 2.6 ps (pure water) to 6.7 ps (approximately equal to 6 M NaBr).

218 mumol g(-1) h(-1) with 94.3% selectivity in pure water under ambient air and visible light.

219 total synthesis of H(2)O(2) was achieved in pure water under an air atmosphere via a synergetic proc

220 ates reaching 33.2 and 17.5 mumol h(-1) from pure water under simulated solar light and visible light

221 and 100% selectivity towards CO and CH(4) in pure water under UV-vis light irradiation, resulting in

222 CoO nanoparticles that result can decompose pure water under visible-light irradiation without any c

223 ivity coefficient compared with its value in pure water (up to approximately 1.5 higher at low sugar

224 Direct solar-to-hydrogen conversion from pure water using all-organic heterogeneous catalysts rem

225 ions have substantially different results in pure water versus water-ammonia, which extends the lifet

226 in terms of its ability to detect sulfide in pure water via an in situ formation of a fluorophore fro

227 on (S) after the electrode was calibrated in pure water (W)).

228 xin B(1), aflatoxin M(1) (AFB(1), AFM(1)) in pure water was studied.

229 the greater solubility of this derivative in pure water, we show for the first time that effective th

230 tuations calculated from the simulation with pure water were less accurate, particularly for two of t

231 for the cannabinoids in saliva, relative to pure water, were dramatically improved by a method devel

232 ereocomplexation is particularly apparent in pure water, where l- and d-KYFIL are soluble random coil

233 ction peak to smaller angle as compared with pure water, whereas solutions of hydrophilic solutes do

234 The chow and HF mice had free access to pure water, whereas the HFHC group received water with 5

235 6 spheroids was only 24 +/- 4% lower than in pure water, which can be accounted for fully by volume e

236 cross-sectional diameters of about 10 nm in pure water, which can be turned to very stable hydrogels

237 ntials at all concentrations, in contrast to pure water, which decays as a biexponential.

238 c disproportionation of hydrogen peroxide in pure water, which has not been observed so far.

239 faster than apple and even 13 % faster than pure water, which in turn was related with diffusion-acc

240 to a carboxylate, phosphate, and sulfate in pure water with affinities of 3.6 x 10(4), 1.1 x 10(3),

241 s simultaneous H(2) and O(2) production from pure water with an average apparent quantum yield over 1

242 Pure water with HC also yielded higher phlorotannin (1.5

243 gen hydrates at moderate temperatures, using pure water, with extremely fast kinetics and much lower

244 Reactions proceeded in pure water without any additives or cosolvents, in a sho

245 OP but on a single catalytic nanoparticle in pure water without organic solvents or multiunit reactio

246 This probe had a linewidth of 1.1 Hz for pure water without susceptibility matching.

247 Here we exfoliate 2D materials directly in pure water without using any chemicals or surfactants.