ライフサイエンスコーパス: resistance training

1 nty subjects performed 8 weeks of whole-body resistance training.

2 skeletal muscle adaptations to endurance and resistance training.

3 randomized, controlled trial of progressive resistance training.

4 tegies for the promotion and prescription of resistance training.

5 s endurance training, interval training, and resistance training.

6 eneity exists in the muscular adaptations to resistance training.

7 ed by patients, at 6 months as compared with resistance training.

8 the change in hypertrophy measures following resistance training.

9 expression in skeletal muscle is altered by resistance training.

10 ucibility in proteome adaptations to earlier resistance training.

11 er undertaking either prolonged endurance or resistance training.

12 nts with CLBP both at baseline and following resistance training.

13 ct may have been a result of detraining from resistance training.

14 of which 2 to 3 sessions were combined with resistance training.

15 udying reproducibility of protein changes to resistance training.

16 trunk muscle strength following progressive resistance training.

17 e with that of nonsurgical treatment such as resistance training.

18 rcise interventions involving aerobic and/or resistance training.

19 skeletal muscle hypertrophy or strength with resistance training.

20 red with stretching but not as compared with resistance training.

21 rea, we observed an increase in tension with resistance training.

22 bute to increased whole muscle function with resistance training.

23 ipulation, splints, and aerobic exercise and resistance training.

24 tance training, or testosterone injections + resistance training.

25 not statistically significant in either the resistance training (-0.16%; 95% CI, -0.46% to 0.15%; P

26 gated the effects of unilateral leg extensor resistance training (2 days/week for 8 weeks) on denerva

27 the requirement) for 16 wk while performing resistance training 3 d/wk.

28 gned to the nonexercise control group, 73 to resistance training 3 days a week, 72 to aerobic exercis

29 protein supplementation (LITW); and 5) heavy resistance training 3 times weekly with whey protein sup

30 n supplementation (WHEY); 4) light-intensity resistance training 3-5 times/wk with whey protein suppl

31 scle strength was significantly greater with resistance training (32% +/- 14%) than without (-13% +/-

32 hypocaloric diet (-600 kcal/d) and performed resistance training 3x/wk.

33 e enanthate injected weekly) with or without resistance training (45 minutes three times weekly) on b

34 ed to total hip replacement (53 patients) or resistance training (56 patients).

35 pating in the recommended 2 days per week of resistance training activities, this scientific statemen

36 ibre type composition) on the variability in resistance training adaptations and on its role in the i

37 term MPS responses during the early stage of resistance training adaptations in middle-aged adults.

38 gated if the inter-individual variability in resistance training adaptations is determined by muscle

39 ology cannot explain the high variability in resistance training adaptations when training is perform

40 or the large inter-individual variability in resistance training adaptations.

41 arm lean mass significantly increased after resistance training (affected arm: median [IQR], 5.64 [4

42 However, sparse research has examined how resistance training affects these outcomes.

43 s measured by qPCR or RT-PCR, while repeated resistance training alone increases blood SIRT1 levels m

44 entific statement summarizes the benefits of resistance training alone or in combination with aerobic

45 ed 17.2% with testosterone alone, 17.4% with resistance training alone, and 26.8% with testosterone +

46 fect of either of these interventions alone, resistance training alone, or resistance exercise with a

47 etic work output during training compared to resistance training alone.

48 ould cause greater decreases than aerobic or resistance training alone.

49 may cause greater decreases than aerobic or resistance training alone.

50 This was not achieved by aerobic or resistance training alone.

51 Upper-body aerobic exercise and resistance training also appear the most effective at im

52 duals with diabetes include both aerobic and resistance training although few studies have directly e

53 domized controlled study to demonstrate that resistance training and aerobic training are equally eff

54 ies, preserving muscle and bone mass through resistance training and appropriate diet, and complement

55 t Association scientific statement regarding resistance training and cardiovascular disease.

56 Combination HIIT and resistance training and concurrent training were the mos

57 to aerobic exercise, people should engage in resistance training and flexibility exercises at least t

58 nterventions incorporating aerobic exercise, resistance training and pelvic floor muscle training pro

59 Exercise consisted of alternating resistance training and running 5 times/wk.

60 e appropriately prescribed aerobic exercise, resistance training and specific pelvic floor muscle ins

61 tended to decrease during the first 4 wk of resistance training and then returned to baseline values

62 group performed consistently better than the resistance-training and stretching groups in maximum exc

63 es, such as home-based and hybrid CR models, resistance training, and digital health technologies, ar

64 ity program (n = 818) that included walking, resistance training, and flexibility exercises or a heal

65 c interventions such as caloric restriction, resistance training, and senolytic and senomorphic drugs

66 Blood flow restriction resistance training (BFRT) employs partial vascular occl

67 al areas increased in patients who performed resistance training by a mean (+/-SD) of 4% +/- 8%, 24%

68 ent rehabilitation that includes progressive resistance training can improve physical function and qu

69 AE) or a combination of aerobic exercise and resistance training (CE).

70 to either resistance training with placebo, resistance training combined with GH administration or G

71 g, resistance training, combined aerobic and resistance training (combined training), and hybrid-type

72 nuous endurance training, interval training, resistance training, combined aerobic and resistance tra

73 betes mellitus, a combination of aerobic and resistance training compared with the nonexercise contro

74 xplain how preserving muscular function with resistance training could prevent brain function deterio

75 trol PRT [1 serving pasta or rice/d; control resistance training (CRT) group; n = 47)].

76 ations were similar after a second period of resistance training, demonstrating reproducibility in pr

77 rt study of breast cancer survivors, intense resistance training did not exacerbate lymphedema and wa

78 Prior resistance training did not improve endurance performanc

79 ement and 4.5 points in patients assigned to resistance training (difference, 11.4 points; 95% confid

80 lities, distinguishing between endurance and resistance training effects.

81 We show that resistance training evokes retained protein levels even

82 sessions/wk (90 min/session) of aerobic plus resistance training for 20 weeks.

83 Resistance training for 3 months improves both leg stren

84 T-C) underwent thrice-weekly, dose-escalated resistance training for 3 months to promote strength, mo

85 We also address the utility of resistance training for promoting cardiovascular health

86 logy does not determine the most appropriate resistance training frequency.

87 and on its role in the individualization of resistance training frequency.

88 ant differentiates hypertrophic responses to resistance training given the potential link between thi

89 ols), and -1.6 (95% CI, -2.2 to -1.0) in the resistance training group (P = .002 vs controls).

90 trols), -2.2 (95% CI -3.7 to -0.8) cm in the resistance training group (P = .048 vs controls), and -4

91 The resistance training group had greater increases in maxim

92 with the control group, whereas those in the resistance training group increased their distance walke

93 The resistance training group lost a mean of -1.4 kg fat mas

94 in the aerobic training group and 70% in the resistance training group.

95 er significantly from that in the aerobic or resistance training group.

96 all secondary outcomes and outperformed the resistance-training group in stride length and functiona

97 d 12 patients (21%) who had been assigned to resistance training had undergone total hip replacement.

98 otein supplementation alone or combined with resistance training has been proposed to be effective in

99 rotein Recommended Dietary Allowance) during resistance training has been shown to maximize lean mass

100 d outcomes associated with aerobic training, resistance training, high-intensity interval training (H

101 th and force steadiness following unilateral resistance training (i.e. cross-education) are attribute

102 Lower extremity resistance training improved functional performance meas

103 Unilateral resistance training improves strength and force steadine

104 r exercise, MOD) and low-volume (1 set, LOW) resistance training in a contralateral fashion for 12 we

105 odel of AD and examined the possible role of resistance training in controlling skeletal muscle size

106 ought to assess the therapeutic potential of resistance training in eight patients with single, large

107 hormone (GH) administration with and without resistance training in healthy elderly men.

108 Repeated resistance training in humans separated by a training br

109 These data suggest that resistance training in mice promotes muscle adaptation a

110 tein diet during the early adaptive phase of resistance training in middle-aged adults.

111 ns or enhance skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training in normotestosterogenic young men an

112 trial to compare total hip replacement with resistance training in patients 50 years of age or older

113 ric strength and gains in strength following resistance training in people with CLBP.

114 nterventions focused on exercise, especially resistance training in the lower body, to prevent weight

115 ection fraction (HFpEF), but the efficacy of resistance training in this patient population has been

116 /kg per week; and 76 to combined aerobic and resistance training in which they expended 10 kcal/kg pe

117 sition during dietary energy restriction and resistance training.In a randomized parallel-design stud

118 Resistance training increases muscle function, although

119 Resistance training increases protein utilization and mu

120 at-free mass, and muscle mass increased with resistance training independently of chromium supplement

121 xamined the association between genotype and resistance training-induced changes (12 wk) in dual x-ra

122 This greater resistance training-induced hypertrophy associated with

123 has previously been suggested to potentiate resistance training-induced hypertrophy by activating sa

124 explain the inter-individual variability in resistance training-induced increases in muscle volume,

125 demonstrates a potential proteomic memory of resistance training-induced muscle growth in human skele

126 emonstrating a potential proteomic memory of resistance training-induced muscle growth.

127 DXA and MRI scans before and after a 10-week resistance training intervention.

128 is known regarding the effects of isometric resistance training (IRT), a practical BP-lowering inter

129 Since 2007, accumulating evidence suggests resistance training is a safe and effective approach for

130 These latter findings suggest shorter term resistance training is an unlikely inducer of cellular s

131 that when mechanical loading in the form of resistance training is combined with GH, MGF mRNA levels

132 ed HIIT combined with muscle endurance-based resistance training is feasible, and that high adherence

133 Resistance training is largely underappreciated as a met

134 protein synthesis rates during 0-3 weeks of resistance training is not further enhanced by a higher

135 avel clearly the mechanisms by which hypoxic resistance training is particularly potent to increase m

136 Moderate-intensity combined aerobic and resistance training is safe in physically unfit patients

137 ow that 12 weeks of progressive overload leg resistance training led to: (i) increased muscle strengt

138 In contrast, resistance training mainly stimulates muscle protein syn

139 Patients assigned to resistance training maintained body weight compared with

140 ndividuals showing suboptimal adaptations to resistance training, manipulation of training volume is

141 ent study suggests that emotional stress and resistance training may be associated with persistent IO

142 In conclusion, MR in combination with resistance training may improve skeletal muscle and meta

143 Compared with high-load resistance training, mechanical load is markedly reduced

144 d across a number of aerobic and progressive resistance training modalities.

145 unning) dominate preclinical research, while resistance training models and high-intensity interval t

146 Resistance training (n = 11) caused a persistent elevati

147 randomly assigned to a low-protein diet plus resistance training (n = 14) or a low-protein diet alone

148 cise group completed 12-weeks of aerobic and resistance training (n = 20), while the control group (n

149 ance training (n = 78), combined aerobic and resistance training (n = 75), or nonexercising control (

150 ups for 22 weeks: aerobic training (n = 75), resistance training (n = 78), combined aerobic and resis

151 Resistance training not only can improve or maintain mus

152 a very modest effect of HIT and no effect of resistance training on AHN in adult male rats.

153 terval training (HIT) or of purely anaerobic resistance training on AHN.

154 er trial of eight weeks combined aerobic and resistance training on body composition assessed by Dual

155 (HIIT) combined with muscle endurance-based resistance training on older adults with treatment naive

156 igated the effects of performing a period of resistance training on the performance and molecular ada

157 IGF-IEb was also investigated in response to resistance training only.

158 resistance training, or combined aerobic and resistance training - or to a control group (no weight-m

159 repetitions of 3 s-bursts at 100 Hz to mimic resistance training) or low frequency (LFS; 3 h at 10 Hz

160 ntensity, suggest other exercise modes (e.g. resistance training) or myotherapeutics may be necessary

161 three exercise programs - aerobic training, resistance training, or combined aerobic and resistance

162 re disease) to one of three groups: tai chi, resistance training, or stretching.

163 about the effectiveness of aerobic training, resistance training, or tai chi for improving cognition.

164 jections + no training, placebo injections + resistance training, or testosterone injections + resist

165 vised treadmill exercise, to lower extremity resistance training, or to a control group.

166 luated the effects of combined endurance and resistance training over 12 months in patients with HFpE

167 raining alone, and 26.8% with testosterone + resistance training (p < 0.001).

168 ne and 3.3 kg with combined testosterone and resistance training (p < 0.001).

169 s in H-Ex and A-Ex groups performed a 5-week resistance training period (17 sessions).

170 periences retained protein changes following resistance training persisting over 2 months, demonstrat

171 imately 160 g cooked) to be consumed 6 d/wk [resistance training plus lean red meat (RT+Meat) group;

172 1 h after the last exercise bout of a daily resistance training program lasting 2, 10, 20, or 30 day

173 Participants in the resistance-training program increased submaximal walking

174 3 weeks) of a dietary counselling-controlled resistance training programme.

175 daptive response during the early phase of a resistance training programme.

176 r to and following an 18 week high-intensity resistance training programme.

177 ypothesis after a 4-week hypoxic vs normoxic resistance training protocol.

178 We assessed the effects of progressive resistance training (PRT) combined with a protein-enrich

179 brain changes after 6 months of progressive resistance training (PRT), computerized cognitive traini

180 Several proteins increased after resistance training remain elevated (i.e. retained) afte

181 Much of the preclinical rodent and human resistance training research to date supports that invol

182 diates specific adaptations to endurance and resistance training, respectively.

183 However, the effects of resistance training (RT) and combined training (CT) on e

184 Resistance training (RT) and dietary protein independent

185 When performed alongside CR, progressive resistance training (RT) attenuates this loss of lean ma

186 Resistance training (RT) dynamically alters the skeletal

187 Resistance training (RT) has been indicated to minimize

188 Resistance training (RT) has shown to mitigate the loss

189 exercise with recovery periods, or anaerobic resistance training (RT) has similar effects on AHN is u

190 Resistance training (RT) improves muscle strength and ov

191 igated the effects of performing a period of resistance training (RT) on the performance and molecula

192 osition response to a unilateral, upper body resistance training (RT) program.

193 he functional and molecular adaptations to a resistance training (RT) programme following short-term

194 inter-individual variability of responses to resistance training (RT) remain to be fully elucidated.

195 Investigating repeated resistance training (RT) separated by a training break e

196 We examined whether addition of resistance training (RT) to CR+AT would reduce skeletal

197 c (high-intensity interval training [HIIT]), resistance training (RT), or combined training (CT) exer

198 methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation, during resistance training (RT).

199 e skeletal muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training (RT).

200 scle mass, nutritional status, and function, resistance training seems to be effective against the ca

201 One weekly submaximal eccentric resistance training session over 12 weeks elicits simila

202 inute is on average 4.9-times lower during a resistance training session than during a spinning class

203 al spinning class session versus a three-set resistance training session.

204 ed 70% (+/- standard deviation [SD], 28%) of resistance training sessions and increased their exercis

205 of AD animals compared with controls, while resistance training significantly increased the CSA of M

206 Five weeks of resistance training significantly increased the mRNA exp

207 Progressive resistance training stimulates muscle protein synthesis

208 l setting, we developed a combined endurance-resistance training stimulus for mice called progressive

209 al a modest beneficial effect of progressive resistance training (strengthening programs) and aerobic

210 ear number and satellite cell content, while resistance training successfully restores these impairme

211 prescribed intensity progressive aerobic and resistance training; the control group received balance

212 Following a program of resistance training, there are neural and muscular contr

213 mg/wk) or placebo injections and progressive resistance training (three times weekly) or no training

214 of dietary energy restriction combined with resistance training to improve body composition is not i

215 s of adding testosterone supplementation and resistance training to rehabilitative programs for caref

216 cal or exercise strategies, such as lifelong resistance training, to preserve fast fibre size and fun

217 d in the SMART (Study of Mental Activity and Resistance Training) Trial.

218 expended 10 kcal/kg per week and engaged in resistance training twice a week.

219 In conclusion, resistance training upregulates proteins associated with

220 Resistance training was associated with a significant de

221 after 3 weeks of recovery during which heavy resistance training was performed.

222 Resistance training was successful in recovering functio

223 Resistance training was very effective in counteracting

224 Resistance training was very effective in restoring both

225 Many of the proteins induced by resistance training were reversed towards baseline after

226 h widely divergent hypertrophic responses to resistance training were used for the identification of

227 rwent 12 weeks of high-intensity progressive resistance training, while 6 elderly subjects performed

228 Once-daily resistance training with electrical nerve stimulation pr

229 ntrained individuals performed contralateral resistance training with moderate and low volume for 12

230 ars, mean +/- S.E.M) were assigned to either resistance training with placebo, resistance training co

231 oard-approved protocols with three months of resistance training with pre and post assessment of body

232 y exercise program that included progressive resistance training with trained and certified exercise

233 We hypothesized that aerobic training and resistance training would each yield greater decreases t

234 ng events were recorded: "walking/cycling", "resistance training", "yoga/meditation", and "emotional