コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 accurate in eyes that have undergone corneal refractive surgery.
2 lation when using the Gaussian formula after refractive surgery.
3 rgoing cataract extraction following corneal refractive surgery.
4 r some IOLs are better suited for subsequent refractive surgery.
5 ntifibrotic therapy on corneal healing after refractive surgery.
6 on safety and quality of vision after laser refractive surgery.
7 s the US Navy has made to the field of laser refractive surgery.
8 historical data acquired before the corneal refractive surgery.
9 stability and to assess complications after refractive surgery.
10 niques, outcomes, and complications of laser refractive surgery.
11 trends of mitomycin-C application in corneal refractive surgery.
12 e to offer expanding options for intraocular refractive surgery.
13 has emerged as a true and recognized form of refractive surgery.
14 on the market for the practitioner to use in refractive surgery.
15 re and power were designed before the era of refractive surgery.
16 ns for the development of corneal models for refractive surgery.
17 f allergic conjunctivitis and pain following refractive surgery.
18 lens fitting, diagnosis of keratoconus, and refractive surgery.
19 e refractive accuracy in patients with prior refractive surgery.
20 them to corneal diseases and to outcomes of refractive surgery.
21 n eyes with and without a history of corneal refractive surgery.
22 ly larger percentage of patients for corneal refractive surgery.
23 t surgery in the setting of previous corneal refractive surgery.
24 vex tonometer (CT) 1 year after myopic laser refractive surgery.
25 scarring, post-corneal transplant, and post-refractive surgery.
26 l and ocular disorders at baseline and after refractive surgery.
27 the pupil center) using TransPRK as corneal refractive surgery.
28 the pathogenesis of corneal neuralgia after refractive surgery.
29 subjects with corneal ectasia after previous refractive surgery.
30 the treatment of corneal ectasia after laser refractive surgery.
31 included in the 2012 PPP Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery.
32 among myopic and hyperopic patients seeking refractive surgery.
33 sequent degradation in quality of life after refractive surgery.
34 Army soldiers (n = 143) who opted for refractive surgery.
35 op chronic ocular surface inflammation after refractive surgery.
36 regarding ocular surface disease and corneal refractive surgery.
37 w more patients to be candidates for corneal refractive surgery.
38 f presbyopia, the so-called last frontier in refractive surgery.
39 a modified vergence formula obtained before refractive surgery.
40 worldwide have undergone some form of kerato-refractive surgery.
41 ery in eyes that have undergone prior kerato-refractive surgery.
42 ain and predict trends in patients attending refractive surgery.
43 corneal fibrosis, a frequent complication of refractive surgery.
44 surgery in eyes that have undergone corneal refractive surgery.
45 tial risk factors in all patients undergoing refractive surgery.
46 that strabismus and diplopia can occur after refractive surgery.
47 st importance in today's modern cataract and refractive surgery.
48 management in ophthalmic surgeries including refractive surgery.
49 ents for training ophthalmology residents in refractive surgery.
50 ss measurements before and after cataract or refractive surgery.
51 ucity of literature on residency training in refractive surgery.
52 CST on evaluating corneal biomechanics after refractive surgeries.
53 nticule extraction (SMILE) and other corneal refractive surgeries.
54 attention due to the increased acceptance of refractive surgeries.
55 tients with positive family history prior to refractive surgeries.
56 patients undergoing DSEK may require further refractive surgeries.
57 timal timing and outcomes of these secondary refractive surgeries.
58 with neurodevelopmental disorders undergoing refractive surgery (6 for pre-/postsurgical assessment a
61 age of the patient may affect the outcome of refractive surgery after multifocal IOL implantation.
62 ialty days, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, American Glaucoma Society, American
63 essential for better explaining outcomes of refractive surgeries and their undesired consequences.
64 er calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery and (2) evaluate the outcomes of tori
66 w, we go over the past history of incisional refractive surgery and also report the current uses and
68 technology has already dramatically changed refractive surgery and is poised to do the same for cata
69 night corneal reshaping is an alternative to refractive surgery and must continue to be studied and m
70 earch on training ophthalmology residents in refractive surgery and offer an approach to incorporatin
71 ticle summarizes current recommendations for refractive surgery and outcomes in ametropic children wh
73 aract surgery has expanded into the realm of refractive surgery and there is a new emphasis on patien
74 dict the response to incisional and ablative refractive surgery and will also affect the formulas use
76 al nerve damage produced by aging, diabetes, refractive surgeries, and viral or bacterial infections
77 cataract surgery, 90 participants with laser refractive surgery, and 134 participants who refused to
78 ry on patients who have had previous corneal refractive surgery, and in these patients intraocular le
81 and wavefront-optimized (WFO) platforms for refractive surgery are designed for improved visual outc
83 cataract surgery, sutureless vitrectomy, and refractive surgery are now reported with regularity in t
84 wavefront refraction and good results after refractive surgery--are attained in eyes with diffractiv
86 The purpose of this article is to review refractive surgery as a means of treatment for strabismu
87 of the cornea altered candidacy for corneal refractive surgery, as well as choice of surgery, in a s
88 d literature on ocular surface changes after refractive surgery, as well as the outcomes of treatment
90 hammas, and American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) average formulas (P < .001).
91 such as the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) calculator have become effici
93 y (AAO) and American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) presented a joint position pa
96 is the most commonly performed procedure in refractive surgery, but new technologies have become ava
97 5kt Myopia and Astigmatism Topography-guided Refractive Surgery by Contoura Method Versus Customized
98 s might help in the surgical decision before refractive surgery by providing a good sensitivity in de
105 tients with myopia and/or astigmatism, forty refractive surgery candidates who visited Farabi Eye Hos
107 aiding in the correction of complex corneal refractive surgery cases.This preview algorithm aims to
108 subspecialty of Cornea, External Disease and Refractive Surgery (CEDRS) was one of the first to join
111 candidates who visited Farabi Eye Hospital's refractive surgery clinic from May to August 2022 were e
114 ts undergoing cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery continues to be a challenging and com
117 a history of glaucoma surgery or medication, refractive surgery, corneal edema, or corneal dystrophy,
118 D is achieved in only 70% of eyes with post-refractive surgery corneas, and (2) astigmatism accuracy
119 and offer an approach to incorporating laser refractive surgery curriculum in residency education.
120 t progressive KCN (5 studies) and post-laser refractive surgery ectasia (1 study), with a mean postop
121 ducing the progression of KCN and post-laser refractive surgery ectasia in most treated patients with
123 egistry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO) and the Malaysian National
125 The data emerging from the survey show that refractive surgery experience is fundamental to the educ
128 h performing modern cataract surgery in post-refractive surgery eyes is technically no more complicat
129 Overall, these studies concluded that cornea/refractive surgery fellows achieve similar postoperative
133 ains a formidable challenge, developments in refractive surgery for naturally occurring ametropias di
135 article reviews the literature on pediatric refractive surgery from 1995 to 2003 and discusses the p
143 several years that the success of hyperopic refractive surgery has begun to approach the efficacy of
145 ea of research for many years, the advent of refractive surgery has stimulated research into the regu
147 rs altered in corneas that develop haze post refractive surgery have been described, but pre-existing
149 cular lens power determination after corneal refractive surgery, highlighting sources of errors and p
150 known uses of in-vivo confocal microscopy in refractive surgery, highlighting the current development
152 omes of phakic intraocular lenses over other refractive surgeries in patients with moderate and high
154 There are still indications for incisional refractive surgery in cataract and post-surgical patient
155 tional study is needed to define the role of refractive surgery in children and in the treatment of a
156 t populations would help address the role of refractive surgery in children and its potential impact
159 ature regarding indications and outcomes for refractive surgery in children, including laser in-situ
161 entially unsatisfactory results with corneal refractive surgery in higher ranges of refractive errors
162 udy included eligible patients who underwent refractive surgery in one or both eyes with Eyecryl tori
176 terior corneal surface (keratoconus, corneal refractive surgery) is well-documented in the literature
180 Current practices of MMC application during refractive surgeries may increase the potential for long
181 ngs from included studies suggest that laser refractive surgery may address amblyogenic refractive er
184 es accounted for 10 cases (7.00%), incorrect refractive surgery measurements accounted for 6 cases (4
189 tion, cataract surgery case series following refractive surgery, new corneal topography technologies
191 article will discuss recent developments in refractive surgery, ocular surgery and various miscellan
192 udies that compared SMILE with other corneal refractive surgeries on adult myopia patients and evalua
193 ropia.(1,2) We aimed to assess the impact of refractive surgery on social functioning and vision-spec
194 sterior chamber phakic lenses that provide a refractive surgery option for those with high myopia or
197 al scarring, whether caused by trauma, laser refractive surgery, or infection, remains a significant
198 a diagnosis of glaucoma suspect or glaucoma, refractive surgery, or presence of corneal abnormalities
199 searchers, to easily and efficiently analyze refractive surgery outcomes using the standardized metho
207 usual case of epithelial ingrowth post-LASIK refractive surgery presenting as a corneal cyst which wa
208 es to be the most commonly performed corneal refractive surgery procedure in the United States Air Fo
210 at times and concentrations commonly used in refractive surgery produces cross-linking of corneal end
211 of the intraocular lens power after corneal refractive surgery, resulting in improved visual outcome
214 ant to cataract surgery outcomes and corneal refractive surgery returned 1169 and 162 relevant citati
219 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Topography-guided laser refractive surgery seeks to correct vision by altering t
220 rtain populations of pediatric patients with refractive surgery shows promise but requires further st
221 evaluating the safety and efficacy of laser refractive surgery since 1993 and will continue to do so
222 Patients with keratoconus (85%) and post-refractive surgery status (100%) exhibited best visual i
223 However, development of non-excimer based refractive surgery such as thermal techniques provides a
225 nge in corneal refractive power due to laser refractive surgery than other currently available clinic
227 n regarding cataract, intraocular lenses and refractive surgery that goes beyond the measurement of v
228 corneal ablation is an exciting frontier in refractive surgery that incorporates wavefront technolog
229 itting methods that are most effective after refractive surgery that results in high refractive error
231 with cataract, cataract surgery, or previous refractive surgery, the eye with the larger absolute sph
232 ould be performed at least 6 months prior to refractive surgery to allow for any potential corneal as
236 raocular lens (IOL) power in eyes with prior refractive surgery undergoing cataract surgery at the Lo
240 /- 9.7 years and a history of myopic corneal refractive surgery were implanted with the LAL during ca
241 ric IOLs in eyes both with and without prior refractive surgery when the BUII and Hill-RBF, Barrett t
243 40 years old, without history of cataract or refractive surgery, who underwent auto-refraction measur
244 Thorough evaluation of ongoing advances in refractive surgery will help ensure that our airmen cont
246 It serves as an alternative to laser-based refractive surgery with essentially no intraoperative or
248 iduals reported persistent ocular pain after refractive surgery, with several preoperative and periop