ライフサイエンスコーパス: referral

1 are facility, of whom 864 (82%) accepted the referral.

2 months, and did not require urgent hospital referral.

3 the transplant evaluation within 6 months of referral.

4 18 cervical infection detected at colposcopy referral.

5 ons on the need for further investigation or referral.

6 ge and ALT values in the 12 months following referral.

7 ical guidelines on hospital attendance after referral.

8 respectively, for any diagnosis resulting in referral.

9 ation was associated with increased specimen referral.

10 hin 30 days and 286, more than 30 days after referral.

11 ion (WHO) and Malawi clinical guidelines for referral.

12 nd 9948 life-years lost for a 75% backlog in referrals.

13 ment, with (N=8098) TAVR and (N=14 778) SAVR referrals.

14 ived and 85.2% (n = 413) of provider-derived referrals.

15 s are common among clinical exome sequencing referrals.

16 o avoid genetic misdiagnosis and unnecessary referrals.

17 arm in recovery (52.7% and 55.4%; p = 0.45), referral (19.2% and 20.1%; p = 0.80), defaulter (12.2% a

18 ) concerns about allergic reactions, lack of referrals (33.6%), parents uninterested in early feeding

19 f participants experienced weight gain after referral, 40.8% had weight loss < 5% and 15% had weight

20 lth system performance (including access and referral), 6.1 million (44.9%) of these children will be

21 abetic and hypertensive retinopathy (13.1%), referral (9.7%), sudden vision loss (9.3%), and trauma (

22 Provider referrals accounted for 49.13% (n = 485) and patient-der

23 ted for 49.13% (n = 485) and patient-derived referrals accounted for 50% (n = 493) of appointments.

24 ignificantly less than those with individual referrals (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.43-0

25 admitted in the inpatients within 7 days of referral advice.

26 positively associated with a higher MELD at referral (aHR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p=0.006) and negat

27 ds of people with HIV infection on cART in a referral AIDS center in Salvador, Brazil.

28 rticipation in WM was 24/632 (3.8%) prior to referral and 67/632 (10.6%) after referral and increased

29 ed age, sex, duration of diabetes, source of referral and best-corrected visual acuity, diabetic reti

30 LT were evaluated in the 12-months following referral and compared to changes 12-months prior.

31 0.37), with no differences in secondary (PR referral and completion) or safety (readmissions and dea

32 dicaid Services process and requirements for referral and coverage of SET and provides guidance on ho

33 Variability and lack of transparency in referral and evaluation allows for gatekeeping, threaten

34 in transplant access exists, but barriers to referral and evaluation are underexplored due to lack of

35 wed through February 2018 and linked data to referral and evaluation data from nine transplant center

36 ) prior to referral and 67/632 (10.6%) after referral and increased among patients who attended NAFLD

37 nephropathy, would also lead to subspecialty referral and inform renal management.

38 Median time between isolate referral and initial genomic and epidemiological assessm

39 ecision in this model may lead to a tool for referral and LC diagnostic decision-making.

40 The source of referral and the location of domicile did not significan

41 female controls were recruited by physician referral and word of mouth, respectively.

42 s a gender different from male), via network referral and word-of-mouth in Cape Town, East London, an

43 ely proportional to the rate of MIS, patient referral and/or providing tailored training to older sur

44 for identifying underserved regions for PCG referrals and evaluation.

45 Hospital referrals and outpatient episodes with referral decision

46 medical care, frequent monitoring and rapid referral, and essential living and social engagement).

47 nd 6632 life-years lost for a 50% backlog of referrals, and 542 additional lives and 9948 life-years

48 vices may lead to a reduction in unnecessary referrals, and earlier referrals in those who go on to d

49 center without financial incentives for self-referral are infrequent, cannot be anticipated, and resu

50 Parental concerns and lack of referrals are major identifiable barriers.

51 ls on a national basis, suggesting selective referral as a mechanism to improve the value of surgical

52 ovide reassurance when appropriate, and make referrals as necessary.

53 livered SBIRT and tailored alcohol treatment referrals as part of the standard of care.

54 Case reports and referral-based studies suggest spontaneous coronary arte

55 ct with IOP reduction was lower than in past referral-based studies.

56 screening at nonstudy hospitals, and 6 from referrals because of clinical symptoms).

57 atient, home treatment team and crisis house referrals between 2010 and 2014.

58 ly from tertiary care centers, with risk for referral bias toward patients with worse outcomes.

59 ted population of Western New York HIV/AIDS, Referral Center at Erie County Medical Center (ECMC), 14

60 PWID aged >=18 years admitted to a tertiary referral center between 01/2016 and 07/2019, who receive

61 al clinic appointment in a tertiary eye care referral center between November 2016 and July 2018 were

62 We conducted a 10-year cohort study in a referral center by collecting all pregnant women who dia

63 than 10 years with ROP seen at our tertiary referral center from 2000 through 2018, 5 (3.6%) demonst

64 n and serial TST, between 1998 and 2004 at a referral center in Brazil.

65 ase and 445 matched controls from a tertiary referral center in the U.K.

66 etrospective analysis from a single tertiary referral center of all patients older than 18 years old

67 8-80 years), diagnosed at the Celiac Disease Referral Center of our University Hospital (Bologna, Ita

68 diatric patient visits presenting to a major referral center were analyzed to train and validate the

69 and 2018, patients with NSTI at a quaternary referral center were followed up for the outcomes of dea

70 fore uncomplicated triple DMEK at a tertiary referral center were included.

71 rdiomyopathy from 2003 to 2019 at a tertiary referral center were reviewed retrospectively.

72 with active TB SLC seen at a single tertiary referral center with 6 months follow-up after initiation

73 um of Pulmonary Hypertension Identified at a Referral Center) MRI database.

74 and 2017 in a cohort of PLWH in a Dutch HIV referral center.

75 id nodules in pediatric patients in a single referral center.

76 Setting: Single-center study at an academic referral center.

77 pril 2019 at a single tertiary ophthalmology referral center.

78 t subsequent surgical repair at a university referral center.

79 6 and October 2018 at a single ophthalmology referral center.

80 , 52 years; range, 9-79 years) in a tertiary referral center.

81 hort study was conducted in a Dutch tertiary referral center.

82 ctive cohort included diagnosed with MC at a referral center.

83 of patients followed up at our tertiary IBD referral Center.

84 with unexplained heart failure at a tertiary referral center.

85 oxygenation from 2012 to 2018 at a tertiary referral center.

86 ullary adenocarcinoma in 9 European tertiary referral centers between February 2006 and December 2017

87 nd, randomized clinical trial conducted at 5 referral centers for catheter ablation of atrial fibrill

88 ly during the COVID-19 emergency was sent to referral centers for hepato-bilio-pancreatic, colorectal

89 ence for severe acute chest syndrome in four referral centers in France.

90 venom as well as idiopathic anaphylaxis from referral centers in Italy, Slovenia, and the United Stat

91 anada, teaching hospitals are mainly cardiac referral centers that are potentially well suited toward

92 and LLS for CRLMs in 9 European high-volume referral centers was performed.

93 nfected necrosis, but should be performed at referral centers with the necessary endoscopic expertise

94 osed with nePVAC were identified at 4 retina referral centers worldwide.

95 typing with adequate technology available at referral centers, is mandatory to confirm AL amyloidosis

96 ults were similar to those of other tertiary referral centers, it would be reasonable to perform furt

97 ing and currently performed only in tertiary referral centers, represents the bottleneck in the work-

98 omes of PRRT in esthesioneuroblastoma from 2 referral centers.

99 were retrospectively analyzed at 2 tertiary referral centers.

100 using one of two PDT regimens at a tertiary referral centre in an Asian population.

101 d Dec 31, 2012, at 37 collaborating tertiary referral centres across 18 European countries of the Eur

102 for all health-care settings, from tertiary referral centres in high-income countries to resource li

103 Patients recruited from primary referral centres were compared with those seen at higher

104 or definite sCJD identified at national CJD referral centres) with a two-stage study design using ge

105 tions of VE/VCO2 in a single-center dyspneic referral cohort (MGH-ExS [Massachusetts General Hospital

106 The referral cohort consisted of a total of 22 876 referrals

107 with DCM and 26% of cases in the diagnostic referral cohort enriched in familial and early-onset DCM

108 r ALS in the 2014-2017 period (n=321), and a referral cohort recruited at the Turin ALS centre and at

109 4.3%, population-based cohort) and 19 (9.3%, referral cohort) were reclassified as ALSbi or ALSci.

110 -65 years from a primary care facility and a referral colposcopy clinic in Cape Town, South Africa.

111 ics was associated with an increased odds of referral compared with standard care.

112 nts presenting with microbial keratitis at a referral cornea clinic in South India.

113 s' complex care needs at the time of hospice referral could complicate transitions to hospice, stretc

114 System (USRDS) data with transplant-program referral data from the Southeastern United States betwee

115 identified TTNtvs were obtained from a large referral database of clinical exome sequencing (Baylor G

116 outcome was the median total wait-time from referral date to either SAVR or TAVR procedure.

117 pital referrals and outpatient episodes with referral decision indications were associated with morta

118 g predictors with FOBTs has shown to improve referral decisions and accuracy.

119 abases could be used to complement screening referral decisions by identifying those at greatest risk

120 ld be used to inform more accurate screening referral decisions.

121 Damage was associated with referral delay.

122 haracteristics (e.g., age, sex, comorbidity, referral), disease severity (e.g., triage level, fever d

123 r and step were used to estimate the odds of referral due to fundus photography findings compared wit

124 ndus photography (9.3% vs. 3.3%), and urgent referrals due to fundus photography (1.8% vs. 1.1%).

125 ography findings (11.3% vs. 4.4%), nonurgent referrals due to fundus photography (9.3% vs. 3.3%), and

126 re, the RFP group had a higher proportion of referrals due to fundus photography findings (11.3% vs.

127 ear of diagnosis, and time from diagnosis to referral ensured individual-level linkage between severa

128 and LASIK in either eye at a single tertiary referral eye center.

129 Five cases from 2 different tertiary referral eye centers and 3 different surgeons were revie

130 oid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy from 9 referral eye centers in India, the United States, Austra

131 econdary or tertiary hospital and their main referral facilities.

132 ally between sites (from 5.9% in the central referral facility in Sierra Leone to 85% in Uganda Centr

133 Guideline-based referral for ASA and SM leads to excellent outcomes with

134 consensus meetings were reviewed in terms of referral for assessment, biopsy rates, cancer detection,

135 tyle modification to promote weight loss and referral for bariatric surgery as indicated for manageme

136 ion with acute neurologic manifestations and referral for brain MRI.

137 s ONH appearance worrisome enough to justify referral for comprehensive examination) by 43 graders.

138 Primary care referral for diagnostic investigations and appropriate i

139 Current clinical guidelines for referral for genetic testing failed to identify 6 (26%)

140 d lactate dehydrogenase) when predicting the referral for intrapleural fibrinolysis or thoracic surge

141 We examined referral for kidney transplantation evaluation and start

142 h progression of SCR and may be criteria for referral for retinal examination.

143 the suboptimal figure in mitral VHD and late referral for valvular interventions suggest the need to

144 ferral cohort consisted of a total of 22 876 referrals for aortic valve replacement, with (N=8098) TA

145 udies of inflammatory bowel disease cohorts, referrals for difficult polypectomy, polyp sizes larger

146 Referrals for emergent cardiothoracic surgery were rare

147 rvational study, we prospectively identified referrals for kidney transplant in adult patients betwee

148 w-up eye care recommendations while reducing referrals for patients with low-risk features.

149 ing the identified screening tools to prompt referrals for services and/or more detailed assessments.

150 Timely referrals for transplantation and left ventricular assis

151 onal data on early transplant steps, such as referral, for a more comprehensive assessment of transpl

152 Referral from primary care to physical therapy for recen

153 n Southwest Virginia featuring bidirectional referrals from and to comprehensive harm reduction (CHR)

154 One of the most common referrals from TECS has been for glaucoma, and this stud

155 ne-associated anterior uveitis in a tertiary referral glaucoma clinic presenting between 2015 and 201

156 that would otherwise have been missed by WHO referral guidelines alone.

157 Additionally, we summarize the referral guidelines for imaging of PPGL patients with or

158 ons; however, the benefit of local selective referral has not been studied.

159 , non-Hispanic patients had a higher rate of referral (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22; 95% confidence interv

160 rgone cardiac MRI at a single large tertiary referral hospital between March 2008 and January 2019 we

161 nts newly diagnosed with NSCLC in a tertiary referral hospital from January 2011 to December 2014 wer

162 nal (VR) diseases presenting at the national referral hospital in Bhutan.

163 oss-sectional study, conducted at a national referral hospital in Kampala, Uganda, was to determine d

164 ere treated in the emergency department of a referral hospital in Kozhikode, India, in May 2018.

165 al between October, 2016 and June, 2018 at a referral hospital in southwestern Uganda.

166 regular RLT is provided only at the national referral hospital in Thimphu, and periodically in the ea

167 neurologic intensive care unit of a regional referral hospital over a 3-year period were prospectivel

168 - 8.4 years old; 22 females) from a tertiary referral hospital were included.

169 isodes in 344 adult patients of our tertiary referral hospital were retrospectively investigated (200

170 , aged 0-5 years, admitted to Jinja Regional Referral Hospital with acute episodes of SA (hemoglobin

171 January 2009 to December 2013 at a tertiary referral hospital, who had available serum ionized calci

172 clinic of the Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital.

173 Setting: Single tertiary referral hospital.

174 ive cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital.

175 e years at the national and the two regional referral hospitals (RRHs).

176 surveillance data recorded routinely at four referral hospitals covering two complete years between D

177 We collected data from 54 referral hospitals in 27 counties.

178 (MNM), and the quality of obstetric care in referral hospitals in Kenya.

179 secutive biopsied patients from two tertiary referral hospitals in the Netherlands and Canada.

180 rategy may be entertained at non-PCI capable referral hospitals or in specific situations where prima

181 lowed to the end points of electrophysiology referrals, ICD implantations, and all-cause mortality.

182 s in England, with lower rates of specialist referral in people from more-deprived backgrounds.

183 uction in unnecessary referrals, and earlier referrals in those who go on to develop ESRD.

184 domized controlled trial (RCT) at a tertiary referral institution.

185 enrolled between 2001 and 2013 in two French referral institutions (N = 734; median follow-up 89 mont

186 ety-two eyes of 120 subjects from 2 academic referral institutions were enrolled.

187 o assess the proportion of primary-level and referral-level facilities in each country with the capac

188 tric surgery, long travel distances, delayed referrals, limited access to healthy foods, difficulties

189 nd four surrounding local subdistricts, with referrals made as needed for refraction (glasses measure

190 tre cohort study performed in five Brazilian referral maternity hospitals and enrolling nulliparous w

191 was conducted as a pilot study at a tertiary referral medical center.

192 spirit, we discuss an Opt-Out for Transplant Referral Model as a compelling solution to improve equit

193 h PAALD had been delivered before hepatology referral, mostly by cesarean section.

194 racy of 98.8% in diagnosing dystonia, with a referral of 3.5% of cases due to diagnostic uncertainty.

195 to control before strategy 2, and (4) direct referral of all to LSM.

196 Diagnosis, staging, and appropriate referral of CKD by primary care clinicians are important

197 The median time from CHiP referral of HIV-positive individuals to ART initiation w

198 including universal home-based HIV testing, referral of HIV-positive individuals to government HIV c

199 Practically, referral of patients should be done within small geograp

200 tomy or suspicion of biliary injury; and (2) referral of patients with confirmed or suspected BDI to

201 or specialist review, and reduce unnecessary referral of patients with mild disease.

202 lmologists in the management and appropriate referral of these patients.

203 s could potentially be improved by selective referral of these procedures to experienced operators wo

204 ifying cancer biomarkers could allow earlier referral of women with altered results for deeper clinic

205 y detection, initial treatment, and hospital referral of women with hypertension.

206 ary surgical revascularization, and targeted referral of younger patients for multiarterial revascula

207 life-years lost as a result of a backlog of referrals of 25%, 361 additional lives and 6632 life-yea

208 ent, improved care coordination, and earlier referral on disadvantaged communities, including women w

209 os of lockdown-accumulated backlog in cancer referrals on cancer survival, and the impact on survival

210 January 2013 and December 2016 in a tertiary referral oncology center.

211 arget (more total patients, prenatal care by referral only, a larger proportion of prenatal patients

212 companying person, place of screening before referral or whether they came by themselves for testing.

213 d not improve posthospitalization PR uptake, referral, or completion.

214 ing motivational interviewing counseling and referral out for alcohol treatment (SBIRT-only), or (2)

215 or cancer diagnoses made via the 2-week-wait referral pathway in 2013-16 from the Cancer Waiting Time

216 a cost-effective intervention when different referral pathways are used according to the prevalence o

217 Rigorous referral pathways for molecular tests may result in sign

218 d patients who were on screening and routine referral pathways to urgent and emergency pathways that

219 w specificity of discharge codes, changes in referral patterns, and improvements in human immunodefic

220 files and future hospitalizations/death in a referral population, highlighting the prognostic importa

221 rom 49 patients in a community-based retinal referral practice with diabetes, glaucoma, and normal co

222 erse males and females over age 30 seen in a referral practice.

223 As a major regional referral program, we used the framework of our well-esta

224 egrated community case management (iCCM) WHO referral protocol and 3 (23%) and 4 (31%) of the 13 HC d

225 Malawi IMCI referral protocol, which differs from WHO protocol at th

226 Cost effectiveness at 12 months; 4) Surgical referral rate at 12 months; 5) Complication rate; 6) Loc

227 The overall referral rate for suspicious nodules was 2.1%.

228 to 58.82% but at the expense of an increased referral rate.

229 seful due to a low sensitivity and increased referral rate.

230 Specialist referral rates also increased from 3.8 (95% CI 3.7-3.9)

231 accepted both insurance types, direct-to-ED referral rates for private and Medicaid patients were 27

232 ecessary, and assess its projected impact on referral rates to secondary care renal services.

233 possibly reflecting age-specific cytogenetic referral reasons.

234 Adherence to referral recommendations was recorded and compared with

235 A sample is obtained by chain-referral recruitment in a network of contacts within the

236 r the hospital bed capacity of each Hospital Referral Region (HRR) in the US to estimate the deficit

237 ized colon resection ratio for each hospital referral region (HRR).

238 0.72], respectively), and varied by hospital referral region and Census Division (range: 18.6% [East

239 henotypes each year by state and by hospital referral region to identify hot spots.

240 We defined catchment areas (transplant referral regions [TRRs]) from transplant center care pat

241 be spreading heterogeneously across hospital referral regions.

242 eterogeneously distributed across healthcare referral regions.

243 re is a limited body of literature exploring referral relationships between general dental practition

244 A 2-month delay in 2-week-wait investigatory referrals results in an estimated loss of between 0.0 an

245 s to assess trends in medications for OUD by referral source.

246 Early referral strategies and timely management of metabolic r

247 ia can help guide treatment, monitoring, and referral strategies.

248 d that there is no evidence that the current referral threshold of 5.5 cm should be changed.

249 ng of the primary screening rate, increasing referral to 90%, rescreening the general population ever

250 the outpatient setting in health centres for referral to a hospital for appropriate management.

251 ICE ADVICE 4: Participation in a registry or referral to a pancreas Center of Excellence should be pu

252 Eleven children required referral to a specialist unit outside Scotland.

253 Patient referral to a transplant facility, a prerequisite for di

254 immediate need for antibiotic therapy, when referral to an allergist is not feasible.

255 ance, self-injectable epinephrine education, referral to an allergist, and be educated about threshol

256 Veteran referral to civilian hospitals should weigh the benefit

257 s: (i) teledermatology, including triage for referral to dermatologists; (ii) augmenting clinical ass

258 ted in the participating PHCCs, and adequate referral to dietitians.

259 coring was used to account for nonrandomized referral to early revascularization (90 days of PET).

260 ed the differential effects of the time from referral to evaluation on pre and post-transplant mortal

261 e <=90 days after diagnosis (EAPC, 0.52%) or referral to HIV prevention services (EAPC, 0.98%).

262 ons, and in-hospital deaths and low rates of referral to hospice as well as shorter hospice length of

263 ts for closer clinical monitoring or earlier referral to intestinal transplantation centers.

264 ation group had a shorter adjusted time from referral to listing by 29.5 days (95% CI -50.4, -8.5, p<

265 LSM if the test was positive, whereas direct referral to LSM is highly cost-effective in high-prevale

266 For high-prevalence populations, direct referral to LSM was highly cost-effective (accuracy 93%,

267 e no significant group differences regarding referral to MRI (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.13, 2.38; p = 0.42) an

268 are management for acute sciatica, including referral to physical therapy.

269 PWID but not linkage to HIV medical care or referral to prevention services.

270 ning, violence awareness, self-efficacy, and referral to social supports.

271 oma procedures, number of patients requiring referral to specialist centres and interest in the devel

272 Treatment as usual involved referral to substance use treatment services.

273 vidualised decisions regarding, for example, referral to tertiary care, frequency and intensity of mo

274 Survivors with impairments may require referral to trained specialists to learn to accommodate

275 29.5 days (95% CI -50.4, -8.5, p<0.006), and referral to transplantation by 115.1 days (95% CI -179.5

276 delivered Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), including motivational in

277 90% of the 2018 population by 2030, with 80% referral to treatment, was projected to lead to 13.8 mil

278 ology consultation for VCTE >= 8 kPa and (4) referral to weight management (WM).

279 ng Refugees-and smoking and, if appropriate, referral to weight management and smoking cessation serv

280 opportunity for postremission counseling and referrals to fertility specialists.

281 ne clinics, and is a common source cause for referrals to gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons

282 43 813) of 8 risk assessment tools to guide referrals to genetic counseling demonstrated moderate to

283 Secondary outcomes included patient-reported referrals to physiotherapy, magnetic resonance imaging (

284 Its introduction into primary care for referrals to secondary care renal services may lead to a

285 years have seen an almost sevenfold rise in referrals to specialist memory clinics.

286 Using referral-to-diagnosis conversion rates and COVID-19 case

287 Referral, unable readings, and positive predictive value

288 utpatient's Hepatobiliary clinic at tertiary referral university hospital in Jakarta.

289 confirmation who were treated at a tertiary referral, university-based academic practice.

290 f fundus photography findings and urgency of referral (urgently in <= 2 weeks vs. nonurgently in > 2

291 Transplant referral varied more than three-fold between provinces,

292 survival per referred patient due to delayed referral versus risk of death from nosocomial infection

293 During the COVID-19 lockdown, referrals via the 2-week-wait urgent pathway for suspect

294 tivariable analyses, factors associated with referral vs evaluation start among those referred at any

295 Mean weight change following referral was - 0.69 kg (SD 6.58 kg) among patients witho

296 x hazard model, evaluation within 30 days of referral was associated with a significantly lower pre-t

297 Referral was associated with increased enrollment in WM,

298 This increase in referral was mostly due to nonurgent posterior segment d

299 Rates of direct emergency department (ED) referral were compared between insurance types.

300 Specialist referrals were greatest in the over 50s and lowest in pe

301 ere nearly 9 times more likely to have an ED referral when triaged by a clinician (OR 8.72, 95% CI 6.