ライフサイエンスコーパス: radiological

1 wo response criteria were used, clinical and radiological.

2 logical biomarker load and high frequency of radiological abnormalities (n = 34, 7.9%) and (iii) low

3 ourse of disease in young children, although radiological abnormalities are noted.

4 Pulmonary nodules are frequently detected radiological abnormalities in lung cancer screening.

5 are related to fixed airflow obstruction and radiological abnormalities in moderate to severe asthma.

6 th fixed airflow obstruction and a number of radiological abnormalities in moderate to severe asthma.

7 Two blinded readers retrospectively graded radiological abnormalities of the craniofacial region ob

8 Fixed airflow obstruction and radiological abnormalities were then mapped to these imm

9 CT scans were scored for the presence of radiological abnormalities.

10 ng, is a serious health threat to victims of radiological accidents or patients receiving radiotherap

11 mitigation in patients after radiotherapy or radiological accidents.

12 Active' or 'Stable' based on clinical and/or radiological activity on-treatment.

13 The clinical and radiological activity preceding the DMF treatment might

14 Clinical, radiological and anatomopathological parameters were ana

15 This is due to the absence of radiological and chemical signatures in the sample matri

16 en-label treatment and blinded assessment of radiological and clinical outcomes.

17 The patients' symptoms, and radiological and endoscopic data were pre/postoperativel

18 itis score of the paw and ankle, increase in radiological and histological lesion score of ankle and

19 b with reduced pedal edema, arthritis score, radiological and histological lesion scores in ankle-joi

20 The course of pulmonary disease, radiological and histopathological interrelations, thera

21 Reports on PPBS do not highlight the radiological and imaging characteristics of this syndrom

22 In this study, the radiological and laboratory findings obtained from 31 co

23 The radiological and partial pressure of oxygen, arterial (P

24 e for prognosis assessment in GC is based on radiological and pathological criteria and they may not

25 Clinical, radiological and pathological feature define CLIPPERS sy

26 We evaluated clinical, radiological and pathological features of patients refer

27 Follow-up included standard cystoscopic, radiological, and clinical assessments.

28 ems probable that the genomic, pathological, radiological, and clinical features of mpMRI-visible and

29 All available medical notes and clinical, radiological, and genetic investigations were reviewed.

30 ioeconomic/geographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological, and genomic data from patient cases of dru

31 Protocol clinical, radiological, and histological examinations were perform

32 But clinical, radiological, and laboratory parameters remain essential

33 diagnostic criteria-which include clinical, radiological, and microbiologic criteria-should be consi

34 tion using a definition comprising clinical, radiological, and mycological criteria.

35 including clinical, demographic, molecular, radiological, and pathological data.

36 olves considering a combination of clinical, radiological, and pathological information in multidisci

37 terventional radiologists performed detailed radiological angiographic assessments.

38 Using an appropriate radiological approach will result in better management a

39 was most closely associated with measures of radiological aspiration (penetration aspiration scale, S

40 However, radiological assessment alone could not accurately ident

41 Histological and radiological assessment evidenced marked endochondral ne

42 nce, pathophysiology, laboratory evaluation, radiological assessment, and treatment of hypothyroidism

43 n in any haematological, serum chemistry, or radiological assessments between the ebselen groups and

44 RASPE can be considered as "radiological associating liver partition and portal vein

45 Radiological biomarkers of TBI (basal cistern volume, ve

46 ast cancer tumors without biopsy (applied in radiological BIRADS classifications) but also evaluate t

47 Typical radiological changes were observed in 27 patients.

48 ed to this patient's persistent symptoms and radiological changes.

49 ected and non-HIV-infected recipients in the radiological characteristics of HCC at enlisting or in t

50 describe optimal management based on precise radiological classification.

51 We describe clinical and radiological clues to aid diagnosis, and we present an o

52 servational, clinicoelectrophysiological and radiological cohort study was performed.

53 e new mixture can increase bowel distention, radiological confidence, and quality in CTE evaluations.

54 Each segment was graded for distensional and radiological confidence.

55 erformed on a sample of pneumonia cases with radiological consolidation and/or pleural fluid in 4 cou

56 of PERCH participants drawn from those with radiological consolidation or pleural fluid, with S. pne

57 Routine radiological contrast swallow following total gastrectom

58 CT and confirmation by surgery, endoscopy or radiological control.

59 atment study is also relevant for a suitable radiological control.

60 Marked clinical and radiological corticosteroid responsiveness was observed

61 We determined the long-term clinical and radiological course of persons undergoing PE episodes.

62 ifying patients by AFP status in addition to radiological criteria may improve the selection process

63 treated in our centre, 65 aneurysms met the radiological criteria of VSIAs.

64 Radiological criteria suggestive of malignant ovarian ma

65 Type 1 (classical) iSS, defined using simple radiological criteria, is associated with a characterist

66 ring 2004-2016 using predefined standardized radiological criteria.

67 Clinical and radiological data of 42 Italian patients with PML were a

68 r clinical characteristics, pathological and radiological data, and therapies used pre- and postibrut

69 h either TBLC or SLB along with clinical and radiological data, in random non-consecutive order.

70 We reviewed clinical and radiological details of patients with iSS assessed at a

71 ting miRNAs may identify recurrence prior to radiological detectability while providing insight into

72 This radiological detection of small vessels disease is impor

73 become experts at visual tasks as complex as radiological diagnosis and action video games.

74 ere: fish bone located beyond the esophagus, radiological diagnosis by CT and confirmation by surgery

75 The accuracy rate of radiological diagnosis compared to each clinical diagnos

76 All patients (n=58) with radiological diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation c

77 s the role of the "central vein sign" in the radiological diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS).

78 MR images of 92 patients with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of PRES.

79 rticle may be helpful in making preoperative radiological diagnosis of XGC.

80 F, particularly for patients without a clear radiological diagnosis, in samples that can be obtained

81 es and locations, enabling a straightforward radiological diagnosis.

82 he recommendations focus on pathological and radiological diagnostics, and the main treatment modalit

83 ive SUNCT and SUNA patients and evaluate the radiological differences between them.

84 No significant radiological differences emerged between SUNCT and SUNA.

85 ignancy, which would also be infeasible in a radiological disaster.

86 bruary 2009 in the CEZ, we reconstructed the radiological dose for 12 species of mammals observed at

87 two of the most important radionuclides for radiological dose from the ingestion pathway.

88 ret these findings from current knowledge of radiological dose-response relationships, here mammal re

89 The variables used to measure radiological efficacy were improvement in the degree of

90 Thus, selective radiological embolization of the left hepatic artery bra

91 Therefore, it is a radiological emergency of vital importance.

92 ed to 44 months for current standard of care radiological evaluation (p < 0.001).

93 Radiological evaluation forms an integral part in patien

94 the critical role of a detailed preoperative radiological evaluation in complex spine surgery.

95 sion of lung aberrations require a method of radiological evaluation to implement and manage the appr

96 ed ORs separately for cases with and without radiological evidence of brain abnormalities.

97 remission for 3 months with no endoscopic or radiological evidence of intestinal inflammation) in pat

98 patients with known chronic liver diseases, radiological evidence of liver cirrhosis, and compensate

99 Radiological evidence supports the loss in thymic volume

100 Radiological examination of one fetus was inconclusive.

101 Radiological examination showed a heterogeneous lesion t

102 patient's injury: number, doses, and type of radiological examination.The sex and age of the patient

103 Radiological examinations at four timepoints before the

104 al clinical picture and irregular results of radiological examinations suggesting neoplasmatic proces

105 tient visits, examinations and in particular radiological examinations, without a strong decrease aft

106 % predicted (r = -0.33; P < 0.0001), and the radiological extent of bronchiectasis (r = 0.29; P < 0.0

107 Demographic, clinical and radiological factors associated with lower EQ-5D utility

108 r emphasis on diagnostic investigations, key radiological features and optimal treatment modalities.

109 The aim of our study is to describe radiological features in CT that will alert you to look

110 We identified clinical laboratory and radiological features of ALS4, and hence they should be

111 ificant correlation between LOP and reliable radiological features of IIH.

112 a simple and systematic approach to clinical-radiological features of primary skull lesions.

113 s the mineralogy, epidemiology, clinical and radiological features of the various forms of silicosis

114 The radiological features were reviewed, and being similar,

115 Radiological features were studied including radioopaque

116 disease recurrence was diagnosed by abnormal radiological features, suggestive of microcirculatory di

117 Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) is a radiological finding and its relation to clinical SM is

118 Brain MRI showed significant improvement of radiological findings (p=0.001).

119 ion was detected between LOP and each of the radiological findings (partial empty sella [p=0.137], pe

120 d treatment paradigms with a focus on recent radiological findings and surgical reports.

121 r any correlation could be found between the radiological findings and the clinical disease course.

122 Finally, the diagnostic potential of radiological findings and urinary biomarkers derived fro

123 infection, as some patients may have normal radiological findings at early stages of the disease.

124 Advances in knowledge: Being aware of the radiological findings described in this article may be h

125 in gastric cancer and its relationship with radiological findings from dual-energy spectral CT(DEsCT

126 ese outcomes could, in part, be predicted by radiological findings from within 1 year of first presen

127 a consensus on the presence or absence of 6 radiological findings identified in the literature as ch

128 uses of dystonia and parkinsonism as well as radiological findings in the context of movement disorde

129 allograft, the need for Px for symptoms and radiological findings is not rare (39/246, 15.8%).

130 le, the purpose was to demonstrate secondary radiological findings of osteoid osteoma in both paediat

131 aper is to review these data underlining the radiological findings of the disease and its differentia

132 The abnormal radiological findings on craniofacial CT scans of Mucor

133 osteoid osteoma may be delayed if secondary radiological findings such as muscle atrophy, oedema in

134 o the nonspecific presentation of MAC-PD and radiological findings that overlap with other pulmonary

135 urrently practiced MRI, and to correlate the radiological findings to the respective arthroscopic fin

136 milial histories, genetic data, clinical and radiological findings), we have diagnosed the families w

137 Radiological findings, especially magnetic resonance ima

138 Secondary radiological findings, such as muscular atrophy, synovit

139 reflect these new wide-ranging clinical and radiological findings.

140 antile hemangioma (IH) based on clinical and radiological findings.

141 us species by evaluating computed tomography radiological findings.

142 The first radiological follow-up was performed approximately 4 wee

143 kidney function as well as the impact of the radiological follow-up.

144 ial and bronchiolar brushing performed under radiological guidance from these patients.

145 d Drug Administration's Center for Drugs and Radiological Health issued Guidance in 2016 on generatin

146 icrobiome/metabolome reconstruction map on a radiological image of a human lung and forms an interact

147 s based on central independent review of the radiological images did not corroborate the investigator

148 Radiological images of 152 patients were reviewed retros

149 Radiological images taken before starting sorafenib, at

150 ing genomic profiles, tumour histopathology, radiological images, proteomic analysis and more.

151 sets that can identify distinct patterns in radiological images.

152 ensional (3D) organ reconstruction built off radiological images.

153 acute pyelonephritis, who were referred for radiological imaging (CECT), were taken into the study.

154 However, radiological imaging plays a crucial role in evaluating

155 ng male patient, diagnosed, according to the radiological, immunological and histological examination

156 We analyzed clinical, radiological, immunological, and histopathological data.

157 able in Italy would not pose any significant radiological impact to infant.

158 n non-CLIPPERS [clinical improvement (8/12); radiological improvement (2/12); clinical worsening on d

159 Radiological improvement and clinical worsening were not

160 Following a large-scale radiological incident, there is a need for FDA-approved

161 wo neuroradiologists blinded to clinical and radiological information analyzed the CT and DSA in cons

162 Thanks to radiological information systems and picture archiving a

163 Clinical and radiological intensity of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH)

164 ancy, particularly lymphoma, was the initial radiological interpretation in 21% of patients; 32% unde

165 nancy, particularly lymphoma was the initial radiological interpretation in 21% of patients; 32% unde

166 our analysis, and that obtaining records of radiological investigations later in pregnancy and postp

167 Radiological investigations play a pivotal role in diagn

168 se myelopathy by results from laboratory and radiological investigations.

169 ant tissues on the biochemical, clinical and radiological levels.

170 Background Current COVID-19 radiological literature is dominated by CT and a detaile

171 re often overlooked in clinical practice and radiological literature.

172 toms (cough and phlegm lasting >2 weeks) and radiological lung abnormalities were compared between ad

173 However, the radiological markers of pathologically elevated ICP have

174 Ultrasonography is the current radiological method of choice for screening.

175 heir appropriate treatment by interventional radiological methods in this article.

176 ntification of novel biomarkers and improved radiological methods may complement our understanding of

177 esenting with any of the following outcomes: radiological objective response (as assessed by Response

178 We excluded patients with a radiological or clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, without

179 h a broad window for medical management in a radiological or nuclear event.

180 In humans, the analogous clinical-radiological paradox could explain why individuals with

181 spite important efforts to solve the clinico-radiological paradox, correlation between lesion load an

182 he reasons for implant failure, clinical and radiological parameters before and after IR, and the sur

183 Various clinical and radiological parameters have been analyzed as factors re

184 This study investigated the radiological-pathological correlation between these imag

185 Our study indicates that radiological PCI is prognostic in MPeM and should be ass

186 histological analysis confirmed the positive radiological performance with larger size, increasing pr

187 found that the control group showed negative radiological performance with successful implantation.

188 years as severe or very severe, hypoxic, or radiological pneumonia as per WHO definitions.

189 In the 12-23 month age group, radiological pneumonia decreased from 15.3 to 10.9 cases

190 children aged 2-11 months, the incidence of radiological pneumonia fell from 21.0 cases per 1000 per

191 ffectiveness of three doses of PCV13 against radiological pneumonia was an adjusted odds ratio of 0.5

192 The primary endpoint was WHO-defined radiological pneumonia with pulmonary consolidation.

193 d with a moderate impact on the incidence of radiological pneumonia, a small reduction in cases of ho

194 nical pneumonia and identified 2156 cases of radiological pneumonia.

195 eria with the addition of having WHO-defined radiological pneumonia.

196 ery severe pneumonia, hypoxic pneumonia, and radiological pneumonia.

197 6) for hypoxic pneumonia, and 25% (9-38) for radiological pneumonia.

198 st the natural history of the disease from a radiological point of view.

199 To prospectively study clinical and radiological PPCs and respiratory insufficiency therapie

200 The multivariate analysis of radiological predictors associated with the symptomatic

201 lysis revealed the two strongest independent radiological predictors for IPA to be the VOS and the ha

202 alopathy with often overlapping clinical and radiological presentations.

203 digitized, including 34 grade 2 gliomas with radiological progression and 22 radiologically stable gr

204 he date of investigator-assessed clinical or radiological progression or death, whichever occurred fi

205 ndomisation to the date of first clinical or radiological progression or death, whichever occurred fi

206 ebo to ivosidenib crossover was permitted on radiological progression per investigator assessment.

207 Median time to radiological progression was 6 months (95% confidence In

208 arcinoid tumours of the lung or thymus, with radiological progression within 12 months before randomi

209 ative viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR), radiological progression, experiencing drug side effects

210 any postoperative radiotherapy), clinical or radiological progression, initiation of a non-trial trea

211 nosis until disease progression (clinical or radiological progressive disease, relapse, or death from

212 published by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the MIRD Committee bu

213 ata presented in International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 107.

214 nations of the 2 International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 110 adult reference

215 ng to the latest International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations, radiation dosim

216 cation 60 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, the U.S. annual individual (per

217 endations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, was used to develop the dose es

218 Radiological recurrences have been reported in up to 30%

219 ee survival (EFS); defined as no clinical or radiological relapses and no disability progression.

220 dings resulted in substantial changes to the radiological report in 34% of the patients in Group 1 an

221 /20 identified 89 consecutive CT scans whose radiological report mentioned COVID-19.

222 dings resulted in substantial changes to the radiological report.

223 metimes result in substantial changes to the radiological report.

224 common variants would facilitate informative radiological reporting of meningiomas.

225 om China suggest clinical benefit, including radiological resolution, reduction in viral loads, and i

226 5 weeks after randomisation and according to radiological response and patient tolerance thereafter.

227 one 1 mg/kg/d, tapered based on clinical and radiological response plus oral fluconazole.

228 The overall radiological response rate was 54% (8 of 15) (all partia

229 The RECIST-defined radiological response rate was lower than that frequentl

230 AFP response, radiological response rate, and disease control rate at

231 is she achieved an excellent serological and radiological response that was maintained for 24 months.

232 uliar mechanism of action, the evaluation of radiological response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (I

233 The role of radiological response to loco-regional therapies, alpha-

234 Complete radiological response was achieved in 186 of 188 nodules

235 Radiological response was achieved in eight (24.2%; 11.1

236 lpha-fetoprotein, Milan-Criteria status, and radiological response) displayed a high effect in terms

237 For radiological response, the following categories were use

238 treatment and he achieved an almost complete radiological response.

239 ties, alpha-feto protein (AFP) response, and radiological response.

240 d on imaging studies assessed by independent radiological review committee.

241 version 1.1) assessed by independent central radiological review, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

242 sessable for efficacy after histological and radiological review.

243 Dedicated pathological and radiological reviews were performed to correlate clinica

244 re commonly employed to predict the clinical radiological safety of novel radiotracers.

245 ion Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 for radiological scans and WHO criteria for medical photogra

246 for Heavy Ions at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (Japan).

247 July 10, 2012, at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) in Japan.

248 The radiological score was obtained by giving 1 point for th

249 gical Societies (WFNS), Hunt & Hess (HH) and radiological scores (modified Fisher Scale (mFS), Subara

250 come (AUC > 0.750), and were better than the radiological scores (P < 0.05).

251 e (AUC > 0.750), and had better results than radiological scores (P < 0.05).

252 s no significant correlation between LOP and radiological scores (r=0.095; p=0.525, Spearman's rank c

253 The correlation between the calculated radiological scores and LOP was evaluated.

254 Radiological scores appeared inferior to the clinical an

255 on between lumbar opening pressure (LOP) and radiological scores based on cranial MRI and contrast-en

256 m production (1.16, 1.03-1.30; p=0.013), and radiological severity of disease (1.03, 1.01-1.04; p<0.0

257 cer in selected patients without clinical or radiological signs of anastomotic leakage.

258 Potential clinical predictors and radiological signs of IH were entered in binary logistic

259 Loss of vision in the absence of clinical or radiological signs of involvement of the orbit and intra

260 It is important to know the characteristic radiological signs of this entity, because early diagnos

261 stic performance of CTPA-detected VOS and of radiological signs that do not require contrast-media we

262 disease with many clinical, biochemical, and radiological signs that has a predilection for the lungs

263 utation and sharing most of the clinical and radiological signs with H-ABC patients.

264 Of 12 evaluable radiological signs, five were found to be significantly

265 nt and improvement or lack of progression of radiological signs.

266 ience and the recommendations of the Spanish radiological societies (SERVEI and SERAM) has enabled us

267 These guidelines have been approved by most radiological societies, although they have also been cri

268 Materials and Methods The Dutch Radiological Society developed CO-RADS based on other ef

269 accuracy research abstracts presented at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Annual Meet

270 Purpose The objectives of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Patient-Cen

271 Purpose The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Pediatric B

272 diology AI companies was aggregated from the Radiological Society of North America and the Society fo

273 tice radiologists shared with members of the Radiological Society of North America COVID-19 Task Forc

274 Our understanding of the clinical and radiological spectrum of CAA has continued to evolve, an

275 rdized diagnostic criteria, and the clinical-radiological spectrum, causes, and optimum investigation

276 CT were significant in the determination of radiological staging of NBL, p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, re

277 MRI was superior to CT in radiological staging.

278 Radiological studies are crucial not only for detecting

279 ians using visual comparison of longitudinal radiological studies is the gold standard.

280 Preoperative radiological studies were reviewed by an abdominal radio

281 nts who are unable to undergo contrast-based radiological studies.

282 rol subjects in this cross-sectional clinico-radiological study.

283 loss and elevated liver enzymes with clinico-radiological suspicion of cholangiocarcinoma.

284 disease course, with no further clinical or radiological symptoms.

285 Posterior cortical atrophy is a clinico-radiological syndrome characterized by progressive decli

286 260b expression in serum was correlated with radiological tail-like patterns, characteristic of the i

287 Radiological techniques with contrast administration and

288 nsity and dense area as measured by a single radiological technologist using Cumulus software (Canto

289 bidity in the event of a nuclear accident or radiological terrorism.

290 iled during the 1970s and do not represent a radiological threat to human health or the environment.

291 rosurgical monitoring and we present a novel radiological threshold for this.

292 No radiological thrombosis extension or clinical embolizati

293 Over the past few years, interventional radiological treatment has evolved and taken the place o

294 al between the date of pre-surgical planning radiological tumour assessment to the date of investigat

295 an size on MRI and in the surgical specimen, radiological type), and presence/absence of free margins

296 intensity and shape with clear potential for radiological use.

297 scale (EDSS), MS severity score (MSSS)) and radiological variables (presence of gadolinium-enhancing

298 The radiological variables of interest were quantified using

299 g, the distribution of baseline clinical and radiological variables was similar across the two patien

300 al response (PR) is defined as a clinical or radiological worsening in patients receiving adequate an