戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ulations, and investigate their clinical and radiographic features.
2 d for Kellgren/Lawrence grade and individual radiographic features.
3  IDDs that present with atypical clinical or radiographic features.
4   Diagnosis is made by clinical findings and radiographic features.
5 Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade and individual radiographic features.
6  while three had characteristic clinical and radiographic features.
7 Lawrence scheme, and assessed for individual radiographic features.
8 try tachycardia: combined electrographic and radiographic features.
9 r without carcinoma had similar clinical and radiographic features.
10 oncomitant medications, platelet counts, and radiographic features.
11 ociated with VTE independent of clinical and radiographic features.
12            Initial microbiologic burdens and radiographic features also varied, including the presenc
13       Outcomes of interest were clinical and radiographic features and 90-day mortality among patient
14                                          The radiographic features and cartilage histology in DMC and
15  concurrent presence of 2 or more individual radiographic features and definitions based on stringent
16 ups, including differences in prevalence and radiographic features and differences in pain and functi
17            This article reviews the prenatal radiographic features and postnatal clinical findings of
18                                     Methods: Radiographic features and PRM-based CT metrics quantifyi
19 Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade and individual radiographic features, and 1.5T MRIs were assessed using
20 ccount the possibility of atypical signs and radiographic features, and consider whether they may be
21 n between individual biochemical markers and radiographic features, and to establish whether the asso
22  pain was significantly associated with both radiographic features (any joint space narrowing grade >
23           Little is known about how specific radiographic features are related to hand strength in os
24                      Because of some similar radiographic features between SMDK and metatropic dyspla
25 tio, vascular pedicle width (VPW), and other radiographic features commonly used to evaluate pulmonar
26 The percentage of BD-IPMN with >=1 high-risk radiographic feature differed between centers (MSK 69%,
27 Marginal osteophytes were the most sensitive radiographic feature for the detection of osteoarthritis
28                                              Radiographic features from HRCT scans included ground-gl
29                     We describe clinical and radiographic features in 168 patients with biopsy confir
30  the rate of BD-IPMN resected with high-risk radiographic features increased; however, the rate of hi
31              Hips were scored for individual radiographic features (IRF) and assigned a summary grade
32 scale (grade 0-4) and 2 validated individual-radiographic-features (IRF) scales (grades 0-3 for narro
33 an of 8 years apart, and read for individual radiographic features (IRFs) of hip OA; summary grades (
34                Atlas-standardized individual radiographic features (IRFs) of OA were assessed and min
35                                        These radiographic features may be useful in evaluating treatm
36 though PD dilation is typically the hallmark radiographic feature of IPMN, other causes of PD dilatio
37            Here we describe the clinical and radiographic features of a new genetic form of polymicro
38 tudy to assess progression of the individual radiographic features of AO and DSN in lumbar spine disc
39  ACEI or ARB was mediated by the presence of radiographic features of cerebral small vessel disease (
40 ectly trained model highlighted conventional radiographic features of CHF as reasons for an elevated
41                                              Radiographic features of disease include an opacified an
42                                 Clinical and radiographic features of ERCP-related periduodenal perfo
43 tios and 95% confidence intervals for having radiographic features of hip OA were 1.63 (1.06, 2.50) a
44 s' UK Adult Twin Register, were assessed for radiographic features of hip OA.
45 el is a feasible approach to reliably assess radiographic features of hip osteoarthritis.
46                                              Radiographic features of knee OA (e.g., osteophytosis, J
47                  Strong associations between radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and pa
48                                   Individual radiographic features of OA (narrowing, osteophyte, scle
49 ther vitamin K deficiency is associated with radiographic features of OA.
50 hytes and joint space narrowing, or > or = 3 radiographic features of OA.
51 s, and subchondral cysts were less sensitive radiographic features of osteoarthritis and rarely occur
52       The sensitivity and specificity of the radiographic features of osteoarthritis for the detectio
53          Racial differences in some specific radiographic features of osteoarthritis have been identi
54  In this study, we compared the clinical and radiographic features of patients with Hallervorden-Spat
55                    Clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features of patients with S-PML.
56 es of this disease, we analyzed clinical and radiographic features of patients with SFR meningoenceph
57    To describe the clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features of pulmonary KS, medical records a
58                             The clinical and radiographic features of respiratory syncytial virus (RS
59                                 Describe the radiographic features of the different forms of extraute
60                               Characteristic radiographic features of the maxillary sinus including o
61 ized fashion, with attention to the specific radiographic features of tumor location, margins, and zo
62                 MED is a milder disease with radiographic features often restricted to the epiphyses
63                 Analyses based on individual radiographic features (osteophyte formation and joint sp
64 cific data, with regard to which clinical or radiographic features predict non-benign histology, or c
65 e more frequent in patients with more severe radiographic features preoperatively.
66 e patellofemoral compartment, and individual radiographic features rather than a global severity scor
67 er, no PH females (0/7 tested) with atypical radiographic features showed FLN1 mutations, suggesting
68           Moreover, EHOA is characterized by radiographic features such as central erosion, saw-tooth
69           In MD-IPMN cohort, the presence of radiographic features such as solid component and main p
70 s assessed, (grade range 0-4) and individual radiographic features, such as osteophytes and joint spa
71  suspicious for malignant neoplasms and with radiographic features suggestive of a nonpalpable lesion
72 acteristic curve (AUROC) for detection of 20 radiographic features was 0.955 (95% CI 0.938-0.955) on
73                                              Radiographic features were analyzed using cone-beam comp
74 n persons with unilateral knee pain, MRI and radiographic features were associated with knee pain, co
75                       Clinical histories and radiographic features were reviewed, and renal function
76 ain, depression, anxiety, and laboratory and radiographic features were significantly weaker predicto