ライフサイエンスコーパス: rank

1 38 events in the placebo group (P=0.09, log-rank).

2 e colchicine group (5 versus 0; P=0.024, log-rank).

3 ence in rank) and joint rank (the sum of the ranks).

4 ction in either the number of antibiotics or rank.

5 n after controlling for changes in dominance rank.

6 relative affinities of glycan ligands to be ranked.

7 port with extensive annotation for candidate ranking.

8 ctly interpretable in terms of profitability ranking.

9 i-CRISPRs, we built a model based on XGBoost ranking.

10 ption points to achieve appropriate priority ranking.

11 ients with score 1-3 (Harrell's C 0.779; log-rank 0.002).

12 les reducing a fraction of wrong answers (at rank-1) by 9-23% depending on the used data set.

13 relationship between male age and dominance rank [12], and high rank enhances paternity success [12,

14 with upright CSR had the worst outcome (log-rank = 14.05; p = 0.001) and the presence of upright CSR

15 traints, we found the near-native poses were ranked 1st, 1st and 10th among 54 000 possible decoys.

16 that the osteoclast differentiation receptor RANK(4,5) couples female sex hormones to the rewiring of

17 rank the entirety of genomic locations or to rank a subset of locations, pre-selected via traditional

18 Among top-ranked academic medical centers, the existence and conte

19 e missing glycemic reduction by eating meals ranked according to the discordant CGM was inversely cor

20 was the fourth most common cancer in women, ranking after breast cancer (2.1 million cases), colorec

21 We develop an Empirical Bayes ranking algorithm, using the marginal distribution of th

22 CSA was applied to rank all of the parameters in the Carbon Bond 6 revision

23 sent a global water tower index (WTI), which ranks all water towers in terms of their water-supplying

24 by half, compared with biomass-productivity ranking alone, with little productivity impact (<1.7% pe

25 Our main findings are that (1) ranking alternatives through direct rating (response tim

26 racterization factors of the three PFAAs are ranked among the top 5% for marine ecotoxicity, when com

27 with over 10 000-14 000 catalytic turnovers, ranking among the most efficient nitrene transfer biocat

28 iScore ranks among the top scoring approaches on the CAPRI scor

29 Hymenoptera venom allergy ranks among the top three causes of anaphylaxis worldwid

30 ) is the most common primary bone cancer and ranks amongst the leading causes of cancer mortality in

31 Individuals with a higher dominance rank and being better socially integrated (i.e. higher E

32 e-free survival (DFS) were calculated by log-rank and Cox regression.

33 and in silico calculations were then used to rank and predict the functional consequences of key vari

34 buting mass features to each of the GOI were ranked and selected using mean absolute SHAP values, hig

35 nal screening techniques that aid in feature ranking and selection by accommodating various forms of

36 ividuals was based on season, single-hormone ranks and multi-variate analysis of the hormonal profile

37 fically symbolic distance (the difference in rank) and joint rank (the sum of the ranks).

38 ate of total death (8 versus 1; P=0.017, log-rank) and, in particular, noncardiovascular death in the

39 Univariate log rank, and multivariable Cox analyses determined factors

40 the predictors is both row-sparse and of low-rank, and propose a group Dantzig type formulation to es

41 We found that a low CI was consistently ranked as a top predictive feature in the diagnosis of m

42 te prediction error (MAE), the formulas were ranked as follows: Kane keratoconus formula (0.81 D), SR

43 Tremor is currently ranked as the most common movement disorder.

44 robabilities, motor relearning programme was ranked as the most effective among all exercise interven

45 Alcoholic CHG 4%-5% was ranked as the most effective antiseptic as it halved the

46 Co-expressed genes ranked as the most stable genes in the TCGA cohort by Ge

47 Such diets have recently been ranked as the sixth most important dietary risk factor-1

48 rtions of females and males at each academic rank (assistant 69.5% vs 41.8%; associate 17.6% vs 21.0%

49 Highly ranked associations were constructed into protein-protei

50 tumor classification results in this work is ranked at second place in the testing phase of the 2019

51 Applying rank-based inverse normal transformation (INT) can make

52 We performed a hypothesis-driven rank-based statistical approach adjusting for multiple t

53 ethod outperforms both clustering and energy ranking-based methods, all the while consistently offeri

54 In other broad regions, infectious causes ranked between fifth and eighth in terms of crude attrib

55 detrimental to the performance of the random ranking, but they are beneficial for the performance of

56 of the 'dirty-cage/excrement microbiome', we ranked by priority the heterogeneity of modern husbandry

57 ics of billions of conformational poses were ranked by the programs PIPER and ClusPro.

58 a gold standard of 2210 pairs of ion images ranked by their co-localization.

59 A ranking by state reveals that GHGs (per unit floor space

60 Using a network propagation method, we ranked candidate genes by their similarity to known dise

61 ound 25%-50% or less in many cohorts, a good ranking cannot be taken to imply that the gene or diseas

62 We rank categories by their trade-off of social benefits an

63 between agents, individual positions in the ranking change more, and the typical structure shows a d

64 tered conditions, whereas competition caused rank changes in fitness under drought.

65 andomized to sham (2-weeks active iTBS); log-rank ChiSq = 5.871, df = 1, p = 0.015; OR = 3.50, 95% CI

66 a receiver operating characteristic analysis ranked chitotriosidase as superior to IL-6 in distinguis

67 form AQuA-HiChIP, going from cell culture to ranking chromatin interactions within 6 d.

68 QR, 22-35 years; 34 men]) using the Spearman rank coefficient.

69 s as social interactions governing a dynamic ranking, communal work to produce a public good, and nor

70 ancer in prostate needle biopsy samples at a ranking comparable to that of international experts in p

71 Spearman's rank correlation analysis also showed that grazing reduc

72 rsely correlated with each subject's Kendall rank correlation coefficient (r = -0.95; P < 0.0001).

73 with decreased total lung capacity (Spearman rank correlation coefficient [r(s)] = -0.40, P = .004).

74 Exact Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to assess the as

75 ), correlating with plasma HCV RNA (Spearman rank correlation r = 0.9); at biopsy 2 (Day 7 in 4 of 5

76 Analysis of covariance and Spearman rank correlation test for cross-sectional analysis and W

77 cise interventions (surface under cumulative ranking curve values [SUCRCV]: 95.6%, standardized mean

78 a were matched to county-level County Health Ranking data using transplant recipient zip code, and na

79 f the population cooperating in spite of the rank differences.

80 The sum of ranking differences (SRD) algorithm can efficiently solv

81 The flexible fusion method of sum of ranking differences (SRD) is applied to combine all asse

82 ng Bayesian inference to develop probability-ranked differential diagnoses.

83 Social rank differentially influences how male and female mice

84 We identified and ranked districts according to the number of people livin

85 Neurons exhibited selectivity for stimulus rank during learning, but not before or after.

86 n male age and dominance rank [12], and high rank enhances paternity success [12, 16].

87 RANK loss, whereas neutrophils, supported by RANK-expressing tumor cells, induce immunosuppression.

88 We present methods of ranking formula accuracy, including the new Haigis IOL F

89 Surveys were ranked from highest to lowest anthropometric data qualit

90 Surveys were ranked from the highest (best) to the lowest (worst) ind

91 A ranked gene tree is a gene tree accounting for the tempo

92 The highest-ranked gene, TTK, was most highly expressed in basal-lik

93 Recent mathematical results concerning ranked genealogies without leaf labels unlock opportunit

94 tree shapes and timed ranked tree shapes or ranked genealogies.

95 centrality measure based on Shapley value to rank genes by their relevance-the individual gene's syne

96 ted and applied game theoretic centrality to rank genes on whole genomes from 756 multiplex autism fa

97 Other highly-ranked genes included proposed prognostic factors (CXCL1

98 g levels of proteins associated with the top-ranked genes were then measured in blood sampled from a

99 Top ranking genes with the highest game theoretic centrality

100 (2), we developed gene variation intolerance rank (GeVIR), a continuous gene-level metric for 19,361

101 In our exploratory analysis, Sb ranked highest as a predictor of BW for GA, followed by

102 In primary analyses, Hg and Ni ranked highest as predictors of BW for GA.

103 studies support a facile method for affinity-ranking hits.

104 well-validated methodology for choosing the rank hyperparameters also raises concern on derived resu

105 tained in each image can be used to reliably rank images by quality and more accurately determine QC

106 The depletion of Rank in the mouse thymic epithelium results in reduced a

107 PPDS was ranked in quartiles.

108 herapeutics, with five monoclonal antibodies ranked in the top 10 blockbuster drugs.

109 up periods, >70% of top-performing hospitals ranked in the top 50%, a substantial proportion remained

110 Cervical cancer ranked in the top three cancers affecting women younger

111 rm acute care hospitals in the United States ranking in either the lowest or highest quartile of risk

112 Interventions that emerged with the highest ranks in our analysis might be considered in practice wh

113 ientists from the developing world and lower-ranked institutions to publish using Landsat data.

114 If ranking is constrained, thus leading to bounded score di

115 The step of ranking is intuitively natural for scRNA-seq data and pr

116 Machine learning ranking (learning to rank) is a class of machine learning and deep learning a

117 pecific disease caused by a gene variant and ranks its severity with more accuracy than existing meth

118 g schemes were validated by their ability to rank known sweet-tasting compounds higher than propertie

119 Machine learning ranking (learning to rank) is a class of machine learnin

120 with the desired keywords, and it returns a ranked list of papers that contain meaningful associatio

121 of the predictions beyond the placement in a ranked list, nor do they provide measures of how much an

122 the attenuated tumor phenotype observed upon RANK loss, whereas neutrophils, supported by RANK-expres

123 cohort by GeNorm when analysed together but ranked lower when analysed individually omitting co-expr

124 ariation in the reproductive success of high-ranking male rhesus macaques on Cayo Santiago.

125 otic' social structure) in which the highest ranking male willow tit is fourth in the overall hierarc

126 Alpha males, the highest ranking males in a social group, are predicted to have b

127 Gene Ontology annotations of genes) into low-rank matrices to simultaneously explore the latent key i

128 gration or personality) other than dominance rank may have a stronger effect on an individual's acces

129 Further annotation of top-ranking metabolic features nominated by the trained mode

130 Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods were used to test prediction of overall sur

131 abolomics is linked to the lack of efficient ranking methods allowing accurate identification of meta

132 al experiments using four well-known feature ranking methods from the machine learning field and five

133 are much more common for one of the feature ranking methods.

134 survival analysis demonstrates that the top-ranked miRNAs are significantly related to the overall s

135 The deep learning ranking model outperforms other approaches and enables r

136 amine receptors were carried out, and 53 top-ranked molecules were evaluated experimentally.

137 Of these compounds, 38 high-ranking molecules were synthesized and tested, revealing

138 % CI: 1.02-1.03; P < .001) as well as having ranked more programs (OR: 1.24; 99% CI: 1.17-1.31; P < .

139 The indicators that ranked most highly for assessing welfare were the presen

140 ality is a fundamental network property that ranks nodes by their structural importance.

141 .001), increasing percentage of applications ranked (number of ranked programs and/or number of appli

142 e less likely than men to be promoted to the rank of associate or full professor or to be appointed t

143 ship between these factors and achieving the rank of full professor within ID.

144 is in terms of two notions of the effective rank of the data covariance.

145 uctural features of GO, (II) structure-based ranking of GO-terms, (III) mapping to reduced GO-DAGs in

146 Here we present a dynamic ranking of host genes implicated in human betacoronaviru

147 he final analysis focuses on a P-value-based ranking of locations which might then be investigated fu

148 Monkeys can learn the implied ranking of pairs of images drawn from an ordered set, de

149 ter-stress constraints to productivity-based ranking of suitable sites reduces water-stress impact by

150 data to produce valid, reliable, and stable ranks of ambulatory care quality for health care systems

151 arning algorithms that perform a comparison (ranking) of objects.

152 e taken to imply that the gene or disease at rank one is necessarily a good candidate.

153 in h-indices were not seen at each academic rank or career duration interval.

154 For mid-ranking, or mesopredators, differences in habitat use mi

155 in line with experiments, including expected rank order in the cooperativity of the folding transitio

156 of UV filters using IVPT, and a formulation rank order was obtained.

157 , which was found to be an indicator for the rank order.

158 he most dominant ASVs detected in the air in rank order.

159 erfaces could be classified in the following rank order: mutated BEAT > original BEAT > knobs-into-ho

160 n that the second guess is determined by the rank ordering of accumulated evidence at or shortly afte

161 Rank orders have been studied in evolutionary biology fo

162 However, current theory on rank orders in biology is somewhat fragmented.

163 5% CI = 4.7-38.3) of relapsing children (log-rank p < 0.001), with no differences observed in adults

164 compared to non-TO patients (75% vs 55%, log-rank P < 0.001).

165 afenib (HR, 0.256; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.65; log-rank P = .002).

166 in arm 2 (95% CI, 28% to 56%; stratified log-rank P = .006).

167 CI, 1.8%-16.4%] from survival analysis; log-rank P = .009).

168 7 (log-rank P = .323) and 0.76 and 0.66 (log-rank P = .018) at 60 months in the A+I arm and HT arm, r

169 9, 0.94]; HR, 0.40 [95% CI: 0.22, 0.71]; log-rank P = .025 and P = .002, respectively).

170 splasia) and no neoplasia, respectively (log-rank P = .10).

171 and OS probabilities were 0.55 and 0.47 (log-rank P = .323) and 0.76 and 0.66 (log-rank P = .018) at

172 te compared with males (32.8% vs. 24.7%; log-rank p = 0.002), but female sex was not an independent p

173 85.7%, non-HS: 83.7%) or graft survival (log-rank P = 0.17; at 5 y, HS: 78.5%, non-HS: 89.8%) in the

174 with no differences observed in adults (log-rank p = 0.280).

175 2-0.75) versus 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.68) (log-rank P = 0.56) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.64-0.77) versus 0.72

176 e was no difference in patient survival (log-rank P = 0.75; at 5 y, HS: 85.7%, non-HS: 83.7%) or graf

177 4-0.77) versus 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.78) (log-rank P = 0.77), respectively.

178 azard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; log-rank p=0.035).

179 enzalutamide (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-1.01; log-rank p=0.050).

180 7.0-13.0) in the standard-of-care group (log-rank p=0.26).

181 up (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.71-1.44; log rank p=0.95).

182 and 100% for nonthrombotic obstruction (log-rank, P<0.0001).

183 al (NCT01864798) is well tolerated, inhibits RANK pathway and increases tumor infiltrating lymphocyte

184 cal findings reveal that tumor cells exploit RANK pathway as a mechanism to evade immune surveillance

185 e immune surveillance and support the use of RANK pathway inhibitors to prime luminal breast cancer f

186 The top ranked phenolics were evaluated by their molecular and p

187 earning scheme were initiated to produce and rank physicochemical property-related features.

188 overy toolkit allows researchers to directly rank potential anti-CRISPR candidate genes for increased

189 water model yielded the highest scoring and ranking power compared to the others.

190 earch exists on how habitat selection of mid-ranking predators can influence population-level process

191 currences of Simpson's paradox involving top-ranked predictors are much more common for one of the fe

192 of Simpson's paradox in the analysis of top-ranked predictors in high-dimensional bioinformatics dat

193 on: they ignore the possibility that the top-ranked predictors occur in an instance of Simpson's para

194 Based on the ranking probabilities, motor relearning programme was ra

195 percentage of applications ranked (number of ranked programs and/or number of applications distribute

196 rence: 9.6; 99% CI: 7.9-11.2; P < .001), and ranked programs on the match list (difference: 6.2; 99%

197 We show that our approach, attractor ranked radial basis function network (AR-RBFN) provides

198 onomic groups (at Family or higher taxonomic rank) ranging from microorganisms to mammals.

199 ypic regressions (including penalization and rank-reduction approaches) into the selection index (SI)

200 example, physical oceanographers often apply rank-reduction techniques (a.k.a. empirical orthogonal f

201 tudies identified that the prescriptions top-ranked repositioned drugs are significantly associated w

202 cornea specialists with regards to academic rank, scholarly productivity, National Institutes of Hea

203 uctures occur in which the adult willow tits rank second and the hierarchy is less steep, or linear.

204 Brazil ranks second worldwide in total number of COVID-19 cases

205 3, recall 0.714) was constructed using a top-ranked set of 13 UV-biomarker genes.

206 receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) signaling pathway may enhance immune activation.

207 We used Wilcoxon rank sum and Fischer exact tests to compare patients who

208 d over time and between groups with Wilcoxon Rank Sum and t-tests.

209 compared with the ORR by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and with PFS by using the log-rank test.

210 were compared across CLAD strata by Wilcoxon rank sum test.

211 We used Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to analyse clinical features, and surviva

212 Analyses used 2-sided t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Spearman correlation coefficients, linea

213 statistics, Fisher exact tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests.

214 We used the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Pearson chi-square tests to examine race di

215 ng a histogram-based method and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and visualizes candidate genes with dynam

216 Exact Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Spearman rank correlation coefficient

217 Wilcoxon rank-sum tests assessed uptake differences across Ki-67

218 es versus controls were assessed by Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, adjusted logistic regression and partial

219 by the completeness of their data based on a ranking system using five criteria: sample collection, s

220 and off-target scoring predictions into its ranking system, and nominates secondary nicking sgRNAs f

221 of medical school surgery faculty, academic rank, tenure status, and department Chair roles.

222 en the matched groups using a stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.

223 ivariate analyses were performed using a log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards model, respective

224 using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank test and Cox regression.

225 using Kaplan-Meier estimators using the log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regr

226 Survival analysis log-rank test examined associations between aFXa level categ

227 cross-sectional analysis and Wilcoxon signed rank test for longitudinal analyses were used, controlli

228 cally reduced in high-load VerEpC group (log-rank test P = 0.019).

229 ratio 0.57, 90% CI 0.33-0.98; one-sided log-rank test p=0.044).

230 A stratified log-rank test was conducted.

231 The Wilcoxon signed rank test was employed to compute the statistical signif

232 Log-rank test was used for comparisons.

233 The paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for pre- and postsurgical comparisons

234 CT and dual-energy CT, and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for reader confidence.

235 Log Rank test was used to assess the influence of the anaest

236 Stratified log-rank test was used to compare bRFS and overall survival

237 A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to establish significance.

238 Student's t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test were used as appropriate (p < 0.05).

239 alculated and compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test with a value of p < 0.05 considered statistica

240 were compared for time to MA detection (log-rank test) and enlargement rates (time x arm interaction

241 ulted in an 83% (95% CI 38.7-95, p=0.004 log-rank test) reduction in per-exposure acquisition risk af

242 wer risk of infection (P < .0001, by the log-rank test).

243 s similar between the groups (P = 0.465, log-rank test).

244 04; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.18; P<0.001 by the log-rank test).

245 7) in the drug-therapy group (P<0.001 by log-rank test).

246 % (1/72) in the TMP-SMZ group (P < .001; log-rank test).

247 Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox model were used for analysis.

248 The Wilcoxon signed rank test, orthogonal regression, Bland-Altman analysis,

249 above the median had higher event rates (log-rank test, P < .001).

250 ent (68% vs. 24% at 10 years' post-BPVT; log-rank test, p < 0.001).

251 11.0 days [IQR 7.5-18.0], respectively; log-rank test, P = .005).

252 antly shorter in the immediate-GS group (log-rank test, p = 0.04).

253 ng those in the edaravone-edaravone arm (log-rank test, p<0.001).

254 Using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, we compared morbidity (intensive care unit ad

255 (high and low delta) was evaluated with log-rank test.

256 decannulation, compared by means of the log-rank test.

257 compared using matched-pairs Wilcoxon signed rank test.

258 rvival curves were compared by using the log-rank test.

259 d using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test.

260 as assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test.

261 rank sum test and with PFS by using the log-rank test.

262 plan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

263 was determined by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

264 were studied using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test.

265 dels were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

266 te RT-related toxicities was compared by log-rank test.

267 r relative to TERT-high or ALT patients (log-rank test; P < 0.01) independent of current clinical and

268 ased mortality (21.3% vs. 9.6%; p<0.001 [log-rank test]).

269 4-471 min] [p < 0.0001 using Wilcoxon signed rank test]).

270 erall survival (OS) were evaluated using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models to adjust

271 Log-rank tests were performed, and corresponding Kaplan-Meie

272 lumes were compared by using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

273 tient TPR was compared using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

274 ully create these two properties must have a rank that is nearly linear in the number of vertices.

275 uire a known reference ligand and produces a ranking that is insensitive to variations in the concent

276 ure the between-node connection strength and rank the effects of such chain-type pathways, which can

277 computationally efficient and can be used to rank the entirety of genomic locations or to rank a subs

278 a released in THP-1 cells can be an index to rank the inflammatory potential of MeONPs.

279 We propose six strategies to rank the invading cheaters and identify those which most

280 testable MoAs, phenomic profiles accurately ranked the reference compounds (AUC-ROC >= 0.9).

281 18 TCs observed during June-August (JJA) and ranked the second most active summer in the satellite er

282 to fitting subsets of time series data, then ranks the fit of break point combinations using model se

283 distance (the difference in rank) and joint rank (the sum of the ranks).

284 and precision medicine, and thus, automatic ranking to figure out the most informative and discrimin

285 NA aptamer motifs and uses a simple weighted ranking to order the candidate aptamers, all driven with

286 In this study, a recently established hazard ranking tool for alternatives assessment based on in sil

287 At the regional level, there were lower (rank-transformed) centrality values in OCD for volume of

288 possible to conduct statistical analyses of ranked tree shapes and timed ranked tree shapes or ranke

289 cal analyses of ranked tree shapes and timed ranked tree shapes or ranked genealogies.

290 Systems were ranked using a composite model that summarizes individua

291 We identified 27 hits that were ranked using a using an algorithm that we designed for h

292 Defining the best SRD ranking value (threshold) for determining class membersh

293 However, this SRD ranking value is automatically optimized by using a rece

294 n perfect match substructure search, (iv) re-rank virtual screening results to achieve selectivity fo

295 Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank was used to determine the predictive value of (64)C

296 Gene stability ranking was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV

297 Sex, residency graduation year, and academic rank were collected from institutional websites between

298 raction effects in which females who fell in rank were more strongly affected by current social statu

299 The ranks were converted to scores having a normal distribut

300 arge N balance were identified in specific ("ranking") years, and these same fields were assessed in