コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ociation with good clinical outcome than did recanalization.
2 olumes than patients without reperfusion and recanalization.
3 uation of the aneurysm neck and the aneurysm recanalization.
4 mechanism that may also be critical for this recanalization.
5 operties, and biological activity to prevent recanalization.
6 low, any early recanalization, and degree of recanalization.
7 alization was achieved than in those without recanalization.
8 NIHSS-derived parameter to identify complete recanalization.
9 ssessed for persistent arterial occlusion or recanalization.
10 the development of adjunct treatments beyond recanalization.
11 rom prompt, sustained, and complete coronary recanalization.
12 were classified as complete, partial, or no recanalization.
13 wledge about prognostic factors beyond early recanalization.
14 on at angiography, and achievement of vessel recanalization.
15 catheter-directed thrombolysis prior to IVC recanalization.
16 rsed in humans by prompt thrombolytic vessel recanalization.
17 underwent selective salpingography and tubal recanalization.
18 lloon dilation as part of percutaneous graft recanalization.
19 hes despite microscopic evidence of thrombus recanalization.
20 tients underwent simultaneous fallopian tube recanalization.
21 T, as this decreases the odds of portal vein recanalization.
22 zation compared with those with unsuccessful recanalization.
23 CI: 1.66, 4.81]; P < .001) after successful recanalization.
24 ve cardioprotective strategies adjunctive to recanalization.
25 mmon intervention performed immediately post-recanalization.
26 udies reported rates of complete and partial recanalization.
27 by leading to their dissolution and arterial recanalization.
28 hould be re-examined as adjunct therapies to recanalization.
29 mbus dissolution and subsequent blood vessel recanalization.
30 ducing infarct growth in patients with early recanalization.
31 weight) or matching placebo before coronary recanalization.
32 d partial recanalization, and 6 had complete recanalization.
33 re 90-day mRS score distribution and 24-hour recanalization.
34 nalization, and none of the patients with no recanalization.
35 patients receiving anticoagulation achieved recanalization.
36 n injury after coronary artery occlusion and recanalization.
37 sminogen activator may be a clinical sign of recanalization.
38 lpingography (0.04-0.55 cGy), fallopian tube recanalization (0.2-2.75 cGy), computed tomography of th
39 trated the highest rates of at least partial recanalization (100% and 86%, respectively), whereas cut
41 greater was seen in 4 patients with partial recanalization, 4 patients with complete recanalization,
44 %, P = 0.01), and a lower rate of successful recanalization (65.0% vs. 90.3%, P = 0.014) than the non
46 tic resonance angiography, 3 patients had no recanalization, 8 had partial recanalization, and 6 had
48 The main outcome variables were the rate of recanalization according to the Thrombosis in Cerebral I
49 dicted probabilities to achieve IVT-mediated recanalization affect cost-effectiveness estimates of in
50 ofile can identify good clinical response to recanalization after acute ischemic stroke, but does not
51 loon-assisted coiling within the Analysis of Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of Intracran
55 in blood pressure may be a clinical sign of recanalization after intravenous tissue plasminogen acti
58 tandem ICA and M1 occlusions showed greater recanalization and a trend toward better outcome with en
60 ogic changes, particularly, those related to recanalization and angiotoxicity after endovascular deli
62 with stent-retrievers achieved high rates of recanalization and functional independence at 90 days.
63 before transfer was associated with improved recanalization and functional outcomes without increasin
65 clusion of IVC was successfully treated with recanalization and implantation of a non-covered aortic
66 antial rates of partial or complete arterial recanalization and improved outcomes compared with IV rt
67 Imaging outcomes included rates of vessel recanalization and infarct growth at 24 hours and occurr
68 e found to exist between the success rate of recanalization and initial angiographic lesion location
69 cy parameters are affected by the process of recanalization and its varying clinical significance.
72 early moments of ischemic stroke to achieve recanalization and potential neurologic improvement has
73 of anticoagulant treatment vs no therapy on recanalization and progression of PVT in patients with c
74 receive anticoagulant therapy have increased recanalization and reduced progression of thrombosis, co
78 artery occlusion was treated by endovascular recanalization and stent placement that resulted in impr
81 ole in the dissociation of epicardial artery recanalization and tissue-level reperfusion, referred to
82 entiation)-84 in acute ischemic stroke after recanalization and to dissect the underlying molecular t
83 asurements were repeated 30 and 60 min after recanalization, and (99m)Tc autoradiography (hot spot im
86 ic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), arterial recanalization, and long-term functional outcome in stro
87 ial recanalization, 4 patients with complete recanalization, and none of the patients with no recanal
88 poration of side branches, and posttreatment recanalization, and should be considered a first choice
89 nd vascular imaging, appropriate devices for recanalization, and the concomitant use of intravenous t
90 CTO score helps to predict complexity of CTO recanalization, and the simplicity of the score supports
92 The primary combined end point was complete recanalization as assessed by transcranial Doppler ultra
93 rmacologic regimens that can safely initiate recanalization as early as possible, minimize bleeding,
96 urs even in the subgroup of patients with no recanalization at first angiography (12.9+/-6.5% therapy
97 le cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and early recanalization at MR angiography had higher rates of fav
99 and the remaining 14 underwent rtMRI-guided recanalization attempts in a 1.5-T interventional MRI sy
100 tology, 3 underwent primary x-ray-guided CTO recanalization attempts, and the remaining 14 underwent
102 nt interventions lead to more frequent early recanalization (before cath arrival), which facilitates
105 f 209 consecutive patients who underwent CTO recanalization by a high-volume operator were included.
107 esized that real-time MRI (rtMRI)-guided CTO recanalization can be accomplished in an animal model.
109 flow less than 30% in patients with complete recanalization (CCC, 0.91 [95% confidence interval: 0.83
110 large CTP-derived ICV and successful vessel recanalization compared with those with unsuccessful rec
113 h favorable clinical response, but degree of recanalization did correlate with favorable clinical res
116 that stent retriever devices provide better recanalization efficacy and clinical outcomes than the p
119 exhausted, interventional radiologic venous recanalization for the placement of permanent catheters
120 ysis of baseline variables, and complete MCA recanalization for the prediction of favorable clinical
129 ween intra-procedural BP characteristics and recanalization, hemorrhagic complications and outcome in
130 l Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, lack of recanalization, history of atrial fibrillation, and sICH
131 46 patients treated with urokinase, revealed recanalization in 196 (79.7 percent) and complete dissol
134 ocedural factors associated with outcome and recanalization in endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) of
137 dentified between treatment arms for 24-hour recanalization in proximal occlusions; carotid T- or L-t
138 ed drainage, dilation, stone extraction, and recanalization in the bile ducts or intestine in all 13
140 te occlusion of the lesions was achieved and recanalization in the follow-up period was revealed.
141 mechanical endovascular therapies have shown recanalization in the majority of target vessels and bet
142 ata support further evaluation of poststroke recanalization in the presence of NOX inhibition for lim
147 jury after arterial occlusion and subsequent recanalization may limit the benefit of reperfusion ther
152 n the cICA-PO group, all patients who failed recanalization (n = 15) experienced poor outcomes, as di
153 rred faster (median 10 minutes) than partial recanalization (n=18; median 30 minutes; P=0.0001).
157 ization than in those who did not have early recanalization (odds ratio = 6.2; 95% confidence interva
162 a dearth of safe and effective regimens for recanalization of an occluded cerebrovascular tributary,
163 study sought to determine whether successful recanalization of an occluded vein graft is associated w
164 the absence of extensive baseline ischemia, recanalization of BAO up to 48 hours was seldom futile a
166 nged, low dose, direct urokinase infusion in recanalization of chronically occluded saphenous vein by
170 approaches designed to limit infarct size by recanalization of infarct-related arteries have reduced
172 be the principal mechanisms responsible for recanalization of occluded cerebral capillaries and term
174 lining the vessel lumen, neovascularization, recanalization of organized thrombus, and regions rich i
175 scular treatment results in a higher rate of recanalization of the affected cerebral artery than syst
176 th coronary angiography performed soon after recanalization of the culprit artery, cardiac magnetic r
177 ar thrombi continue to accumulate even after recanalization of the MCA, contributing to postischemic
178 0+/-32 versus 177+/-59 minutes, and complete recanalization of the middle cerebral artery in 19% vers
181 s greater than 3 seconds in patients with no recanalization of the occluded artery (CCC, 0.96 [95% co
186 odified PPT were similarly successful in the recanalization of thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts
188 ith microbubbles who did not have epicardial recanalization, of which 5 had recovery of wall thickeni
189 sociated with high recanalization rates, but recanalization on its own does not predict outcome.
191 Neurologic improvement could result from recanalization or better collateral flow despite persist
195 ntly negative D-dimers in patients with vein recanalization or stable thrombotic burden can identify
196 (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.83-1.76), successful recanalization (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02-1.46), and succ
197 I = 1.21-3.25, p < 0.01), and inter-facility recanalization (OR = 5.64, 95% CI = 2.92-10.89, p < 0.01
203 on 90-day modified Rankin scores, successful recanalization, post-procedural symptomatic hemorrhage (
210 d PV has become obliterated, we developed PV recanalization (PVR)-transjugular intrahepatic portosyst
212 val: 0.67, 1.70]; P = .70); however, 24-hour recanalization rate was higher for endovascular treatmen
213 microbubbles; P=0.03) and higher epicardial recanalization rates (53% versus 7% for prourokinase alo
215 icrobubbles) was associated with both higher recanalization rates and even higher rates of ST-segment
216 to thrombolysis, with a trend toward higher recanalization rates and less reocclusion at 5 to 7 days
219 (sonothrombolysis) and increase angiographic recanalization rates in patients with ST-segment-elevati
221 of a stent retriever is associated with high recanalization rates, but recanalization on its own does
223 o the combined approach as "pharmacoinvasive recanalization" rather than by the conventional term "fa
224 c agents in clinical practice are limited by recanalization, risk of non-target embolization, failure
225 tment, anticoagulant therapy obtained higher recanalization (RR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.66-3.44) and lower t
227 d CT Perfusion (CTp) findings and (ii) early recanalization (spontaneous or following thrombolysis) b
231 justed for age, infarct size before EVT, and recanalization success, average LF gain predicted indepe
232 receiving anticoagulation, the rates of SVT recanalization, SVT progression, recurrent venous thromb
235 g findings at baseline who experienced early recanalization than in those who did not have early reca
237 ts treated with anticoagulants underwent PVT recanalization than patients who did not receive anticoa
240 f cerebral autoregulation (CA) status during recanalization therapies could guide further studies aim
244 pretreatment MRI data on patients undergoing recanalization therapy for acute cerebral ischemia at a
246 y variable that influences the indication of recanalization therapy for treatment of acute brain infa
247 ferences with regard to BP regulation during recanalization therapy for vertebrobasilar and TBA occlu
251 groups were similar in terms of substantial recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia scores
253 cture time, 248 vs 189 minutes; and onset-to-recanalization time, 297 vs 240 minutes; P < .001).
254 of children (neonates excluded) with AIS and recanalization treatment between January 1, 2015, and Ma
255 therectomy are efficient methods of arterial recanalization used in the treatment of acute, subacute
256 I-only patients before PCI, and angiographic recanalization was 48% in high MI/PCI versus 20% in PCI
263 nd better outcomes in those patients in whom recanalization was achieved than in those without recana
283 e stroke severity scores, whereas successful recanalization was the sole predictor of good outcomes.
289 asmin-mediated fibrin degradation and vessel recanalization, which frequently comes at the cost of in
290 = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02-1.46), and successful recanalization with <=2 device passes (OR = 2.28, 95% CI
292 r the recovery of anterograde flow after CTO recanalization with drug-eluting stent implantation affe
293 tus on presentation, increased likelihood of recanalization with endovascular therapy, and better fun
297 spective studies provided data on successful recanalization with widely varying rates (43% to 78% wit
298 anial Doppler augments t-PA-induced arterial recanalization, with a nonsignificant trend toward an in
299 ecurrence of deep venous thrombosis, partial recanalization within affected venous system has been ac