コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 study contemporaneous to a partner-enrolled randomized trial.
2 o Reduce HIV Transmission (PopART) community-randomized trial.
3 tial value and challenges of a sham ablation randomized trial.
4 oronary artery bypass grafting in a blinded, randomized trial.
5 3 y; BMI: 23 +/- 2) participated in a 2 x 2 randomized trial.
6 2 Study (NEAT022) is a European, open-label, randomized trial.
7 ing the performance of an adequately powered randomized trial.
8 d demonstrated efficacy in a 6-month cluster-randomized trial.
9 y exploratory interim analysis of an ongoing randomized trial.
10 supporting the testing of this strategy in a randomized trial.
11 al breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in a large randomized trial.
12 eriod) was followed by a three-month cluster-randomized trial.
13 xamine TBE in a single-blind, sham procedure randomized trial.
14 treatment trial and the stepped-wedge group-randomized trial.
15 warrants further evaluation in a multicenter randomized trial.
16 C after LT was investigated in a prospective randomized trial.
17 hese data provide the scientific basis for a randomized trial.
18 PDAC and warrants confirmation in subsequent randomized trials.
19 ovations in the design and analysis of group-randomized trials.
20 ain probiotics in a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
21 ork meta-analysis of 52 816 patients from 12 randomized trials.
22 nd data from uncontrolled studies and small, randomized trials.
23 nt provides minimum guidelines for reporting randomized trials.
24 oagulation therapy, require investigation in randomized trials.
25 conditioning regimen has not been studied in randomized trials.
26 ved and currently is being tested in ongoing randomized trials.
27 FADS1 genotype needs to be tested in larger randomized trials.
28 prevention in men was demonstrated in three randomized trials.
29 ower risk of cancer than in meta-analyses of randomized trials.
30 ry, supratentorial IPH are being explored in randomized trials.
31 stematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
32 ese data will provide a basis to plan future randomized trials.
33 , as they have not been compared directly in randomized trials.
36 this 4-mo, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 244 women (45-65 y) participated in a
39 e I/II prospective, open label, multicenter, randomized trial aimed primarily at evaluating the safet
41 and FGF23 in stage 3b/4 CKD, we conducted a randomized trial among individuals with eGFR 20-45 ml/mi
44 tion for sample size calculations of cluster-randomized trials and household surveys, and inform the
45 t they still lag behind parallel-arm cluster-randomized trials and individually randomized trials in
47 trum and consistency of outcomes reported in randomized trials and observational studies in living ki
49 learly established by consistent findings of randomized trials and observational studies; that animal
50 eview focuses on the available evidence from randomized trials and proposes a design for future clini
52 mework clarifies the findings of large-scale randomized trials and the close association of ketogenes
53 ic bypass are limited by low sample size (in randomized trials) and selection bias (in observational
54 men on the basis of immunogenicity data from randomized trials, and limited data suggest that even 1
56 In a harmonized dataset of 4 multicenter randomized trials (APPRAISE-2 [Apixaban for Prevention o
59 up treated surgically for bicuspid stenosis, randomized trials are needed to adequately assess the ef
74 lusions should be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial before firm recommendations regarding c
75 owing T-cell-depleting induction in a recent randomized trial (Belatacept-based Early Steroid Withdra
76 s also essential to extend the evidence from randomized trials beyond the narrow range of settings an
77 -savings favour intermittent therapy in most randomized trials, but the benefit for clinical practice
78 c disease have not been proven successful in randomized trials, but the quantity of early-life gluten
79 ent nested within a population-based cluster-randomized trial comparing a nutrition counseling and mi
80 1-98 is a four-arm, phase III, double-blind, randomized trial comparing adjuvant letrozole versus tam
81 ted a pragmatic, nonblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial comparing antibiotic therapy (10-day co
82 ies over time; BP MAP will conduct a cluster-randomized trial comparing effectiveness of 2 versions o
83 ome will conduct an individual patient-level randomized trial comparing effectiveness of smartphone-l
84 l outcomes; however, further evidence from a randomized trial comparing immediate with delayed surger
86 he SVG as the second conduit and the largest randomized trial comparing the use of single and bilater
88 A systematic review identified published randomized trials comparing EBRT with or without ADT, or
89 These results highlight the urgent need for randomized trials comparing OAC versus APT post-LAAC.
90 l Register of Controlled Trials searches for randomized trials comparing routine revascularization ve
93 s a multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted at 34 hospitals in the US.
94 omes) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted from 2008 to 2012 over a medi
96 SIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter randomized trial conducted from February 8, 2017, throug
99 se results, based on an IPD meta-analysis of randomized trials, confirm the benefit of ExCR on HRQoL
110 n adults in the published literature nor any randomized trials designed to examine this association.
112 prematurely terminated and thus underpowered randomized trial, early prophylactic ICD implantation de
113 itiated, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial enrolled 70 patients with HFrEF from Ma
116 edings (1990-2018) were searched to identify randomized trials evaluating the sequencing, but not dur
117 imply causation, and there was a paucity of randomized trial evidence addressing long-term safety of
118 ir approval, there has been no real-world or randomized trial evidence evaluating the effect of the a
121 important, such as in the design of cluster randomized trials for studying interventions for infecti
124 ctive studies (18 cohorts, 3 case-cohorts, 4 randomized trials) from the GENIUS-CHD (Genetics of Subs
129 adjuvant therapy, although data from several randomized trials have shown improved outcomes with neoa
131 ING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in 15 EDs in France of 503 patients 75
136 we conducted a parallel-group, double-blind, randomized trial in participants aged 18 or older with C
138 r, 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in patients with anhedonia and a mood o
140 h cohort study nested within a large cluster-randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus, that had re
141 h cohort study nested within a large cluster-randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus, with repeat
144 con Dieta Mediterranea) cohort, originally a randomized trial in which participants followed a Medite
145 educes left ventricular mass, we conducted a randomized trial in which patients received either low-s
147 m cluster-randomized trials and individually randomized trials in achieving adequate power to detect
155 th prior surgical results, in the context of randomized trials including the left main (LM) coronary
158 for Promotion of Health) study is a cluster-randomized trial involving 15 Head Start preschools in H
165 These data demonstrate how registry-based randomized trials may offer methods for enrollment feedb
167 of 3511 patients from the PARTNER 2 Cohort A randomized trial (n=1910) and SAPIEN 3 registry (n=1601)
171 : Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel randomized trial of 342 patients with IPF, breathlessnes
172 is a multicenter, open-label, 2x2 factorial, randomized trial of 447 patients with aortic stenosis un
176 y-2 factorial design, we conducted a cluster-randomized trial of a home-based CHW intervention in 2 o
178 wledge, this was the first large, long-term, randomized trial of an intervention directed at improvin
180 lysis to compare the predicted outcomes of a randomized trial of EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT plus BT.
181 nhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk), a randomized trial of evolocumab versus placebo in patient
182 timmunization from 60 patients enrolled in a randomized trial of HD versus SD vaccine (30 HD; 30 SD)
185 n (5-17 years old) were enrolled in a 1-year randomized trial of integrated pest management plus educ
188 ral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, in a randomized trial of patients with Crohn's disease (CD).
196 both the WGHS and in JUPITER (N = 8,749), a randomized trial of rosuvastatin for primary prevention
202 ine candidates are available, but conducting randomized trials of additional candidates in outbreaks
204 220 patients with parenchymal NCC from three randomized trials of antiparasitic treatment was assesse
205 ening instruments; and systematic reviews of randomized trials of behavioral and pharmacologic treatm
207 PATIENTS: Secondary analysis of multicenter randomized trials of critically ill adults in which mort
209 ed Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for randomized trials of eHealth interventions in solid orga
213 Individual patient-data were pooled from 10 randomized trials of patients with STEMI undergoing prim
215 ese points with evidence from two studies of randomized trials of PES programs aimed at increasing fo
216 ibility of potential individual- and cluster-randomized trials of sodium reduction on cardiovascular
224 ences in overall survival have been found in randomized trials performed in the general breast cancer
226 atrial fibrillation has been evaluated in 2 randomized trials; post-approval clinical data are limit
230 follow-up analysis of a previously-published randomized trial (RCT) evaluating the 2-years effects of
236 nti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) from multiple randomized trials representing 1,445 patients with metas
240 These data strongly support the need for a randomized trial sufficiently powered to compare the lat
242 , mechanistic insights and observations from randomized trials suggest no clear benefit on HF-related
247 n the United Kingdom, we conducted a cluster randomized trial, the Primary-Secondary Care Partnership
251 ion Effectiveness Trial (ResPECT), a cluster randomized trial to assess personal protective equipment
256 mph node retrieval strengthen the need for a randomized trial to confirm the oncological safety of MI
259 igned this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to determine, in patients with COPD who
263 red multiple treatment arms from a community-randomized trial to evaluate whether increasing frequenc
265 potential risk factors among a subset of the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV (REPR
268 ed baseline kidney function in the REPRIEVE (Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV) tria
269 rin inhibitors avoidancE trial was the first randomized trial to study early withdrawal of CNIs in de
272 icoagulation enrolled in the Evolut Low Risk randomized trial underwent computed tomographic imaging
274 We estimated transition probabilities from randomized trials using parametric survival modeling.
278 N, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This clustered randomized trial was implemented at 160 worksites from J
279 ulticenter, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial was performed in five UK hospitals, inv
284 In this prospective, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized trial, we enrolled 330 participants at 29 int
292 ute Stroke Services) was a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial where the hospital was the unit of rand
296 s a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority randomized trial with a factorial design among treatment
297 PARTICIPANTS: FORWARD (FGF-18 Osteoarthritis Randomized Trial with Administration of Repeated Doses)
298 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cluster randomized trial with enrollment from July 19, 2016, thr
299 OUT IX trial (Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome IX), was a large
300 on of clinical efficacy would require larger randomized trials with more definitive outcome measures.