ライフサイエンスコーパス: rayon

1 rmany, collected by the passive sampler Blue Rayon.

2 ylene-including 52.0 14.0 microfibres-mainly rayon.

3 biological silks and cellulose-based viscose rayon.

4 on swab type, as follows: 71.9% and 75% for rayon, 71.2% for cotton, 81.3% for polyester, and 53.2%

5 ials (31%), followed by polypropylene (15%), rayon (8%) and polyethylene (6%).

6 Thus, neither cotton nor rayon amplifies production of TSST-1 in vitro, and cotto

7 s/kg, and their composition was dominated by rayon and polyester fibers.

8 Three types of swabs, flocked-nylon, rayon, and polyester, were evaluated by 3 extraction met

9 single dry Dacron swab paired with a single rayon Bacti-Swab with liquid Stuart transport medium for

10 ermine whether tampons composed of cotton or rayon differ in their effects on production of TSST-1 in

11 4.2 and 86% of the mutagenicity of the blue rayon extracts and may be byproducts of dye production a

12 parallel using ESwab and Liquid Stuart (LS) rayon fiber wrapped swab collection devices.

13 eight consecutive nasal swabs (four standard rayon, four charcoal-coated rayon), which were processed

14 mented from its long-term use in the viscose rayon industry.

15 ater owing to a higher water affinity of the rayon material and low solid fraction of the high-aspect

16 anostructures were formed on cellulose-based rayon microfibers through selective etching with oxygen

17 MRSA NxG assay with prospectively collected rayon nasal swabs (n = 1,103) and flocked swab (ESwab) n

18 For several years we used rayon or Dacron swabs with liquid transport media for co

19 and specificity of the combined flocked and rayon swab data were 91.8% (95% CI, 87.4 to 94.8%) and 9

20 osal biomass occurs directly from a standard rayon swab mounted on a rotating device and analyzed by

21 A nasopharyngeal rayon swab specimen was collected from each participant

22 ulation evaluated were 11.1% (122/1,103) for rayon swabs and 11.6% (98/846) for flocked swabs.

23 The negative predictive values (NPVs) for rayon swabs and ESwab specimens were 98.9% and 99.1%, re

24 tal fossa, groin, and toe webs with separate rayon swabs and the forehead, upper arm, and thigh with

25 The high background RLU values for the Copan rayon swabs appear to be a direct result of the gamma ir

26 Dacron and rayon swabs are an excellent choice for both PCR and cul

27 For culture, rayon swabs are superior and Dacron polyester swabs are

28 al samples were collected with cytobrush and rayon swabs from 30 women with high-grade cervical preca

29 a pertussis between specimens collected with rayon swabs on an aluminum wire shaft in Amies gel with

30 The number of colonies cultured from rayon swabs or medium was significantly higher than the

31 est yield will be achieved by using standard rayon swabs that are enriched overnight in TSB with inoc

32 The positive predictive value (PPV) for rayon swabs was 78.7%, versus 83.5% for ESwabs.

33 e overall sensitivity and specificity of the rayon swabs were 91.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84

34 ette swabs, we tested multiple lots of Copan rayon swabs with liquid media and determined that the sw

35 that the background RLU values for the Copan rayon swabs with liquid media were higher than the RLU v

36 qualified for use with the GASDT, but Copan rayon swabs with liquid transport media should not be us

37 A, including the use of charcoal rather than rayon swabs, preincubation of swabs in Stuart's medium,

38 y lower than with either calcium alginate or rayon swabs.

39 coal swabs showed no advantage over standard rayon swabs.

40 tion was detected in any PCRs with dacron or rayon swabs.

41 It is plausible that compared to rayon swabs; the most commonly used sampling devices, cy

42 Neither cotton nor rayon tampons consistently increased toxin production, n

43 Calcium alginate, Dacron polyester, or rayon-tipped swabs were inoculated with pneumococci or w

44 With Dacron polyester or rayon-tipped swabs, there was no consistent difference b

45 s (four standard rayon, four charcoal-coated rayon), which were processed by primary plating on MSA,