戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  1.2 +/- 7.6% vs. 19 +/- 13%, p < 0.0001 for regurgitant fraction).
2 ume; r = 0.90, SEE = 0.07 cm, p < 0.0001 for regurgitant fraction).
3 lysis times, net forward volumes (NFVs), and regurgitant fractions.
4 etermining pulmonary regurgitant volumes and regurgitant fractions.
5  also used to obtain regurgitant volumes and regurgitant fractions.
6 regurgitation (odds ratio per unit of mitral regurgitant fraction, 1.05; P = .001) and reduced left v
7 ted leaflet closure and mild-to-moderate MR (regurgitant fraction, 25.2+/-2.8%).
8                                              Regurgitant fraction 30%, regurgitant volume 35 mL and r
9 tricle-to-left atrial shunt implanted in 12 (regurgitant fraction, 30%).
10 ume, 62+/-45 mL and r=.80 (P<.0001); and for regurgitant fraction, 45+/-17% and r=.78 (P<.0001).
11 re at 90 days corrected the volume overload (regurgitant fraction 6 +/- 5% versus 27 +/- 16% for late
12 gnitude of the regurgitant flow volume/beat, regurgitant fraction and instantaneous regurgitant flow
13  demonstrated the strong prognostic value of regurgitant fraction and left ventricular adverse remode
14 th SG and Uni-Graft groups having the lowest regurgitant fractions and anticommissural plication havi
15 ctors (including global longitudinal strain, regurgitant fraction, and myocardial extracellular volum
16  mL, 50%, and 40 mm2 for regurgitant volume, regurgitant fraction, and orifice, respectively.
17 nd C statistics) was performed, with HDR and regurgitant fraction as independent predictors.
18 er, ICC >= 0.99) and strong to excellent for regurgitant fraction assessment (intraobserver, ICC >= 0
19  more precisely using simplified measures of regurgitant fraction based on Doppler and color flow ima
20                      Regurgitant volumes and regurgitant fractions by the new method agreed well with
21       As a result of these measurements, the regurgitant fractions derived by the 3D method agreed we
22 t flow rates, regurgitant stroke volumes and regurgitant fractions determined using mitral and aortic
23 is feasible, significantly reduces pulmonary regurgitant fraction, facilitates right ventricular volu
24 volume from 40 +/- 20 ml to 24 +/- 17 ml and regurgitant fraction from 40 +/- 12% to 25 +/- 14% (both
25 h high accuracy: 85% of the 39 subjects with regurgitant fraction &gt;33% progressed to surgery (mostly
26  to quantitate aortic regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction in a chronic animal model with surg
27                                    Pulmonary regurgitant fraction increased from 32.8+/-15% to 49.6+/
28                            Over time, aortic regurgitant fraction increased slightly but significantl
29 s) in comparison with 8% of 74 subjects with regurgitant fraction &lt;/= 33% (P<0.0001); the area under
30        A similar separation was observed for regurgitant fraction &lt;/=40% and >40%.
31 t pulmonary regurgitation (less than mild or regurgitant fraction &lt;10% on magnetic resonance imaging
32 ith LVESVi of 45 mL/m2 or greater and aortic regurgitant fraction of 32% or greater, the latter addin
33 esholds were regurgitant volume of 47 mL and regurgitant fraction of 43%, indexed LV end-systolic (iL
34 rial shunt implanted, consistently producing regurgitant fractions of approximately 30%.
35 ble right ventricular function and pulmonary regurgitant fraction, on exercise stress test the 22q11.
36 t late gadolinium enhancement (P = .884) and regurgitant fraction (P = .727) were the most important
37                   Both CMR-derived tricuspid regurgitant fraction (per 5% increase) and right ventric
38                In animals with PI, pulmonary regurgitant fraction progressed more in the presence of
39 8), but the combination of this measure with regurgitant fraction provided the best discriminatory po
40 c magnetic resonance imaging RVol r=0.84 and regurgitant fraction r=0.80.
41         Peak E wave velocity correlated with regurgitant fraction (r = 0.52, p < 0.001).
42                 The MR Index correlated with regurgitant fraction (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001).
43 icantly correlated with reductions in mitral regurgitant fraction (r = 0.77, p < 0.001).
44 nd SV(RHC) were combined to determine the TR regurgitant fraction (RegFr=RVSV(3DE)-RVSV(RHC)/RVSV(3DE
45 rea (EROA), regurgitant volume (RegVol), and regurgitant fraction (RegFrac).
46 e quantitation of regurgitant volume (RVol), regurgitant fraction (RF) and effective regurgitant orif
47                      AR was quantified using regurgitant fraction (RF) measured by phase-contrast vel
48              CMR regurgitant volume (RV) and regurgitant fraction (RF) were quantified for all patien
49 ejection fraction, RV volumes, and pulmonary regurgitant fraction (RF).
50                                 The RSVs and regurgitant fractions (RFs) obtained by the DCD method u
51 us intraoperative flow probe measurements of regurgitant fraction (RgF) and regurgitant volume (RgV).
52 nd who had TR quantification using tricuspid regurgitant fraction (TRF) and parametric mapping analys
53  evaluation by an expert and quantitation of regurgitant fraction using two-dimensional and Doppler e
54  evaluation by an expert and quantitation of regurgitant fraction using two-dimensional and Doppler e
55                                              Regurgitant fraction varied between grafts, with SG and
56 m 7.0 to 48.0 (26.9+/-12.2) mL/beat, and the regurgitant fractions varied from 23% to 78% (55+/-16%).
57  added little to the discriminatory power of regurgitant fraction/volume alone.
58 lar ejection fraction was 60+/-8%, pulmonary regurgitant fraction was 34+/-17%, and right ventricular
59 ed across the pulmonary valve, the pulmonary regurgitant fraction was 37%; this was not seen in the a
60                   In the PI group, pulmonary regurgitant fraction was 49.2+/-5.9% at 3-month follow-u
61                                              Regurgitant fraction was consistently >50% over the cour
62                A strong decline in pulmonary regurgitant fraction was observed after hTPV implantatio
63                Aortic regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction were associated with a higher incid
64      Although overall differences in NFV and regurgitant fraction were comparable between both method
65                   Pulmonary flow volumes and regurgitant fraction were quantified by velocity-encoded
66  a reduction in left ventricular volumes and regurgitant fraction, with or without an increase in eje
67 ides accurate aortic regurgitant volumes and regurgitant fractions without cumbersome measurements.