ライフサイエンスコーパス: radiography

1 ovide a microbiological diagnosis (eg, chest radiography).

2 MRI, nuclear imaging, echocardiography, US, radiography).

3 es (OR, 4.2 [95% CI: 4.0, 4.4] compared with radiography).

4 fractures that were diagnosed by outpatient radiography.

5 vely as an adjunct to two-dimensional dental radiography.

6 fy four out of every five earlier than chest radiography.

7 ability of 3D OCT in comparison with digital radiography.

8 chest radiography and plain abdominal erect radiography.

9 rcuit boards has been studied by synchrotron radiography.

10 to increase diagnostic accuracy compared to radiography.

11 ify small calcifications that were missed at radiography.

12 t much more versatile as compared with X-ray radiography.

13 logical changes not depicted by conventional radiography.

14 igher sensitivity, AUC and Kappa values than radiography.

15 ication of calcifications when compared with radiography.

16 lly, knee OA is diagnosed using conventional radiography.

17 Inc.), tuberculin skin test (TST), and chest radiography.

18 nsitive than conventional absorption-based x-radiography.

19 nation is much wider than in plain abdominal radiography.

20 18 weeks, stone formation was visualized by radiography.

21 from other causes of abnormalities at chest radiography.

22 han is possible with conventional absorption radiography.

23 f a single or multilobar infiltrate on chest radiography.

24 pelvis, and calyces, could be depicted with radiography.

25 to follow-up with either PET/CT or US/chest radiography.

26 graphy (LDCT) versus those assigned to chest radiography.

27 e of antibiotics or oral steroids, and chest radiography.

28 nt of yearly follow-up posteroanterior chest radiography.

29 ed with that diagnosed with routine US/chest radiography.

30 with a right lower lobe infiltrate on chest radiography.

31 be insertion accuracy was then confirmed via radiography.

32 aphic air bronchograms undetectable by chest radiography.

33 e of osteolytic bone lesions on conventional radiography.

34 tive predictive value was lower than that of radiography.

35 rocessing without destroying it using proton radiography.

36 n effective imaging alternative to abdominal radiography.

37 tion is not detectable with absorption-based radiography.

38 uence interpretation of results at abdominal radiography.

39 ut any baseline chest images underwent chest radiography.

40 CT is superior to plain radiography.

41 analogous modalities are pelvic US and chest radiography.

42 fter an inversion injury and underwent plain radiography.

43 probed using state of the art dynamic X-ray radiography.

44 in multiple myeloma (MM) patients was plain radiography.

45 nd ACE levels determined and underwent chest radiography.

46 th high-speed, high-energy synchrotron X-ray radiography.

47 heter tip determined by postprocedural chest radiography.

48 xclusion of pneumothorax compared with chest radiography.

49 irteen studies were eligible (CT = 12; chest radiography = 1; US = 0).

50 p (26,715 to low-dose CT and 26,724 to chest radiography); 26,309 participants (98.5%) and 26,035 (97

51 Although mean SMT for the three-dimensional radiography (3DR) group was 1.33 mm (95% CI = 1.06 to 1.

52 ndard deviation for SWI, 7.6 mm +/- 5.4; for radiography, 5.3 mm +/- 5.1).

53 round times were significantly increased for radiography (52 minutes [IQR, 26-73 minutes] vs annual m

54 ltrasound = 59%, 81%, 0.78 (n = 4); specimen radiography = 53%, 84%, 0.73 (n = 9); optical spectrosco

55 of 40 relapses were identified with US/chest radiography (97.5%; P = .0001 for the equivalence test).

56 Apart from abdominal radiography, abdominal ultrasound with bowel assessment

57 changes in the sacroiliac joints observed in radiography according to the modNY criteria (false posit

58 the 26,554 participants who underwent chest radiography, according to the quintile of 5-year risk of

59 .8 readers per center)-186 radiologists, 143 radiography advanced practitioners, and 31 breast clinic

60 ith findings of pulmonary infection at chest radiography (all of whom were symptomatic) required supp

61 industrial inspections and large FOV medical radiography - all with the inherent advantages of the XP

62 s, whereas the organ doses from PA localizer radiography alone are lower.

63 antum of disease may be difficult with plain radiography alone.

64 g electron microscopy with energy-dispersive radiography analysis and infrared spectrometry, were mos

65 y combined experiments using time-resolved x-radiography and a novel simulation method to reveal the

66 All patients underwent plain radiography and an ultrasound study.

67 and those without knee OA, as classified by radiography and by severity of knee pain.

68 Combining chest radiography and clinical variables increased the AUC of

69 The review focuses on radiography and computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing

70 sing ultrasound and MRI has increased, chest radiography and computed tomography still play important

71 All patients underwent chest radiography and CT within 4 days of presentation (range,

72 lity was predominately diffuse at both chest radiography and CT.

73 ulated as the sum of the dose from localizer radiography and CT.

74 By combining (a) radiography and DXA and (b) quantitative CT and DXA, cor

75 .001) and 0.84 (P < .001), respectively, for radiography and DXA and to 0.80 (P < .001) and 0.86 (P <

76 Anteroposterior chest radiography and enhanced chest CT were also performed at

77 Anteroposterior chest radiography and enhanced chest CT were also performed at

78 echnique for elemental imaging that combines radiography and fluorescence spectroscopy has been devel

79 ssing vector alone, as determined by digital radiography and histological analysis.

80 (1.5 cm) in a rabbit model was evaluated by radiography and histology.

81 oral health examination, including panoramic radiography and laboratory analyses.

82 sted drug packets underwent supine abdominal radiography and low-dose CT.

83 The dental radiography and micro-CT findings revealed significantly

84 f this study was a comparative evaluation of radiography and MRI in the diagnostics of sacroiliitis i

85 nitial radiologic examination included chest radiography and plain abdominal erect radiography.

86 7 y, from either sex, who had undergone oral radiography and presented with no orofacial syndromes or

87 he ionized foam was retrieved by using x-ray radiography and proton radiography was used to verify th

88 Combined chest radiography and serum ACE levels at the standard cutoff

89 Chest radiography and serum angiotensin-converting enzyme find

90 dose, including both the dose from localizer radiography and that from subsequent chest computed tomo

91 d pneumonia that had been diagnosed by chest radiography and that was documented as being caused by o

92 Radiography and ultrasonography are of crucial importanc

93 Patients have initial imaging with chest radiography and ultrasound, which can also be used to as

94 Anteroposterior pelvic radiography and unenhanced pelvic CT were performed to r

95 piric food avoidance, upper gastrointestinal radiography, and gastrointestinal scintigraphy.

96 diography, metabolic exercise testing, chest radiography, and hemodynamics before intervention were c

97 de an excellent visualization tool for X-ray radiography, and high resolution flexible scintillators

98 immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, radiography, and micro-computed tomography.

99 : screening with low-dose CT, screening with radiography, and no screening.

100 ed that APCs ordered antibiotics, CT or MRI, radiography, and referrals as often as physicians in bot

101 cancer screening (basic blood testing, chest radiography, and screening for breast, cervical, and pro

102 icacy of low-dose computed tomography, chest radiography, and sputum cytologic evaluation for lung ca

103 rocedure to catheter utilization after chest radiography approval was 2.4 hours.

104 US and chest radiography are diagnostic tools that enable effective,

105 such as computed tomography and conventional radiography are of no significance in the diagnostics of

106 d small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering and radiography are used for strain evaluation across the sc

107 6-y lung cancer incidence in the PLCO chest radiography arm, with sensitivities >79.8% and specifici

108 th calcific tendonitis by using conventional radiography as a reference and offers better sensitivity

109 agnose pneumonia were determined using chest radiography as a reference standard.

110 oplastic enamel and reduced density in X-ray radiography as well as shortened enamel rods under scann

111 ors grown in mice was measured using ex vivo radiography as well as static and dynamic PET imaging.

112 h tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography, as given by the area under the receiver ope

113 Bedside ultrasound is faster than radiography at identifying pneumothorax after central ve

114 patients with pneumonia who underwent chest radiography between October 1, 2019, and December 31, 20

115 went several imaging studies-including chest radiography; bone scanning; contrast material-enhanced c

116 alpha radiography by a solid-state nuclear track detector indi

117 actures that cannot be shown by conventional radiography can be clearly imaged by high-resolution bon

118 In opaque organisms or structures, X-ray radiography captures sequences of 2D projections to visu

119 We show X-ray radiography captures the bulk flow properties, in contra

120 On radiography cherubic lesions appear as cystic multilocul

121 Chest radiography (chest x-ray [CXR] and chest computed tomogr

122 features have been described on plain chest radiography, chest computed tomography (CT), chest ultra

123 Chest radiography combined with sIL-2R at a cutoff of 6000 pg/

124 with higher mRALE scores at admission chest radiography compared with White or non-Hispanic patients

125 Imaging included plain film radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic reso

126 These imaging modalities include chest radiography, computed tomography, lung magnetic resonanc

127 field of hip imaging, covering the roles of radiography, computed tomography, sonography and magneti

128 imodality imaging, including single-snapshot radiography, cone-beam computed tomography (CT), multide

129 Rabbits were imaged with single-snapshot radiography, cone-beam CT, and multidetector CT.

130 tween 1 month and 15 years of age with chest radiography-confirmed pneumonia.

131 The patient underwent erect abdominal radiography, contrast material-enhanced multidetector ro

132 ment by using images from conventional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus DE imag

133 uted tomography (CT), as compared with chest radiography, could reduce mortality from lung cancer.

134 ality for several screen-film (SF), computed radiography (CR), and fully digital (DR) mammography sys

135 ID-19) across multiple modalities, including radiography, CT, MRI, PET/CT, and US.

136 ormer heavy smokers to receive LDCT or chest radiography (CXR) for three annual screens.

137 ly recently been employed to interpret chest radiography (CXR) to screen and triage people for pulmon

138 ted tomography (LDCT; n = 26,722) with chest radiography (CXR; n = 26,732) for lung cancer detection,

139 efects were evaluated by digital subtraction radiography (DSR) at baseline and 6 months post-treatmen

140 te the performance of three imaging methods (radiography, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA], and

141 alveolar pneumonia (CAAP) and overall chest radiography examination rates in young children.

142 Utilising multi-MHz phase contrast radiography, extended sequences of the collapse process

143 ated empiric treatment based on clinical and radiography findings (32/53 [60%] vs 28/73 [38%]; p=0.01

144 ore likely to present with gasless abdominal radiography findings (6.3% vs 0.9%; P = .009) compared w

145 h weight z score, and clinical and abdominal radiography findings as candidate variables in a logisti

146 osis of NEC, especially when plain abdominal radiography findings do not correlate with clinical symp

147 h tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography for all nodules (1.49-fold, P < .001; 95% CI

148 lyze the clinical utility of screening chest radiography for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic pa

149 cy of bedside ultrasound compared with chest radiography for confirmation of central venous catheters

150 Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma pati

151 In addition, evidence suggests that plain radiography for evaluation of blunt thoracic trauma may

152 omosynthesis outperformed conventional chest radiography for lung nodule detection and determination

153 -energy (DE) imaging, and conventional chest radiography for pulmonary nodule detection and managemen

154 Here we use high energy proton radiography for the first time to image a large metal vo

155 guideline-discordant antibiotics (for URIs), radiography (for URIs and back pain), computed tomograph

156 with the use of either low-dose CT or chest radiography, for 3 years.

157 ing patients most likely to have OA on plain radiography from those who will not.

158 All patients underwent plain abdominal radiography, gray-scale and color Doppler sonography.

159 e low-dose CT group versus 190 (0.7%) in the radiography group (stage 1 in 158 vs. 70 participants an

160 the low-dose CT group and 2387 (9.2%) in the radiography group had a positive screening result; in th

161 or IV in the low-dose CT group at T1; in the radiography group, 31 (23.5%) were stage IA and 78 (59.1

162 the CT-screening group, as compared with the radiography group, increased according to risk quintile

163 and in 6.2% and 5.0% of participants in the radiography group, respectively.

164 In the radiography group, the sensitivity was 59.6%, the specif

165 Model validation in the chest radiography groups of the PLCO and the National Lung Scr

166 88.5% and specificity of 93.3%, while plain radiography had sensitivity of 48.9% and specificity of

167 Classical radiography has been used for this purpose for over a hu

168 Synchrotron x-ray radiography has enabled real-time glimpses into metal so

169 Background Chest radiography has not been validated for its prognostic ut

170 Although conventional radiography has traditionally been the standard imaging

171 nd negative or equivocal findings at initial radiography have a high frequency of occult hip fracture

172 Chest radiography (images not shown) revealed bronchiectatic c

173 hat tuberculosis screening by (mobile) chest radiography improved screening coverage and tuberculosis

174 Fifty-six calcifications were detected with radiography in 27 patients.

175 assessment, tuberculin skin test, and chest radiography in all eligible children irrespective of sym

176 or tomosynthesis than for conventional chest radiography in all nodule size categories (3.55-fold for

177 as the potential to augment the use of chest radiography in clinical radiology, but challenges includ

178 variables and to compare sonograhy and chest radiography in detecting early stages of NEC in suspecte

179 CR results to determine the utility of chest radiography in diagnosing COVID-19.

180 had higher sensitivity and specificity than radiography in diagnosing sacroiliitis (sensitivity: 71%

181 ct on radiomic diagnostic accuracy for chest radiography in patients with congestive heart failure (C

182 The incidence of new opacity on chest radiography in the 48 hours after tracheal intubation wa

183 ients older than 14 years who received chest radiography in this prospective, observational, diagnost

184 ed synchrotron X-ray computed tomography and radiography, in conjunction with thermal imaging, to tra

185 increased sensitivity of CT, as compared to radiography, in detecting lytic foci obscured by other s

186 nd had dyspnea, vascular congestion on chest radiography, increased plasma concentrations of natriure

187 izing the manufacturer on the basis of chest radiography inputs.

188 is result shows that systematic use of chest radiography is a useful tool for active TB screening amo

189 Plain abdominal radiography is currently the modality of choice for init

190 Chest radiography is generally the first imaging modality used

191 Plain radiography is key in diagnosing bone diseases.

192 Abdominal radiography is mainly limited by low sensitivity when co

193 ner Society recommendations, screening chest radiography is not indicated in patients with coronaviru

194 However, abdominal radiography is still considered the modality of choice.

195 Plain radiography is the first-line, essential screening or di

196 Although abdominal radiography is usually the initial imaging study perform

197 in 993 822 women were included (37 computed radiography mammography systems and 55 DR systems).

198 d as a complementary imaging tool along with radiography may enable more accurate and cost-effective

199 Background Chest radiography may play an important role in triage for cor

200 n 3.42 +/- 0.68 versus 1.96 +/- 0.34 mm) and radiography (mean 3.35 +/- 0.62 versus 2.27 +/- 0.33 mm)

201 order of magnitude as those for conventional radiography (median: 0.012 mSv [95% CI confidence interv

202 Radiography, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), histo

203 ibular first molars were evaluated by dental radiography, microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), and hi

204 r TB with an algorithm using symptoms, chest radiography, molecular diagnostics, and tuberculin skin

205 numbers of follow-up examinations were chest radiography (n=431), chest CT (n=410), abdominal CT (n=2

206 24 abdominal imaging studies were performed (radiography, n = 137; US, n = 44; CT, n = 42; MRI, n = 1

207 Despite an extensive microscopy and radiography network at middle levels of the health syste

208 ut recent advances in high-speed synchrotron radiography now permit the study of highly transient, su

209 Using neutron radiography (NR), X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro

210 ly with standard anteroposterior and lateral radiography, nuclear medicine scanning, MR imaging, and

211 me conditions, material science studies, and radiography of biological systems.

212 Radiography of both hands was performed to assess for ac

213 The patient underwent routine weight-bearing radiography of her left foot and weight-bearing computed

214 Initial plain-film radiography of the abdomen at admission revealed dilated

215 Plain radiography of the abdomen showed normal air-fluid level

216 tients were examined clinically, followed by radiography of the affected shoulder.

217 cal examination and subsequently recommended radiography of the lower extremities ( Fig 3 ).

218 Radiography of the right and left hands was performed.

219 use of the suspected diagnosis, conventional radiography of the skeleton was performed.

220 tion axillary lymph node dissection and used radiography of the specimen to confirm removal of the cl

221 gnosis, of 6897 patients who had had a chest radiography, only 2296 (33%) also had spirometry.

222 re eligible for inclusion if plain abdominal radiography or CT scan showed diffuse free air or fluid.

223 c images were acquired using either computed radiography or flat panel digital radiography systems.

224 nificant differences over conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis alone.

225 n when paired with either conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis.

226 Chest radiography or Xpert RIF/MTB, delivered through maternal

227 ging approach including bone scanning, chest radiography, or dedicated CT and abdominopelvic sonograp

228 re higher when using PA projection localizer radiography owing to higher TCM values, whereas the orga

229 localizer radiography than with AP localizer radiography (P = .03).

230 Abdominal radiography performed to investigate clinical concerns.

231 tional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus DE imaging, tomosynthesis, and tomosynt

232 phy (CT) and imaging with conventional chest radiography (posteroanterior and lateral), DE imaging, a

233 Transverse proton radiography probed the target with ps order temporal and

234 Purpose To calculate the effect of localizer radiography projections to the total radiation dose, inc

235 onstrated a high correlation between SWI and radiography (R(2) = 0.90), with overestimation of lesion

236 puted tomography (CT) as compared with chest radiography reduced lung-cancer mortality.

237 puted tomography (CT) rather than with chest radiography reduced mortality from lung cancer.

238 Radiography remains central to the detection and charact

239 Radiography remains the primary imaging modality in clin

240 or low-dose CT and 73.5% and 91.3% for chest radiography, respectively.

241 ere analysed and qualitatively compared with radiography results.

242 Radiography revealed profound skeletal defects in cKO mi

243 R 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99; I2 = 0%) and chest radiography (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96; I2 = 32%), but n

244 the pregnant patient has been performed with radiography, scintigraphy, computed tomography, magnetic

245 vel, distribution of lung disease, and chest radiography score at hospital presentation.

246 ssessed by using an eight-point scale (chest radiography score).

247 A complete radiography series was available for 561 of the original

248 Thus, PA localizer radiography should be used in combination with reduced r

249 cted influenza and lung infiltrates on chest radiography should receive early and aggressive treatmen

250 Initial chest radiography showed an enlarged heart with bilateral pleu

251 Because chest radiography showed consolidation in addition to typical

252 Chest radiography showed no pneumonia, and venous ultrasonogra

253 US/chest radiography showed significantly higher specificity and

254 HHCs underwent symptom screenings, chest radiographies, sputum TB bacteriologies, TB infection (T

255 ) and measured the Cobb angle in whole-spine radiography (standing) and scout images from low-dose CT

256 screening by means of low-dose CT and chest radiography, suggesting that a reduction in mortality fr

257 study, we have built a multi-modal live-cell radiography system and measured the [(18)F]FDG uptake by

258 r computed radiography or flat panel digital radiography systems.

259 e a non-electronic fast neutron differential radiography technique using superheated emulsion detecto

260 ise in CT images was lower with PA localizer radiography than with AP localizer radiography (P = .03)

261 For radiography, the strongest correlation with mechanical f

262 For Monte Carlo simulations of localizer radiography, the tube position was fixed at 0 degrees an

263 As compared with radiography, the two annual incidence screenings with lo

264 Compared with chest radiography, there was also a trend favoring reduced lat

265 Using x-radiography to identify shell layers, faunal counts, she

266 w experimental technique using dynamic X-ray radiography to make such measurements possible.

267 [standard deviation]) were examined with (a) radiography to measure geometric parameters (lengths, an

268 t, urinary lipoarabinomannan test, and chest radiography) to determine whether treatment for tubercul

269 Knees were imaged with radiography, tomosynthesis, and MR imaging.

270 s consensus statement regarding the roles of radiography, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (

271 trategies for hip imaging modalities such as radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and m

272 In comparison to radiography, ultrasound performed better or at least equ

273 es in modalities without code bundling (MRI, radiography, US), although flat trends mostly were exhib

274 es the spectrum of imaging findings at chest radiography, US, CT, and MRI in 35 children admitted to

275 that clinical criteria (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study [NEXUS] Head CT decision i

276 ut clinically using the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria because

277 ociated with alveolar consolidation at chest radiography, very severe pneumonia, oxygen saturation <9

278 le, and the prevalence of pneumonia by chest radiography was 18.0%.

279 The average sensitivity of digital radiography was 50%, average specificity was 82.2%, PPV

280 mean score for patients who underwent early radiography was 8.54 vs 8.74 among the control group (di

281 C arm radiography was available in 3% (95% CI 0.5-5.5) of dist

282 Chest radiography was estimated to have a sensitivity of 64% (

283 Abdominal radiography was performed in the emergency department, a

284 Radiography was performed in the emergency department, a

285 cal TB missed by symptom screening and chest radiography was rare in our mostly HIV-negative cohort.

286 To this end, neutron radiography was used to trace the transport of deuterate

287 rieved by using x-ray radiography and proton radiography was used to verify the uniformity of the pla

288 Using picosecond-time-resolved X-ray radiography, we show that we can achieve areal densities

289 sensitivity and specificity of conventional radiography were 22% and 94% and of MRI were 71% and 90%

290 Radiation doses for CT and radiography were assessed for adults (>18 years) and chi

291 Results Organ doses from localizer radiography were lower when using a PA instead of an AP

292 Findings in plain abdominal radiography were normal or nonspecific.

293 ed lung ultrasonography, and evaluated chest radiography when available.

294 to density variations than X-ray absorption radiography, which is a crucial advantage when imaging w

295 lity was high for all grading systems except radiography, which was moderate (alpha = 0.565-0.895).

296 th DCNNs can accurately classify TB at chest radiography with an AUC of 0.99.

297 Admission chest radiography with interstitial infiltrates was more frequ

298 tients with US and in 10 (23%) patients with radiography, with 90% sensitivity for US.

299 skeleton of Alpl(+/A116T) mice was normal by radiography, with no differences in femur length, cortic

300 %) specificity alone but combined with chest radiography yielded 92% sensitivity and 58% specificity.