コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 er resistance to chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
2 ittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
3 s: mefloquine, chloroquine, doxycycline, and pyrimethamine.
4 on cassette were retrieved by selection with pyrimethamine.
5 unate-amodiaquine or amodiaquine-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
6 sed efficacy of amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
7 hydrophobic antifols such as trimetrexate or pyrimethamine.
8 dose of 1500 mg of sulfadoxine and 75 mg of pyrimethamine.
9 uch as chloroquine, quinine, and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
10 enotype and clinical or in vitro response to pyrimethamine.
11 modiaquine, or amodiaquine plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine.
12 7 participants assigned to sulfadoxine\#8211;pyrimethamine.
13 its for birth outcomes than does sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
14 50 concentrations of mefloquine, quinine and pyrimethamine.
15 ioration of the effectiveness of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
16 piperaquine as an alternative to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
17 in birth outcomes compared with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
18 ely reduced by an anti-STAT3 treatment using pyrimethamine.
19 nation therapy, chloroquine, and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
20 in blocks of 16 to sulfadoxine (250 mg) plus pyrimethamine (12.5 mg; n=319 in moderate-transmission a
21 125 [35%]) than with amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (12/129 [9%]; risk difference 26% [95% CI
22 ent over 28 days for amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (17/129 [13%]) and amodiaquine+artesunate
23 1.1%-32.1%) for amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, 17.4% (95% CI, 13.1%-23.1%) for amodiaqui
24 quine (25 mg/kg over 3 days) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (25 mg/kg sulfadoxine, 1.25 mg/kg pyrimeth
25 ficantly higher with chloroquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (44/125 [35%]) than with amodiaquine+sulfa
26 mine (90%) than those receiving sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (48%) or no antimalarial drugs (34%; p<0.0
27 In order to identify structural features of pyrimethamine (5-(4-chlorophenyl)-6-ethylpyrimidine-2,4-
28 97 of 476 (20%) for amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, 54 of 491 (11%) for amodiaquine+artesunat
29 ts aged 2-11 months, but neither sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (-6.7%, -45.9 to 22.0) nor chlorproguanil-
30 ger antimalarial effect than did sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (8 g, -9 to 26), although more frequent do
31 quine (86%) or amodiaquine plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (90%) than those receiving sulphadoxine-py
33 -dapsone was less effective than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 6.4; 95% confid
34 36-66, p<0.0001) compared with sulfadoxine/ pyrimethamine alone and by 37% (12-54, p=0.007) compared
35 ne alone or in combination with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, although associated with minor side-effec
36 tion therapies (amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine plus artesunate, or artemethe
38 the women assigned chloroquine, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, and amodiaquine plus sulphad
40 randomly assigned chloroquine, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, or amodiaquine plus sulphado
41 in areas with high resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine among P falciparum parasites, but remains
43 fected cells with the toxoplasmastatic drugs pyrimethamine and 6-thioxanthine prior to LPS stimulatio
46 ind, placebo-controlled trial of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and chlorproguanil-dapsone treatment for u
47 get of antifolate antimalarial drugs such as pyrimethamine and cycloguanil, the clinical efficacy of
48 e reductase (DHFR) to two related inhibitors-pyrimethamine and cycloguanil-across a breadth of drug c
49 with either chloroquine or sulfadoxine\#8211;pyrimethamine and followed for 28 days to assess the ant
52 ed until delivery with regular monitoring of pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine concentration in maternal
57 oses of the clinical antimalarial inhibitors pyrimethamine and tetracycline and observed differential
58 tive treatment with two doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and the use of insecticide-treated nets.
60 intermittent preventive therapy (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine) and insecticide-treated mosquito nets are
61 oxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and amodiaquine+artesunate for treatment
62 led trial comparing chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and chlorproguanil-dapsone for the treatm
63 ne than among those who received sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and monthly treatment with dihydroartemis
64 ve pharmaceutical ingredients, sulfalene and pyrimethamine, and NQR analysis revealed spectral differ
71 ed as a potential alternative to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine as intermittent preventive treatment again
73 in an area of high resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine at sites of moderate (n=1280 infants enrol
75 was a near-significant risk elevation after pyrimethamine/azithromycin treatment (P = .078 and P = .
76 e demonstrated superior efficacy compared to Pyrimethamine based counterparts in an in vivo model of
78 es of women randomly assigned to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine compared with women assigned to dihydroart
85 egnancy, and monthly amodiaquine-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine during the rainy season months in children
86 om two doses to monthly doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine during the second and third trimesters, bu
87 uail eggs were found to contain florfenicol, pyrimethamine, estrone and 17beta-estradiol at levels fr
88 in which 1 of 4 treatments with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine fail in children by day 14, the 2-dose IPT
89 re treated with amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for 396 episodes of uncomplicated malaria
90 sing alternative drug to replace sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment.
93 ittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group (15 [3%] of 457 women vs 47 [10%] of
94 raquine group (9.2%) than in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group (18.6%, P=0.05) or the three-dose di
95 gnificantly more frequent in the sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine group (38 of 215, 18%) compared with eithe
96 was significantly higher in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group (41 episodes over 43.0 person-years
97 was significantly higher in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group (50.0%) than in the three-dose dihyd
98 hange 13 ms [SD 23]) than in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group (mean change 0 ms [SD 23]; p<0.0001)
100 nce of parasitemia (40.5% in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group vs. 16.6% in the three-dose dihydroa
101 5 of 290 patients (1.7%) in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group, and 27 of 272 patients (9.9%) in th
107 randomly assigned to treatment (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in combination with amodiaquine or dual pl
109 finity)) or the half-lives of sulfadoxine or pyrimethamine in prepartum or postpartum women, although
110 ittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in the context of high sulfadoxine-pyrimet
111 preventive treatment (IPT) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in vulnerable populations reduces malaria
112 ia prevention (ITNs or IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine) in pregnancy and birth outcomes, includin
114 effectiveness of daily CMX with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine intermittent preventive treatment (IPT-SP)
115 ittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, intermittent preventive treatment with di
116 Therapeutic alternatives to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine IPTp are needed in areas where the prevale
117 (primary outcome) and malaria by sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine IPTp dose, and for studies that reported o
118 ciparum and the effectiveness of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine IPTp for malaria-associated outcomes.
120 from 13 surveys (42 394 births), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine IPTp was associated with reduced prevalenc
122 eventive therapy with 2 doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) is the mainstay of efforts in su
123 tive treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) would improve maternal and infan
131 ciparum to the antimalarial drug sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is a result of extremely rare mutations th
137 Intermittent treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is widely recommended for the prevention o
140 ) in areas of high resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (Lys540Glu >=90% in east and southern Afri
143 Compared with monthly doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, monthly doses of dihydroartemisinin-piper
144 and randomly assigned to receive sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (n=391) or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine
145 modiaquine (n=270), amodiaquine +sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (n=507), or amodiaquine+artesunate (n=515)
146 ittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (n=515); 1368 (88%) women comprised the in
147 ntry to replace chloroquine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine nationwide in response to high rates of ch
149 Data on the efficacy of IPT with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on placental and peripheral malaria, birth
150 fect of increasing resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on the efficacy of IPT during pregnancy in
151 Combinations of amodiaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or artesunate were significantly more effi
153 reatment as random assignment to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine before p
155 e combination of chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or fosmidomycin may be more effective agai
156 e investigated whether IPTi with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or other antimalarial drug combinations ad
157 f an adverse effect of IPTi with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or other antimalarial drugs on the proport
158 nd 15, respectively) than in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or placebo groups (eight deaths per group;
159 STAT3 and that blocking STAT3 signaling with pyrimethamine or similar drugs may be an attractive ther
160 e of artesunate plus one dose of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or two placebos on three occasions during
161 ydroartemisinin-piperaquine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (or another compound with non-malarial eff
162 quine (25 mg/kg over 3 days) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine; or amodiaquine and artesunate (4 mg/kg da
165 mefloquine-artesunate (MQAS) or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SPAQ) was more effective
167 d the effectiveness of SMC using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine given over 5 months to ch
168 5, 18%) compared with either the sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine group (two of 164, 1%; p<
169 28 and 42 days, patients in the sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine group were significantly
171 n of azithromycin to the monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine used for seasonal malaria
172 omycin or placebo, together with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, during the annual malari
173 up (two of 164, 1%; p<0.0001) or sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine plus artesunate group (one of 198, 1%; p<0
174 ng monthly chemoprophylaxis with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus artesunate to selectively control tim
176 receive 25 mg/kg sulfadoxine and 1.25 mg/kg pyrimethamine plus either placebo, 25 mg/kg amodiaquine,
178 ntion (SMC) with amodiaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine provides substantial benefit to this vulne
179 aimiri boliviensis monkeys infected with the pyrimethamine (Pyr)-susceptible Chesson strain with a ZF
182 domly assigned participants to a sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine regimen (106 participants), a three-dose d
183 n by day 14, the 2-dose IPT with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine regimen continues to provide substantial b
185 onsistent across a wide range of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance (0% to 96% dihydropteroate-synt
186 explore the modifying effects of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance (as indicated by Ala437Gly, Lys
188 hich has experienced sustained selection for pyrimethamine resistance at the dihydrofolate reductase
192 associations between markers of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in P falciparum and the effecti
197 ng that malaria parasites bearing high-level pyrimethamine resistance originally arrived in Africa fr
198 h ACT along with predominance of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance parasite invoked a strong possi
200 le evolutionary pathways in the evolution of pyrimethamine resistance using an approach in which all
210 4 key amino acid replacements implicated in pyrimethamine resistance: N51I, C59R, S108N, and I164L.
211 In order to directly assess the costs of pyrimethamine-resistance in vivo, we have carried out co
212 d in vivo, which may explain why this highly pyrimethamine-resistant allele has not been observed in
213 t-expression system to identify rare, highly pyrimethamine-resistant alleles of dhfr in isolates from
214 rocytic development of both chloroquine- and pyrimethamine-resistant P. falciparum strains with poten
216 Molecular assays for monitoring sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum have not b
218 cific alleles and the failure of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (S/P) to clear the erythrocytic stages of
220 e if changes in gch1 expression alone modify pyrimethamine sensitivity, we manipulated gch1 CN in sev
221 quine with the standard of care, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, showed dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was
223 imethamine (25 mg/kg sulfadoxine, 1.25 mg/kg pyrimethamine, single dose); amodiaquine (25 mg/kg over
224 eated with chloroquine (CQ) plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and amodiaquine (AQ) plus SP were tes
225 requency of molecular markers of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and amodiaquine (AQ) resistance did n
226 atment (IPTp) with two doses of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and insecticide-treated-nets (ITNs) i
227 ttent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and SP plus azithromycin (SPAZ) reduc
228 ficacy of this drug with that of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) as treatment for uncomplicated falcip
229 (IPTi) is the administration of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) at 2, 3, and 9 months of age to preve
230 ent during pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) decreases placental malaria parasitem
231 tudied amendable determinants of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) efficacy involving 2869 treatments am
233 istance to the antimalarial drug sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) emerged in Plasmodium falciparum from
234 anization advocates 2-3 doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for intermittent preventive treatment
235 sites resistant to the IPTp drug sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) have emerged worldwide, and infection
236 loquine (MQ) compared with IPTp-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
237 malaria in pregnancy (IPT) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in Malawi, the impacts of IST-DP and
238 piperaquine (DP) was superior to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in preventing maternal and placental
239 s paired with artesunate (AS) or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in recommended antimalarial regimens.
240 Pfdhfr and Pfdhps have rendered sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) ineffective for malaria treatment in
241 otrimoxazole (CTX) compared with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) intermittent-preventive-therapy (IPTp
242 ugs such as chloroquine (CQ) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is a major global health threat.
244 ent during pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is protective against malaria but may
245 eatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended for malaria prevention
248 ts and received a single dose of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) on enrollment, followed by either int
249 laria Chemoprevention (SMC) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) plus amodiaquine (AQ), given each mon
250 Tp comparing the standard 2-dose sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) regimen with monthly IPTp among a coh
251 ciated with chloroquine (CQ) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance and the microsatellite loc
254 e to no chemoprevention, monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
255 lm of blood and was treated with sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP), in accordance with national policy.
256 d for uncomplicated malaria with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), SP + amodiaquine (AQ), or SP + artes
257 malarial parasite resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), SP continues to be recommended for i
258 lacebo, artemether-lumefantrine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), SP+amodiaquine, SP+piperaquine, SP+c
259 to concerns about resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), the only drug currently recommended
261 g simultaneous administration of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP-IPTi) with immunizations, we measured
262 By contrast, resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SPR) has emerged during an era of molecul
263 ittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine strategy recommended by WHO is threatened
265 he pregnant woman until week 16, followed by pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and folinic acid for at lea
266 at least 4 weeks of combination therapy with pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and folinic acid independen
267 efficacy of chloroquine, and the combination pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine is the most commonly chosen al
269 ich enabled teachers to dispense sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine tablets according to national guidelines.
270 ance of Plasmodium falciparum to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine threatens the antimalarial effectiveness o
271 m falciparum to chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine threatens the use of these drugs for malar
272 Compared with three doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, three doses of dihydroartemisinin-piperaq
273 trials compared 2-dose IPT with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to case management or placebo in women dur
274 rmittent preventive therapy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to control malaria during pregnancy is use
275 or coadministration of IPTi with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to infants at the time of the second and t
276 aken to determine the safety and efficacy of pyrimethamine to lower SOD1 levels in the CSF in fALS/SO
277 ttent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine to pregnant women (IPTp-SP) through antena
279 le mutant") were associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment failure but not with chlorprogua
280 hydroartemisinin-piperaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment group (54 [16%] of 337 women vs
281 in Africa, notably intermittent sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment in pregnancy, and monthly amodia
283 associated with chloroquine or sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment, attention has turned to the few
286 therapy with 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was associated with a higher birth weight
287 eatment failure with amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was balanced by a lower risk of new infect
288 m 2368 children from sites where sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was compared with placebo were analysed fo
290 ated with clinical resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was found in 0.8% of samples from malaria
293 minant of treatment outcome with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was retrospectively studied in young child
295 ne, amodiaquine, and amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine were all effective for treatment of uncomp
300 Treatment with lower and higher doses of pyrimethamine with sulfadizine improved outcomes relativ