ライフサイエンスコーパス: reach statistical significance

1 02; p = 0.104), but the associations did not reach statistical significance.

2 her in DSA-positive patients, though did not reach statistical significance.

3 al change in overall QOL and anxiety did not reach statistical significance.

4 e interval, 0.98-1.87) although this did not reach statistical significance.

5 RNFL thickness over time, but these did not reach statistical significance.

6 tric contractions with morphine that did not reach statistical significance.

7 ar incident AF in men 70 to 79 years did not reach statistical significance.

8 Other notable morbidities did not reach statistical significance.

9 provement in perceived sleep quality did not reach statistical significance.

10 asma glucose among the three groups) did not reach statistical significance.

11 re were similar point estimates that did not reach statistical significance.

12 etween CF and non-CF isolates, these did not reach statistical significance.

13 y ICU outcomes and post-ICU outcomes did not reach statistical significance.

14 ) and inferior (P = 0.087) meridians did not reach statistical significance.

15 ment errors than males although this did not reach statistical significance.

16 in the FLX and EE2 groups, but this did not reach statistical significance.

17 bral perfusion pressure 70 group but did not reach statistical significance.

18 n the t(4;14) group, but this number did not reach statistical significance.

19 trial outcome and publication status did not reach statistical significance.

20 hes that rely on the prevalence of events to reach statistical significance.

21 ction in hsCRP, d-8-iso and MMP-9 it did not reach statistical significance.

22 nd a 3.1-month survival benefit that did not reach statistical significance.

23 %, respectively) but the differences did not reach statistical significance.

24 eflecting systemic immune reactivity did not reach statistical significance.

25 ere noted in the Nocturnal Trial but did not reach statistical significance.

26 = 0.25), although these differences did not reach statistical significance.

27 deaths after ODN (4 vs. 0), but this did not reach statistical significance.

28 receptor mirrored those in EGFR, but did not reach statistical significance.

29 ), although these associations did not quite reach statistical significance.

30 BP was also reduced, but this change did not reach statistical significance.

31 l killer cell numbers, although this did not reach statistical significance.

32 rative chemotherapy, the differences did not reach statistical significance.

33 activity was reduced in AD but this did not reach statistical significance.

34 0.38-4.36; p = .67), the difference did not reach statistical significance.

35 ence for eight of the nine questions did not reach statistical significance.

36 fference in OS favored cetuximab but did not reach statistical significance.

37 ith more serious adverse events that did not reach statistical significance.

38 ucing anticonvulsants, although this did not reach statistical significance.

39 between the NoDR and control groups did not reach statistical significance.

40 l LMS, a similar trend was noted but did not reach statistical significance.

41 (ORR) than docetaxel (35%), but this did not reach statistical significance.

42 cific (7%) and overall survival (5%) did not reach statistical significance.

43 he 1G allele, although this relation did not reach statistical significance.

44 regression, but these differences failed to reach statistical significance.

45 ptin level with temporal horn volume did not reach statistical significance.

46 groups in VAS pain scores at 3 days did not reach statistical significance.

47 a expression patterns, although this did not reach statistical significance.

48 However, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

49 men as provided in the current study did not reach statistical significance.

50 for colorectal and prostate cancers did not reach statistical significance.

51 T uptake slightly, but this increase did not reach statistical significance.

52 erences at higher pacing frequencies did not reach statistical significance.

53 iorated this decline but this effect did not reach statistical significance.

54 dnisolone although these differences did not reach statistical significance.

55 e chemotherapy; however, the results did not reach statistical significance.

56 and OA suggested similar trends, but did not reach statistical significance.

57 tween the 3 major MLL rearrangements did not reach statistical significance.

58 ymph nodes, although this difference did not reach statistical significance.

59 anded examiners, but this difference did not reach statistical significance.

60 ts as compared to control subjects failed to reach statistical significance.

61 d PD interaction, though this effect did not reach statistical significance.

62 drosarcoma (P = .026) was the only factor to reach statistical significance.

63 (92% vs 69%, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance.

64 tively, for the two groups, but this did not reach statistical significance.

65 near work was 0.42 +/- 0.26 D, which did not reach statistical significance.

66 in(a) were in the same direction but did not reach statistical significance.

67 oved manual dexterity were noted but did not reach statistical significance.

68 ional VACP, although the differences did not reach statistical significance.

69 than in controls but the differences did not reach statistical significance.

70 component loss with the 7F stimulus did not reach statistical significance.

71 nce in response rates between groups did not reach statistical significance.

72 cts than in the comparison subjects) did not reach statistical significance.

73 response to treatment, although this did not reach statistical significance.

74 The difference did not reach statistical significance.

75 atin had a 22% reduction in GVD that did not reach statistical significance.

76 ied secondary end points reported, 9 did not reach statistical significance.

77 ifference was in favor of F17464 but did not reach statistical significance.

78 CI = 0.95-2.2); however, this result did not reach statistical significance.

79 ared to control, although the latter did not reach statistical significance.

80 SD participants a smaller response failed to reach statistical significance.

81 cy in favour of the active group but did not reach statistical significance.

82 color (OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.51-2.71]) did not reach statistical significance.

83 (P = 0.19) and ETAR (P = 0.32), but did not reach statistical significance.

84 nd year of life lacked precision and did not reach statistical significance.

85 ghtly increased, although the result did not reach statistical significance.

86 yr mutations of 1.3 (0.6-3.1), which did not reach statistical significance.

87 the association in Native Hawaiians did not reach statistical significance.

88 h FLG mutations, but the interaction did not reach statistical significance.

89 isease, although the latter estimate did not reach statistical significance.

90 iew, these correlations remained but did not reach statistical significance.

91 mages, but this difference (of 2.9%) did not reach statistical significance.

92 racial difference between the 2 eras did not reach statistical significance.

93 tion that, despite previous reports, did not reach statistical significance.

94 the tumor edge, although this effect did not reach statistical significance.

95 th control, although this difference did not reach statistical significance.

96 l meta-analyses showed a trend but failed to reach statistical significance.

97 but differences between drug classes did not reach statistical significance.

98 larly elevated, but this association did not reach statistical significance.

99 ventional wines, however differences did not reach statistical significance.

100 predicted in 20 trials, of which 16 did not reach statistical significance.

101 s showed continuous improvement that did not reach statistical significance.

102 d to the F <1 and F > 3 groups did not quite reach statistical significance.

103 tion between AF-alb and child growth did not reach statistical significance.

104 7 animals but the group mean changes did not reach statistical significance.

105 ene copies, only amodiaquine and piperaquine reached statistical significance.

106 Neither cause nor the depression scores reached statistical significance.

107 No other indirect comparison reached statistical significance.

108 d 34 duplications from five loci) would have reached statistical significance.

109 9 deletion CNVs and 11 duplication CNVs that reached statistical significance.

110 controls, age-related deterioration with SAP reached statistical significance.

111 ip of CH and CRF to RNFL thickness no longer reached statistical significance.

112 thmatics and for C. albicans this difference reached statistical significance.

113 sitive xenodiagnosis, but neither difference reached statistical significance.

114 However, neither of these effects reached statistical significance.

115 not estimable) was suggested, neither effect reached statistical significance.

116 but only the likelihood of discharge to home reached statistical significance.

117 pt of biphasic waveform shock, none of which reached statistical significance.

118 dence interval: 0.31, 0.76; p trend = 0.002) reached statistical significance.

119 No other factors reached statistical significance.

120 untreated initial psychosis were weak; none reached statistical significance.

121 pathy and intrinsic connectivity dysfunction reached statistical significance.

122 hs, the reduction in brain atrophy no longer reached statistical significance.

123 and by the type of physical therapy applied reached statistical significance.

124 a genetic risk score combining all NOS1 SNPs reached statistical significance.

125 None of the remaining outcomes reached statistical significance.

126 status, but none of the genetic comparisons reached statistical significance.

127 food intake for 2 h after injection without reaching statistical significance.

128 confirmed by real time RT-PCR, with 5 genes reaching statistical significance.

129 ared with SCS (score: 1-3, P = 0.3), without reaching statistical significance.

130 y was numerically higher with L-DAPT without reaching statistical significance.

131 scular risk factors, which, however, did not reach statistical significance (0.720 to 0.730 for risk

132 tudy arms for this primary end point did not reach statistical significance (-0.13 [95% CI, -0.01 to

133 deaths was noted in the elderly but did not reach statistical significance (13% v 8%; P =.29).

134 on, and depression, with only skin reactions reaching statistical significance (14.4% vs 7.8%; P = .0

135 mpared to the control group in all 7 annuli, reaching statistical significance (36.6% +/- 3.30% vs 33

136 veldt group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (38% Ahmed, 50% Baerveldt

137 isease was higher among siblings but did not reach statistical significance (4.0% vs 2.3%, respective

138 e difference in severe complications did not reach statistical significance (4.5% for LRYGB vs 1% for

139 1) (71%, 67%, and 67%, respectively) did not reach statistical significance (5-year P = 0.09).

140 n in clinically significant symptoms did not reach statistical significance (5.7% vs 22.4%; aRR, 0.33

141 h the clinical periodontal disease failed to reach statistical significance (50% in those with gestat

142 ifference between positive predictive values reached statistical significance (61% and 82%; p = .04).

143 sham at 6 weeks, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (95% CI, -0.7 to 2.4; P =

144 er in patients who received plating and this reached statistical significance (95% CI: 1.38 to 3.23,

145 otein levels increased in the spinal cord to reach statistical significance after 7 days of exercise

146 These differences did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for age,

147 ed with placebo, but the differences did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for mult

148 f processed meat and fasting insulin did not reach statistical significance after correction for mult

149 The difference reached statistical significance after the first month a

150 although the genetic correlations failed to reach statistical significance among PLRS blacks.

151 In addition, potentials for halogens have reached statistical significance and are included also.

152 Overall survival differences did not reach statistical significance, and response rate was no

153 However, only MAb 74.5.2 prophylaxis therapy reached statistical significance, and only sera from ani

154 te rejection at 6 months, but this no longer reached statistical significance, and there was no assoc

155 the association with prehypertension did not reach statistical significance (aOR = 0.72, CI 0.38-1.37

156 ation in favor of thalidomide may eventually reach statistical significance as well.

157 Implant location approached, but did not reach, statistical significance as a risk factor for exp

158 Short LTL reached statistical significance as a determinant of tot

159 s means in the BIC vs non-BIC groups did not reach statistical significance at every month.

160 rventions and indirect interventions did not reach statistical significance at the 0.05 level (OR 0.6

161 formal tests for effect modification did not reach statistical significance at the 95% confidence lev

162 This reached statistical significance at 10-14 mol/L 17beta-e

163 This benefit reached statistical significance at 12 days after random

164 All test statistics reached statistical significance at p < 0.0001.

165 None of the investigated contrasts reached statistical significance at P < 0.05, apart from

166 servative assessment of corneal healing also reached statistical significance at week 8: compared to

167 nterval except 6 months, with the difference reaching statistical significance at 1 week (odds ratio

168 with overall myocardial function, no longer reaching statistical significance at 3 hr.

169 0-min images had a similar trend but did not reach statistical significance (AUC = 0.79 vs. 0.73, P =

170 Neither anti-PSP nor anti-SP1 reached statistical significance because of the small nu

171 ers (P = .03, log-rank test), but it did not reach statistical significance between patients with GD

172 The difference in plasma Hcy concentrations reached statistical significance between the patient and

173 ular conductance during hypoxaemia failed to reach statistical significance both during H1 and during

174 Questionnaire sleep quality ratings did not reach statistical significance, but there were significa

175 ith its own baseline (P = 0.03), but did not reach statistical significance compared with its control

176 nd 10 years, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance compared with those with

177 though differences in neutralization did not reach statistical significance, cross-linked Env spikes

178 thermia, xenon-augmented hypothermia did not reach statistical significance for any measure.

179 rmia, however, combination treatment did not reach statistical significance for any measure.

180 Clinical progression-free survival did not reach statistical significance for either Sr89 or ZA.

181 I, 26.8-33.2; P=0.02), although this did not reach statistical significance for hospital discharge.

182 dex based on arterial blood pressure did not reach statistical significance for predicting outcome me

183 If the difference did not reach statistical significance for superiority, a noninf

184 s in subjects with AAU with axial SpA, which reached statistical significance for 2DS5 (P = 0.025, co

185 BNP beginning with 2-day moving averages and reached statistical significance for 3- and 4-day moving

186 21], p = 0.02), although the difference only reached statistical significance for 50% milk.

187 cted epitopes, although this comparison only reached statistical significance for EBV epitopes.

188 pathway (hsa04020) was the only pathway that reached statistical significance for LAD and LVA in both

189 Superiority of IVIG to placebo reached statistical significance for the primary endpoin

190 er mass revealed that liraglutide's efficacy reached statistical significances for all analyzed param

191 sociated with lower scores on all syndromes, reaching statistical significance for Anxious/Depressed

192 se of emollients compared to uncommon users, reaching statistical significance for some LMW phthalate

193 f therapy in favor of thalidomide (P = .09), reaching statistical significance for the one third of p

194 olitis compared with their matched controls, reaching statistical significance for ulcerative colitis

195 ction in the hazard for death and HF did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95%

196 ad a higher risk of HCC, although it did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio: 2.07; 95%

197 enosis resistance, and flow velocity did not reach statistical significance; however, the diastolic v

198 rted data showed similar results but did not reach statistical significance (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78 t

199 igher with LAAC, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (HR: 1.71; p = 0.080).

200 cannabinoids but these associations did not reach statistical significance in all trials.

201 and >4.00 mm), although differences did not reach statistical significance in any group.

202 The primary end-point did not reach statistical significance in the intention to treat

203 The intervention effect did not reach statistical significance in the intention-to-treat

204 hippurate, and prolyl-hydroxyproline did not reach statistical significance in this cohort.

205 ge (ranging from 1-13%, or r = 0.1-0.36) and reached statistical significance in 90% of the brain reg

206 Differences between the 2 groups reached statistical significance in a clustered analysis

207 pared with a diverse group of LOCM that just reached statistical significance in a meta-analysis (poo

208 m disorders (ASD), and several of these have reached statistical significance in case-control analyse

209 of 18 years, and divorce; most similar risks reached statistical significance in men.

210 e caudate nucleus and nucleus accumbens that reached statistical significance in methamphetamine-depe

211 nd cold ischemia more than or equal to 12 hr reached statistical significance in the combined (OR 1.2

212 All secondary end points reached statistical significance in the ferric citrate g

213 h also caused an increase in cell death that reached statistical significance in two of the four nucl

214 comparison with HFpEF and HFrEF, albeit not reaching statistical significance in fully adjusted anal

215 ly shifted toward a sympathetic predominance reaching statistical significance in the final trimester

216 requent in the active groups of both trials, reaching statistical significance in the trial of conjug

217 by about 35% (although the decrease did not reach statistical significance) in the medial arcuate nu

218 le treatment than for placebo, but failed to reach statistical significance, including improvement in

219 Though only one of these regions has yet reached statistical significance individually, we detect

220 necessarily larger for smaller studies that reach statistical significance, making cross-field compa

221 trials, a pervasive issue in the failure to reach statistical significance may be the initial study

222 e changes in total cholesterol level did not reach statistical significance (mean [SD] level preopera

223 fference in ADC between these groups did not reach statistical significance (mean, 1.42 vs 1.16 x 10(

224 nearly 2-fold, respectively [the latter not reaching statistical significance]), MMP-1 (expressed pr

225 Although differences in needle size did not reach statistical significance, no participant in the 24

226 l ablation group was detected, which did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% co

227 8%; no patient, disease, or treatment factor reached statistical significance on univariate or multiv

228 specimens negative for all drugs, but these reached statistical significance only for individuals co

229 LDL cholesterol reached statistical significance only in the association

230 7; P = 0.029 per C allele), this association reached statistical significance only in the MedDiet int

231 ach cohort was in the positive direction but reached statistical significance only in the women.

232 line receptor (mAChR) increases with age but reaches statistical significance only in patients with d

233 ent among case than control subjects, though reaching statistical significance only in one case.

234 eloping de novo DSA, the DSA results did not reach statistical significance (only 22% of patients wit

235 lysis; however, its predictive value did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.90

236 however, these mortality differences did not reach statistical significance over the entire study per

237 improved in both Bet v 1 COP-treated groups, reaching statistical significance over placebo in the 50

238 r curve, although these improvements did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05).

239 rence between the CP and DMCP groups did not reach statistical significance (P >0.05).

240 ee survival was also improved but it did not reach statistical significance (P = .057).

241 ever, the reduction in invasion area did not reach statistical significance (P = .06).

242 ange in controls, but the comparison did not reach statistical significance (P = .07).

243 ectively; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (P = .12).

244 mortality, although the correlation did not reach statistical significance (P = .18).

245 (95% CI, 80-302) days, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = .20).

246 the room with a loved one during CPR did not reach statistical significance (p = .275) between the tw

247 A similar trend for plasma did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.053).

248 mmon in nonresponders, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.055).

249 e false negative results (5/56) this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.063).

250 with AT1R-Ab >17 U/ml, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07).

251 was also elevated in MpIL12 mice but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.081).

252 ive donors, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.083).

253 red to the healthy/FS - group, which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0898).

254 = 45; 1.92+/-0.60), but this result did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09).

255 ] % for placebo) but the differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11 and 0.24, respe

256 .99 +/- 0.82; n = 17); however, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11).

257 in women, although in men this trend did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.12).

258 histologic analysis, such difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.15).

259 the ODRH group (8% vs. 3%), but it failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.167).

260 s in ERMBT results among groups that did not reach statistical significance (p =.06).

261 without, although these differences did not reach statistical significance (p homogeneity=0.104/0.05

262 eated animals, however these results did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05).

263 l head rotations, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06).

264 stage 3 and 4 tumours (17%) but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06).

265 (relative risk, 0.68), although this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06).

266 tisite LV stimulation, although this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.08).

267 +/-0.9 mm), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.16).

268 ol subjects, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.22).

269 oration in VA in the P group and this effect reached statistical significance (P < 0.05).

270 groups (P = .1) and 100 ms groups, where it reached statistical significance (P = .02).

271 expression and response to FU and leucovorin reached statistical significance (P =.034).

272 e in area 35 and low cROD value in area Te3V reached statistical significance (p<0.05).

273 4)), and PICALM (rs561655, P = 2.2 x 10(-3)) reaching statistical significance (P < .005).

274 rences in IL-12 and IFN-gamma concentrations reaching statistical significance (P < 0.001).

275 bilirubin and direct bilirubin, with 29 SNPs reaching statistical significance (P < 1.84 x 10(-7)).

276 remelimumab expanded TCR repertoire, but not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.057).

277 group (n=6 vs. n=14 in basiliximab arm) just reaching statistical significance (P=0.049); however, a

278 is (15%), and hypertension (14%) but without reaching statistical significance (P=0.12).

279 orphology, exhibiting a trend toward-but not reaching-statistical significance (P = .0627).

280 acebo (n = 148) group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (pasireotide, MP$22,800 v

281 Despite not reaching statistical significance, patients with BRCA-mu

282 These differences did not reach statistical significance (placebo, 7%; 40 microg/k

283 g a positive direction of association and 11 reaching statistical significance; pooled OR from six st

284 low at 0.3 (95% CI 0.04 to 2.20) but did not reach statistical significance possibly due to the relat

285 in the proportions of each ethical principle reached statistical significance (Q = 73.8, P < 0.0001).

286 dentified by external reviewers that did not reach statistical significance (reduction factor, 0.92;

287 1.83, 95% CI 0.84-3.95, P = .13) but did not reach statistical significance; rejection was lower with

288 n relative and absolute terms, which did not reach statistical significance (relative risk 0.83 [95%

289 hite spouses of 10.4% (SE, 1.7%) but did not reach statistical significance (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.5-6.0

290 presence of focal hyperpigmentation, almost reaching statistical significance, showed the strongest

291 Although the relationship did not reach statistical significance, there was a trend toward

292 t the differences in HOAs between the groups reached statistical significance, they were not of patho

293 s, although there was a trend, which did not reach statistical significance, toward small dimensions

294 However, the variants that reach statistical significance typically explain only a

295 se of toxicity, its clinical benefit did not reach statistical significance until year 10.

296 amples (P=0.0014) but the difference did not reach statistical significance when analyzed by patient

297 replication study and focus on findings that reach statistical significance when stage 2 data are con

298 nary reflex vagal bradycardias but this only reached statistical significance when the rats were anes

299 with systemic inflammation but fell short of reaching statistical significance when comparing against

300 to CRT-ON; the comparison with women did not reach statistical significance, which may be because of