ライフサイエンスコーパス: recollection

1 rength of subsequent episodic memory (during recollection).

2 brain regions are a signature of successful recollection.

3 be faithfully and rapidly reinstated during recollection.

4 so did not influence hippocampal activity or recollection.

5 r perceptual details in the face of impaired recollection.

6 evealed three key properties of constructive recollection.

7 rnally directed thought, for example, memory recollection.

8 d on an increase in item familiarity but not recollection.

9 sted verbal memory based on the mechanism of recollection.

10 the EAS is associated with more rapid memory recollection.

11 ory formation as indicated by enhanced later recollection.

12 possibly reflects a "sensory echo" that aids recollection.

13 l item memory could still be associated with recollection.

14 ese experiences should not be accompanied by recollection.

15 are dynamically reactivated to support vivid recollection.

16 in damage impaired familiarity while sparing recollection.

17 ea that the hippocampus selectively supports recollection.

18 ing) plays a critical role in spatial memory recollection.

19 e hippocampus in mental imagery and episodic recollection.

20 ortex make material-general contributions to recollection.

21 rontal control region, resulting in impaired recollection.

22 campal damage impairs familiarity as well as recollection.

23 or parietal locations activated by conscious recollection.

24 sed risk resulted in greater activity during recollection.

25 t in source monitoring resulting in impaired recollection.

26 refrontal cortex is predictive of subsequent recollection.

27 old/new effects, which are assumed to index recollection.

28 ring scene encoding and increased subsequent recollection.

29 teract to support the quality and content of recollection.

30 m incorporating the subjective experience of recollection.

31 miliarity and indirectly also be involved in recollection.

32 ocampus, PFC, and striatum during successful recollection.

33 e spatial and nonspatial aspects of episodic recollection.

34 the hippocampus was stronger for successful recollection.

35 using a different operational definition of recollection.

36 extended memories, such as autobiographical recollections.

37 ories were accompanied by personal, episodic recollections.

38 ss with which participants experienced their recollections.

39 Canonical neural correlates of recollection [8-10] were also modulated by stimulation.

40 plex forms of human memory, such as episodic recollection, a primary challenge is to develop adequate

41 increases correlated across individuals with recollection accuracy in areas diffusely distributed thr

42 S activity is responsible for the subsequent recollection accuracy of one-shot learned episodic memor

43 The generative nature of recollection allows us to represent and communicate the

44 s with familiarity-based memory and PhC with recollection, an alternative organizing principle is the

45 500 ms after the onset of a cue that prompts recollection and correlates with source memory accuracy.

46 on of VLPFC function led to subtle shifts in recollection and familiarity accuracy.

47 can account for the apparent dissociation of recollection and familiarity along anatomical lines.

48 prediction was based on the assumption that recollection and familiarity are independent or dependen

49 des, there has been intense debate about how recollection and familiarity are organized in the brain.

50 However, the qualitative experiences of recollection and familiarity are typically confounded wi

51 s architecture, the subjective experience of recollection and familiarity arises from the interaction

52 previous findings, these results dissociate recollection and familiarity by selective MTL damage.

53 signal detection analysis that distinguishes recollection and familiarity contributions to recognitio

54 reanalysis of these study results to obtain recollection and familiarity estimates that account for

55 recognition memory tests designed to assess recollection and familiarity for the studied pictures.

56 ntary lines of interpretation to explain how recollection and familiarity in Alzheimer's disease can

57 ing characteristic procedures to investigate recollection and familiarity in schizophrenia.

58 y, this result is predicted by a model where recollection and familiarity make independent contributi

59 icate that the hippocampus supports both the recollection and familiarity processes.

60 Recollection and familiarity were assessed in an object

61 Over 10 months, recollection and familiarity were assessed using an odor

62 s suggest that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.

63 oints out that these studies have confounded recollection and familiarity with strong and weak memori

64 of long-term memory storage, the concepts of recollection and familiarity, and the question of how di

65 be explained through aberrant integration of recollection and familiarity, in keeping with a dysfunct

66 us exclusively supports recollection or both recollection and familiarity--the two latent cognitive p

67 g of false memories or of the development of recollection and familiarity.

68 emory retrieval have focused on processes of recollection and familiarity.

69 memory is thought to rely on two processes: recollection and familiarity.

70 memory can be supported by the processes of recollection and familiarity.

71 ly associated with relatively high levels of recollection and familiarity.

72 nct medial temporal lobe (MTL) substrates of recollection and familiarity.

73 suggest that hippocampal lesions impair both recollection and familiarity.

74 recognition memory can be supported by both recollection and familiarity.

75 complex neurocognitive mechanisms underlying recollection and familiarity.

76 ought to consist of two component processes--recollection and familiarity.

77 judgments are not process-pure indicators of recollection and familiarity.

78 ory is thought to consist of two components: recollection and familiarity.

79 features considered to be characteristic of recollection and familiarity.

80 e brain potentials corresponding to explicit recollection and familiarity.

81 thought to depend on two distinct processes: recollection and familiarity.

82 airs recollection or whether it impairs both recollection and familiarity.

83 n the recognition task, young rats used both recollection and familiarity.

84 of representations and operations underlying recollection and familiarity.

85 ognition memory performance and tracked both recollection and familiarity.

86 patients had the characteristics of episodic recollection and included references to particular place

87 ng-term memories are rapidly replayed during recollection and involve representations that were forme

88 s were recruited indiscriminately for detail recollection and item recognition; in 10- to 11-year-old

89 different and that the hippocampus supports recollection and not familiarity.

90 d particle arrangements, as well as particle recollection and pattern transfer.

91 orty-eight hours later, they were given cued recollection and recognition memory tests designed to as

92 results extend the pattern of impairment in recollection and relative sparing of familiarity observe

93 st, the aged rats showed a selective loss of recollection and relative sparing of familiarity, simila

94 t hippocampal pattern completion to episodic recollection and reveal how oscillatory dynamics in the

95 preted to mean that the hippocampus supports recollection and that the adjacent perirhinal cortex sup

96 has a crucial contribution to the quality of recollection and the subjective experience of rememberin

97 r hippocampal SWRs in triggering spontaneous recollections and orchestrating the reinstatement of cor

98 Humans can recollect past events in details (recollection) and/or know that an object, person, or pla

99 en linked in previous work to the process of recollection, and the findings described here represent

100 iliarity-based recognition in the absence of recollection, and this circumstance (termed the "butcher

101 Reinstatement was evident during both recollection- and familiarity-based judgments, providing

102 lleagues present an integrative model of how recollection- and familiarity-based memories are represe

103 nts with lateral PFC damage were impaired in recollection- and familiarity-based recognition, and the

104 Several brain structures involved in recollection are affected by anesthesia-induced neurodeg

105 Familiarity and recollection are components of recognition memory.

106 te that the mechanisms supporting recall and recollection are linked to accurate neural reactivation

107 The size of the ERP index of recollection associated with correct responses to target

108 terpretation is complicated by the fact that recollection-based decisions are typically associated wi

109 ased memories whenever they are as strong as recollection-based memories.

110 dicted subsequent item memory strength while recollection-based memory (performance on source memory

111 esentation system and an attribution system, recollection-based memory judgements are not based on no

112 cMEC plays a critical and selective role in recollection-based performance, supporting the view that

113 indicating that mPFC damage severely reduced recollection-based performance, while sparing familiarit

114 Recollection-based processes (parietal EM effect) were r

115 Recollection-based recognition is characterized by the r

116 tributed positivity that was associated with recollection-based source memory in both the high- and l

117 rC in familiarity-based item recognition and recollection-based source retrieval, event-related fMRI

118 based item memory, independent of subsequent recollection-based success.

119 p by either or both mechanisms, by comparing recollection before and after sleep.

120 If hippocampal damage selectively impairs recollection but leaves familiarity intact, then patient

121 preted to mean that the hippocampus supports recollection but not familiarity.

122 suggest that the hippocampus is critical for recollection but not familiarity.

123 They also showed impaired recollection but preserved familiarity.

124 ed sensory cortex responses during emotional recollection, but decreased resting-state blood flow in

125 dicate that the hippocampus is essential for recollection, but not for familiarity.

126 More than storytelling, these recollections change how we act in the future and endow

127 ontrast, children appeared to rely mainly on recollection concordant with their conservative decision

128 that unitization affects the manner in which recollection contributes to performance, rather than inc

129 The results revealed an episodic recollection deficit for events encoded out-of-body comp

130 , we found evidence for both familiarity and recollection deficits across studies, suggesting multi-f

131 range is common among theoretical models of recollection, direct evidence supporting this hypothesis

132 The recollection DM effect involved a robust sustained (onse

133 nally arousing stimuli had greater levels of recollection during delayed memory testing compared to t

134 eness heuristic source factor which enhanced recollection during remembering.

135 ition memory tasks assessing familiarity and recollection each using different procedures and a high-

136 e retrieved, words giving rise to successful recollection elicited transient responses in the hippoca

137 We discovered key features of constructive recollection embedded in the rat CA1 ensemble discharge

138 In the Encoding group, MDMA reduced recollection estimates for negative and positive picture

139 The recollection failure was associated with an impaired abi

140 veform associated with later memory based on recollection, familiarity or priming with ERP waveform f

141 nce of multiples sources for familiarity and recollection feelings and the fact that expectations det

142 We indexed strong familiarity and recollection for previously studied words by obtaining c

143 g of emotion can endure beyond the conscious recollection for the events that initially triggered the

144 performance based on an objective measure of recollection for visual details.

145 quantitative difference in memory strength (recollection > familiarity).

146 ge-related deficits in source monitoring and recollection have revealed a selective decline in memory

147 During recollection, high-order visual areas showed pronounced

148 acteristic of episodic retrieval is holistic recollection, i.e., comprehensive recall of the elements

149 h age to support the development of detailed recollection in male and female developing humans.

150 echanistic basis for selective impairment of recollection in normal aging.

151 The fornix and hippocampus are critical to recollection in the healthy human brain.

152 ed during encoding are later replayed during recollection in the human brain.

153 ations during successful versus unsuccessful recollection in three separate experiments, each using a

154 testing scheduled after sleep, responses to recollection increased significantly more in Val/Val ind

155 tissue injury during anesthesia had similar recollection indices as rats that had been anesthetized

156 Recollection involves remembering specific details about

157 Recollection involves retrieving specific contextual det

158 ection versus a feeling of familiarity (when recollection is absent).

159 he hypothesis that the development of detail recollection is also associated with changes in MTL func

160 c information, consistent with the idea that recollection is based on a continuous neural signal.

161 ally used as a compensatory ability, whereas recollection is conceptualized as a therapeutic target f

162 ach to hippocampal recruitment during remote recollection is consistent with its increasingly acknowl

163 Recollection is constructive, the product of memory retr

164 wever, patients with hippocampal lesions, if recollection is impaired, should frequently experience h

165 r, cognitive psychology has established that recollection is not a verbatim replay of stored informat

166 Recollection is recovery of qualitative information abou

167 Contrary to previous conclusions that recollection is selectively impaired in schizophrenia, w

168 Recollection is therefore impaired following MD damage,

169 Recollection is thought to be the hallmark of episodic m

170 Such holistic recollection is thought to require reactivation of brain

171 othesized that anesthesia in infancy impairs recollection later in life in humans and rats.

172 t that general anesthesia in infancy impairs recollection later in life in humans and rats.

173 Thus key features of episodic recollection manifest in rat hippocampal representations

174 However, impaired recollection may underlie persistent age-related source

175 d to be associated with significantly better recollection memory.

176 xpress strong familiarity (in the absence of recollection) more often than controls.

177 esonance imaging (fMRI) has revealed a "core recollection network" (CRN) centered on posterior pariet

178 nectivity with different members of the core recollection network.

179 cessful versus failed recollection-the "core recollection network." In the present study, we investig

180 simple cue can be sufficient to elicit vivid recollection of a past episode.

181 activity reflecting a current stimulus, the recollection of a previous stimulus (cued recall), and t

182 s believed to support episodic memory, vivid recollection of a specific event situated in a particula

183 ections, suggesting that subjects were using recollection of actual-source information to avoid sourc

184 om the vague feeling of familiarity to vivid recollection of associated details.

185 PrC is critical for item familiarity but not recollection of associations between items and their con

186 Network connectivity supported recollection of contextual details based on visual image

187 tation of test items which elicited accurate recollection of contextual details of the prior study ep

188 Recollection of contextual information represents the co

189 ct overall memory accuracy, it did alter the recollection of details associated specifically with emo

190 whether or not they were accompanied by the recollection of details from encoding.

191 tem was encoded and are thought to depend on recollection of details from the study episode.

192 the possibility of decreasing the persistent recollection of distressing memories.

193 A behavioral experiment revealed that recollection of episodic details was diminished in the p

194 gions where neural activity is enhanced when recollection of episodic information is successful.

195 tion can be based on stimulus familiarity or recollection of event details.

196 Reminders of the past can trigger the recollection of events that one would rather forget.

197 erior-medial (HPM) network implicated in the recollection of highly precise contextual and spatial in

198 The results show that the recollection of images depicting faces and scenes is ass

199 cal model based on memory or the storage and recollection of information in the flow field.

200 losing that language and having no conscious recollection of it.

201 nder rigorous investigation, it seems that a recollection of knowledge from the literature can provid

202 atural lifestyle involves the processing and recollection of memories for multiple stimuli [5].

203 ivity in the human hippocampus with holistic recollection of multi-element events based on cues (Horn

204 ong involvement of the human CA3 in holistic recollection of multi-element events via pattern complet

205 results in anterograde amnesia while sparing recollection of old, schema-based memories.

206 how the human hippocampus not only supports recollection of past experiences, but also the construct

207 ts administered with oxytocin showed reduced recollection of previously studied faces and houses.

208 ment is characterized by a selective loss in recollection of previously studied items contrasted with

209 Recognition memory judgments can be based on recollection of qualitative information about an earlier

210 s revealed that visual distraction disrupted recollection of relevant details to a greater degree in

211 We quantitatively evaluated recollection of short audiovisual segments from movies a

212 participants were successful at prioritising recollection of some kinds of information over others.

213 f pattern separated item representations and recollection of source information.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMEN

214 gery, and social cognition contribute to the recollection of specific plays in the mind of a sports f

215 as evidence of successful prioritisation of recollection of target information.

216 ure for 12.6 y, on average, and no conscious recollection of that language.

217 und my pen drifting inexorably to a personal recollection of the metaphorical transcontinental road t

218 , with possible consequences for navigation, recollection of the past, and imagination of the future,

219 nced stimulus is supported by two processes: recollection of the stimulus in the context of other inf

220 a single element can be sufficient to prompt recollection of the whole event.

221 ectly after the walk, were compared with the recollections of controls tested directly after the walk

222 r life-after the prize-and includes personal recollections of how she mentored young scientists and i

223 We studied the narrative recollections of memory-impaired patients with medial te

224 sexes to obtain genealogical information and recollections of raids in which they and their relatives

225 espect to memory for the walk, the narrative recollections of the patients were impoverished compared

226 The recollections of the patients, recorded directly after t

227 s brief essay, I set down some miscellaneous recollections of these meetings and some thoughts about

228 overished compared with C1 but resembled the recollections of volunteers tested after long delays (C2

229 Patients showed poor recollection on all three tasks.

230 whether the hippocampus exclusively supports recollection or both recollection and familiarity--the t

231 which these deficits reflect impairments in recollection or familiarity is less well understood.

232 amage to the hippocampus selectively impairs recollection or whether it impairs both recollection and

233 debate whether the hippocampus supports only recollection or whether it supports both processes.

234 lder adults showed reduced ERP correlates of recollection (parietal old-new effect), as well as a sus

235 rrelates with the accuracy of the integrated recollection performance.

236 object-location memory task that segregated recollection precision from general recollection success

237 asting ( approximately 24 hr) enhancement of recollection precision, without effects on general succe

238 ntinuous familiarity process and a threshold recollection process.

239 hat under some circumstances familiarity and recollection processes activate competing responses.

240 man primates suggests that some animals have recollection processes similar to those of humans.

241 gate the role of the cMEC in familiarity and recollection processes that underlie nonspatial recognit

242 y retrieval processes (i.e., familiarity and recollection processes) interact with motor and control

243 ion memory by acting on both familiarity and recollection processes, as purportedly indexed by the FN

244 ion memory by acting on both familiarity and recollection processes.

245 ons may be dependent on both familiarity and recollection processes.

246 , we characterized quantitatively individual recollection profiles and showed that rats are able to i

247 Their recollections provide a view of the changes that have oc

248 s signal detection model yields estimates of recollection (r) and familiarity (d').

249 rain activation reveals that episodic memory recollection recruits a specific, distributed network of

250 The finding that recollection-related activity in the angular gyrus track

251 Results showed that recollection-related activity in the posterior hippocamp

252 hese regions dissociate according to whether recollection-related activity is transient or sustained

253 ibuted set of regions consistently exhibited recollection-related increases in connectivity with diff

254 vestigated whether these regions demonstrate recollection-related increases not only in activity but

255 are interpreted as support for a continuous, recollection-related neural signal that has been central

256 widely agreed that the hippocampus supports recollection (remembering the episode in which an item w

257 w language was used by the patients in their recollections resembled how language was used by groups

258 ity in response to competing familiarity and recollection retrieval processes is inconsistently repor

259 nesthetized children had significantly lower recollection scores and were impaired at recollecting as

260 nesthetized subjects had significantly lower recollection scores than controls while familiarity was

261 that demonstrated this effect included both recollection-sensitive regions and areas where activity

262 opment and is maintained with aging, whereas recollection shows protracted development and deteriorat

263 Placing rats in a contextually challenging recollection situation at recall reveals the ability for

264 y, fast-acting and relatively automatic, and recollection, slower-acting and more effortful.

265 We can show that recollection-specific theta-alpha (4-13 Hz) effects are

266 ll as whether recognition was accompanied by recollection, strong familiarity, or weak familiarity.

267 e same encoding mechanisms are predictive of recollection success after hours as after a retention in

268 regional activity levels during encoding and recollection success over short time intervals.

269 gions during encoding is predictive of later recollection success.

270 gregated recollection precision from general recollection success.

271 where activity did not vary as a function of recollection success.

272 erent EAS components during performance of a recollection task known to coactivate regions of both ne

273 nts in the current study possibly engendered recollection that augmented remembering "old" words.

274 investigated by contrasting an ERP index of recollection (the left-parietal ERP old/new effect) with

275 While emotion often leads to vivid recollection, the precision of emotional memories can be

276 more active during successful versus failed recollection-the "core recollection network." In the pre

277 ams' in the hippocampus that enable episodic recollection--the re-experiencing or holistic retrieval

278 al gyrus become increasingly specialized for recollection; these changes may be in part responsible f

279 tested the causal role of the HPM network in recollection using network-targeted noninvasive brain st

280 judgments, particularly those accompanied by recollection versus a feeling of familiarity (when recol

281 elements forming an event, allowing holistic recollection via pattern completion of all elements.

282 ment of hippocampal subfield CA3 in holistic recollection via pattern completion.SIGNIFICANCE STATEME

283 behavioral results and found that diminished recollection was associated with the disruption of funct

284 ty resembling the ERP correlate of conscious recollection was found only in the recall task.

285 An MEG index of the process of recollection was larger for Remember than Know judgments

286 ition was correlated with spatial memory and recollection was poorer in aged rats that were also impa

287 s of actual-source activity (suggesting that recollection was taking place), but the relationship bet

288 new effect--an electrophysiological index of recollection--was reliable for words from the drawing ta

289 was substantially less than was predicted if recollection were impaired.

290 Instances in which recognition was based on recollection were removed from all analyses.

291 ons are ordinarily accompanied by successful recollection (when memory is intact).

292 mpal gyrus selectively for subsequent detail recollection, whereas 8- and 10- to 11-year-olds did not

293 on decisions are based disproportionately on recollection, whereas perirhinal activity predicts recog

294 associations that form the basis of episodic recollection, whereas the perirhinal cortex (PRc) suppor

295 king the vividness of participants' reported recollections, whereas distinct unimodal memories were r

296 c nucleus (AN) complex would be critical for recollection while the Mediodorsal nucleus (MD) of the t

297 been suggested that the hippocampus supports recollection, while adjacent cortex supports familiarity

298 e and interchangeable use of familiarity and recollection with a breakdown in the latter at older age

299 This article provides a personal recollection (with all the known faults of self-reportin

300 s determined by online ratings of subjective recollection, would increase subsequent true memories bu