コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ting of a total of 386 patients who received radical resection.
2 acterized by a high risk of recurrence after radical resection.
3 with respect to the potential advantages of radical resection.
4 ons as to the indications for reoperation or radical resection.
5 oma (MIUC) at high risk for recurrence after radical resection.
6 y that precludes the possibility of safe and radical resection.
7 focused on the impact of conservative versus radical resections.
8 l, and cisplatin for two cycles, followed by radical resection ~4 weeks after treatment completion.
9 a were met: no intraoperative complications, radical resection according to the surgeon, pR0 resectio
10 nderwent resection, 685 underwent definitive radical resection and 407 underwent reresection after un
11 included 296 patients with PCa who underwent radical resection and were followed up every three month
13 cers treated by either transanal excision or radical resection at our institution to assess patient s
14 For treatment, 11 (57.9 %) patients received radical resection by either enucleation or hepatic resec
16 viously showed the feasibility and safety of Radical Resection Combined with Intestinal Autotransplan
18 idney cancer, particularly those who undergo radical resection for localized renal cell carcinoma, is
23 cancer after cholecystectomy, and results of radical resection in patients with advanced disease.
24 ith gallbladder cancer and determine whether radical resection in patients with gallbladder cancer is
25 uggest that multimodality regimens including radical resection increase survival selectively in MPM p
26 th locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing radical resection is an early surrogate marker and corre
29 cus multilocularis, who was treated with not radical resection of pathologic mass together with persi
32 ross-sectional images who were scheduled for radical resection of the primary tumor and extended pelv
33 um VEGF levels decreased significantly after radical resection of the primary tumor and increased in
34 concentration decreases significantly after radical resection of the primary tumor and is an indepen
35 at high risk of recurrence after undergoing radical resection of urothelial carcinoma based on resul
36 ances now enable the surgeon to achieve more radical resections of these neoplasms and to reconstruct
39 In a cohort of 66 patients who underwent radical resection (R0), survival was significantly short
40 verge) by either transanal excision (TAE) or radical resection (RAD) between January 1987 and January
41 istant dissemination rate (both groups 28%), radical resection rate (both groups 100%), and severity
42 eoperative chemoradiotherapy may improve the radical resection rate for resectable or borderline rese
44 tumor response and disease control following radical resection should be established before tumor res
45 local recurrence develops can be salvaged by radical resection, the long-term outcome remains unknown
46 is study, we utilized 120 PDAC tissues after radical resection to detect cancer-FOXP3 and Treg cells
47 alignancies has shifted from the traditional radical resection to more conservative procedures that a
48 For patients with RT-associated breast AS, radical resection was associated with reduced recurrence