ライフサイエンスコーパス: refractive

1 Ocular and refractive abnormalities present on initial screening we

2 Suggestions for target refractive aims in each stage of keratoconus are given.

3 MO target site would result in a Morpholino-refractive allele thus suppressing true MO phenotypes wh

4 Refractive amblyopia was found in 780 children (1.0% of

5 onditions is achieved by exploiting both the refractive and absorptive properties of X-ray photons.

6 BICAT-NL study will provide more insight in refractive and cost-effectiveness outcomes for ISBCS com

7 rt the experimental realization of polariton refractive and meta-optics in the mid-infrared by exploi

8 lop hybrid nanostructures incorporating both refractive and plasmonic optics, by creating SiO(2) nano

9 ctive real-world study evaluated the visual, refractive and safety outcomes of a monofocal lens 1 yea

10 The study was performed to evaluate the refractive and visual outcome of patients with misaligne

11 We sought to evaluate the visual, refractive, and biomicroscopic findings pre- and posttre

12 The slit lamp, refractive, and visual findings and the management of th

13 latter has therapeutic potential beyond the refractive aspect and has already proven helpful in case

14 t spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive astigmatism (RA), endothelial cell density, i

15 ly higher frequency of <0.25 diopters (D) of refractive astigmatism at 12 months (82.5%; 95% CI, 75.0

16 Refractive astigmatism following suture removal (all vis

17 s was compared with the actual postoperative refractive astigmatism to give the prediction error.

18 ivalent was -4.72 +/- 3.32 diopters (D), and refractive astigmatism was 3.69 +/- 3.09 D.

19 tor calculation, the predicted postoperative refractive astigmatism was calculated for each formula.

20 ts were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive astigmatism, and endothelial cell loss (ECL)

21 Subjective refractive, corneal tomography, and specular microscopy

22 raction is the gold-standard for prescribing refractive correction, but its accuracy is limited by pa

23 Compared to their refractive counterparts, metalenses offer reduced size a

24 cycloplegic examination if they met specific refractive criteria for myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism,

25 manifest refraction, and vector analysis of refractive cylinder are presented for the 307 eyes treat

26 rical equivalent (MSE) of up to -11.50 D and refractive cylinder of up to -3.00 D.

27 The refractive cylinder reduced from -1.53+/-0.70 D at basel

28 Slight undercorrection of refractive cylinder requires further attention.

29 The mean correction ratio of refractive cylinder was 0.96+/-0.16 and a slight underco

30 high myopia were defined based on right eye refractive data.

31 nal, non-genetic heritable effects influence refractive development, using grandparental prenatal smo

32 Red light induced a hyperopic shift in mouse refractive development.

33 echnologies is a compact, in-line, low cost, refractive device that could dynamically tune optical ab

34 eficiency (25,155 to 19,187), undercorrected refractive disorders (2,286 to 2,040), cataract (1,846 t

35 agmus (14%), amblyopia (24%) and uncorrected refractive error (62%).

36 were the mean spherical equivalent (MSE) of refractive error (dioptres), axial length (AXL; mm), and

37 Refractive error (myopia or hyperopia) was significantly

38 From the total students diagnosed to have refractive error (n = 92), myopia constituted 83/92 (90.

39 (odds ratio 1.230, P = .021) and uncorrected refractive error (odds ratio 0.834, P = .032) according

40 ine in measures of binocular CDVA (P = .89), refractive error (P = .36), binocular eye alignment (P =

41 Refractive error alone accounted for 68.9% of childhood

42 stently reported strong associations between refractive error and AMD are likely to be the result of

43 the assumption that the relationship between refractive error and AMD risk is linear.

44 However, the negative association between refractive error and an increase in height was only pres

45 Refractive error and binocular vision assessment, integr

46 We sought to determine the association of refractive error and its associated determinants (axial

47 Accurate estimation of refractive error and ocular alignment is critical for id

48 association of height, weight, and BMI with refractive error and ocular biometric measures at age 15

49 To explore a potential relationship with refractive error and ocular structure we performed a lif

50 a new abnormality, most commonly significant refractive error and strabismus.

51 These results may enable the prediction of refractive error and the development of personalized myo

52 assumption of a linear relationship between refractive error and the risk of AMD, myopia and hyperop

53 ing the 126 genetic variants associated with refractive error as instrumental variables, under the as

54 One refractive error currently attracting significant scient

55 genetic and environmental factors related to refractive error development.

56 indicating that it is the commonest type of refractive error found amongst secondary school students

57 th sex, type of healthcare insurance, or the refractive error in the treated or fellow eye.

58 Our results suggest that refractive error is genetically heterogeneous, driven by

59 hree students were identified to have myopic refractive error making the prevalence of 6.5% (95% CI:

60 children (71%) were eligible for cycloplegic refractive error measurements.

61 es were from females, 74% were myopic with a refractive error of +3.00 to -17.00 diopters (spherical

62 presentation of 35.2 (14.2) years, and mean refractive error of -1.6 diopters.

63 alysis was used to assess the causal role of refractive error on AMD risk, using the 126 genetic vari

64 pia, ocular disease, or spherical equivalent refractive error outside of -3.00 to +8.00 diopters.

65 of ocular structures and the development of refractive error over the life-course is required, parti

66 Cases of uncorrected refractive error remained the major cause for presenting

67 Uncorrected refractive error remains a significant cause of impaired

68 Uncorrected refractive error remains the major causes of visual impa

69 ome-wide association meta-analysis (GWAS) of refractive error reported shared genetics with anthropom

70 The actual postoperative refractive error was -0.30+0.47x6 (95% LCL, -2.36+1.31x3

71 Specifically, 1 D more hyperopic refractive error was associated with an odds ratio (OR)

72 Refractive error was calculated as sphere plus half nega

73 Refractive error was found significantly associated with

74 months from standard fundus photographs, and refractive error was measured annually during the 6.5 ye

75 l image size (RIS) on the measurement of RA, refractive error was separately corrected with (i) trial

76 were female; mean [SD] spherical equivalent refractive error, -2.39 [1.00] D).

77 ing examination were strabismus, significant refractive error, and eyelid abnormalities (including ec

78 visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity, refractive error, and wavefront aberrometry.

79 spectively reviewed with regard to symptoms, refractive error, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of

80 llowed by post-VR testing of binocular CDVA, refractive error, binocular eye alignment (strabismus),

81 Refractive error, especially myopia, is the most common

82 Astigmatism (>=1 D) was the most common refractive error, in 13 (40%) and 14 (47%) subjects, res

83 igher systolic blood pressure, more negative refractive error, lower IOPcc and lower corneal hysteres

84 .7 million cases of cataract, 2.3 million of refractive error, over 250,000 cases of glaucoma, and 11

85 ess was additionally associated with age and refractive error, while ELM-ISOS was additionally associ

86 patients with PPG and 67 eyes of 67 age- and refractive error-matched controls.

87 so involved in the development of myopia and refractive error.

88 correct for the spherical equivalent of the refractive error.

89 was attributable to cataract and uncorrected refractive error.

90 red noise-on mean spherical equivalent (MSE) refractive error.

91 AMD was caused by a 1-diopter (D) change in refractive error.

92 ified 336 novel genetic loci associated with refractive error.

93 ns exchange was successful in correcting the refractive error.

94 associated with age, smoking status, SBP and refractive error; and ISOS-RPE was additionally associat

95 monstrated its effects on the post-operative refractive errors (RE) one month after cataract surgery.

96 ditional insight on the proportion of common refractive errors and their association with race/ethnic

97 Uncorrected refractive errors are the second leading cause of worldw

98 Uncorrected refractive errors contribute enormously to the burden of

99 Refractive errors did not change across the decade (line

100 Correction of refractive errors in the students remained a challenge.

101 %) was the commonest VR disease, followed by refractive errors referred for retinal evaluation (16.7%

102 Mean refractive errors were hyperopic for all age groups but

103 We found most of the amblyogenic refractive errors were underdiagnosed in rural school ch

104 This review defines refractive errors, describes their prevalence, and prese

105 Refractive errors, in particular myopia, are a leading c

106 Ophthalmologic findings such as refractive errors, strabismus, and fundus abnormalities

107 After correcting for refractive errors, the model can only reach healthy perf

108 improves visual acuity and reduces residual refractive errors.

109 igher among those with VI due to uncorrected refractive errors.

110 mpliance with spectacle use in children with refractive errors.

111 rative and 6 months postoperative visual and refractive evaluation (efficacy, safety, predictability,

112 of them, 48 (39.67%) ICRSs were removed for refractive failure and 26 (21.49%) in the setting of a k

113 he main cause of explantation was functional refractive failure followed by spontaneous extrusion of

114 When no refractive history is available, the True K [No History]

115 Knowledge of the refractive history significantly improves the accuracy o

116 Of the methods that do not require refractive history, the True K [No History] and unadjust

117 iangle light scattering (MALS), differential refractive index (dRI), and differential viscometer (dVi

118 This label-free sensor measures refractive index (RI) changes within the waveguide layer

119 Gas sensing based on bulk refractive index (RI) changes, has been a challenging ta

120 ary (50 mum i.d., 80 mum o.d.) combined with refractive index (RI) detection using backscatter interf

121 ored in real-time by measuring the change in refractive index (RI) in the evanescent layer.

122 Determination of size and refractive index (RI) of dispersed unlabeled subwaveleng

123 d in a double cladding fiber with a W-shaped refractive index (RI) profile.

124 ed when light passes through an interface of refractive index (RI)-mismatched substances (i.e., a dis

125 hanges in both polymer thickness and polymer refractive index (RI).

126 is to minimise the impact of changes of the refractive index along an optical path.

127 , TNF-alpha promoted specific changes to the refractive index and cell morphology of individual cells

128 r writing approach for achieving the desired refractive index and optical phase profiles through impr

129 ibit distinctive responses to the changes of refractive index and temperature, which enables simultan

130 The dynamic range and linearity of the refractive index are comparable to the peak-wavelength s

131 cs, suggests that these changes in the local refractive index are determined by the degree of molecul

132 n caused by lens thickening and changing its refractive index as a result of allergic or idiosyncrati

133 ly, it has been proposed that time dependent refractive index associated with laser-produced nonlinea

134 concentration of each wine component to the refractive index can be of value for the estimation of f

135 equence of the optically induced unity-order refractive index change in a sub-picosecond time scale.

136 anced chromatic color changes in response to refractive index changes and small molecule surface atta

137 metals respond to ultrafast excitation with refractive index changes on femtosecond time scales, typ

138 ion of the nearby surface plasmon, this high refractive index coating creates an effective matching o

139 oil and a lensing effect created by a higher refractive index compared to surrounding tissue.

140 the bandgap in diamond crystals appears at a refractive index contrast of about 2, which means that a

141 arge-to-light conversion of unity(10), their refractive index contrast reduces the observable fractio

142 ces created by acoustic waves that result in refractive index contrasts.

143 to the thickness variation of the plate, the refractive index decreases radially from the centre to t

144 ined by the micro- and nano-structure of the refractive index distribution of the sensing devices.

145 brafish lens shows evidence of a gradient of refractive index from the earliest stages measured and i

146 icon dioxide (SiO(2)) having low and tunable refractive index has been chosen as the dielectric layer

147 l, tartaric acid and glucose/fructose on the refractive index in model aqueous solutions and in dry w

148 cidence between periods of rapid increase in refractive index in the lens nucleus and increased expre

149 lyzed to yield precise information about the refractive index in which the emitters are embedded, the

150 We report a method where the refractive index increments of an iron storage protein,

151 The refractive index is a basic optical property of material

152 of organic and biological layers, since its refractive index is very similar to that of these materi

153 The nature of a gradient refractive index lens, however, renders accurate measure

154 The SLL is a graded refractive index lens, which is realized by using a vari

155 ves color purity without the need for either refractive index matching or the inclusion of a broadban

156 bubble, where light travels from the higher refractive index material outside a bubble to the lower

157 Moreover, HAMLs can be fabricated in low-refractive index materials using multi-photon lithograph

158 rtunities for photonic devices based on high refractive index materials.

159 ts near-field emission couples to the higher refractive index medium (n(2) >n(1)) and becomes propaga

160 ring from collagen fibrils in the dermis and refractive index mismatch owing to the presence of diffe

161 rial resulting in accumulation of stress and refractive index modification, and the rearrangement of

162 arency at lambda = 0.4-8 um and an optimized refractive index n = 2.39.

163 hiocarbonate and carbonate units exhibited a refractive index of 1.501 with an enhanced Abbe number a

164 video microscopy to measure the diameter and refractive index of individual probe spheres as they flo

165 ce of these same MDLs with the change in the refractive index of the constitutive material.

166 exploit a giant modulation of the effective refractive index of the gate dielectric.

167 The refractive index of white dry wines samples was also mea

168 d by molecular specific changes in the local refractive index probed by the evanescent field of the g

169 esult of the modification of the interfacial refractive index profile by surface adsorption processes

170 cated optics of the lens and its gradient of refractive index provide the superior optical quality th

171 t up to 19.63 nm/refractive index unit for a refractive index range from 1.3329 up to 1.37649.

172 is achieved thanks to the exceptionally high refractive index ranging between 7 and 8 throughout the

173 hips showed a detectable depth of 600 nm and refractive index resolution of ~5 x 10(-5) refractive in

174 and the total solute concentration from the refractive index retrieved from WGM analysis of the stim

175 vity to inert gases (Ar, N(2)), presenting a refractive index sensitivity (RIS) to bulk RI changes of

176 ght cage related to absorption spectroscopy, refractive index sensitivity, and dye diffusion was expe

177 and back-side plasmon modes by using a lower refractive index substrate in order to blue-shift the ba

178 By coating one object with a low-refractive index thin film, we show that the Casimir int

179 their metastatic potential, we show that 3D refractive index tomograms can capture subtle morphologi

180 d refractive index resolution of ~5 x 10(-5) refractive index unit (RIU) by using a self-referenced t

181 Our Au TNPs, NRs, and SNPs display refractive index unit (RIU) sensitivities of 318, 225, a

182 ensitivity of the biosensor ((420 +/- 83) nm/refractive index unit (RIU)), which is comparable to sen

183 0.75 nm/refractive index unit up to 19.63 nm/refractive index unit for a refractive index range from

184 r exhibited a sensitivity range from 0.75 nm/refractive index unit up to 19.63 nm/refractive index un

185 ions with a detection limit of 1.04 x 10(-5) refractive index units.

186 ng of these components were prepared and the refractive index was measured at 20 degrees C and each c

187 tion were characterized for moisture, color, refractive index, fatty acid composition and antioxidant

188 was found to have the greatest effect on the refractive index, followed by tartaric acid and glycerol

189 The air-like refractive index, n, of an aerogel substrate provides an

190 ons on planar, fiber optic, evanescent wave, refractive index, surface plasmon resonance and holograp

191 absorptiometry, reflectometry, luminescence, refractive index, surface plasmon resonance, photonic cr

192 tion is always accompanied by changes of the refractive index, the refractive indices of substrate an

193 alytes natively lacking chemical signatures, refractive index-based measurements are appealing as a m

194 eated glass fiber pads due to changes in the refractive index.

195 sensor capable of detecting bulk changes in refractive index.

196 ured with the composite method used the mean refractive index.

197 ngth Bessel lightsheet method, optimized for refractive-index matching with clarified specimens to ov

198 lly, we show that, by using lossless, higher-refractive-index materials like silicon, focusing effici

199 angles when light travels from low- to high-refractive-index media.

200 By carefully engineering a refractive-index profile across the device, we are able

201 ght interacts with a material exhibiting two refractive indexes separated by a boundary in time.

202 In this research work, viscosities and refractive indices (the physico-chemical properties) for

203 Polymeric materials possessing both high refractive indices and high Abbe numbers are much in dem

204 The segmented-AL method used individual refractive indices for each ocular medium.

205 be inversely designed from the corresponding refractive indices in order to manipulate the target wav

206 However, inhomogeneous refractive indices inside cells and tissues distort the

207 Furthermore, the local refractive indices may be tuned by altering the size, sh

208 nied by changes of the refractive index, the refractive indices of substrate and layer can substantia

209 For these solutions, the experimental refractive indices were fitted using a semi-empirical eq

210 racterized by layers with spatially changing refractive indices, have recently been investigated as p

211 ured by PSI can be highly sensitive to their refractive indices, PSI is successfully demonstrated to

212 study of emmetropic presbyopes who underwent refractive lens exchange (RLE) followed by an implantati

213 AEs and significant loss of CDVA in elective refractive lens exchange surgery was low.

214 y-one subjects underwent cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange with bilateral implantation of

215 we show improvements in image quality using refractive lenses that show significantly improved contr

216 ext, we use microfocusing optics by compound refractive lenses to probe the diffraction signal of the

217 s is less than 100 times those of comparable refractive lenses.

218 Hybrid refractive-metasurface devices, with nondispersive refra

219 We demonstrate rewritable waveguides, refractive optical elements such as lenses, prisms, and

220 In refractive optics, chromatic dispersion is a significant

221 al of biometry results that do not match the refractive or clinical picture and ask for it to be repe

222 at biometry still is not in keeping with the refractive or clinical picture.

223 The intended and postoperative refractive outcome and differences between these were an

224 The postoperative refractive outcome at 6 months, mean error, and mean abs

225 ecially for high cylinder power IOLs, better refractive outcome can be seen when performing a back-ca

226 ndpoint is the proportion of patients with a refractive outcome in the second eye within 1.0 dioptre

227 The refractive outcome of cataract surgery is influenced by

228 Refractive outcome showed a reduction of residual sphere

229 of the formulas and compared with the actual refractive outcome to give the prediction error.

230 The mean intended refractive outcome was -0.12+0.12x2 (95% lower confidenc

231 tive refraction and calculation of predicted refractive outcome with 5 different IOL formulas.

232 To compare the visual and refractive outcomes after myopic LASEK using three diffe

233 trial suggest that SMILE produced promising refractive outcomes in terms of predictability, efficacy

234 To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond laser assisted catara

235 ll normal IOL formulas resulted in hyperopic refractive outcomes that worsened as the corneal power i

236 Prediction of refractive outcomes was evaluated with a review of IOL c

237 were refraction-matched, and both visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated at 1 and 7 days and 1

238 Good to excellent long-term visual and refractive outcomes, and a low rate of complications in

239 Secondary outcomes were refractive outcomes, that is, efficacy and safety at 3 a

240 n calculating lens power leads to acceptable refractive outcomes.

241 yses, and retrospective analysis of surgical refractive outcomes.

242 S often lack information on safety regarding refractive outcomes.

243 and (3) Does IA improve refractive outcomes?

244 arge cohort study shows age- and sex-related refractive parameters among myopic and hyperopic patient

245 Analysis of demographic and refractive parameters of myopic and hyperopic patients w

246 ta: 0.32; P < .001), higher anterior corneal refractive power (B: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.18; beta: 0.0

247 = .461, control group); Delta total corneal refractive power +/- SD 0.60 +/- 0.83 D (P = .001, FECD

248 The cornea provides the largest refractive power for the human visual system.

249 The postoperative change of refractive power will lead to a customized fine-tuning t

250 The refractive prediction error (PE) was calculated as the d

251 d 29% to 87.5% of eyes, respectively, showed refractive prediction errors within +/-0.5 diopter (D);

252 ging Myopes-EMYO) as optimal to characterise refractive progression and two classes to characterise A

253 ic character of the lens because of its high refractive properties.

254 d visual acuity and undilated noncycloplegic refractive screening using an autorefractor on 93,097 ch

255 est spectacle-corrected VA (BSCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), endothelial cell

256 The mean +/- SD refractive spherical equivalent was -4.72 +/- 3.32 diopt

257 oups showed no difference regarding UDVA and refractive stability, and no signs of keratectasia.

258 hort biofeedback training independent of the refractive state.

259 Refractive states and ocular dimensions were compared at

260 l structure differs as a function of age and refractive status in children.

261 picamide were used to obtain the cycloplegic refractive status of each participant.

262 henopia in an unselected population and that refractive status per se was not a major contributor to

263 ficant differences between groups 1 and 2 in refractive status, axial length, or Cardiff acuity.

264 uctural differences as a function of age and refractive status.

265 cs were not related to age, axial length, or refractive status.

266 ing and Randomization: Two masked cornea and refractive surgeons of different training backgrounds in

267 udies that compared SMILE with other corneal refractive surgeries on adult myopia patients and evalua

268 OCE may prove useful for clinical diagnosis, refractive surgeries, and treatment monitoring.

269 CST on evaluating corneal biomechanics after refractive surgeries.

270 nticule extraction (SMILE) and other corneal refractive surgeries.

271 The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) postrefractive IOL calculator

272 es: normal, keratoconus (KC), and history of refractive surgery (RS).

273 er calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery and (2) evaluate the outcomes of tori

274 Setting: Private refractive surgery clinics.

275 ion errors in routine cataract surgery after refractive surgery for myopic correction.

276 Refractive surgery has evolved beyond laser refractive t

277 rs altered in corneas that develop haze post refractive surgery have been described, but pre-existing

278 The average indemnity for incorrect refractive surgery measurement was $123 125, that for in

279 es accounted for 10 cases (7.00%), incorrect refractive surgery measurements accounted for 6 cases (4

280 Laser refractive surgery procedures (such as laser in-situ ker

281 sks performed on corneal topography, such as refractive surgery screening.

282 Furthermore, to avoid possible refractive surgery that could produce ectasias.

283 With advancing age, refractive surgery was performed for lower magnitudes of

284 ric IOLs in eyes both with and without prior refractive surgery when the BUII and Hill-RBF, Barrett t

285 ain and predict trends in patients attending refractive surgery.

286 surgery in eyes that have undergone corneal refractive surgery.

287 accurate in eyes that have undergone corneal refractive surgery.

288 historical data acquired before the corneal refractive surgery.

289 among myopic and hyperopic patients seeking refractive surgery.

290 f presbyopia, the so-called last frontier in refractive surgery.

291 intraocular lens implantation and result in refractive surprise following cataract surgery.

292 We present a unique cause of refractive surprise in a patient undergoing cataract sur

293 peratively the patient had a + 14.00 dioptre refractive surprise.

294 o enhance measurements and IOL calculations, refractive surprises still occur.

295 hema (UGH) syndrome, IOL opacifications, and refractive surprises.

296 cases were within +/-0.5 diopters (D) of the refractive target, and 93% of FLACS and 92% of PCS cases

297 Refractive surgery has evolved beyond laser refractive techniques over the past decade.

298 ors, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is refractive to standard chemotherapy.

299 The only refractive, topographic, or biomechanical abnormality as

300 ter discontinuation or change to alternative refractive treatment.