ライフサイエンスコーパス: quality improvement

1 d by ID physicians and will promote clinical quality improvement.

2 measurement burden and increase data use for quality improvement.

3 used for sepsis surveillance, research, and quality improvement.

4 certification, employment, credentialing and quality improvement.

5 s and would therefore represent a target for quality improvement.

6 mong different hospitals as a foundation for quality improvement.

7 fication of potential health benefits of air quality improvement.

8 ment of hospital and surgeon performance for quality improvement.

9 mark development and help identify areas for quality improvement.

10 s in the IMPACT Registry as a foundation for quality improvement.

11 across hospitals suggests opportunities for quality improvement.

12 Anticoagulation protocol quality improvement.

13 ggregation, indicating practical utility for quality improvement.

14 are unchanged despite substantial efforts in quality improvement.

15 o characterize novel targets for value-based quality improvement.

16 aters have not resulted in significant water-quality improvements.

17 oach that can be used to support data-driven quality improvements.

18 ardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes - Quality Improvement), a multicenter registry launched in

19 ment learning collaborative when coordinated quality improvement activities are leveraged, resulting

20 tained in clinical practice for research and quality improvement activities.

21 ality conference is a common educational and quality improvement activity performed in cardiac cathet

22 c direction and investments in its research, quality improvement, advocacy, and public health program

23 lared goal in the United States economic and quality improvement agenda.

24 he best quartile or decile as benchmarks for quality improvement aims, but to what extent these aims

25 preintervention compliance, the impact of a quality improvement algorithm to optimize infusion time

26 being observational, quasi-experimental, or quality improvement, along with two randomized control t

27 64% of the impact overall estimated in this quality improvement analysis.

28 enable national surveillance and facilitate quality improvement and comparative effectiveness resear

29 of a procedure-targeted approach to surgical quality improvement and describe a practical method for

30 tions (SSIs) feature prominently in surgical quality improvement and pay-for-performance measures.

31 The use of clinical registries for quality improvement and research has grown significantly

32 However, most research on quality improvement and safety interventions in EHRs is

33 combined with complementary technologies for quality improvement and validation.

34 ter uncertainty and the relationship between quality improvements and long-run quality-adjusted life

35 d life year (which includes effectiveness of quality improvement) and cost (which includes incentive

36 es can leverage these data for onsite, rapid quality improvement, and benchmarking versus other insti

37 utions to evaluate their care quality, drive quality improvement, and deliver high-value cirrhosis ca

38 ratings aim to encourage transparency, spur quality improvement, and empower patient choice.

39 entific advancement through shared learning, quality improvement, and research.

40 ing tested can be considered minimal risk or quality improvement, and when clinical decision making i

41 ed in 91 watersheds with no consistent water-quality improvements, and balances increased in 52 water

42 dditional climate warming in this way, water quality improvements appear to have offset recent temper

43 t state-level regulatory mandates for sepsis quality improvement are associated with decreased sepsis

44 s Education: A Bridge to Quality', advocated quality improvement as a core competency for all healthc

45 oup meetings designed to motivate sanitation quality improvement as a way to build wealth and reduce

46 protocol which targeted variables in need of quality improvement, as identified by prior work: 1) lun

47 These results suggest that water quality improvements, as well as other types of ecosyste

48 Targeting quality improvement at QMs that demonstrate substantial

49 th system principles to establish a cycle of quality improvement based on data generated from routine

50 Purpose To identify potential PET image quality improvement by using a recently developed lightw

51 participants were beneficiaries of a nursing quality improvement campaign in infant safe sleep practi

52 research communities emerged: epidemiology, quality improvement, cognitive systems engineering (CSE)

53 duction bundle in a large statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative leveraging a multiface

54 rgeons (n = 25) participating in a statewide quality improvement collaborative submitted an unedited

55 Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, a statewide quality improvement collaborative that uses a prospectiv

56 nd implemented in a large statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative through a novel implem

57 ONTO simulation and team training as well as quality improvement collaboratives.

58 lture on patient outcomes, methodologies for quality improvement commonly used in healthcare, and pat

59 Clarity regarding which quality improvement competencies are priority for this p

60 edicare Supplemental plans, data from the GI Quality Improvement Consortium Registry, and national da

61 Evidence for the effectiveness of continuous quality improvement (CQI) in resource-poor settings is v

62 eon is important, as it has implications for quality improvement, criteria for referral and reimburse

63 National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement data on inpatient general, vascular,

64 tic shock patients captured in a prospective quality improvement database suspected or confirmed infe

65 patients were obtained from the prospective quality improvement database.

66 ia Clinical Outcomes Registry, a multicenter quality-improvement database from 2010 to 2015.

67 y (RAI-A), using variables from the surgical quality improvement databases (Veterans Affairs or Ameri

68 In the quality improvement domain, 21 recommendations address t

69 nents and contextual factors associated with quality improvement education in practice.

70 Evaluating quality improvement education is complex.

71 REVIEW Publications where quality improvement education was delivered to pre-regis

72 Clusters were randomised (1:1) to receive a quality improvement educational intervention (interventi

73 Quality improvement efforts are needed to help hospitals

74 Further quality improvement efforts are urgently needed to impro

75 Quality improvement efforts can target uncovered misalig

76 Quality improvement efforts have been evaluated within i

77 Quality improvement efforts have been shown to be more e

78 Many policy and quality improvement efforts have focused primarily on hi

79 developed a set of six internal QMs to guide quality improvement efforts in cirrhosis in the domains

80 th care use, and may be used to guide future quality improvement efforts in cirrhosis.

81 luation of key studies assessing large-scale quality improvement efforts in the ICU, impact of safety

82 nship is observed across hospitals, surgical quality improvement efforts may benefit by shifting focu

83 Multicenter collaborative quality improvement efforts may benefit patients with TG

84 Quality improvement efforts should focus on iAE preventi

85 Future studies and quality improvement efforts should focus on identifying

86 Quality improvement efforts should shift focus from indi

87 Local quality improvement efforts suggest that antibiotic misu

88 marking may assist hospitals in prioritizing quality improvement efforts to optimize resource utiliza

89 opy telephone calls, patient registries, and quality improvement efforts).

90 ify risk is an important foundation for such quality improvement efforts.

91 These findings may spark further quality improvement efforts.

92 atients and merits further focus in surgical quality improvement efforts.

93 reduce cardiac complications is important to quality improvement efforts.

94 ogists' diagnostic performance into targeted quality improvement efforts.

95 eal a practical alternative for volume-based quality improvement efforts.

96 Valve surgery quality improvement endeavors should focus on a more com

97 Modern approaches to quality improvement focus on using and enhancing interpe

98 e a DLR algorithm's dose reduction and image quality improvement for pediatric CT.

99 esent an opportunity for standardization and quality improvement for prenatal counseling and delivery

100 be used to identify high-priority areas for quality improvement from a population perspective.

101 be valuable for clinical care, research, and quality improvement if that information could be extract

102 , this study highlights the need for further quality improvement in certain areas of the district's h

103 ber 2016 through the Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement in Kerala randomized trial.

104 the ACS QUIK trial (Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement in Kerala).

105 bal discourse on essential interventions and quality improvement in maternal health.

106 and their teams and implement strategies for quality improvement in paediatric anaesthesia.

107 Our study provides first evidence for milk quality improvement in terms of antioxidants and PL enri

108 Different methodologies exist for quality improvement in the ICU; a thoughtful approach to

109 There is significant scope for yield and quality improvement in these largely undomesticated spec

110 ty have great potential for acceleration and quality improvement in translational biomedical research

111 mortality will require a bigger push toward quality improvements in clinical care.

112 We suggest approaches for quality improvement, including better patient education,

113 as a frailty screening instrument began as a quality improvement initiative at the University of Pitt

114 ICU Liberation Collaborative is a real-world quality improvement initiative being implemented across

115 The continuous quality improvement initiative focused on the resuscitat

116 To investigate the impact of a quality improvement initiative for severe sepsis and sep

117 This quality improvement initiative in sepsis in an emerging

118 We aimed to assess the results of a quality improvement initiative in sepsis in an emerging

119 A prospective cohort quality improvement initiative involving ICU patients.

120 The National Cancer Database (NCDB), a joint quality improvement initiative of the American College o

121 of the American Heart Association's national quality improvement initiative to accelerate door-to-nee

122 acility's participation in a sepsis-specific quality improvement initiative was associated with 62% h

123 The quality improvement initiative was based on a multifacet

124 Some respondents identified that a specific quality improvement initiative was developed related to

125 During the study period, a multifaceted quality improvement initiative was instituted, focused o

126 As a quality improvement initiative, we sought to understand

127 and therapeutic research, surveillance, and quality improvement initiatives are hindered by variatio

128 The described methods allow for targeting quality improvement initiatives at these hospitals.

129 Quality improvement initiatives focused on systems to im

130 Quality improvement initiatives have been developed to i

131 patient and family engagement in successful quality improvement initiatives in the ICU.

132 d strive to minimize delays in fixation, and quality improvement initiatives should emphasize this re

133 Future quality improvement initiatives should highlight the imp

134 There is a scarcity of well-developed quality improvement initiatives targeting patient satisf

135 tertiary pediatric centers that implemented quality improvement initiatives to improve early septic

136 ntial to properly interpreting the impact of quality improvement initiatives, making meaningful compa

137 ant target for surveillance, prevention, and quality improvement initiatives.

138 ous, mechanistic program evaluation of other quality improvement initiatives.

139 e was a notable lack of blends incorporating quality improvement initiatives.

140 study was conducted to aid prioritization of quality improvement initiatives.

141 onged critical illness could lead to broader quality improvement initiatives.

142 ls are encouraged to participate in national quality-improvement initiatives.

143 y for their total care and should be part of quality-improvement initiatives.

144 to understand the potential cost savings of quality-improvement initiatives.

145 ecords have become instrumental in effecting quality improvement innovations and providing data to ev

146 Identifying care and quality improvement innovations at these sites may provi

147 Allocation to the quality improvement intervention group had the strongest

148 que the feasibility of this methodology as a quality improvement intervention in complex healthcare s

149 India with variability across age, sex, and quality improvement intervention status.

150 The independent effect of the nursing quality improvement intervention was not significant for

151 obile health intervention, but not a nursing quality improvement intervention, improved adherence to

152 Hospital-based acute coronary syndrome quality improvement interventions have a modest effect o

153 s for hospital-based acute coronary syndrome quality improvement interventions on clinical outcomes a

154 For perioperative quality improvement interventions to compete successfull

155 Quality improvement is now a validated science, and ther

156 successfully implemented throughout a large quality improvement learning collaborative when coordina

157 Hospitals should implement quality improvement measures to aid in the rapid and acc

158 that integrates components of several proven quality improvement methodologies to enhance safety cult

159 Applying quality improvement methodology at the institutional lev

160 mber 31, 2015, a multidisciplinary team used quality-improvement methods and the chronic care model t

161 rtality following emergency surgery is a key quality improvement metric in both the United States and

162 The sleep quality improvement occurred immediately after the thera

163 aimed to assess the potential effects of air-quality improvements on respiratory health by investigat

164 ns (for example, Quality Innovation Networks-Quality Improvement Organizations), referred to as "stat

165 des incentive payments and cost offsets from quality improvements) outputs from the model.

166 Our estimates imply that air quality improvements over the past 4 decades have stemme

167 We aimed to assess the effect of a quality improvement package for intrapartum and immediat

168 search as part of a larger project on trauma quality improvement practices in Peru.

169 These may be used to guide quality improvement practices.

170 the study successfully identified quality improvement priorities leading to changes in Eme

171 client service charter and a facility-based, quality-improvement process aimed to redefine norms and

172 atients within the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2000-2014) who underwent a

173 O were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2017).

174 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2006-2012) were used to ide

175 The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017) was queried for pedia

176 merican College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database does no

177 g the American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) (88 centers; 201

178 erican College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2014 Participant

179 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database, a tota

180 ng the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

181 geted American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

182 rican College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was queried for

183 olic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) longitudinal (30 d

184 Within each hospital, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data were merged wit

185 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calcul

186 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).

187 he American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) and measured the resu

188 s, merged with the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) to identify surgica

189 samples within the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP; 2010-2014; N = 480,

190 merican College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012 Participant Use File.

191 The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Corporate Data Warehouse

192 Prospectively collected National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and electronic medical recor

193 nters participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Vanderbilt Patient A

194 al data from the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Appendectomy Collaborative P

195 study using the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program appendectomy pilot database,

196 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cohorts were selected.

197 rican College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy data (July 2014-De

198 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication was 11.7%.

199 rican College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2014 to 2015, oper

200 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 3 academic centers

201 ed administrative data and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data regarding the presence

202 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data was queried from 2012 t

203 , and were included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2010 and 20

204 merican College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database to capture all gene

205 merican College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database, to which participa

206 Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we performed a ret

207 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

208 erican College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (N = 20,575).

209 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (NSQIP; 2005-2014; N

210 data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 8193 patients with cirrh

211 II North American Centers enrolled in Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2010 to 2017.

212 pleting a voluntary checklist-based surgical quality improvement program had a reduction in deaths af

213 indings were similar among National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals.

214 eport postdischarge VTE data from an ongoing quality improvement program incorporating root-cause ana

215 erican College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program investigated elective surgic

216 ion of a voluntary, checklist-based surgical quality improvement program is associated with reduced 3

217 plain how this patient- and family-centered, quality improvement program is novel, generalizable, and

218 Implementation of a quality improvement program over 7.5 years.

219 151,700 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File identif

220 olic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File.

221 olic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files 2015 w

222 olic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program participant use files were a

223 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files were q

224 operations included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Participant Use Da

225 merican College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program preoperative risk factors, w

226 lege of Surgeons Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure Targeted Appendect

227 rican College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry were merged with 20

228 enter, prospective, observational study of a quality improvement program studied 2420 patients 20 yea

229 Creation of an integrated, regional quality improvement program that linked the 35 spoke hea

230 erican College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program thyroidectomy-targeted datab

231 ns Affairs Cancer Registry with the Surgical Quality Improvement Program to identify veterans having

232 A quality improvement program was then implemented over 36

233 rican College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used as the reference st

234 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were assessed for the develo

235 n 18 years included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent inpatient or o

236 This hospital quality improvement program will allow participating hos

237 ications as defined by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program within 30 days of the operat

238 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk

239 As part of a "co-surgery" quality improvement program, 20 faculty surgeons were ra

240 ong hospitals participating in the GWTG-AFIB quality improvement program, OAC prescription at dischar

241 erican College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we identified 91,963 patien

242 itals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, which focuses on 30-day mor

243 5, and 10371 patients from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Hepatopancreaticobiliary (NS

244 and clinical data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Appendectomy Pilot

245 00,554 patients within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database (2012-201

246 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database to evalua

247 and the cost-effectiveness of implementing a quality improvement program.

248 thin the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.

249 merican College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

250 effectiveness of 2 versions of a BP control quality improvement program; BP Home will conduct an ind

251 Despite quality improvement programs and heightened awareness, s

252 Although quality improvement programs have an ongoing and importa

253 is an essential step for the development of quality improvement programs in electrophysiology labora

254 be incorporated into comprehensive surgical quality improvement programs to improve patient safety.

255 een systems and are considered essential for quality improvement programs.

256 parities: 1) implementation of measure-based quality improvement programs; 2) effective culturally co

257 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database from 2005 to 2016 w

258 iac surgery in the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Project database from 2009 through 2

259 In July 2016, we began a quality improvement project distributing a free SSI Prev

260 ngle-site, facility-wide, prospective cohort quality improvement project studied all 9153 patients fr

261 national collaborative database as part of a quality improvement project.

262 ements of an ASP, and complete a preliminary quality improvement project.

263 Veterans Affairs Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Projects data and calculated the C s

264 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Projects).

265 Quality improvement (QI) initiatives have become an inte

266 center registry launched in 2015, instituted quality improvement (QI) initiatives to reduce patient r

267 ealth care costs and savings associated with quality improvement (QI) interventions initiated and imp

268 We evaluated the scaling up of a quality improvement (QI) package for neonatal resuscitat

269 We studied the effectiveness of a national quality improvement (QI) programme to implement a care p

270 ncluded, papers had to either be research or quality improvement (QI) projects focusing on the patien

271 This Quality Improvement (QI) study reports the development,

272 t, then ID specialists can direct ID-related quality improvement, quantify the impact of ID physician

273 aborious and a barrier to the sustainment of quality improvement registries like ACS-NSQIP.

274 30, 2013, according to the guidelines of the Quality Improvement Registry in CT Scans in Children wer

275 Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program, a quality improvement registry in Washington state.

276 AQuIRE (American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Evaluation, and Education)

277 nclusions In a large contemporary nationwide quality improvement registry, hospitals varied widely in

278 and grouped into five domains: patient care, quality improvement, research and scholarship, training

279 and grouped into five domains: patient care, quality improvement, research and scholarship, training

280 tions for patient outcomes, and education in quality improvement skills are ways in which globalizati

281 ems redesign and standardization (SOP), Lean quality improvement, SOP + TT combination, or Lean + TT

282 (e.g., leaders who communicate a culture of quality improvement), staffing (e.g., lower nurse-to-pat

283 -2.04 to -0.35]); and combined clinic-level quality improvement strategies (eg, case management), mu

284 n between combined clinic- and patient-level quality improvement strategies and multifactorial assess

285 Quality improvement strategies could include aggressive

286 Debriefing and other quality improvement strategies were previously mentioned

287 (2) workforce development and diversity; (3) quality improvement strategies; (4) policy solutions; an

288 ay for performance is an increasingly common quality improvement strategy despite the absence of robu

289 During this single-institution randomized quality improvement study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

290 A stepped-wedge cluster randomized quality improvement study was performed on 26 inpatient

291 ents owing to PHS are costly and represent a quality improvement target.

292 A Continuous Quality Improvement Team (CQIT) of surgical quality offi

293 Each unit established a multidisciplinary quality improvement team.

294 analyse educational approaches used to teach quality improvement to pre-registration healthcare profe

295 anization (WHO) Safe Childbirth Checklist, a quality-improvement tool, promotes systematic adherence

296 However, the localized air quality improvement was accompanied by a contemporaneous

297 ng the focus from the "what" to the "how" of quality improvement will require National Tuberculosis P

298 and staff should enhance the impact of local quality improvement work but has not been widely impleme

299 de patients and families in the processes of quality improvement work in the ICU should be expanded.

300 ypically may not be invited to contribute to quality improvement work.